There were so many bad films that year this is only a short list :

Mulholland Dr. (2001)
Vanilla Sky (2001)
Artificial Intelligence: AI (2001)
Jurassic Park III (2001)
The Order (2001)
Pearl Harbor (2001)
Freddy Got Fingered (2001)
The Fast and the Furious(2001)
Moulin Rouge! (2001)
Planet of the Apes (2001)
Scary Movie 2 (2001)
Glitter (2001)
Jeepers Creepers (2001)

Planet Of The Apes gets my vote.

Jeepers Creepers started off so well but just got silly once it was clear he was some winged indestructible creature

I hate all Scary Movies

Mullholland Drive should not even be on that list!!!

DAVID LYNCH IS BRILLIANT!!!!! Many people didn't understand this movie, but that doesn't make it bad.



_____
[This message was edited Tue Dec 23 6:18:14 PST 2003 by JediMaster]

Of the ones I saw, I can vouch that "Jeepers Creepers" was very VERY bad.

They were all quiet bad. I couldn't pick just one from the list.

And for the record, the worst movie of that year was, hands down, Pearl Harbour, followed not far behind by AI.

While I DETESTED Moulin Rouge I have to say its because it justisn't my bag. I'm not so sure it belongs on that list either. It was successful in what it set out to accomplish (I just don't like what that is).

glitter

Vanilla Sky is the best thing that came out of 2001... It never ceases to amaze me how most (Americans at that) have to have explosions and an simply story line to keep them watching, not to mention a story line that an infant could follow... and THIS movie was one EASY to follow
If u were to include this movie as "worst" then u simply dont want to pay attention... If u dont like it, thats fine, but it is not by any standards "Worst" or a bad movie..

holymoses54 said:

you're a fucking idiot.

compared to the original "vanilla sky" sucked! sorry, but it's true.
and by the way whoever told mariah scarey she should do a movie should be shot in the face!

prrtybby said:

my favorite line in Glitter is when... somebody, i don't remember who... asks Mariah's character... "Have you ever thought about acting?"


i almost wish i'd seen this in a theater so i could scream "NO" at the screen

AaronAlmighty said:

haha

Sdldawn said:

My problem with Vanilla Sky is that it was TOO dumbed down for Americans, with the whole "Basil Exposition" character who showed up at the end to explain it to all the morons in the audience who didn't "get it". If it hadn't have been for that, it would have been one of my favorite films of the year.

JediMaster said:

hey now. i don't think it was dumbed down for Americans. i think it was dumbed down for Tom Cruise and Cameron Diaz.

gone with the wind.

I thought that AI was a breathtaking movie.

I didn't understand Vanilla Sky.
[This message was edited Tue Dec 23 11:48:02 PST 2003 by ConsciousContact]

JediMaster said:

Yeah, but what do u expect? Most didnt need that person to show up, but it didnt ruin the show for me, simply because of the plot creation they used... (LE) I think it was a well thought out movie that deals with more real things than the basic standard movie.. It is my favorite movie of all time..

I kinda liked Jeppers Creepers..

I caught a few minutes of Glitter on HBO a few weeks ago.. God besides telling Mariah to wear some clothes that fit her body.. tell her she cant' act her way out of a paper bag too!!

AaronAlmighty said:

JediMaster said:

Hi Jedi!!!

ConsciousContact said:

It was breathtaking for me also... in the sense that I almost choked on my popcorn several times at how atrociously bad it was! I could have filmed me taking a crap and it would have been a better "film"! Bloody awful!

BabyCakes said:

Hey baby!!!

JediMaster said:

a ton avis

Sdldawn said:

Well see, that's the problem right there. I expected more out of Cameron Crowe than for him to "dumb down" his movie. That's part of why I like Mulholland Drive so much (a similar film, in that both are fantasy creations of the main character, with reality intruding) because it didn't explain it. The viewer was left to figure it out for him/herself, even if it took multiple viewings. The people who weren't going to get it had already decided they hated it by the time it got to the explanation anyway, so it just wasn't necessary. I think Cameron should have trusted his intelligent viewers, and ignored all the rest.

JediMaster said:

I agree, The funny thing is.. There is a Majority that stands to NOT understanding the movie, and saying "I hate that movie, It sucks" simply because they didnt udnerstand it.. EVEN with an explanation at the end... It just amazes me..

Sdldawn said:

We're in total agreement there!

Glitter is too easy of a vote...

so I'll go with Planet of the Apes...could've been an awesome remake, and was hugely disappointing...watching a movie full of Michael Jackson look-a-likes was simply NOT FUN

endorphin74 said:

Not all of them looked like Michael, just Helena Bonham Carter's character. Still, it was better than Pearl Harbour or AI. Those were two incredibly craptacular wastes of film!