independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > General Discussion > This is for all you music "sharing" people out there: Record industry to sue downloaders
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 2 of 3 <123>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Reply #30 posted 06/26/03 6:48am

IceNine

avatar

teller said:

IceNine said:

I wouldn't expect the RIAA to care about minor things like recording a song from a radio broadcast. Recording a song from a radio broadcast is a one-off thing and it is not spread like a virus to thieves all over the planet who are anxiously awaiting the opportunity to steal.

Millions of thieves. A nation of theives. Something's not right with this picture when normal everyday people are doing this...the world has changed, and the music industry simply has to come up with a better offer...or die.


The thing is that most people don't realize that it is a crime or they don't feel like it should be a crime, therefore more people are doing it. Would these same people shoplift from a store? No, probably not. It just doesn't feel like theft to many people since there is no physical product... the same issues are affecting the computer software industry as well.
SUPERJOINT RITUAL - http://www.superjointritual.com
A Lethal Dose of American Hatred
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #31 posted 06/26/03 6:50am

CAMILLE4U

avatar

IceNine said:

teller said:

IceNine said:

I wouldn't expect the RIAA to care about minor things like recording a song from a radio broadcast. Recording a song from a radio broadcast is a one-off thing and it is not spread like a virus to thieves all over the planet who are anxiously awaiting the opportunity to steal.

Millions of thieves. A nation of theives. Something's not right with this picture when normal everyday people are doing this...the world has changed, and the music industry simply has to come up with a better offer...or die.


The thing is that most people don't realize that it is a crime or they don't feel like it should be a crime, therefore more people are doing it. Would these same people shoplift from a store? No, probably not. It just doesn't feel like theft to many people since there is no physical product... the same issues are affecting the computer software industry as well.


True. I think most people don't realise he seriousness of it either. Most people think it's no big deal as nothing has phiscally been taken from anyone. People should be made aware that unless the companies are funded they are going to start producing shit (probably).
NOTE: THIS ACCOUNT IS NOW CLOSED. PLEASE CONTACT “K A M eye L L E
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #32 posted 06/26/03 6:51am

CAMILLE4U

avatar

CAMILLE4U said:

IceNine said:

teller said:

IceNine said:

I wouldn't expect the RIAA to care about minor things like recording a song from a radio broadcast. Recording a song from a radio broadcast is a one-off thing and it is not spread like a virus to thieves all over the planet who are anxiously awaiting the opportunity to steal.

Millions of thieves. A nation of theives. Something's not right with this picture when normal everyday people are doing this...the world has changed, and the music industry simply has to come up with a better offer...or die.


The thing is that most people don't realize that it is a crime or they don't feel like it should be a crime, therefore more people are doing it. Would these same people shoplift from a store? No, probably not. It just doesn't feel like theft to many people since there is no physical product... the same issues are affecting the computer software industry as well.


True. I think most people don't realise he seriousness of it either. Most people think it's no big deal as nothing has phiscally been taken from anyone. People should be made aware that unless the companies are funded they are going to start producing shit (probably).


Actually, they've already started!
NOTE: THIS ACCOUNT IS NOW CLOSED. PLEASE CONTACT “K A M eye L L E
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #33 posted 06/26/03 6:58am

teller

avatar

CAMILLE4U said:

CAMILLE4U said:

True. I think most people don't realise he seriousness of it either. Most people think it's no big deal as nothing has phiscally been taken from anyone. People should be made aware that unless the companies are funded they are going to start producing shit (probably).


Actually, they've already started!

Exactly!

Imagine if you could walk into a store with a matter replicator...you scan the Preparation H and go home and POOF! You have a duplicate box of Preparation H. Did you steal from the store? No...did you steal from Preparation H company? Maybe... Can you turn back the clock of technological history? NO...new business models must be created. People WILL clone their own Preparation H, and they shouldn't feel guilty about it.
[This message was edited Thu Jun 26 7:00:14 PDT 2003 by teller]
Fear is the mind-killer.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #34 posted 06/26/03 6:58am

IceNine

avatar

CAMILLE4U said:

CAMILLE4U said:

IceNine said:

teller said:

IceNine said:

I wouldn't expect the RIAA to care about minor things like recording a song from a radio broadcast. Recording a song from a radio broadcast is a one-off thing and it is not spread like a virus to thieves all over the planet who are anxiously awaiting the opportunity to steal.

Millions of thieves. A nation of theives. Something's not right with this picture when normal everyday people are doing this...the world has changed, and the music industry simply has to come up with a better offer...or die.


The thing is that most people don't realize that it is a crime or they don't feel like it should be a crime, therefore more people are doing it. Would these same people shoplift from a store? No, probably not. It just doesn't feel like theft to many people since there is no physical product... the same issues are affecting the computer software industry as well.


True. I think most people don't realise he seriousness of it either. Most people think it's no big deal as nothing has phiscally been taken from anyone. People should be made aware that unless the companies are funded they are going to start producing shit (probably).


Actually, they've already started!


Right and right... :LOL:
SUPERJOINT RITUAL - http://www.superjointritual.com
A Lethal Dose of American Hatred
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #35 posted 06/26/03 7:04am

CAMILLE4U

avatar

I've just worked it out. That's why we get shit on the telly like S-club-jns. Children are cheap to employ and they get to sell tons of records. That's how they make up for the money they lose.

Imagine all the great bands out there, playing in garages or makeing their music in their bedrooms that we havn't heard of because of piracy.
NOTE: THIS ACCOUNT IS NOW CLOSED. PLEASE CONTACT “K A M eye L L E
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #36 posted 06/26/03 7:07am

teller

avatar

CAMILLE4U said:

I've just worked it out. That's why we get shit on the telly like S-club-jns. Children are cheap to employ and they get to sell tons of records. That's how they make up for the money they lose.

Imagine all the great bands out there, playing in garages or makeing their music in their bedrooms that we havn't heard of because of piracy.

Oh...and the music industry was so great before Napster existed?
Fear is the mind-killer.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #37 posted 06/26/03 7:10am

IceNine

avatar

teller said:

CAMILLE4U said:

I've just worked it out. That's why we get shit on the telly like S-club-jns. Children are cheap to employ and they get to sell tons of records. That's how they make up for the money they lose.

Imagine all the great bands out there, playing in garages or makeing their music in their bedrooms that we havn't heard of because of piracy.

Oh...and the music industry was so great before Napster existed?


The music industry sucks, but that is not the issue at hand. The issue is that people are stealing material at an alarming rate... you could compare this to the Boston Tea Party if you wanted to make it into an ideological rebellion against tyranny in the corporate music world... but that isn't really the issue. The issue is that many people believe that it is okay to steal music.
SUPERJOINT RITUAL - http://www.superjointritual.com
A Lethal Dose of American Hatred
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #38 posted 06/26/03 7:14am

VinaBlue

avatar

CAMILLE4U said:

jthad1129 said:

so i propose renting cds.


I will open a store, like blockbuster, or Tower and carry every title. Have a subscription service and you can rent any cd in the store, overnight or up to three days, for $3.00 (like a video/dvd rental), box sets would be $5

hey, i think I have something here


Me too, open your store and I'll also buy a hugh quantity of blank CD-R off U. tease


lol

Hey Camille, the new slogan for the NFO is:

"You wont get sued for downloading this!"
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #39 posted 06/26/03 7:16am

Muse2noPharaoh

teller said:

IceNine said:

Copying material that is offered for sale and is protected by copyright law is illegal and is equal to stealing the physical goods in that the thief does not purchase the tangible product as would have been necessary if copying was impossible.

So you would advocate suing everyone in the 1980's who shared music on cassette with friends?



That is a good point. Say they do wipe out the scourge across the land that download music. What is to stop the masses from simply burning CDs and trading them either way? Or file trading without utilizing the big outfits out there?
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #40 posted 06/26/03 7:17am

teller

avatar

IceNine said:

teller said:

CAMILLE4U said:

I've just worked it out. That's why we get shit on the telly like S-club-jns. Children are cheap to employ and they get to sell tons of records. That's how they make up for the money they lose.

Imagine all the great bands out there, playing in garages or makeing their music in their bedrooms that we havn't heard of because of piracy.

Oh...and the music industry was so great before Napster existed?


The music industry sucks, but that is not the issue at hand. The issue is that people are stealing material at an alarming rate... you could compare this to the Boston Tea Party if you wanted to make it into an ideological rebellion against tyranny in the corporate music world... but that isn't really the issue. The issue is that many people believe that it is okay to steal music.

Deal with my Preparation H replicator scenario.
Fear is the mind-killer.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #41 posted 06/26/03 7:18am

teller

avatar

Muse2noPharaoh said:

teller said:

IceNine said:

Copying material that is offered for sale and is protected by copyright law is illegal and is equal to stealing the physical goods in that the thief does not purchase the tangible product as would have been necessary if copying was impossible.

So you would advocate suing everyone in the 1980's who shared music on cassette with friends?



That is a good point. Say they do wipe out the scourge across the land that download music. What is to stop the masses from simply burning CDs and trading them either way? Or file trading without utilizing the big outfits out there?

Tis a force of nature...or a force of history...there is no stopping the change. They must adapt or die. Telling millions that they are immoral or criminal isn't the way...
Fear is the mind-killer.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #42 posted 06/26/03 7:20am

CAMILLE4U

avatar

VinaBlue said:

CAMILLE4U said:

jthad1129 said:

so i propose renting cds.


I will open a store, like blockbuster, or Tower and carry every title. Have a subscription service and you can rent any cd in the store, overnight or up to three days, for $3.00 (like a video/dvd rental), box sets would be $5

hey, i think I have something here


Me too, open your store and I'll also buy a hugh quantity of blank CD-R off U. tease


lol

Hey Camille, the new slogan for the NFO is:

"You wont get sued for downloading this!"


lol Nice 1
NOTE: THIS ACCOUNT IS NOW CLOSED. PLEASE CONTACT “K A M eye L L E
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #43 posted 06/26/03 7:20am

CAMILLE4U

avatar

teller said:

CAMILLE4U said:

I've just worked it out. That's why we get shit on the telly like S-club-jns. Children are cheap to employ and they get to sell tons of records. That's how they make up for the money they lose.

Imagine all the great bands out there, playing in garages or makeing their music in their bedrooms that we havn't heard of because of piracy.

Oh...and the music industry was so great before Napster existed?


Good point.
NOTE: THIS ACCOUNT IS NOW CLOSED. PLEASE CONTACT “K A M eye L L E
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #44 posted 06/26/03 7:20am

VinaBlue

avatar

IceNine said:

teller said:

CAMILLE4U said:

I've just worked it out. That's why we get shit on the telly like S-club-jns. Children are cheap to employ and they get to sell tons of records. That's how they make up for the money they lose.

Imagine all the great bands out there, playing in garages or makeing their music in their bedrooms that we havn't heard of because of piracy.

Oh...and the music industry was so great before Napster existed?


The music industry sucks, but that is not the issue at hand. The issue is that people are stealing material at an alarming rate... you could compare this to the Boston Tea Party if you wanted to make it into an ideological rebellion against tyranny in the corporate music world... but that isn't really the issue. The issue is that many people believe that it is okay to steal music.


What about the fact that mp3s are usually about 10% of the digital information of a song? Has anyone ever brought that up? They're only "stealing" 10% of the song!!! There is some quality loss in mp3s for that reason. Most people don't care, but some of us do.


Camille, you're right about many great bands not being heard, but it's because the music industry wont sign them. They don't care about art, they just care about money. Just like the fast food industry doesn't care about your health, they just want to make a fast buck.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #45 posted 06/26/03 7:23am

IceNine

avatar

teller said:

Muse2noPharaoh said:

teller said:

IceNine said:

Copying material that is offered for sale and is protected by copyright law is illegal and is equal to stealing the physical goods in that the thief does not purchase the tangible product as would have been necessary if copying was impossible.

So you would advocate suing everyone in the 1980's who shared music on cassette with friends?



That is a good point. Say they do wipe out the scourge across the land that download music. What is to stop the masses from simply burning CDs and trading them either way? Or file trading without utilizing the big outfits out there?

Tis a force of nature...or a force of history...there is no stopping the change. They must adapt or die. Telling millions that they are immoral or criminal isn't the way...


Stealing is a force of nature and a force of history... many laws have been created to punish people for theft.
SUPERJOINT RITUAL - http://www.superjointritual.com
A Lethal Dose of American Hatred
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #46 posted 06/26/03 7:24am

teller

avatar

IceNine said:

Stealing is a force of nature and a force of history... many laws have been created to punish people for theft.

Punishing an entire nation?! omfg

No...as Captain Kirk once said about the Klingons, I say about the RIAA..."let them die."
Fear is the mind-killer.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #47 posted 06/26/03 7:26am

Muse2noPharaoh

teller said:

Muse2noPharaoh said:

teller said:

IceNine said:

Copying material that is offered for sale and is protected by copyright law is illegal and is equal to stealing the physical goods in that the thief does not purchase the tangible product as would have been necessary if copying was impossible.

So you would advocate suing everyone in the 1980's who shared music on cassette with friends?



That is a good point. Say they do wipe out the scourge across the land that download music. What is to stop the masses from simply burning CDs and trading them either way? Or file trading without utilizing the big outfits out there?

Tis a force of nature...or a force of history...there is no stopping the change. They must adapt or die. Telling millions that they are immoral or criminal isn't the way...


It just isn't a solution. I would doubt the numbers of people that get the music without paying would hardly shift. So I am inclined to agree with you. As well, last time I checked the official "losses" recorded by RIAA were very minuscule. Hardly over whelming numbers.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #48 posted 06/26/03 7:27am

IceNine

avatar

teller said:

IceNine said:

Stealing is a force of nature and a force of history... many laws have been created to punish people for theft.

Punishing an entire nation?! omfg

No...as Captain Kirk once said about the Klingons, I say about the RIAA..."let them die."


If an entire nation of people started stealing, they should be punished. As much as I dislike the music industry, I dislike people trying to dismiss copyright law and act like theft is acceptable.

The number of people perpetrating the crime should not factor into the equation... If 10,000 people started looting the shops on Fifth Avenue, should all of them be punished for stealing? Yes.
SUPERJOINT RITUAL - http://www.superjointritual.com
A Lethal Dose of American Hatred
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #49 posted 06/26/03 7:28am

IceNine

avatar

Muse2noPharaoh said:

teller said:

Muse2noPharaoh said:

teller said:

IceNine said:

Copying material that is offered for sale and is protected by copyright law is illegal and is equal to stealing the physical goods in that the thief does not purchase the tangible product as would have been necessary if copying was impossible.

So you would advocate suing everyone in the 1980's who shared music on cassette with friends?



That is a good point. Say they do wipe out the scourge across the land that download music. What is to stop the masses from simply burning CDs and trading them either way? Or file trading without utilizing the big outfits out there?

Tis a force of nature...or a force of history...there is no stopping the change. They must adapt or die. Telling millions that they are immoral or criminal isn't the way...


It just isn't a solution. I would doubt the numbers of people that get the music without paying would hardly shift. So I am inclined to agree with you. As well, last time I checked the official "losses" recorded by RIAA were very minuscule. Hardly over whelming numbers.


So... stealing small items at your local store is cool too, because the losses are not overwhelming???

:LOL:
SUPERJOINT RITUAL - http://www.superjointritual.com
A Lethal Dose of American Hatred
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #50 posted 06/26/03 7:29am

CAMILLE4U

avatar

VinaBlue said:

...it's because the music industry wont sign them. They don't care about art, they just care about money. Just like the fast food industry doesn't care about your health, they just want to make a fast buck.


star Quote of the day award (and it's only 3:30pm)
NOTE: THIS ACCOUNT IS NOW CLOSED. PLEASE CONTACT “K A M eye L L E
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #51 posted 06/26/03 7:31am

teller

avatar

IceNine said:

If an entire nation of people started stealing, they should be punished. As much as I dislike the music industry, I dislike people trying to dismiss copyright law and act like theft is acceptable.

The number of people perpetrating the crime should not factor into the equation... If 10,000 people started looting the shops on Fifth Avenue, should all of them be punished for stealing? Yes.

Copyright law never anticipated the Internet. The principle of the law is correct, but you cannot sit there in denial...new business models must be created, better marketing must be achieved, prices must reflect the new reality. When millions of regular folk become thieves overnight, it isn't a worldwide lapse of morality--it's a fundamental change of the playing field. Adapt or die.
Fear is the mind-killer.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #52 posted 06/26/03 7:32am

Muse2noPharaoh

IceNine said:

Muse2noPharaoh said:

teller said:

Muse2noPharaoh said:

teller said:

IceNine said:

Copying material that is offered for sale and is protected by copyright law is illegal and is equal to stealing the physical goods in that the thief does not purchase the tangible product as would have been necessary if copying was impossible.

So you would advocate suing everyone in the 1980's who shared music on cassette with friends?



That is a good point. Say they do wipe out the scourge across the land that download music. What is to stop the masses from simply burning CDs and trading them either way? Or file trading without utilizing the big outfits out there?

Tis a force of nature...or a force of history...there is no stopping the change. They must adapt or die. Telling millions that they are immoral or criminal isn't the way...


It just isn't a solution. I would doubt the numbers of people that get the music without paying would hardly shift. So I am inclined to agree with you. As well, last time I checked the official "losses" recorded by RIAA were very minuscule. Hardly over whelming numbers.


So... stealing small items at your local store is cool too, because the losses are not overwhelming???

:LOL:



I never argued the morality of it. I recently have purchased several copies of one artists album as many people wanted it and I knew he was making his living from it. I also purchased the music right from the artist snd know he earned more then the standard $1.00 per CD. What I did say was, "it just isn't a solution".
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #53 posted 06/26/03 7:35am

jthad1129

avatar

CAMILLE4U said:

jthad1129 said:

so i propose renting cds.


I will open a store, like blockbuster, or Tower and carry every title. Have a subscription service and you can rent any cd in the store, overnight or up to three days, for $3.00 (like a video/dvd rental), box sets would be $5

hey, i think I have something here


Me too, open your store and I'll also buy a hugh quantity of blank CD-R off U. tease


exactly, that's the point. I pay $11 wholesale for the new Annie Lennox cd, cdr it 10 times and put those 10 on the shelf for rent at $3 a pop. If 4 of the copies rent once, I brake even, rest is $$$, if someone does not return it, I really have lost nothing but the small print says i get to charge your cc $16 for replacement of the cd, packaging etc.

What you do with it when you get home is not my business. Tape it onto cassette, cdr, upload it, whatever.
---------------------------------
rainbow Funny and charming as usual
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #54 posted 06/26/03 7:51am

ButterscotchPi
mp

avatar

IceNine said:

teller said:

IceNine said:

Stealing is a force of nature and a force of history... many laws have been created to punish people for theft.

Punishing an entire nation?! omfg

No...as Captain Kirk once said about the Klingons, I say about the RIAA..."let them die."


If an entire nation of people started stealing, they should be punished. As much as I dislike the music industry, I dislike people trying to dismiss copyright law and act like theft is acceptable.

The number of people perpetrating the crime should not factor into the equation... If 10,000 people started looting the shops on Fifth Avenue, should all of them be punished for stealing? Yes.



A truer statement on this topic hasn't been said. But i wanted to point out a huge misconception on the topic. Yes the cost of MAKING cd's has gone down. The cost of PRODUCING ALBUMS HASN'T. Studio costs, advertising costs, video budgets, placement at radio, all have GONE UP. And all those things factor into the cost of a cd. When you go into a Best Buy and all the cd's are between $9.99 - $13.99, they do that at a loss. They regularly sell cd's BELOW what they pay for them. They can afford to do this becuase the markup on everything else they sell is so high. And the goal is to drive the mom and pop music stores out of business. And when they've done that and there's no competition, the prices WILL GO UP.

Just thought you might like to know.
[This message was edited Thu Jun 26 7:52:44 PDT 2003 by ButterscotchPimp]
http://www.facebook.com/p...111?ref=ts
y'all gone keep messin' around wit me and turn me back to the old me......
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #55 posted 06/26/03 7:53am

teller

avatar

ButterscotchPimp said:

A truer statement on this topic hasn't been said. But i wanted to point out a huge misconception on the topic. Yes the cost of MAKING cd's has gone down. The cost of PRODUCING ALBUMS HASN'T. Studio costs, advertising costs, video budgets, placement at radio, all have GONE UP. And all those things factor into the cost of a cd. When you go into a Best Buy and all the cd's are between $9.99 - $13.99, they do that at a lost. They regularly sell cd's BELOW what they pay for them. They can afford to do this becuase the markup on everything else they sell is so high. And the goal is to drive the mom and pop music stores out of business. And when they've done that and there's no competition, the prices WILL GO UP.

Just thought you might like to know.

This is bullshit. Even without Mom and Pop, it's not like you don't have a choice between various record stores, Walmart, Amazon, eBay. It always amazes me when people turn their nose up and large chains with lower prices.
Fear is the mind-killer.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #56 posted 06/26/03 7:55am

POOK

avatar

ButterscotchPimp said:

IceNine said:

teller said:

IceNine said:

Stealing is a force of nature and a force of history... many laws have been created to punish people for theft.

Punishing an entire nation?! omfg

No...as Captain Kirk once said about the Klingons, I say about the RIAA..."let them die."


If an entire nation of people started stealing, they should be punished. As much as I dislike the music industry, I dislike people trying to dismiss copyright law and act like theft is acceptable.

The number of people perpetrating the crime should not factor into the equation... If 10,000 people started looting the shops on Fifth Avenue, should all of them be punished for stealing? Yes.



A truer statement on this topic hasn't been said. But i wanted to point out a huge misconception on the topic. Yes the cost of MAKING cd's has gone down. The cost of PRODUCING ALBUMS HASN'T. Studio costs, advertising costs, video budgets, placement at radio, all have GONE UP. And all those things factor into the cost of a cd. When you go into a Best Buy and all the cd's are between $9.99 - $13.99, they do that at a loss. They regularly sell cd's BELOW what they pay for them. They can afford to do this becuase the markup on everything else they sell is so high. And the goal is to drive the mom and pop music stores out of business. And when they've done that and there's no competition, the prices WILL GO UP.

Just thought you might like to know.
[This message was edited Thu Jun 26 7:52:44 PDT 2003 by ButterscotchPimp]


THAT RECORD INDUSTRY FAULT

WHITE STRIPEY MAKE CHEAP RECORD

EVEN NEW METALLICA NOT EXPENSIVE LIKE OLD METALLICA

AND KORN NOT REALLY NEED FOUR MILLION TO MAKE RECORD

MAKE CHEAPER RECORD

IT SOUND BETTER!

EVERYONE WIN!

NIRVANA MAKE RECORD FOR SIX HUNDRED

WHY CANT LINKIN PARK

IT BECAUSE THEY NEED FAKE MUSIC FROM STUDIO

HIRE GOOD BAND

AND THAT NOT PROBLEM ANYMORE

PS BUY INDEPENDENT!

P o o |/,
P o o |\
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #57 posted 06/26/03 8:33am

CAMILLE4U

avatar

teller said:

Copyright law never anticipated the Internet.


I think there are a lot of laws that never anticipated the Internet.
NOTE: THIS ACCOUNT IS NOW CLOSED. PLEASE CONTACT “K A M eye L L E
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #58 posted 06/26/03 8:35am

VinaBlue

avatar

CAMILLE4U said:

VinaBlue said:

...it's because the music industry wont sign them. They don't care about art, they just care about money. Just like the fast food industry doesn't care about your health, they just want to make a fast buck.


star Quote of the day award (and it's only 3:30pm)



Ah, thank you. It's only 8:30am here. mr.green

Should I put that in my sigy?

hmmm
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #59 posted 06/26/03 8:38am

CAMILLE4U

avatar

VinaBlue said:

CAMILLE4U said:

VinaBlue said:

...it's because the music industry wont sign them. They don't care about art, they just care about money. Just like the fast food industry doesn't care about your health, they just want to make a fast buck.


star Quote of the day award (and it's only 3:30pm)



Ah, thank you. It's only 8:30am here. mr.green

Should I put that in my sigy?

hmmm


Yeah, if U like!
NOTE: THIS ACCOUNT IS NOW CLOSED. PLEASE CONTACT “K A M eye L L E
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 2 of 3 <123>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > General Discussion > This is for all you music "sharing" people out there: Record industry to sue downloaders