independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > General Discussion > This can't be true! Bush is fucking insane!
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 1 of 2 12>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Author

Tweet     Share

Message
Thread started 10/14/03 3:12pm

TRON

This can't be true! Bush is fucking insane!

New plan: Kill endangered species to save them

By Shankar Vedantam

The Washington Post

WASHINGTON - The Bush administration is proposing far-reaching changes to conservation policies that would allow hunters, circuses and the pet industry to kill, capture and import animals on the brink of extinction in other countries.

Giving Americans access to endangered animals, officials said, would both feed the gigantic U.S. demand for live animals, skins, parts and trophies, and generate profits that would allow poor nations to pay for conservation of the remaining animals and their habitats.

This and other proposals that pursue conservation through trade would, for example, open the door for American trophy hunters to kill the endangered straight- horned markhor in Pakistan; license the pet industry to import the blue-fronted Amazon parrot from Argentina; permit the capture of endangered Asian elephants for U.S. circuses and zoos; and partially resume the international trade in African ivory.

No U.S. endangered species would be affected.

Conservation groups counter that killing or capturing even a few animals is hardly the best way to protect endangered species, and say the policies cater to individuals and businesses that profit from animal exploitation.

"It's a very dangerous precedent to decide that wildlife exploitation is in the best interest of wildlife," said Adam Roberts, a senior research associate at the nonprofit Animal Welfare Institute, an advocacy group for endangered species.

The latest proposal involves an interpretation of the Endangered Species Act that deviates radically from the course followed by Republican and Democratic administrations since President Nixon signed the act in 1973.

The law established broad protection for endangered species, most of which are not native to America, and effectively prohibited trade in them.

Kenneth Stansell, assistant director for international affairs at the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, said there has been a growing realization that the Endangered Species Act provides poor countries no incentive to protect dying species.

Allowing American hunters, circuses and the pet industry to pay countries to take fixed numbers of animals from the wild would fund conservation programs for remaining animals, he said.

U.S. officials note that such trade is already open to hunters, pet importers and zoos in other Western nations. They say the idea is supported by poor countries that are home to the endangered species and would benefit from the revenue.

Officials at the Department of Interior and Fish and Wildlife, who are promoting many of the new policies, said the proposals merely implement rarely used provisions in the law.

"This is absolutely consistent with the Endangered Species Act, as written," said David Smith, assistant deputy interior secretary for fish, wildlife and parks.

"I think the nature of the beast is such that there are critics who are going to claim some kind of ulterior motive."

Animal-welfare advocates question the logic of the new approach, saying that foreign countries and groups that stand to profit will be in charge of determining how many animals can be killed or captured.

Advocates also warn that opening the door to legal trade will allow poaching to flourish.

"As soon as you place a financial price on the head of wild animals, the incentive is to kill the animal or capture them," Roberts said.

"The minute people find out they can have an easier time killing, shipping and profiting from wildlife, they will do so."

The proposals also trigger a visceral response: To many animal lovers, these species have emotional and symbolic value, and should never be captured or killed.

The Endangered Species Act prohibits removing domestic endangered species from the wild.

Until now, that protection was extended to foreign species. Explaining the change, Stansell said: "There is a recognition that these sovereign nations have a different way of managing their natural resources."

Indeed, many of the strongest advocates for "sustainable use" programs - under which some animals are "harvested" to raise money to save the rest - have been countries that are home to various endangered species.

Foreign trade groups and governments have tried for years - mostly in vain - to convince the United States that animals are no longer in limited supply or that capturing or killing fixed numbers would not drive a species to extinction.

That could change after Friday, the end of the public comment period on one proposed change.

According to the proposal, "allowing a limited number of U.S. hunters an opportunity to import trophies from this population could provide a significant increase in funds available for conservation."

John Monson, a New Hampshire trophy hunter and former chairman of that state's Fish and Game Commission, said the program would help preserve rare animals. In 1999, Monson applied for a permit to shoot and import a straight- horned markhor. He was turned down.

Monson said the money he has spent hunting trophies - including a leopard from Namibia and a bontebok antelope from South Africa - has funded conservation programs.

Monson is president-elect of Safari Club International, a national hunting advocacy group.

He agreed to an interview only in his personal capacity.

Safari Club International gave $274,000 to candidates during the 2000 election, 86 percent of it to Republicans. It also spent $5,445 printing bumper stickers for the Bush presidential campaign.

Monson has made a variety of contributions himself, including $1,000 to the Bush for President campaign.

mad mad mad
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #1 posted 10/14/03 3:18pm

Anxiety

This has got to be the product of a bitterly overimaginative mind.

Right?
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #2 posted 10/14/03 3:19pm

Teacher

mad mad mad

I don't believe this fucker... I'll make HIM an endangered species.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #3 posted 10/14/03 3:21pm

PEJ

avatar

Reply to 'This can't be true! Bush is fucking insane!'



I've been knowin.. nod






since he was a gleam in his daddys eye 's edit
[This message was edited Tue Oct 14 16:27:44 PDT 2003 by PEJ]
To Sir, with Love
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #4 posted 10/14/03 3:25pm

justkelley

avatar

im thinking someone needs to remove him now nod
THE UNOFFICIAL ORG SEX THERAPIST

the original org kisser...:K:
proud member of the 4F
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #5 posted 10/14/03 3:25pm

TRON

Anxiety said:

This has got to be the product of a bitterly overimaginative mind.

Right?

That's what I'm hoping. It seems too ridiculous to be real.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #6 posted 10/14/03 3:31pm

endorphin74

disbelief

i'm speechless
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #7 posted 10/14/03 3:33pm

AaronUniversal

avatar

justkelley said:

im thinking someone needs to remove him now nod



omfg are you suggesting assassination? disbelief
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #8 posted 10/14/03 3:34pm

XxAxX

avatar

bush isn't insane, he's just not very bright
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #9 posted 10/14/03 3:37pm

psychodelicide

avatar

Teacher said:

mad mad mad

I don't believe this fucker... I'll make HIM an endangered species.


highfive I'm with ya, Teacher. If Bush puts this idea into practice, he IS fucking insane. WTF is the world coming to?? As an animal lover, this makes me ill. pissed pissed
RIP, mom. I will forever miss and love you.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #10 posted 10/14/03 3:40pm

AaronUniversal

avatar

sounds like urban legend to me. urban legend that some poor sap at the Washington Post bought hook line & sinker.



but we'll see.



the problem i see with the veracity of this story, and the application of the program, if it is true, is that the US government would have no jurisdiction over what hunters are allowed to do in other countries when the hunters are in those countries.

in effect, all this plan would do is to no longer make it illegal for US citizens to be poachers in other countries. the poaching laws in the countries they are going to (and also international poaching laws) would remain intact, therefore changing essentially nothing.


if it's true, it's incredibly stupid, but on the other hand, it may just be eliminating redundancy in the law books. who knows. still sounds bogus to me.


oh, and wrong forum nana
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #11 posted 10/14/03 3:41pm

Byron

"Foreign trade groups and governments have tried for years - mostly in vain - to convince the United States that animals are no longer in limited supply or that capturing or killing fixed numbers would not drive a species to extinction."

That really stood out at me as I read this...it never occurred to me that for years, other countries have been trying "in vain" to convince the U.S. government to give it's OK on killing "fixed numbers" of certain species. Seems like it's usually the other way around...lol
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #12 posted 10/14/03 3:41pm

Number23

I must be a toy because I'm almost certainly being wound up.
[This message was edited Tue Oct 14 15:41:49 PDT 2003 by Number23]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #13 posted 10/14/03 3:42pm

AaronUniversal

avatar

Byron said:

"Foreign trade groups and governments have tried for years - mostly in vain - to convince the United States that animals are no longer in limited supply or that capturing or killing fixed numbers would not drive a species to extinction."

That really stood out at me as I read this...it never occurred to me that for years, other countries have been trying "in vain" to convince the U.S. government to give it's OK on killing "fixed numbers" of certain species. Seems like it's usually the other way around...lol




actually, that's true. the endangered species list and the implementation of it and sanctions against killing animals on it was so successful, that there is overpopulation in some of those species, and species are semi-frequently taken off the list. it's just a matter of each country or governmental body catching up with what's due to come off the list.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #14 posted 10/14/03 3:48pm

conch5184

i can't believe this is true..and if it is, it'll be politically self-destructive because americans are the biggest animal lovers of anyone in the world.

where did you get this, tron?
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #15 posted 10/14/03 3:48pm

TRON

AaronUniversal said:

oh, and wrong forum nana

That was intentional.

Like you've never put something in the GD that belonged elsewhere so that it'd get proper attention. nana
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #16 posted 10/14/03 3:49pm

Byron

AaronUniversal said:

Byron said:

"Foreign trade groups and governments have tried for years - mostly in vain - to convince the United States that animals are no longer in limited supply or that capturing or killing fixed numbers would not drive a species to extinction."

That really stood out at me as I read this...it never occurred to me that for years, other countries have been trying "in vain" to convince the U.S. government to give it's OK on killing "fixed numbers" of certain species. Seems like it's usually the other way around...lol




actually, that's true. the endangered species list and the implementation of it and sanctions against killing animals on it was so successful, that there is overpopulation in some of those species, and species are semi-frequently taken off the list. it's just a matter of each country or governmental body catching up with what's due to come off the list.

If that's the case, then it sounds like the Washington Post writer kinda sensationalized the story somewhat...
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #17 posted 10/14/03 3:50pm

AaronUniversal

avatar

Byron said:

AaronUniversal said:

Byron said:

"Foreign trade groups and governments have tried for years - mostly in vain - to convince the United States that animals are no longer in limited supply or that capturing or killing fixed numbers would not drive a species to extinction."

That really stood out at me as I read this...it never occurred to me that for years, other countries have been trying "in vain" to convince the U.S. government to give it's OK on killing "fixed numbers" of certain species. Seems like it's usually the other way around...lol




actually, that's true. the endangered species list and the implementation of it and sanctions against killing animals on it was so successful, that there is overpopulation in some of those species, and species are semi-frequently taken off the list. it's just a matter of each country or governmental body catching up with what's due to come off the list.

If that's the case, then it sounds like the Washington Post writer kinda sensationalized the story somewhat...



that's the Washington Post for you
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #18 posted 10/14/03 3:52pm

AaronUniversal

avatar

TRON said:

AaronUniversal said:

oh, and wrong forum nana

That was intentional.

Like you've never put something in the GD that belonged elsewhere so that it'd get proper attention. nana




I, AaronUniversal, would never dream of such a thing! batting eyes
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #19 posted 10/14/03 3:56pm

TRON

AaronUniversal said:

TRON said:

AaronUniversal said:

oh, and wrong forum nana

That was intentional.

Like you've never put something in the GD that belonged elsewhere so that it'd get proper attention. nana




I, AaronUniversal, would never dream of such a thing! batting eyes

Sorry, wrong Aaron. lol
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #20 posted 10/14/03 4:18pm

Moonbeam

My God- he's even worse than I imagined. shake mad mad
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #21 posted 10/14/03 4:20pm

AaronUniversal

avatar

let's do housecats first! all in favor?
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #22 posted 10/14/03 4:22pm

Paisley

WTF'S wrong with this guy? disbelief
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #23 posted 10/14/03 4:28pm

Blackcat

I don't know why everybody's trippin. Ain't this the same bullshit logic he been trying to shove passed our tonsils since he stole the election? I'm not surprised at all -- nothing he does surprises me anymore.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #24 posted 10/14/03 5:12pm

NovaAngel

avatar

If this is true, I propose that idiotic, illiterate, beady eyed, slack jawed, trigger happy, Texan Presidents be declared an endangered species. Happy Hunting! mr.green
[This message was edited Tue Oct 14 19:21:23 PDT 2003 by NovaAngel]
"I ordered no broth! Away with ye lest my cane find your backside!!"- Ralph Wiggum, Actor.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #25 posted 10/14/03 5:57pm

mrdespues

Paisley, what's wrong with this guy? How about the fact that he is a fucking idiot?
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #26 posted 10/14/03 6:36pm

sabaisabai

avatar

On the face of it this looks pretty dire, but I don't think the Washington Post is telling the whole story here. If, as AaronUniversal suggested, that due to past campaigns overpopulation is at play, then that alters the reasoning significantly. This story just doesn't get into the nitty gritty of the details/criteria/mechanisms etc.

As for Bush being fucking insane, that's a certainty.
[This message was edited Tue Oct 14 18:37:44 PDT 2003 by sabaisabai]
Life it ain't real funky unless you got that orgPop.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #27 posted 10/14/03 7:15pm

bratchildsfrie
nd

avatar

This makes me completely ill ~ I couldn't even finish reading it. how is this man president of our country? We look like total idiots to much of the world.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #28 posted 10/14/03 7:23pm

00769BAD

avatar

XxAxX said:

bush isn't insane, he's just not very bright



His whole family suffers from some mental deficiency...
I AM King BAD a.k.a. BAD,
YOU EITHER WANNA BE ME, OR BE JUST LIKE ME

evilking
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #29 posted 10/14/03 8:18pm

bluesbaby

avatar

Bush is the anti Christ. This pretty much confirms it.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 1 of 2 12>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > General Discussion > This can't be true! Bush is fucking insane!