independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > General Discussion > Hypocrasy, lies, racism and pack mentality.
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 1 of 4 1234>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Author

Tweet     Share

Message
Thread started 02/04/04 8:11am

Number23

Hypocrasy, lies, racism and pack mentality.

'Tis a shame most people believe what they are told and revert back to ineptitude and lethargy when it comes to thinking for themselves.
Painting with broad strokes is not art - it's lazy and conceited.
The worthless scum who have threatened certain Quaidbowl's member's lives are merely mirrors for the dark freedom which infested that site - they glutton themselves on hatred and suspicion, anticipating a future of knawing away at the bones for weeks to come in an attempt to discover what they perceive as light, honesty, righteousness and sincerity in their black veined souls.
Of course, the concepts of right and wrong are up for auction in the mind of every individual. There is no truth. The gut reaction to Quaidbowl many of you felt is natural and understandable - but the avalanche of hypocrasy and bile which has polluted this site since needs urgent addressing and the thickest magic marker line you could ever imagine drawn boldly underneath.
It doesn't take a telescope to see that the urge to label everyone on Quaidbowl a bigoted, racist pedeophile on the org is just as ludicrous, mentally-deficient, dangerous and flame-baiting as the posts made over there over the past few weeks.
This guilty by assocation verdict - thrown down by self-appointed judges MD7 (you have issues), ElephantitisOfTheNuts (why are you hiding behind a cloak,friend?), BlackCherry and whomever else is enjoying fanning the flames - was handed down in a rubber-walled kangaroo court with popcorn-munching, vulturous braindead no-marks for a jury. Idiot wind blowing through their teeth.
Those who were personally attacked by some members of Quaidbowl should tune into their God-given intelligence and view the sillyness and bile as jealously and fear brewing inside the minds of offenders. It's not personal, far less racist.
All I see now is people out looking for a ruck when their real enemy's just a mirror away.
And ask yourselves this - what were the motives of the one who revealed the address? Righteousness or a overwhelming need to justify their cowardly existance?
At least on Quaidbowl we used our real fucking names.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #1 posted 02/04/04 8:15am

MD7

Thought you had left already Bill? It's "hypocrisy" by the way, if you're going to keep saying it then spell it correctly, my KKKuaidbowling friend.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #2 posted 02/04/04 8:16am

AnotherLoverTo
o

This is your first Orgquake. Don't be afeared, it'll pass. wink
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #3 posted 02/04/04 8:17am

Number23

MD7 said:

Thought you had left already Bill? It's "hypocrisy" by the way, if you're going to keep saying it then spell it correctly, my KKKuaidbowling friend.


smile
Stop flirting with me.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #4 posted 02/04/04 8:19am

blackcherry

avatar

i fail to understand what this has to do with the
crap posted on that website
which was directed at this website
this is a natural reaction, shit, if anything this could
have been a lot more serious

[Flame deleted. --Matt]

[This message was edited Wed Feb 4 8:21:27 PST 2004 by blackcherry]
[This message was edited Wed Feb 4 9:35:58 PST 2004 by matt]
red hot like a chilli pepper
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #5 posted 02/04/04 8:26am

Lleena

rubber-walled kangaroo court with popcorn-munching, vulturous braindead no-marks for a jury


you've got a way with words number smile


Pack mentality? Some of us dont run with a pack, but tell as it as we see it.


...
[This message was edited Wed Feb 4 8:27:03 PST 2004 by Lleena]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #6 posted 02/04/04 8:28am

cborgman

avatar

Lleena said:




Pack mentality? Some of us dont run with a pack, but tell as it as we see it.


nod
Power tends to corrupt; absolute power corrupts absolutely. - Lord Acton
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #7 posted 02/04/04 8:28am

Number23

Lleena said:

rubber-walled kangaroo court with popcorn-munching, vulturous braindead no-marks for a jury


you've got a way with words number smile


Pack mentality? Some of us dont run with a pack, but tell as it as we see it.


...


wink
Shame I can;t spell though, huh?
I run with no pack either.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #8 posted 02/04/04 8:29am

Number23

cborgman said:

Lleena said:




Pack mentality? Some of us dont run with a pack, but tell as it as we see it.


nod


You think me a bad dude, Chris?
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #9 posted 02/04/04 8:33am

cborgman

avatar

Number23 said:

cborgman said:

Lleena said:




Pack mentality? Some of us dont run with a pack, but tell as it as we see it.


nod


You think me a bad dude, Chris?


no. i didn't see you posting stuff along the likes of what they were doing. but i do think being a part of it was not a good idea, and i also think coming over here and aggresively defending isn't a good idea, as it seems to be making it appear you are defending the mentality and vile things spoken over there. people involved in this scandal only by involvement would just be really smart to say "i am sorry i was unintentionally a part of it, i didn't see some of the things said, i apologize."

cause this aggressive defensive "yea, so what? you did this and this and this" stance is not working at all, because it makes people taking that stance appear that they are defending what was said on the site.

just my opinion.
Power tends to corrupt; absolute power corrupts absolutely. - Lord Acton
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #10 posted 02/04/04 8:36am

Number23

cborgman said:

Number23 said:

cborgman said:

Lleena said:




Pack mentality? Some of us dont run with a pack, but tell as it as we see it.


nod


You think me a bad dude, Chris?


no. i didn't see you posting stuff along the likes of what they were doing. but i do think being a part of it was not a good idea, and i also think coming over here and aggresively defending isn't a good idea, as it seems to be making it appear you are defending the mentality and vile things spoken over there. people involved in this scandal only by involvement would just be really smart to say "i am sorry i was unintentionally a part of it, i didn't see some of the things said, i apologize."

cause this aggressive defensive "yea, so what? you did this and this and this" stance is not working at all, because it makes people taking that stance appear that they are defending what was said on the site.

just my opinion.


I appreciate your view, but if you read what I wrote again it's pretty obvious I'm not defending what was said over on that site.
My point was - it's the chocolate calling the candy sweet. Two wrongs don't make a right.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #11 posted 02/04/04 8:41am

cborgman

avatar

Number23 said:

cborgman said:

Number23 said:

cborgman said:

Lleena said:




Pack mentality? Some of us dont run with a pack, but tell as it as we see it.


nod


You think me a bad dude, Chris?


no. i didn't see you posting stuff along the likes of what they were doing. but i do think being a part of it was not a good idea, and i also think coming over here and aggresively defending isn't a good idea, as it seems to be making it appear you are defending the mentality and vile things spoken over there. people involved in this scandal only by involvement would just be really smart to say "i am sorry i was unintentionally a part of it, i didn't see some of the things said, i apologize."

cause this aggressive defensive "yea, so what? you did this and this and this" stance is not working at all, because it makes people taking that stance appear that they are defending what was said on the site.

just my opinion.


I appreciate your view, but if you read what I wrote again it's pretty obvious I'm not defending what was said over on that site.
My point was - it's the chocolate calling the candy sweet. Two wrongs don't make a right.


yea, but all you are doing is making them more upset. same goes for melissa.
Power tends to corrupt; absolute power corrupts absolutely. - Lord Acton
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #12 posted 02/04/04 8:42am

Lleena

cborgman said:

Number23 said:

cborgman said:

Lleena said:




Pack mentality? Some of us dont run with a pack, but tell as it as we see it.


nod


You think me a bad dude, Chris?


no. i didn't see you posting stuff along the likes of what they were doing. but i do think being a part of it was not a good idea, and i also think coming over here and aggresively defending isn't a good idea, as it seems to be making it appear you are defending the mentality and vile things spoken over there. people involved in this scandal only by involvement would just be really smart to say "i am sorry i was unintentionally a part of it, i didn't see some of the things said, i apologize."

cause this aggressive defensive "yea, so what? you did this and this and this" stance is not working at all, because it makes people taking that stance appear that they are defending what was said on the site.

just my opinion.



Yes! Like the thread yesterday that stated we were all being childish for airing opinions over the racist content of that site.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #13 posted 02/04/04 8:44am

blackcherry

avatar

Number23 said:

cborgman said:

Number23 said:

cborgman said:

Lleena said:




Pack mentality? Some of us dont run with a pack, but tell as it as we see it.


nod


You think me a bad dude, Chris?


no. i didn't see you posting stuff along the likes of what they were doing. but i do think being a part of it was not a good idea, and i also think coming over here and aggresively defending isn't a good idea, as it seems to be making it appear you are defending the mentality and vile things spoken over there. people involved in this scandal only by involvement would just be really smart to say "i am sorry i was unintentionally a part of it, i didn't see some of the things said, i apologize."

cause this aggressive defensive "yea, so what? you did this and this and this" stance is not working at all, because it makes people taking that stance appear that they are defending what was said on the site.

just my opinion.


I appreciate your view, but if you read what I wrote again it's pretty obvious I'm not defending what was said over on that site.
My point was - it's the chocolate calling the candy sweet. Two wrongs don't make a right.


fuck that if someone pushes me i will push them back
who cares what is wrong or what is right
red hot like a chilli pepper
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #14 posted 02/04/04 8:47am

Number23

blackcherry said:

Number23 said:

cborgman said:

Number23 said:

cborgman said:

Lleena said:




Pack mentality? Some of us dont run with a pack, but tell as it as we see it.


nod


You think me a bad dude, Chris?


no. i didn't see you posting stuff along the likes of what they were doing. but i do think being a part of it was not a good idea, and i also think coming over here and aggresively defending isn't a good idea, as it seems to be making it appear you are defending the mentality and vile things spoken over there. people involved in this scandal only by involvement would just be really smart to say "i am sorry i was unintentionally a part of it, i didn't see some of the things said, i apologize."

cause this aggressive defensive "yea, so what? you did this and this and this" stance is not working at all, because it makes people taking that stance appear that they are defending what was said on the site.

just my opinion.


I appreciate your view, but if you read what I wrote again it's pretty obvious I'm not defending what was said over on that site.
My point was - it's the chocolate calling the candy sweet. Two wrongs don't make a right.


fuck that if someone pushes me i will push them back
who cares what is wrong or what is right


kotc
Didn't you watch Grafitti Bridge?
When a man shouts, you must learn to whisper.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #15 posted 02/04/04 8:48am

cborgman

avatar

Lleena said:

cborgman said:

Number23 said:

cborgman said:

Lleena said:




Pack mentality? Some of us dont run with a pack, but tell as it as we see it.


nod


You think me a bad dude, Chris?


no. i didn't see you posting stuff along the likes of what they were doing. but i do think being a part of it was not a good idea, and i also think coming over here and aggresively defending isn't a good idea, as it seems to be making it appear you are defending the mentality and vile things spoken over there. people involved in this scandal only by involvement would just be really smart to say "i am sorry i was unintentionally a part of it, i didn't see some of the things said, i apologize."

cause this aggressive defensive "yea, so what? you did this and this and this" stance is not working at all, because it makes people taking that stance appear that they are defending what was said on the site.

just my opinion.



Yes! Like the thread yesterday that stated we were all being childish for airing opinions over the racist content of that site.


nod

if i had been involved in the scandal, i would have done what richard and ian have, which was to apologize for being unintentionally involved, point out that he did not take part in the racist and/or homophobic bashing that chemmie, teller, aaron, and icenine were involved in, and take the slap on the wrist.

melissa and 23 and now apparently carrie over in that other thread are taking this aggressive defense stance, and it's just getting people more upset and angry.
Power tends to corrupt; absolute power corrupts absolutely. - Lord Acton
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #16 posted 02/04/04 8:49am

sag10

avatar

There is alot of anger here at the ORg and rightly so.. I have never read such filth in my life. And to address humanity in such terms is downright disgusting.

I don't believe that 2the9s, Hands, Chris, deserved any of the trash spoken there.

In life you reap what you sow...
^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^
Being happy doesn't mean that everything is perfect, it means you've decided to look beyond the imperfections... unknown
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #17 posted 02/04/04 8:53am

cborgman

avatar

people are going to be upset about it, and they have every right to be whether it is someone direclty and ruthlessly trashed on (9s, deja, me, rd, pej, and c) or not (everyone else involved) cause that was some really and truely VILE and extremely offensive bullshit posted over there.

taking this aggressive defense stance of well "you don't have a right to feel this way, your all childish, etc" and demeaning their anger and hurt is just riling them up more.
Power tends to corrupt; absolute power corrupts absolutely. - Lord Acton
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #18 posted 02/04/04 8:53am

blackcherry

avatar

Number23 said:

blackcherry said:

Number23 said:

cborgman said:

Number23 said:

cborgman said:

Lleena said:




Pack mentality? Some of us dont run with a pack, but tell as it as we see it.


nod


You think me a bad dude, Chris?


no. i didn't see you posting stuff along the likes of what they were doing. but i do think being a part of it was not a good idea, and i also think coming over here and aggresively defending isn't a good idea, as it seems to be making it appear you are defending the mentality and vile things spoken over there. people involved in this scandal only by involvement would just be really smart to say "i am sorry i was unintentionally a part of it, i didn't see some of the things said, i apologize."

cause this aggressive defensive "yea, so what? you did this and this and this" stance is not working at all, because it makes people taking that stance appear that they are defending what was said on the site.

just my opinion.


I appreciate your view, but if you read what I wrote again it's pretty obvious I'm not defending what was said over on that site.
My point was - it's the chocolate calling the candy sweet. Two wrongs don't make a right.


fuck that if someone pushes me i will push them back
who cares what is wrong or what is right


kotc
Didn't you watch Grafitti Bridge?
When a man shouts, you must learn to whisper.


lol

awww u kissed me :blush:
red hot like a chilli pepper
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #19 posted 02/04/04 8:54am

blackcherry

avatar

sag10 said:

There is alot of anger here at the ORg and rightly so.. I have never read such filth in my life. And to address humanity in such terms is downright disgusting.

I don't believe that 2the9s, Hands, Chris, deserved any of the trash spoken there.

In life you reap what you sow...



right on sister nod
red hot like a chilli pepper
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #20 posted 02/04/04 8:54am

Number23

cborgman said:

people are going to be upset about it, and they have every right to be whether it is someone direclty and ruthlessly trashed on (9s, deja, me, rd, pej, and c) or not (everyone else involved) cause that was some really and truely VILE and extremely offensive bullshit posted over there.


I am not in any way defending what was said over there - but I'd die to defend their right to say it.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #21 posted 02/04/04 8:55am

CarrieLee

cborgman said:


melissa and 23 and now apparently carrie over in that other thread are taking this aggressive defense stance, and it's just getting people more upset and angry.


Boo hoo, people are getting angry because I'm defending myself..gimme a friggin break Chris. I'm not gonna be silent about this, I did nothing wrong.

Now do I have to confess that I posted on a Tommy Lee site too? Because a lot of you don't like him! Does that make me a jerk too? lol
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #22 posted 02/04/04 8:55am

blackcherry

avatar

Number23 said:

cborgman said:

people are going to be upset about it, and they have every right to be whether it is someone direclty and ruthlessly trashed on (9s, deja, me, rd, pej, and c) or not (everyone else involved) cause that was some really and truely VILE and extremely offensive bullshit posted over there.


I am not in any way defending what was said over there - but I'd die to defend their right to say it.


then why aren't you allowing us our right to react to it
i am not telling them to shut up
i am angry at their reckless use of words
and ignorant play at humour
red hot like a chilli pepper
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #23 posted 02/04/04 8:57am

Lleena

cborgman said:

Lleena said:

cborgman said:

Number23 said:

cborgman said:

Lleena said:




Pack mentality? Some of us dont run with a pack, but tell as it as we see it.


nod


You think me a bad dude, Chris?


no. i didn't see you posting stuff along the likes of what they were doing. but i do think being a part of it was not a good idea, and i also think coming over here and aggresively defending isn't a good idea, as it seems to be making it appear you are defending the mentality and vile things spoken over there. people involved in this scandal only by involvement would just be really smart to say "i am sorry i was unintentionally a part of it, i didn't see some of the things said, i apologize."

cause this aggressive defensive "yea, so what? you did this and this and this" stance is not working at all, because it makes people taking that stance appear that they are defending what was said on the site.

just my opinion.



Yes! Like the thread yesterday that stated we were all being childish for airing opinions over the racist content of that site.


nod

if i had been involved in the scandal, i would have done what richard and ian have, which was to apologize for being unintentionally involved, point out that he did not take part in the racist and/or homophobic bashing that chemmie, teller, aaron, and icenine were involved in, and take the slap on the wrist.

melissa and 23 and now apparently carrie over in that other thread are taking this aggressive defense stance, and it's just getting people more upset and angry.




As Anotherlover stated, Carrie was the only one who said that the site should be open and that people should say what they had to say directly to the person they were bitching about.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #24 posted 02/04/04 8:57am

cborgman

avatar

Number23 said:

cborgman said:

people are going to be upset about it, and they have every right to be whether it is someone direclty and ruthlessly trashed on (9s, deja, me, rd, pej, and c) or not (everyone else involved) cause that was some really and truely VILE and extremely offensive bullshit posted over there.


I am not in any way defending what was said over there - but I'd die to defend their right to say it.

i know your position and i feel the same way, but now is not the time nor the place to make a stand about it. there aren't many people here who feel that they shouldn't be allowed to say it, but most of them feel that they shouldn't have said it, and those four will have to deal with that. but defending the right for those four to spew the kind of disgusting bile they did just makes it look like you are defending them.

i feel the same way you do, i really do, but you are shooting yourself in the foot here.
Power tends to corrupt; absolute power corrupts absolutely. - Lord Acton
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #25 posted 02/04/04 8:59am

Number23

blackcherry said:

Number23 said:

cborgman said:

people are going to be upset about it, and they have every right to be whether it is someone direclty and ruthlessly trashed on (9s, deja, me, rd, pej, and c) or not (everyone else involved) cause that was some really and truely VILE and extremely offensive bullshit posted over there.


I am not in any way defending what was said over there - but I'd die to defend their right to say it.


then why aren't you allowing us our right to react to it
i am not telling them to shut up
i am angry at their reckless use of words
and ignorant play at humour


Cherry, read my post again.
Quaidbowl members have been getting death threats from orgers.
That isn't a reaction - that's insanity.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #26 posted 02/04/04 8:59am

cborgman

avatar

CarrieLee said:

cborgman said:


melissa and 23 and now apparently carrie over in that other thread are taking this aggressive defense stance, and it's just getting people more upset and angry.


Boo hoo, people are getting angry because I'm defending myself..gimme a friggin break Chris. I'm not gonna be silent about this, I did nothing wrong.

Now do I have to confess that I posted on a Tommy Lee site too? Because a lot of you don't like him! Does that make me a jerk too? lol


case in point: where did i say i hold any anger for you carrie? if you would bother to look back, you were on the list of people i posted that i felt were pretty innocent in the matter.

what i said was this aggresive defense stance you are taking is just pissing people off more.
Power tends to corrupt; absolute power corrupts absolutely. - Lord Acton
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #27 posted 02/04/04 9:00am

jn2

the most pathetics are those who are in the talking shit mode about some others who are no more here and they don't even know just because it's the latest fashion and it's the easiest way to be member of a club
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #28 posted 02/04/04 9:02am

Number23

cborgman said:

Number23 said:

cborgman said:

people are going to be upset about it, and they have every right to be whether it is someone direclty and ruthlessly trashed on (9s, deja, me, rd, pej, and c) or not (everyone else involved) cause that was some really and truely VILE and extremely offensive bullshit posted over there.


I am not in any way defending what was said over there - but I'd die to defend their right to say it.


i feel the same way you do, i really do, but you are shooting yourself in the foot here.


That's fine. I have another one. wink
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #29 posted 02/04/04 9:02am

cborgman

avatar

Lleena said:

cborgman said:

Lleena said:

cborgman said:

Number23 said:

cborgman said:

Lleena said:




Pack mentality? Some of us dont run with a pack, but tell as it as we see it.


nod


You think me a bad dude, Chris?


no. i didn't see you posting stuff along the likes of what they were doing. but i do think being a part of it was not a good idea, and i also think coming over here and aggresively defending isn't a good idea, as it seems to be making it appear you are defending the mentality and vile things spoken over there. people involved in this scandal only by involvement would just be really smart to say "i am sorry i was unintentionally a part of it, i didn't see some of the things said, i apologize."

cause this aggressive defensive "yea, so what? you did this and this and this" stance is not working at all, because it makes people taking that stance appear that they are defending what was said on the site.

just my opinion.



Yes! Like the thread yesterday that stated we were all being childish for airing opinions over the racist content of that site.


nod

if i had been involved in the scandal, i would have done what richard and ian have, which was to apologize for being unintentionally involved, point out that he did not take part in the racist and/or homophobic bashing that chemmie, teller, aaron, and icenine were involved in, and take the slap on the wrist.

melissa and 23 and now apparently carrie over in that other thread are taking this aggressive defense stance, and it's just getting people more upset and angry.




As Anotherlover stated, Carrie was the only one who said that the site should be open and that people should say what they had to say directly to the person they were bitching about.


i'm not saying that carrie is guilty of any of the offensive shit, she isn't. what i am saying is this condescending "yeah, well, you do this and this and this, and i ain't apologizing for shit and fuck you if you don't like it" attitude and posts is just making it worse than it already is.
Power tends to corrupt; absolute power corrupts absolutely. - Lord Acton
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 1 of 4 1234>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > General Discussion > Hypocrasy, lies, racism and pack mentality.