AaronAlmighty said:

they go thru but the recipient cant access them until they get reactivated

rdhull said:

pa le ase !

The C better get re-activated as rd said, he is a charter member.

The C is usually pretty reasonable in his arguments but he always stands up for what he believes in.

What did he say on that thread before it got snipped?

bkw said:

He proved that matt was a hypocrite..and all the violin cry babies are asskissers who'd suck a dick at the drop of a dime to sell someone out
[This message was edited Mon Dec 22 19:59:57 PST 2003 by rdhull]

rdhull said:

Did Matt really de-activate him over comments that C made on that thread?

If that's the case that is fucking weak.

rdhull said:

bkw said:

rdhull said:

For the record, C was issued a third "strike" (which results in an automatic temporary banning) for an abusive comment directed at cborgman. It had nothing to do with me or Melissa. Perhaps you should think before making meritless accusations like a loose cannon.

AaronAlmighty said:

you'd think, but when it comes to him, there is no such thing as objectivity on his part, as i experienced personally when in my run-in with him that contributed to getting the GD shut down originaly.

i remember _ _ _ using the words "high strung" and "over-reacting" with his name associated. [/quote]


ohh my stars..you just reminded me of this time period..hehehee..


i think both you *and* matt wanted to kill me then.

matt said:

da bomb go boom..so did chris report him or something? did he?

AaronAlmighty said:

Real high school stuff there, Aaron. Grow up.

man, for people who are so damn quick to call people drama queens and accusing them of over-reacting, ya'll sure do it an awful lot.

he flamed me, i DIDN'T report it, cause i only report people who continually flame me, and i didn't see the comment, but obviously it was a third strike case.

ya'll oughta maybe think about knowing what happened before you start hysterically over-reacting...

So when is C coming back?

cborgman said:

wtf are u tlaking about--matt said he flamed u so I asked if it was reported as to why he got deactivated..dont trip

cborgman said:

but seriously though...its all about "tactful" moderation... the fact that this was done right at the time it did reeks of revenge...

not saying it is..but, we all gotta lil displaced anger in us at one time or another..




editor note: "tactful" might be too harsh a word....but i cant think of anyother at the time... sorry matt
[This message was edited Mon Dec 22 20:29:59 PST 2003 by sosgemini]

sosgemini said:

everyone knows good and well it does...

2the9s said:

I'm waiting for him to email me to discuss the situation. So far, he hasn't.

rdhull said:

relax, RD, i wan't talking to you
[This message was edited Mon Dec 22 20:37:27 PST 2003 by cborgman]

sosgemini said:

I'll take Matt over Ian any day!

Though I do want to see C back...

matt said:

whats to discuss--just reactivate him--it was a weird thread and nobody should be punished for what was said--u knew things would get heated

matt said:

yeah, and talking about the intimate details of your sex life isn't

cborgman said:

sureee u wasnt lol
[This message was edited Mon Dec 22 20:37:22 PST 2003 by rdhull]

rdhull said:

i didn't see the post, but based on how much in that thread was left intact, i am betting his comment had nothing to do with the topic.
[This message was edited Mon Dec 22 20:38:29 PST 2003 by cborgman]

AaronAlmighty said:

wait..that aint cool aaron..that aint cool.

AaronAlmighty said:

I haven't said anything about my sex life. Based upon what I've said here, I may not even have one.

rdhull said:

oh, good lord, please don't make a pointless fight out of this.

the simple fact is his deactivation has NOTHING to do with any of you. it is between him and the moderators, and to a much lesser extent me.

period.
[This message was edited Mon Dec 22 20:44:48 PST 2003 by cborgman]

rdhull said:

That puts me in an interesting situation, eh? If I take any moderation action in that thread, my motivation gets questioned. But if I don't, then people are free to violate the rules with impunity. I'm screwed either way.

matt said:

welcome to rock n roll!

matt said:

no it doesnt...you could have snipped the comment and brought it to ben's attention for action later on..


or better yet, you could have just emailed "c" and give him a warning pending a less partial mod...

come on now!!! your a lawyer..you know this stuff...

i gotta say, i have recieved a couple org notes from mods...and while i respect the volunterism a am always shocked at the lack of tact from which comments are made...

i said this from day one (when you, aaron and i got into a tiff about the new org); "mods set the tone for online forums"...

let it go guys it has nothing to do with any of ya.