Was intended ONLY as a joke. Nothing more nothing less!
[This message was edited Sun Aug 10 15:49:47 PDT 2003 by Chico319]

That's a pretty poor Photoshop effort, by any standard

No that baby looks real.

ian said:

I use photoshop everday and its more then a poor effort it is a horrid one at the very minimum.

pejman said:

..

either way, be it a poor or good image

its fucked up babies/children

should not be presented in this manner

..

Maybe we should worry less about the Photoshop, and a little more about the subject.

I'm the last one to be a kill-joy, but does anyone else feel a little uncomfortable with this image?

That's not Pete Townsend holding that baby is it?

youngsoulrebel said:

agreed

RedCorvette69 said:

Heh, you are right of course. However it looks like something that was done for a joke, rather than a serious attempt at sexualising (is that a word?) a child. Doesn't make any less crass though.

youngsoulrebel said:

Come to think of it... your right step! I'd hate to be that lil kid and grow up with my pic on the net without my authorization.

RedCorvette69 said:

youngsoulrebel said:

yea i agree

ian said:

Absolutely, I see it as nothing more than a joke, just a little mis-guided...

There are other jokes that can be made.

Like this one:

My dog's got no nose.

RedCorvette69 said:

how does he smell?

.
[This message was edited Sun Aug 10 15:47:53 PDT 2003 by Chico319]

MrBliss said:

Through his huge Photoshop'd cock!

Wow, Michael Jackson looks like he's had more work done. Why doesn't the baby have a scarf on his head?

His big head, that is.


I mean, the big head with the eyes.

Anxiety said:

Chico319 said:

here cover your head with this you joker..

pejman said:

As long as it has never been used...by anyone but you!
Wait! I wouldn't be ale to breathe in that!! U tryin' to kill me? I thought we was tight!?


Much lube needed edit!
[This message was edited Sun Aug 10 16:05:14 PDT 2003 by Chico319]

cover your we tight man!!!