Time usually has a man of the year--err..person of th e year..and several years it has been someone controversial--i.e. not neccessarrily the epitome of gootness but someone who afected the Time worl in one way or another---good or bad . They lost their cajones when it was debated that they wouod put Bin Laden on th e cover the year of the WTC terrorist act. They fudged because the world or the U.S. wasn't ready or they weren't..they felt they'd be burned at th estake for dsoing that i that time of crissi so to speak...

so does the org have the balls to nominate and select an orger who wasnt all nicey nice--someone who is despised at times--somone who made an impact

That would entail thoise who hate or disliked Icenine to vote for him
or EWM
or even me if Im despised ( but that cant be because Im )

But Ice is gone but he was th ecatalyst for a lot of things even I have to admit..some brought the org to its knees at times but he started it lol...

does the org have the balls this TIME (magazine)?

oh and thgat would have meant Ocena would have been orger of the year for last year--if we went that Time Magazine route

you have to figure out the space bar

conch5184 said:

I vote for U RDHull. Ur the best.

this isnt about my typing or lack thereof--( on this funky keyboard)

ok i vote for you.

JDINTERACTIVE said:

now youre just being facetious etc...but Im serious though...we should vote for the impact regardless if we liked the person etc

here we go with the one star ratings again





you'll miss me when Im dead n buried

ive been orgnoting bribes to everyone. this will be the year.

rdhull said:

eheheh, I admit I was but I guess Ur right. And another, thing, I do genuinly agree with U with the ratings of threads.
[This message was edited Fri Dec 5 12:45:49 PST 2003 by JDINTERACTIVE]

oh i...i dunno how to play the game i guess

chemmie said:

lol
th eyear chemmie gets his props? ol

even if i did bribe my way into the winners circle, they wouldnt have the balls to give me the award.

chemmie said:

lol

you wouldnt get it because even though youve been somewhat..something..you havent outshined many others in that categorie...you a nom yeah --but not winner material just as yet...

conch5184 said:

Id vote for U conch over these two anyday.

ehehe

JDINTERACTIVE said:

whatd I ever do to you but break it down..see you're mad about thaT...SHEESH

rdhull said:

Sorry RD, I'll stop pissing U off now. Have 5stars for Ur trouble.

JDINTERACTIVE said:

Im not pissed, yoy are, have been ever since the other day at me. And you didnt rate it 5 u gave it zero liar lol

lets not make this a u vs. me thing please jd, weve never had any conflict before

woops--someone else must have rated it zero--becauie a 5 came up--sorry about th e"liar" part jd

rdhull said:

Of cause. Im a man of my word though. I just voted U 5stars and said I didnt like the ratings of threads! U want blood out of a stone man!?!?!? ehehe.

No hard feelings of cause sir. Not at all.

JDINTERACTIVE said:

se my posat right above your last one--I apologized for not believing u since someone rated it zero before u had a chance ot rate the five and I mistook their zero as you doing that--sorry, apologies again

i'm surprised nobody voted for loudawg, ya'll remember that cat?

Handclapsfingasnapz said:

he wasnt here this year

rdhull said:

Number23 said:

thinkin...i coulda sworn the cat was here for a bit way at the beginnin of the year

Handclapsfingasnapz said:

even if..made no impact as his first year--and that was even less thaN oceana heffa ho biz

rdhull said:

true...and XLBubba, that mofo was da debble of the non-prince forum.