IceNine said: My current lineup is:
EF 17-40 f/4L USM wowza!! EF 24-85mm f/3.5-4.5 USM geddafuckouttahere!.. that sure is purty EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM i'm gonna get me one of them! then i'll get ALL the women I have Tiffen circular polarizers and UV filters for each lens, and I have a color warming filter for nature shots. I have been pleased with the results from these lenses and filters but I have questions about various other lenses and filters. gosh... i feel so tiny | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
IceNine said: lovemachine said: You should have just sent this as an orgnote to MostBeautifulGrlNTheWorld
Is she a photographer? If so, I will certainly talk with her. Thanks. Why yes I am a photographer...Althom is too | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I will send you a nice orgnote full of info when I get home from work tonight. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
MostBeautifulGrlNTheWorld said: I will send you a nice orgnote full of info when I get home from work tonight.
I will have problems getting the orgnote, as I have been deactivated for not flaming. :LOL: SUPERJOINT RITUAL - http://www.superjointritual.com
A Lethal Dose of American Hatred | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
IceNine said: Anyone? Byron?
Hell, I dunno...I just those $4.99 disposable ones from Walmart...:O | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
IceNine said: MostBeautifulGrlNTheWorld said: I will send you a nice orgnote full of info when I get home from work tonight.
I will have problems getting the orgnote, as I have been deactivated for not flaming. :LOL: . [This message was edited Fri Oct 3 21:25:30 PDT 2003 by MrBliss] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Check ur orgnotes satan | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
don't know much bout the techy side to photography, but the way I see it, the grainier the better! D | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Moxy said: don't know much bout the techy side to photography, but the way I see it, the grainier the better! D
Actually its just the opposite...you do not want to see the grains in a photograph...graininess usually means your camera is bad | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
MostBeautifulGrlNTheWorld said: Moxy said: don't know much bout the techy side to photography, but the way I see it, the grainier the better! D
Actually its just the opposite...you do not want to see the grains in a photograph...graininess usually means your camera is bad Don't tell him that...I think her had it right the first time. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
althom said: MostBeautifulGrlNTheWorld said: Moxy said: don't know much bout the techy side to photography, but the way I see it, the grainier the better! D
Actually its just the opposite...you do not want to see the grains in a photograph...graininess usually means your camera is bad Don't tell him that...I think her had it right the first time. Uhh ok.. Cause people just love to be able to see pixels in their photos Ain't pixelization grand [This message was edited Sat Oct 4 21:52:54 PDT 2003 by MostBeautifulGrlNTheWorld] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
MostBeautifulGrlNTheWorld said: althom said: MostBeautifulGrlNTheWorld said: Moxy said: don't know much bout the techy side to photography, but the way I see it, the grainier the better! D
Actually its just the opposite...you do not want to see the grains in a photograph...graininess usually means your camera is bad Don't tell him that...I think her had it right the first time. Uhh ok.. Okie dokie! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
althom said: MostBeautifulGrlNTheWorld said: althom said: MostBeautifulGrlNTheWorld said: Moxy said: don't know much bout the techy side to photography, but the way I see it, the grainier the better! D
Actually its just the opposite...you do not want to see the grains in a photograph...graininess usually means your camera is bad Don't tell him that...I think her had it right the first time. Uhh ok.. Okie dokie! I edited see above | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
MostBeautifulGrlNTheWorld said: althom said: MostBeautifulGrlNTheWorld said: althom said: MostBeautifulGrlNTheWorld said: Moxy said: don't know much bout the techy side to photography, but the way I see it, the grainier the better! D
Actually its just the opposite...you do not want to see the grains in a photograph...graininess usually means your camera is bad Don't tell him that...I think her had it right the first time. Uhh ok.. Okie dokie! I edited see above Oh crap...I'm always doing that. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
althom said: MostBeautifulGrlNTheWorld said: althom said: MostBeautifulGrlNTheWorld said: althom said: MostBeautifulGrlNTheWorld said: Moxy said: don't know much bout the techy side to photography, but the way I see it, the grainier the better! D
Actually its just the opposite...you do not want to see the grains in a photograph...graininess usually means your camera is bad Don't tell him that...I think her had it right the first time. Uhh ok.. Okie dokie! I edited see above Oh crap...I'm always doing that. Silly boy | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
MostBeautifulGrlNTheWorld said: Moxy said: don't know much bout the techy side to photography, but the way I see it, the grainier the better! D
Actually its just the opposite...you do not want to see the grains in a photograph...graininess usually means your camera is bad High speed film like 400, 800, 1600, and 3200 allow you to get shots with faster shutter speeds, especially in low light conditions. But the downside is that these films are grainy. Low speed films like 50, 100, 200 require a wider apeture and/or a longer exposure time, but they're less grainy and provide better detail and color saturation. Digital cameras are suprisingly similar. You can often toggle them between 100,200,400, and 800 ISO. And the same thing occurs, the higher you go, the more speckled your image becomes. There are alot of B&W photographers who love to use grain in their images. Especially if they're shooting edgy or fringe subjects. Ernst Haas used grain in some of his work. The second photo is a really bad reproduction, it looks much better up close. [This message was edited Sun Oct 5 9:08:00 PDT 2003 by Tom] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Tom said:[quote] MostBeautifulGrlNTheWorld said: Moxy said: don't know much bout the techy side to photography, but the way I see it, the grainier the better! D
Actually its just the opposite...you do not want to see the grains in a photograph...graininess usually means your camera is bad High speed film like 400, 800, 1600, and 3200 allow you to get shots with faster shutter speeds, especially in low light conditions. But the downside is that these films are grainy. Low speed films like 50, 100, 200 require a wider apeture and/or a longer exposure time, but they're less grainy and provide better detail and color saturation. Digital cameras are suprisingly similar. You can often toggle them between 100,200,400, and 800 ISO. And the same thing occurs, the higher you go, the more speckled your image becomes. There are alot of B&W photographers who love to use grain in their images. Especially if they're shooting edgy or fringe subjects. Ernst Haas used grain in some of his work. The second photo is a really bad reproduction, it looks much better up close. _____ I agree with what you say cause it is true...but here is my experience...I have a camera...and no matter the film speed you use in it...all the pictures you get from it are grainy as hell no matter if they are in focus or not. Now me personally I HATE seeing the grains in pics...so I took it in to have it looked at, come to find out the lense was bad. So I just bought another camera not like I need anymore I hate grain some like grain each to their own I suppose [This message was edited Sun Oct 5 13:13:30 PDT 2003 by MostBeautifulGrlNTheWorld] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Tom said:[quote] MostBeautifulGrlNTheWorld said: Moxy said: don't know much bout the techy side to photography, but the way I see it, the grainier the better! D
Actually its just the opposite...you do not want to see the grains in a photograph...graininess usually means your camera is bad Actually, its not the opposite, its what I like. There are alot of B&W photographers who love to use grain in their images. Especially if they're shooting edgy or fringe subjects. Thanks Tom. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Moxy said:[quote] Tom said: MostBeautifulGrlNTheWorld said: Moxy said: don't know much bout the techy side to photography, but the way I see it, the grainier the better! D
Actually its just the opposite...you do not want to see the grains in a photograph...graininess usually means your camera is bad Actually, its not the opposite, its what I like. There are alot of B&W photographers who love to use grain in their images. Especially if they're shooting edgy or fringe subjects. Thanks Tom. Actually I am still gonna disagree with you to a point. But as I said above each to their own...you like what you like and I like what I like. I was speaking from my experiences which are different from your. Thanks Jessica | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |