New topic
Printable| Author | Message |
| Moderator
|
A New Idea For "The .Orgies", What'dya Think? 
I've made a decision that may address some of the "complaints" from fellow .orgers. While it's true that many .orgers have been nominated simply for the fact that nominations are fun to do and unregulated, like a 'shout out' for your buddies; are these noms really worthy of the title? Usually, the voting process would determine that. This year, I will round out the nominations to the five most worthy of each catagory... and speaking of catagories, a few of you have expressed a desire to add more. I will go back to the nomination thread and add the most reasonable catagories that make sense... I will choose someone who will assist me in determining who will be the top five... anyone wishing to assist should .orgnote me privately. I will announce who the assistant is. I am in no way the person who determines who's what, or why - I just happened to start the thread and therefore has been ultimately given the 'job' of organizing this mess. I thought it would be fun... but, this is the .Org! While this is really just silly fun, it's also an honor being nominated by your peers for something you may have said, or a thread you created that got a huge response, and I recognize this...so, is this cool? Lemme know... 
|
- E-mail - orgNote -  Report post to moderator |
moderator| Moderator
|
In case you're not aware... (  ) here's the original Nomination thread...
http://www.prince.org/msg/100/71524 |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Make definetly sure AaronUniversal and RDHull are in the top 5. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
| Moderator
|
JDINTERACTIVE said: Make definetly sure AaronUniversal and RDHull are in the top 5.
 |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
JDINTERACTIVE said: Make definetly sure AaronUniversal and RDHull are in the top 5.
Yeah. We wouldn't want them to sulk.  | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
| Moderator
|
So what? Nobody wants the job??? 
(More work for me...  )
.Orgnote me if you wanna help... |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
why don't we just skip it? it hasn't been a banner year at the org for anyone... | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
AaronUniversal said: why don't we just skip it? it hasn't been a banner year at the org for anyone...
but what about my to the org with love thread? "Climb in my fur." | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
rdhull said: AaronUniversal said: why don't we just skip it? it hasn't been a banner year at the org for anyone...
but what about my to the org with love thread? peaked too soon in the year 
though you "npgmc makes me want to quit prince" was pretty good | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
June7 said:
I've made a decision that may address some of the "complaints" from fellow .orgers. While it's true that many .orgers have been nominated simply for the fact that nominations are fun to do and unregulated, like a 'shout out' for your buddies; are these noms really worthy of the title? Usually, the voting process would determine that. This year, I will round out the nominations to the five most worthy of each catagory... and speaking of catagories, a few of you have expressed a desire to add more. I will go back to the nomination thread and add the most reasonable catagories that make sense... I will choose someone who will assist me in determining who will be the top five... anyone wishing to assist should .orgnote me privately. I will announce who the assistant is. I am in no way the person who determines who's what, or why - I just happened to start the thread and therefore has been ultimately given the 'job' of organizing this mess. I thought it would be fun... but, this is the .Org! While this is really just silly fun, it's also an honor being nominated by your peers for something you may have said, or a thread you created that got a huge response, and I recognize this...so, is this cool? Lemme know...
Why did you post this all in bold?  | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
2the9s said: June7 said:
I've made a decision that may address some of the "complaints" from fellow .orgers. While it's true that many .orgers have been nominated simply for the fact that nominations are fun to do and unregulated, like a 'shout out' for your buddies; are these noms really worthy of the title? Usually, the voting process would determine that. This year, I will round out the nominations to the five most worthy of each catagory... and speaking of catagories, a few of you have expressed a desire to add more. I will go back to the nomination thread and add the most reasonable catagories that make sense... I will choose someone who will assist me in determining who will be the top five... anyone wishing to assist should .orgnote me privately. I will announce who the assistant is. I am in no way the person who determines who's what, or why - I just happened to start the thread and therefore has been ultimately given the 'job' of organizing this mess. I thought it would be fun... but, this is the .Org! While this is really just silly fun, it's also an honor being nominated by your peers for something you may have said, or a thread you created that got a huge response, and I recognize this...so, is this cool? Lemme know...
Why did you post this all in bold? because it's important (  ) | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
AaronUniversal said: 2the9s said: June7 said:
I've made a decision that may address some of the "complaints" from fellow .orgers. While it's true that many .orgers have been nominated simply for the fact that nominations are fun to do and unregulated, like a 'shout out' for your buddies; are these noms really worthy of the title? Usually, the voting process would determine that. This year, I will round out the nominations to the five most worthy of each catagory... and speaking of catagories, a few of you have expressed a desire to add more. I will go back to the nomination thread and add the most reasonable catagories that make sense... I will choose someone who will assist me in determining who will be the top five... anyone wishing to assist should .orgnote me privately. I will announce who the assistant is. I am in no way the person who determines who's what, or why - I just happened to start the thread and therefore has been ultimately given the 'job' of organizing this mess. I thought it would be fun... but, this is the .Org! While this is really just silly fun, it's also an honor being nominated by your peers for something you may have said, or a thread you created that got a huge response, and I recognize this...so, is this cool? Lemme know...
Why did you post this all in bold? because it's important ( )Come again? | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |