independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > General Discussion > Melissa (tackam) has left the .org
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 3 of 7 <1234567>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Reply #60 posted 12/19/03 6:49pm

CtheUncanny

avatar

matt said:

CtheUncanny said:

nod Personal life should be kept PERSONAL.


Where do you draw the line? Should we not discuss anything regarding our lives? Should we not have a profile feature that allows users to provide information about themselves?

Two .orgers are in love with one another. Yeah, that's pretty personal information there.

You draw the line at what you can handle sent back at you.
If you talk bout your favorite sports team, you may get flack. If you talk about a health issue you have, you may get flack. If you talk about a sexual escapade you had, you may get flack. Put out what you want, just be able to deal with not so pleasant responces. I don't put anything up there i can't deal with.
I GOT YA, I GOT YA, I GOT YA PUNKASS! REPEAT
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #61 posted 12/19/03 6:53pm

Supernova

avatar

matt said:

CtheUncanny said:

nod Personal life should be kept PERSONAL.


Where do you draw the line? Should we not discuss anything regarding our lives? Should we not have a profile feature that allows users to provide information about themselves?

Two .orgers are in love with one another. Yeah, that's pretty personal information there.

Oh, bloody hell. You know it wasn't as simple as that. You're not that naive.
This post not for the wimp contingent. All whiny wusses avert your eyes.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #62 posted 12/19/03 6:55pm

Lleena

matt said:

Lleena said:

I was surprised to see you and Melissa sharing your personal life with the Org, to the extent that you would post a thread about it and invite questions from everyone. I'm sure you knew that an unorthodox relationship such as yours was bound to illicit some negative feedback. I think that your relationship seems to be a very loving one but which should have been kept private. Is it really any of our business how you guys live your lives? NO. Now that thread has been voted for as most embarassing when it shouldn't have even existed.


sigh

"Yeah, I don't mind gays, as long as they keep it to themselves. Why do they have to be so blatant about it?"

If we were a monogamous couple, would you expect us to remain closeted about our relationship?

Anyway, yes, I expected negative feedback, and I personally was not offended by it.



Your analogy is totally missing the point Matt. I find your comment narrow minded and judgemental. The point of my post was that don't put your personal life out there for public scrutiny and then not expect to get any criticism. You stated that one of the reasons Melissa left is due to the fact that your thread was nominated for a most embarassing poll did you not? that happened precisely because you felt the need to share your relationship.

Spare me the analogies you don't have a clue.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #63 posted 12/19/03 6:55pm

CtheUncanny

avatar

Supernova said:

matt said:

CtheUncanny said:

nod Personal life should be kept PERSONAL.


Where do you draw the line? Should we not discuss anything regarding our lives? Should we not have a profile feature that allows users to provide information about themselves?

Two .orgers are in love with one another. Yeah, that's pretty personal information there.

Oh, bloody hell. You know it wasn't as simple as that. You're not that naive.

That too razz There was a ton of other issues going on with that. :LOL:
I GOT YA, I GOT YA, I GOT YA PUNKASS! REPEAT
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #64 posted 12/19/03 6:57pm

oOoOJulyOoOo

Everybodys always annoucing stuff... typing In love, leaving out of here, new songs at NPGMC, NPG Tourdates, I got a pizza in the oven. When will it all end? Damn Free flow information... stfu
and freedom of expression stfu and to think this site is free... doh! typing reading
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #65 posted 12/19/03 6:58pm

coqui

avatar

Don't sweat the small shit. And trust me, the .org is "the small shit". Enjoy the time you have with your significant other regardless of how or where that time is spent. And don't give a shit about what a bunch of computer chair warriors have to say about it.


Sorry to see another one go. Enjoy your future together.
"It's that Coqui 900, can I have me a sip"

The evil cometh...
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #66 posted 12/19/03 7:02pm

matt

Sr. Moderator

moderator

Supernova said:

matt said:

Two .orgers are in love with one another. Yeah, that's pretty personal information there.

Oh, bloody hell. You know it wasn't as simple as that.


No, it wasn't. Despite jessyMD32781's implication that we would have gotten the same reactions if we were monogamous, I firmly believe that the issue of polyamory is what caused such a stir.

Both of us were married when we posted that thread, and our marriages were public knowledge on the .org. IMHO it was far better to explain the poly aspect of the relationship than have people assume that we were cheating on our spouses. (Yes, polyamory and cheating are two very different things.)

Moreover, I see no reason to be ashamed of being poly or hide it. I'm disappointed at the bigotry of those who insist that we remain in the closet in exchange for being tolerated.
Please note: effective March 21, 2010, I've stepped down from my prince.org Moderator position.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #67 posted 12/19/03 7:06pm

CtheUncanny

avatar

matt said:

Supernova said:

matt said:

Two .orgers are in love with one another. Yeah, that's pretty personal information there.

Oh, bloody hell. You know it wasn't as simple as that.


No, it wasn't. Despite jessyMD32781's implication that we would have gotten the same reactions if we were monogamous, I firmly believe that the issue of polyamory is what caused such a stir.

Both of us were married when we posted that thread, and our marriages were public knowledge on the .org. IMHO it was far better to explain the poly aspect of the relationship than have people assume that we were cheating on our spouses. (Yes, polyamory and cheating are two very different things.)

Moreover, I see no reason to be ashamed of being poly or hide it. I'm disappointed at the bigotry of those who insist that we remain in the closet in exchange for being tolerated.


nod I'm not sure, but i know it didn't help. Step out the box and prepare to be a target, whether you are right or wrong.
I GOT YA, I GOT YA, I GOT YA PUNKASS! REPEAT
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #68 posted 12/19/03 7:08pm

IAmTheTouch

a lot of energy is being spent on talking about how Melissa SHOULD feel. it makes absolutely no difference how anybody thinks she SHOULD feel, what matters is how she DOES feel.

i am sad to hear she's decided to leave the org - another thoughtful, smart orger gone. she had a lot to contribute, and it's definitely our loss.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #69 posted 12/19/03 7:11pm

funkbible

avatar

Sniff Sniff. I smell a thread lock coming!!!
My DC Direct wishlist: 1) Bane, 2) Prof Zoom, 3) Superman Blue, 4) Kilowag, 5) Parasite
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #70 posted 12/19/03 7:12pm

Anxiety

matt said:

CtheUncanny said:

nod Personal life should be kept PERSONAL.


Where do you draw the line? Should we not discuss anything regarding our lives? Should we not have a profile feature that allows users to provide information about themselves?

Two .orgers are in love with one another. Yeah, that's pretty personal information there.


I think we all have the option to divulge everything or nothing about ourselves, or something in between. I could talk about my relationships on here, but I choose not to because I really don't need everyone's input on my own particular romantic misadventures. But hey - results may vary. Maybe there are other topics on which I am very open and vocal, which others wouldn't dare talk about.

As an openly gay man, I've had to justify my existence over and over and over again, for what's going on two decades. As a vegetarian, I've had to justify to people why I don't eat certain foods over and over and over and over again. I don't wear these aspects of myself on my sleeve - they're as much a part of me as my hair color or my eye color or my age or my last name - but because they're "different" I'm called to question, repeatedly.

And you know what? It's worth it. The parts of my identity that feel natural to me, that feel like "THIS IS WHO I AM", are worth all the razzing, all the jokes, all the questions, all the unwelcome pontificating, all the whatevers that come with the public at large scrutinizing who I am, whether they "get it" or not.

So while yeah, the outside world could be more sensitive and inclusive, I could also be wealthy and dating Ewan McGregor and have my own personal private leer jet. A lot of things COULD be.

Then there's how things ARE.

People who go against the grain of society, no matter how ideally peaceable their existence may be, will always be called to the matt (no pun intended) - that's just how it is. Maybe you have the stuff to ignore the foolishness and go right on expressing yourself. Maybe you'll decide that your personal live doesn't need to be scrutinized and you'll keep some stuff private and personal. Maybe you'll decide being "different" isn't worth it at all, and you'll set about finding a way to "fit in" with what's considered "normal". I dunno. Everyone's different.

The world isn't gonna change per our individual specifications. It's all about bending with the wind. It's up to you.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #71 posted 12/19/03 7:15pm

Supernova

avatar

matt said:

Supernova said:

matt said:

Two .orgers are in love with one another. Yeah, that's pretty personal information there.

Oh, bloody hell. You know it wasn't as simple as that.


No, it wasn't. Despite jessyMD32781's implication that we would have gotten the same reactions if we were monogamous, I firmly believe that the issue of polyamory is what caused such a stir.

Both of us were married when we posted that thread, and our marriages were public knowledge on the .org. IMHO it was far better to explain the poly aspect of the relationship than have people assume that we were cheating on our spouses. (Yes, polyamory and cheating are two very different things.)

Moreover, I see no reason to be ashamed of being poly or hide it. I'm disappointed at the bigotry of those who insist that we remain in the closet in exchange for being tolerated.

Why do you equate being ashamed about it with not screaming from the Org's rooftops to inform everybody who reads the site? There are other couples on the Org who haven't felt the need to tell this site's inhabitants the ins/outs/what'swhat of what's going on between them because they know what type of fallout they'd get. If you're going to make a big production out of WHATEVER your relationship is, you have to be ready to take the criticism about announcing it. You mean to tell me that you guys could take all those responses in that infamous thread, but yet the second it's nominated as "most embarrassing thread" it hurts you?
This post not for the wimp contingent. All whiny wusses avert your eyes.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #72 posted 12/19/03 7:17pm

matt

Sr. Moderator

moderator

Lleena said:

matt said:


sigh

"Yeah, I don't mind gays, as long as they keep it to themselves. Why do they have to be so blatant about it?"

If we were a monogamous couple, would you expect us to remain closeted about our relationship?

Anyway, yes, I expected negative feedback, and I personally was not offended by it.



Your analogy is totally missing the point Matt. I find your comment narrow minded and judgemental. The point of my post was that don't put your personal life out there for public scrutiny and then not expect to get any criticism. You stated that one of the reasons Melissa left is due to the fact that your thread was nominated for a most embarassing poll did you not? that happened precisely because you felt the need to share your relationship.


The analogy is on-point. Some people assert that being gay is part of one's "private life," yet heterosexuals are not held to that standard. Likewise, you seem to imply that the poly aspect of our relationship (as you said, "an unorthodox relationship") falls within our private lives, but who would expect a monogamous couple to keep quiet about their monogamy?

Sure, if you post something, people are probably going to respond, and we knew that. In fact, one of reasons for doing it was that we thought we'd enjoy the responses. But it's perfectly reasonable for Melissa to be upset about being held to a double standard.
Please note: effective March 21, 2010, I've stepped down from my prince.org Moderator position.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #73 posted 12/19/03 7:17pm

CtheUncanny

avatar

funkbible said:

Sniff Sniff. I smell a thread lock coming!!!

When i see that avatar i think the same thing :LOL:
Then i remember...He's been defeated already :LOL:
I GOT YA, I GOT YA, I GOT YA PUNKASS! REPEAT
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #74 posted 12/19/03 7:21pm

matt

Sr. Moderator

moderator

Supernova said:

You mean to tell me that you guys could take all those responses in that infamous thread, but yet the second it's nominated as "most embarrassing thread" it hurts you?


Melissa has indicated that while the "Statement of Love" responses didn't bother her at the time, she does now feel hurt by some of them.

Is she overreacting? Possibly yes. But to borrow a thought from IAmTheTouch, regardless of how she should feel, she does feel hurt right now. That's a fact, Jack.
Please note: effective March 21, 2010, I've stepped down from my prince.org Moderator position.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #75 posted 12/19/03 7:32pm

Anxiety

Your analogy of polygamist = gay is built on a foundation of toothpicks, in my opinion. I can see where you're going with it, and I'm not going to say it's an altogether invalid analogy...but look at it this way:

You can be gay, and that's one thing.

You can be gay and very conservative, which is not as rare as you may think, and that's one thing.

You can be gay and part of the fetish community, or the bear community, or the leather community, etc., and that's another thing altogether. These are all subsets of the LGBT community that have very proud groups of people who discuss their interests openly and without embarrassment, but being gay does not necessarily mean being into leather or being into sex parties or being into a certain "type" of person of a particular gender.

For me, when someone knows I'm gay, they know my sexual/romantic preference. Period. That's all it should mean. And I'm cool with defending that generic identifier, I'm cool with explaining it, and I'm not threatened by what people read into it that isn't the truth. Why would I be?

Polyamory speaks to something a little more specific. That's NOT a value judgment. It's just how it is. It's also a relatively "new" concept in mainstream society. I mean, please - look at how our president is treating gay marriage. You think we as a society are ready to embrace polyamorous relationships? That may suck, but that's how it is.

And that's why, if you REALLY believe in your lifestyle, you need to acknowledge and "own" the perceptions people have of it, so you can fight those perceptions, protect yourself from them, or decide if the lifestyle is even worth the fight to you.

And, you know, maybe that is where polyamory and being gay are indeed similar - both ways, you have a bit of a struggle on your hands.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #76 posted 12/19/03 7:38pm

Supernova

avatar

matt said:

Supernova said:

You mean to tell me that you guys could take all those responses in that infamous thread, but yet the second it's nominated as "most embarrassing thread" it hurts you?


Melissa has indicated that while the "Statement of Love" responses didn't bother her at the time, she does now feel hurt by some of them.

Is she overreacting? Possibly yes. But to borrow a thought from IAmTheTouch, regardless of how she should feel, she does feel hurt right now. That's a fact, Jack.

Posting one's own kryptonite can be hazarous.
This post not for the wimp contingent. All whiny wusses avert your eyes.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #77 posted 12/19/03 7:39pm

Lleena

matt said:

Lleena said:

matt said:


sigh

"Yeah, I don't mind gays, as long as they keep it to themselves. Why do they have to be so blatant about it?"

If we were a monogamous couple, would you expect us to remain closeted about our relationship?

Anyway, yes, I expected negative feedback, and I personally was not offended by it.



Your analogy is totally missing the point Matt. I find your comment narrow minded and judgemental. The point of my post was that don't put your personal life out there for public scrutiny and then not expect to get any criticism. You stated that one of the reasons Melissa left is due to the fact that your thread was nominated for a most embarassing poll did you not? that happened precisely because you felt the need to share your relationship.


The analogy is on-point. Some people assert that being gay is part of one's "private life," yet heterosexuals are not held to that standard. Likewise, you seem to imply that the poly aspect of our relationship (as you said, "an unorthodox relationship") falls within our private lives, but who would expect a monogamous couple to keep quiet about their monogamy?

Sure, if you post something, people are probably going to respond, and we knew that. In fact, one of reasons for doing it was that we thought we'd enjoy the responses. But it's perfectly reasonable for Melissa to be upset about being held to a double standard.



It may come as a surprise to you but some people DO keep quiet about their personal relationships. This has absolutely nothing to do with what is acceptable by society. Frankly i couldn't give a toss about what is expected of me. ( If i want to go out and bang a huge stuffed fluffy bunny. I will). The point is that your relationship was put out there and now you are upset that it was demeaned by being nominated. I find this Ironic. It shouldn't have been nominated as that was hurtful to the both of you, but it was nominated because you decided to let the public judge you.

I'm sorry Melissa is hurt, like I said previously, I hope she has some fond memories of this place too.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #78 posted 12/19/03 7:42pm

matt

Sr. Moderator

moderator

Lleena said:

The point is that your relationship was put out there and now you are upset that it was demeaned by being nominated.


Clarification: I am not upset about the nomination. I was actually rather amused. But Melissa is upset.
Please note: effective March 21, 2010, I've stepped down from my prince.org Moderator position.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #79 posted 12/19/03 7:47pm

CtheUncanny

avatar

matt said:

Lleena said:

The point is that your relationship was put out there and now you are upset that it was demeaned by being nominated.


Clarification: I am not upset about the nomination. I was actually rather amused. But Melissa is upset.


Then have her read this thread and see if she understands.
I GOT YA, I GOT YA, I GOT YA PUNKASS! REPEAT
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #80 posted 12/19/03 7:47pm

Milty

avatar

Matt, i have not had any contact with you ever since i have been on the Org but all i wanted to say is that you need to do what you got to do and you do have the support of a lot of people in here.
i am in a similiar relationship with another orger and i want nothing but success for myself. good luck to you and melissa.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #81 posted 12/19/03 7:50pm

Supernova

avatar

CtheUncanny said:

matt said:

Lleena said:

The point is that your relationship was put out there and now you are upset that it was demeaned by being nominated.


Clarification: I am not upset about the nomination. I was actually rather amused. But Melissa is upset.


Then have her read this thread and see if she understands.

Um, C, that's more fuel for fire.
This post not for the wimp contingent. All whiny wusses avert your eyes.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #82 posted 12/19/03 7:51pm

CtheUncanny

avatar

Supernova said:

CtheUncanny said:

matt said:

Lleena said:

The point is that your relationship was put out there and now you are upset that it was demeaned by being nominated.


Clarification: I am not upset about the nomination. I was actually rather amused. But Melissa is upset.


Then have her read this thread and see if she understands.

Um, C, that's more fuel for fire.


OK, maybe not boxed
I GOT YA, I GOT YA, I GOT YA PUNKASS! REPEAT
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #83 posted 12/19/03 8:06pm

AnotherLoverTo
o

Milty said:


...i am in a similiar relationship with another orger...


Another polyamorous relationship?! woot!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #84 posted 12/19/03 8:09pm

CtheUncanny

avatar

AnotherLoverToo said:

Milty said:


...i am in a similiar relationship with another orger...


Another polyamorous relationship?! woot!

:LOL:
I GOT YA, I GOT YA, I GOT YA PUNKASS! REPEAT
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #85 posted 12/19/03 8:14pm

funkbible

avatar

Swingers.com



End of discussion
My DC Direct wishlist: 1) Bane, 2) Prof Zoom, 3) Superman Blue, 4) Kilowag, 5) Parasite
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #86 posted 12/19/03 8:16pm

jessyMD32781

funkbible said:

Swingers.com



End of discussion

were you trying to be funny?
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #87 posted 12/19/03 8:19pm

funkbible

avatar

jessyMD32781 said:

funkbible said:

Swingers.com



End of discussion

were you trying to be funny?





Errr no I wasnt.


But this is!






My DC Direct wishlist: 1) Bane, 2) Prof Zoom, 3) Superman Blue, 4) Kilowag, 5) Parasite
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #88 posted 12/19/03 8:22pm

kiss85

avatar

omg I leave this place and after several hrs and someone else has ditched us!!

Okay, I'ma put my twocents in and then leave it alone.

Bottom line: Another orger runs because of a few so-called "closed-minded" comments about business that shouldn't have been put out in the first place. It's not that I totally disagree with Matt and Melissa's decision to do "whatever", but I agree with C when he said personal business is personal business. C'mon, how many people here would stand out on a street and announce something like that? Seriously?

I'm sorry Melissa chose to go, cause she'll be missed for sure.
They did WHAT??!.... disbelief
Org Sci-Fi Association
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #89 posted 12/19/03 8:25pm

2the9s

funkbible said:

jessyMD32781 said:

funkbible said:

Swingers.com



End of discussion

were you trying to be funny?





Errr no I wasnt.


But this is!








Try again. neutral
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 3 of 7 <1234567>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > General Discussion > Melissa (tackam) has left the .org