I hear Jenna Jameson has been trying to have a child and may adopt. Excuse me? Call me old fashioned, but I don't think that porn stars should have childen. I think that is a horrible example to set for a child. And what about when the child starts going to school? They'll have to hear "Your mom is a porn star" "Your mom gets freaky alot" u get the idea.

Ummm.. kind of in the middle of something here.

LaCoyta said:

if that were so, i'd be thinkin more of the other children's parents and how they're raisin their kids, than the son or daughter of a mere porn star.

Hmmm...would an adoption agency let a porn star adopt a baby?

LaCoyta said:

i don't see why not...it ain't like they're gonna expose their kid to what they do, y'know. porn stars are people, too.

Handclapsfingasnapz said:

anyone else thinking about "boogie nights"?

julianne moore broke my heart in that movie

Handclapsfingasnapz said:

True. They brush and floss like the rest of us.

cborgman said:

ahh, boogie nights...i've been meanin to get a hold of it on dvd. i love that movie. for some reason i like movies like that and the players club...

I'm hugry lazy and stoned, please bring me some turkey, mashed potatoes with gravy and hurry please I'm ready to eat my foot

LaCoyta said:

Ummm... floss?

Handclapsfingasnapz said:

i looove boogie nights.

i haven't seen players club

cborgman said:

Did you know that Boogie Nights was loosely based upon John Holmes?

It is a very gritty film and manages to wreck any "fantasy" you might have about being a porn star.

so, I dont see a problem with it, I mean it's not like she's going to have the kid star in a porno with her. She should be allowed to adopt if she wants to.

The only way a child would know another child's mother was a porn star is because their parents told them. This would require an explanation of what porn is. Those parents who talk about porn around their children shouldn't have children. Jenna is capable of being a good mother. She'll probably be a better mother than some of these so-called "Better" women. I see nothing wrong with porn viewed and made by adults in private. So, what's the beef?

cborgman said:

Julianne's character had a right to be a mother to her child. She couldn't even get visitation. I was tearing up in the scene after the hearing where she was crying. It was sad. My friend who watched it with was unsympathetic. She was like "Well, that's what happens when you do stuff like that."

bkw said:

yea, i knew. PT Anderson the director, is one of my faves.

mrbungle said:

Well Said

Jenna Jameson has bank. Part of the reason is because so many grown adults, including those with kids, buy porn. So how are they any holier than her?

She's well set, so financially she can provide alot for a kid. Not to mention, she's gonna eventually get too old to star in porn flicks, she has the rest of her life to live. If she wants to settle down and raise a child, good for her.

It just doesnt seem reasonable to treat her extra worse simply because she's a porn star. There are white collar criminals who have done far worse things than her, who simply get a slap on the wrist and get to move on with their lives. Porn stars get this eternal bad rap. It's a double standard when we celebrate performers like Brittney for dancing around half naked, then condem people like Jenna Jameson for performing fully naked, when the only difference between the two is literally a few threads.

Jenna should be able to have a child,
If I'm not mistaken she's married & says that she will leave the business when she gets pregnant or adopts. The kids wont know what she did in her former life unless thier dad or mom tells them...early on anyway.
And by the time her child is old enough to have freinds who've watched porn she'll be long forgotten or in the classic section anyway. Plus I'm sure she'll be going by her married name by then (and with age) most people won't catch on.
Regardless there are many a parents out there who shouldn't be, not because of their past but because of thier actions.