independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > General Discussion > Martha found guilty on ALL counts
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 1 of 2 12>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Author

Tweet     Share

Message
Thread started 03/05/04 12:10pm

SassierBritche
s

Martha found guilty on ALL counts

ol' girl is going to jail.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #1 posted 03/05/04 12:12pm

Handclapsfinga
snapz

Martha Stewart found guilty
Associated Press

March 5, 2004 STEW06
NEW YORK -- Martha Stewart was convicted Friday of obstructing justice and lying to the government about a superbly timed stock sale, a devastating verdict that probably means prison for the woman who epitomizes meticulous homemaking and gracious living.

Stewart was found guilty of conspiracy, making false statements and obstruction of justice. The charges carry up to 20 years in prison, but she will most certainly get much less than that under federal sentencing guidelines.

Her ex-stockbroker, Peter Bacanovic, 41, was convicted on all but one count against him, making a false statement.

The jury of eight women and four men reached the verdicts on the third day of deliberations in the case.


holy flaming hohners, she's goin to the slammer!!!!! martha gone dooooown!!!! woot!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #2 posted 03/05/04 12:13pm

minneapolisgen
ius

avatar

eek
"I saw a woman with major Hammer pants on the subway a few weeks ago and totally thought of you." - sextonseven
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #3 posted 03/05/04 12:23pm

TheOrgerFormer
lyKnownAs

Who-mothafuckin-hoo!!! woot!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #4 posted 03/05/04 12:29pm

SassierBritche
s

obviously, i wasn't in the court room to hear all of the evidence. i assume the prosecution did a good job of presenting the necessary facts in order to receive a guilty verdict. the outcome bothers me nonetheless. not because she is famous or successful or anything like that but because this is something that everyone knows goes on. yes, it is illegal and yes, she probably did break the law. how many of us (or the prosecutors, for that matter) would not have done what she did if in the same situation? how many of us would knowingly lose money if it could have been avoided? i guess the bottom line is that she broke the law and needs to know she is not above that.

my uncle lost a bunch of money in the market (like, enough to put my cousin through all 4 years of her college education at Boston University) a few years ago. while i was visiting family over the xmas break, we got into a discussion about martha's case. he really wanted her to be prosecuted and found guilty for 'cheating the system'. i asked him if he was in the same position as her BEFORE he lost his money would he have done the same thing. he couldn't give me a straight answer. or, rather, he couldn't give me an HONEST answer. he got really angry and gave me some smart ass reply. with the general attitude being that of my uncle's, i have to wonder if martha is being used as a punching bag for those who have lost a lot of money in the market crash. this doesn't change what she has or hasn't done but i think it could change the way some of us see the situation.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #5 posted 03/05/04 12:32pm

LittlePill

avatar

falloff evillol
Avatar by Byron rose

prince Proud member of Prince's cult for 20 years! prince
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #6 posted 03/05/04 12:33pm

Handclapsfinga
snapz

TheOrgerFormerlyKnownAs said:

Who-mothafuckin-hoo!!! woot!

dance with me, ivy! dancing jig omg...i wonder if she'll make designer shivs in prison n'stuff...this is just so surreal y'know.

martha stewart...in a jail cell...
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #7 posted 03/05/04 12:35pm

BabyCakes

avatar

Greedy bitch belongs there!!!
The day came when the risk to remain tight in a bud was more painful than the risk it took to blossom - Anais Nin

"Unnecessary giggling"... giggle
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #8 posted 03/05/04 12:37pm

SassierBritche
s

Handclapsfingasnapz said:

TheOrgerFormerlyKnownAs said:

Who-mothafuckin-hoo!!! woot!

dance with me, ivy! dancing jig omg...i wonder if she'll make designer shivs in prison n'stuff...this is just so surreal y'know.

martha stewart...in a jail cell...

you know she'll be able to things with orange and brick that noody has ever seen nod
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #9 posted 03/05/04 12:38pm

TheRealFiness

Hokey smokes Bullwinkle... eek for a hot Minute there, i thought she was gonna walk...maaaaan dont fuck with the SEC lol
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #10 posted 03/05/04 12:39pm

theVelvetRoper

avatar

"It's a good thing!" ~Martha Stewart
'Cause your friends don't dance, and if they don't dance... well, they're no friends of mine.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #11 posted 03/05/04 12:41pm

theVelvetRoper

avatar

'Cause your friends don't dance, and if they don't dance... well, they're no friends of mine.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #12 posted 03/05/04 12:55pm

Handclapsfinga
snapz

theVelvetRoper said:


next on 'martha stewart living', how to make your own 'save martha!' t-shirts... evillol
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #13 posted 03/05/04 12:56pm

Handclapsfinga
snapz

theVelvetRoper said:

"It's a good thing!" ~Martha Stewart

falloff
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #14 posted 03/05/04 12:57pm

theVelvetRoper

avatar

Handclapsfingasnapz said:

theVelvetRoper said:


next on 'martha stewart living', how to make your own 'save martha!' t-shirts... evillol


I thought it was a joke when I first saw the site, but they're damn serious!
'Cause your friends don't dance, and if they don't dance... well, they're no friends of mine.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #15 posted 03/05/04 1:14pm

alandail

SassierBritches said:

obviously, i wasn't in the court room to hear all of the evidence. i assume the prosecution did a good job of presenting the necessary facts in order to receive a guilty verdict. the outcome bothers me nonetheless. not because she is famous or successful or anything like that but because this is something that everyone knows goes on. yes, it is illegal and yes, she probably did break the law. how many of us (or the prosecutors, for that matter) would not have done what she did if in the same situation? how many of us would knowingly lose money if it could have been avoided? i guess the bottom line is that she broke the law and needs to know she is not above that.


The problem is getting out on inside knowledge that other shareholders don't know about. Think about it this way - someone bought the shares she sold - and had they known what she knew, they wouldn't have bought them - and as a result, they lost all of the money she avoided losing and I'm sure she could have afforded the loss she avoided a heck of a lot more than she did. What compounded the situation was her boyfriend lying to the public about what happened with the FDA denial while both of them were selling. Both of them went to jail because of it, as they should. It wasn't just imclone stock either - virtually all biotechs took a major hit because of what went on at Imclone.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #16 posted 03/05/04 1:24pm

SassierBritche
s

alandail said:

SassierBritches said:

obviously, i wasn't in the court room to hear all of the evidence. i assume the prosecution did a good job of presenting the necessary facts in order to receive a guilty verdict. the outcome bothers me nonetheless. not because she is famous or successful or anything like that but because this is something that everyone knows goes on. yes, it is illegal and yes, she probably did break the law. how many of us (or the prosecutors, for that matter) would not have done what she did if in the same situation? how many of us would knowingly lose money if it could have been avoided? i guess the bottom line is that she broke the law and needs to know she is not above that.


The problem is getting out on inside knowledge that other shareholders don't know about. Think about it this way - someone bought the shares she sold - and had they known what she knew, they wouldn't have bought them - and as a result, they lost all of the money she avoided losing and I'm sure she could have afforded the loss she avoided a heck of a lot more than she did. What compounded the situation was her boyfriend lying to the public about what happened with the FDA denial while both of them were selling. Both of them went to jail because of it, as they should. It wasn't just imclone stock either - virtually all biotechs took a major hit because of what went on at Imclone.

oh yeah, i am completely aware of what her actions entail. and like i said, she needs to know she's not immune to the law. my concern was more with the way the public has looked at her. its as if they wouldn't do the exact same thing if the opportunity presented itself. unfortunately, the market is a dog eat dog world where screwing someone may be necessary to get ahead or save your ass. i don't agree with it, but nonetheless, that's how it is. martha was plain and simply being a business woman. unfortunately for her, she did it at a time when the government is really cracking down on white collar crimes in order to promote a more positive opinion of the corporate world. we all know that these people are all slimey. martha is just one in the bunch. yes, she should go to jail for her actions. i just think people need to recognize that she only did what everyone in that industry does and, most likely, what we would probably all do if faced with the same dilemma.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #17 posted 03/05/04 1:29pm

SupaFunkyOrgan
grinderSexy

avatar

The thing that bothers me about this case is that it makes it look like these regulators are actually doing something. Martha should have been the last person on the list of corporate CEOs, stockbrokers and other corporate criminals who have so far got off scott free in the corporate scandals. They shouldn't have bothered with her until they nabbed the more important crooks first.
2010: Healing the Wounds of the Past.... http://prince.org/msg/8/325740
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #18 posted 03/05/04 1:30pm

SupaFunkyOrgan
grinderSexy

avatar

The kicker to all this is that the FDA did just approve the drug. If only they waited.....
2010: Healing the Wounds of the Past.... http://prince.org/msg/8/325740
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #19 posted 03/05/04 1:43pm

madartista

avatar

SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said:

The thing that bothers me about this case is that it makes it look like these regulators are actually doing something. Martha should have been the last person on the list of corporate CEOs, stockbrokers and other corporate criminals who have so far got off scott free in the corporate scandals. They shouldn't have bothered with her until they nabbed the more important crooks first.


BIG co-sign. She's done some bitchy things, but I'm not excited to see her go to jail, and I think it's sad that people are cheering it. Definitely victim of a Bitch Hunt.
let me come over it's a beautiful day to play with you in the dark
http://elmadartista.tumblr.com/
http://twitter.com/madartista
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #20 posted 03/05/04 1:56pm

TheOrgerFormer
lyKnownAs

SassierBritches said:

obviously, i wasn't in the court room to hear all of the evidence. i assume the prosecution did a good job of presenting the necessary facts in order to receive a guilty verdict. the outcome bothers me nonetheless. not because she is famous or successful or anything like that but because this is something that everyone knows goes on. yes, it is illegal and yes, she probably did break the law. how many of us (or the prosecutors, for that matter) would not have done what she did if in the same situation? how many of us would knowingly lose money if it could have been avoided? i guess the bottom line is that she broke the law and needs to know she is not above that.

my uncle lost a bunch of money in the market (like, enough to put my cousin through all 4 years of her college education at Boston University) a few years ago. while i was visiting family over the xmas break, we got into a discussion about martha's case. he really wanted her to be prosecuted and found guilty for 'cheating the system'. i asked him if he was in the same position as her BEFORE he lost his money would he have done the same thing. he couldn't give me a straight answer. or, rather, he couldn't give me an HONEST answer. he got really angry and gave me some smart ass reply. with the general attitude being that of my uncle's, i have to wonder if martha is being used as a punching bag for those who have lost a lot of money in the market crash. this doesn't change what she has or hasn't done but i think it could change the way some of us see the situation.
Sassy, I wouldn't have done it. I have four broker licenses and securities law is very clear about what she did. Everytime I think about Enron, Worldcom and other companies where the consumer loses their life savings and the head honchos get the golden parachute, it makes me sick. I honestly would not have done what she did. Since I know the market, I wouldn't have sold my stock at all. Had she held on to it, like investors are supposed to, she would have made a ton of money. She was either greedy, cheap or stupid.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #21 posted 03/05/04 1:57pm

TheOrgerFormer
lyKnownAs

Handclapsfingasnapz said:

TheOrgerFormerlyKnownAs said:

Who-mothafuckin-hoo!!! woot!

dance with me, ivy! dancing jig omg...i wonder if she'll make designer shivs in prison n'stuff...this is just so surreal y'know.

martha stewart...in a jail cell...
I would love to see whose prison bitch she is going to be. Fuck her.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #22 posted 03/05/04 1:59pm

TheOrgerFormer
lyKnownAs

theVelvetRoper said:

"It's a good thing!" ~Martha Stewart
worship
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #23 posted 03/05/04 2:00pm

TheOrgerFormer
lyKnownAs

TheRealFiness said:

Hokey smokes Bullwinkle... eek for a hot Minute there, i thought she was gonna walk...maaaaan dont fuck with the SEC lol
I was at a brokerage firm for 5 years. I used to love it when the SEC and NASD laid the smackdown. They ain't no punk bitches.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #24 posted 03/05/04 2:02pm

luv4u

Moderator

avatar

moderator

omfg
canada

Ohh purple joy oh purple bliss oh purple rapture!
REAL MUSIC by REAL MUSICIANS - Prince
"I kind of wish there was a reason for Prince to make the site crash more" ~~ Ben
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #25 posted 03/05/04 2:12pm

jessyMD32781

madartista said:

SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said:

The thing that bothers me about this case is that it makes it look like these regulators are actually doing something. Martha should have been the last person on the list of corporate CEOs, stockbrokers and other corporate criminals who have so far got off scott free in the corporate scandals. They shouldn't have bothered with her until they nabbed the more important crooks first.


BIG co-sign. She's done some bitchy things, but I'm not excited to see her go to jail, and I think it's sad that people are cheering it. Definitely victim of a Bitch Hunt.

and another co-sign from me! i think what she did was wrong but there are bigger criminals to go after than her.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #26 posted 03/05/04 2:16pm

SassierBritche
s

TheOrgerFormerlyKnownAs said:

SassierBritches said:

obviously, i wasn't in the court room to hear all of the evidence. i assume the prosecution did a good job of presenting the necessary facts in order to receive a guilty verdict. the outcome bothers me nonetheless. not because she is famous or successful or anything like that but because this is something that everyone knows goes on. yes, it is illegal and yes, she probably did break the law. how many of us (or the prosecutors, for that matter) would not have done what she did if in the same situation? how many of us would knowingly lose money if it could have been avoided? i guess the bottom line is that she broke the law and needs to know she is not above that.

my uncle lost a bunch of money in the market (like, enough to put my cousin through all 4 years of her college education at Boston University) a few years ago. while i was visiting family over the xmas break, we got into a discussion about martha's case. he really wanted her to be prosecuted and found guilty for 'cheating the system'. i asked him if he was in the same position as her BEFORE he lost his money would he have done the same thing. he couldn't give me a straight answer. or, rather, he couldn't give me an HONEST answer. he got really angry and gave me some smart ass reply. with the general attitude being that of my uncle's, i have to wonder if martha is being used as a punching bag for those who have lost a lot of money in the market crash. this doesn't change what she has or hasn't done but i think it could change the way some of us see the situation.
Sassy, I wouldn't have done it. I have four broker licenses and securities law is very clear about what she did. Everytime I think about Enron, Worldcom and other companies where the consumer loses their life savings and the head honchos get the golden parachute, it makes me sick. I honestly would not have done what she did. Since I know the market, I wouldn't have sold my stock at all. Had she held on to it, like investors are supposed to, she would have made a ton of money. She was either greedy, cheap or stupid.

i think she was definitely a combo of all three. i'm glad to hear that there are some honest people who have been involved in the industry, like yourself. i just wish it were more common. sadly, those companies and ceo's make their money off of screwing many others. this was small fries compared to what many head honchos do.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #27 posted 03/05/04 3:04pm

madartista

avatar

SassierBritches said:

i think she was definitely a combo of all three. i'm glad to hear that there are some honest people who have been involved in the industry, like yourself. i just wish it were more common. sadly, those companies and ceo's make their money off of screwing many others. this was small fries compared to what many head honchos do.


another co-sign.
let me come over it's a beautiful day to play with you in the dark
http://elmadartista.tumblr.com/
http://twitter.com/madartista
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #28 posted 03/05/04 3:36pm

mrbungle



she will end up in a so called prison. These are the ones with cabel television and no bars
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #29 posted 03/06/04 4:11am

FiveFootNine

avatar

couldn't had happened to a nicer person....she fucked up, she got caught...bout time that justice is gonna be served. But, she won't be going to a "normal" prison....she'll have all the luxeries of home AND garden, I'm sure. giggle


It's a good thing!! ~Velvet Roper falloff
**...they were right about you.**
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 1 of 2 12>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > General Discussion > Martha found guilty on ALL counts