Forums >
General Discussion > I didn't realize how dead this place was untill the new trailer for 'Superman' just came out and there is no thread
Thread started 12/19/24 10:48pmnayroo2002
|
I didn't realize how dead this place was untill the new trailer for 'Superman' just came out and there is no thread "Whatever skin we're in
we all need 2 b friends" |
| Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #1 posted 12/20/24 12:26am
Reply #2 posted 12/20/24 12:32am
ShellyMcG |
I'm not sure what to expect from this. It's the same guy who did the Guardians Of The Galaxy so it could be a disaster. The trailer looks decent though. Not sure about that Lex Luthor though.
I'm a huge fan of the first two Christopher Reeve movies and I even enjoyed the third movie in a funny kind of way. I barely remember the 4th movie but I know I hated it. I did really like the one with Kevin Spacey too. The guy who plays Superman in that was really good. I didn't really like the Cavill movies. They were kind of dour and boring. This new movie looks like it might fall somewhere in between all of those. If I like it as much as Superman 3 then I'll be happy enough with that. I don't think it will rank up there with the first two though. |
| Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #3 posted 12/20/24 4:58pm
kpowers
|
nayroo2002 said:
No comment? Really???
Why didn't you start a thread? |
| Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #4 posted 12/20/24 5:11pm
kpowers
|
ShellyMcG said:
I'm not sure what to expect from this. It's the same guy who did the Guardians Of The Galaxy so it could be a disaster. The trailer looks decent though. Not sure about that Lex Luthor though. I'm a huge fan of the first two Christopher Reeve movies and I even enjoyed the third movie in a funny kind of way. I barely remember the 4th movie but I know I hated it. I did really like the one with Kevin Spacey too. The guy who plays Superman in that was really good. I didn't really like the Cavill movies. They were kind of dour and boring. This new movie looks like it might fall somewhere in between all of those. If I like it as much as Superman 3 then I'll be happy enough with that. I don't think it will rank up there with the first two though.
I agree with all your takes. Loved Superman Returns. I know Guy Gardner is in this movie, probably there for comic relief. |
| Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #5 posted 12/20/24 6:51pm
nayroo2002
|
kpowers said:
nayroo2002 said:
No comment? Really???
Why didn't you start a thread?
That's a fine idea, Oscar Mayer! To me, this new iteration looks a bit hokey with that CGI dog. I actually liked the Cavill-acted version the best. I guess Gunn had to change it up and make it brighter and friendlier for the masses. "Whatever skin we're in
we all need 2 b friends" |
| Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #6 posted 12/20/24 8:10pm
purplethunder3 121 |
I was pleasantly surprised by how much I liked Superman Returns. It hit sll the right notes for myself and my son when we went to see it in a movie theater in 2006. As a huge fan of the Christopher Reeve movies (especially the first two as Shelly pointed out) I think it did a great job paying tribute to those movies. I might go see the new one--depending on what the reponse is after it comes out. "Music gives a soul to the universe, wings to the mind, flight to the imagination and life to everything." --Plato
https://youtu.be/CVwv9LZMah0 |
| Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #7 posted 12/20/24 10:36pm
ColonelAngus |
it has died down alittle lol .... i just came back a few days ago and was surprised at the lack of threads .... |
| Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #8 posted 12/21/24 12:36pm
ShellyMcG |
purplethunder3121 said: I was pleasantly surprised by how much I liked Superman Returns. It hit sll the right notes for myself and my son when we went to see it in a movie theater in 2006. As a huge fan of the Christopher Reeve movies (especially the first two as Shelly pointed out) I think it did a great job paying tribute to those movies. I might go see the new one--depending on what the reponse is after it comes out. I kind of expected to hate the new one because I really don't like the Guardians movies but the trailer kind of sold it to me. I don't want to see any more trailers or read any reviews for it until I've seen the movie for myself. I showed the trailer to my son and the first thing he said was that it looks like "those really old Spider-Man movies". Can't help but feel slightly triggered by that "really old" part but I actually think he's got a point. Those Spider-Man movies felt like real comic book movies. They weren't trying to be heavy dramas but they also weren't embarrassed to be comic book movies like a lot of recent Marvel movies. I do kind of get a similar vibe from Superman. Now, whether my son was thinking about it that deeply is up for debate. He was probably just talking about how colourful it was |
| Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #9 posted 12/21/24 12:43pm
ShellyMcG |
nayroo2002 said:
kpowers said:
nayroo2002 said:
No comment? Really???
Why didn't you start a thread?
That's a fine idea, Oscar Mayer! To me, this new iteration looks a bit hokey with that CGI dog. I actually liked the Cavill-acted version the best. I guess Gunn had to change it up and make it brighter and friendlier for the masses. I like the dog. My bf is a massive Superman nerd and he actually had a dog called Krypto when he was a kid. So it's kind of nice for him too. I feel kind of bad for Cavill. He looked like he could have been a really good Superman but he never really got a good movie. I just don't know why they tried to make it so dark and devoid of fun. He didn't even have the red trunks. Or the crystal fortress thing. Or a Lex Luthor. |
| Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #10 posted 12/21/24 12:47pm
ShellyMcG |
kpowers said:
ShellyMcG said: I'm not sure what to expect from this. It's the same guy who did the Guardians Of The Galaxy so it could be a disaster. The trailer looks decent though. Not sure about that Lex Luthor though. I'm a huge fan of the first two Christopher Reeve movies and I even enjoyed the third movie in a funny kind of way. I barely remember the 4th movie but I know I hated it. I did really like the one with Kevin Spacey too. The guy who plays Superman in that was really good. I didn't really like the Cavill movies. They were kind of dour and boring. This new movie looks like it might fall somewhere in between all of those. If I like it as much as Superman 3 then I'll be happy enough with that. I don't think it will rank up there with the first two though.
I agree with all your takes. Loved Superman Returns. I know Guy Gardner is in this movie, probably there for comic relief. He's a Green Lantern right? I just noticed that the guy from Firefly is playing him. I didn't even see him at first. That's kind of cool. I'm not sure how I feel about there being so many superheroes in it. I'd kind of prefer if it was Superman by himself. |
| Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #11 posted 12/21/24 1:18pm
nayroo2002
|
ShellyMcG said:
I'm not sure how I feel about there being so many superheroes in it. I'd kind of prefer if it was Superman by himself.
Well, the first scene in the trailer sees Superman injured and bleeding. Perhaps he needs some help? "Whatever skin we're in
we all need 2 b friends" |
| Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #12 posted 12/21/24 4:50pm
kpowers
|
ShellyMcG said:
kpowers said:
I agree with all your takes. Loved Superman Returns. I know Guy Gardner is in this movie, probably there for comic relief.
He's a Green Lantern right? I just noticed that the guy from Firefly is playing him. I didn't even see him at first. That's kind of cool. I'm not sure how I feel about there being so many superheroes in it. I'd kind of prefer if it was Superman by himself.
Yes Guy Gardner is a Green Lantern. Hawkgirl & Mr. Terrific is also in the moviie |
| Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #13 posted 12/21/24 7:39pm
ShellyMcG |
nayroo2002 said:
ShellyMcG said: I'm not sure how I feel about there being so many superheroes in it. I'd kind of prefer if it was Superman by himself.
Well, the first scene in the trailer sees Superman injured and bleeding. Perhaps he needs some help? That's what Krypto's there for I'm really curious about who the villain is going to be. Obviously we get a look at Lex Luthor and some sort of Kaiju beast thing but I'm looking forward to seeing how it all plays out. Even though I am a bit apprehensive over the whole thing. I want it to be good though. |
| Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #14 posted 12/21/24 7:43pm
ShellyMcG |
kpowers said:
ShellyMcG said: kpowers said:
I agree with all your takes. Loved Superman Returns. I know Guy Gardner is in this movie, probably there for comic relief.
He's a Green Lantern right? I just noticed that the guy from Firefly is playing him. I didn't even see him at first. That's kind of cool. I'm not sure how I feel about there being so many superheroes in it. I'd kind of prefer if it was Superman by himself.
Yes Guy Gardner is a Green Lantern. Hawkgirl & Mr. Terrific is also in the moviie I feel like I've seen Hawkgirl before in something else. I've never heard of Mr Terrific though. James Gunn seems to like using little-known characters in his movies. I wonder if this is some sort of elaborate set up for the next Justice League movie. Like, these smaller characters get killed off to sell the audience on how tough the villain is before Superman recruits Batman, Wonder Woman and co to kick his ass? |
| Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #15 posted 12/22/24 11:38am
kpowers
|
ShellyMcG said:
kpowers said:
Yes Guy Gardner is a Green Lantern. Hawkgirl & Mr. Terrific is also in the moviie
I feel like I've seen Hawkgirl before in something else. I've never heard of Mr Terrific though. James Gunn seems to like using little-known characters in his movies. I wonder if this is some sort of elaborate set up for the next Justice League movie. Like, these smaller characters get killed off to sell the audience on how tough the villain is before Superman recruits Batman, Wonder Woman and co to kick his ass?
|
| Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #16 posted 12/23/24 4:48am
89Flowers |
Doood, this place was the shiznit from 04 to 18, a generous time after his death. Even with that generosity, 110 out of 99 percentage of the world didn't give a fuck. This post has been modified from its original thought. It has been formatted to fit into the space and run in the time allotted. |
| Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #17 posted 12/23/24 7:16am
purplethunder3 121 |
89Flowers said:
Doood, this place was the shiznit from 04 to 18, a generous time after his death. Even with that generosity, 110 out of 99 percentage of the world didn't give a fuck.
About Superman?! "Music gives a soul to the universe, wings to the mind, flight to the imagination and life to everything." --Plato
https://youtu.be/CVwv9LZMah0 |
| Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #18 posted 12/24/24 4:39pm
TheBigBang
|
nayroo2002 said:
kpowers said:
Why didn't you start a thread?
That's a fine idea, Oscar Mayer! To me, this new iteration looks a bit hokey with that CGI dog. I actually liked the Cavill-acted version the best. I guess Gunn had to change it up and make it brighter and friendlier for the masses.
You liked the "Cavill-acted" version the best because that's the one you've actually seen. Please don't judge a film you haven't seen yet based entirely on a two minute teaser trailer.
And for the record, "brighter and friendlier" is what most people expect from Superman. Why do you think the Donner-directed, Reeve-acted version is still cherished so much after almost a half a century. It's because it was the most accurate onscreen depiction of Superman, and until someone does better, it will always be held in the highest regard. And no, Snyder did not do better.
|
| Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #19 posted 12/24/24 11:11pm
nayroo2002
|
TheBigBang said:
nayroo2002 said:
That's a fine idea, Oscar Mayer! To me, this new iteration looks a bit hokey with that CGI dog. I actually liked the Cavill-acted version the best. I guess Gunn had to change it up and make it brighter and friendlier for the masses.
You liked the "Cavill-acted" version the best because that's the one you've actually seen. Please don't judge a film you haven't seen yet based entirely on a two minute teaser trailer.
And for the record, "brighter and friendlier" is what most people expect from Superman. Why do you think the Donner-directed, Reeve-acted version is still cherished so much after almost a half a century. It's because it was the most accurate onscreen depiction of Superman, and until someone does better, it will always be held in the highest regard. And no, Snyder did not do better.
I saw the original 1978 film in the theater. I still have the John Williams vinyl soundtrack. I've seen every 'Superman' movie. No need to get upset. Merry Christmas. "Whatever skin we're in
we all need 2 b friends" |
| Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #20 posted 01/02/25 8:01pm
TheBigBang
|
nayroo2002 said:
TheBigBang said:
You liked the "Cavill-acted" version the best because that's the one you've actually seen. Please don't judge a film you haven't seen yet based entirely on a two minute teaser trailer.
And for the record, "brighter and friendlier" is what most people expect from Superman. Why do you think the Donner-directed, Reeve-acted version is still cherished so much after almost a half a century. It's because it was the most accurate onscreen depiction of Superman, and until someone does better, it will always be held in the highest regard. And no, Snyder did not do better.
I saw the original 1978 film in the theater. I still have the John Williams vinyl soundtrack. I've seen every 'Superman' movie. No need to get upset. Merry Christmas.
I hope you had a good holiday.
I saw the original 1978 film at the Loma in San Diego. Humongous screen and, to this day, the Richard Donner-directed, Reeve-acted, Williams-scored film is the gold standard.
I'm not upset, but I love Jame Gunn and was sitting in a theater, literally crying during Guardians of the Galaxy 3. For me, I put my trust in Jame Gunn, and I refuse to judge an entire film on a two minute trailer. And I just don't understand why other people are doing this. Yes, I get it, for whatever reason, people feel the need to gatekeep a universe that is done. The Snyderverse, Cavill-Superman era is over. These folks need to get a grip and move on.
Until I walk out of the theater in July, I will not judge.
|
| Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #21 posted 01/03/25 8:23pm
ShellyMcG |
TheBigBang said:
nayroo2002 said:
TheBigBang said:
You liked the "Cavill-acted" version the best because that's the one you've actually seen. Please don't judge a film you haven't seen yet based entirely on a two minute teaser trailer.
And for the record, "brighter and friendlier" is what most people expect from Superman. Why do you think the Donner-directed, Reeve-acted version is still cherished so much after almost a half a century. It's because it was the most accurate onscreen depiction of Superman, and until someone does better, it will always be held in the highest regard. And no, Snyder did not do better.
I saw the original 1978 film in the theater. I still have the John Williams vinyl soundtrack. I've seen every 'Superman' movie. No need to get upset. Merry Christmas.
I hope you had a good holiday.
I saw the original 1978 film at the Loma in San Diego. Humongous screen and, to this day, the Richard Donner-directed, Reeve-acted, Williams-scored film is the gold standard.
I'm not upset, but I love Jame Gunn and was sitting in a theater, literally crying during Guardians of the Galaxy 3. For me, I put my trust in Jame Gunn, and I refuse to judge an entire film on a two minute trailer. And I just don't understand why other people are doing this. Yes, I get it, for whatever reason, people feel the need to gatekeep a universe that is done. The Snyderverse, Cavill-Superman era is over. These folks need to get a grip and move on.
Until I walk out of the theater in July, I will not judge.
This is kind of where I am with it. I'll judge it after I've seen it. I didn't like the Guardians movies and I was instantly turned off by the trailer of that Suicide Squad movie he did but if this new Superman movie was directed by anyone else, I'd be pretty excited based on the trailer for it. So just because the director has made some movies in the past that I didn't like shouldn't even be a factor in how I view this one. Very few filmmakers have a 100% record anyway so like I said, I'll judge it when I see it. Might still be shit. But for now, I'm looking forward to it. |
| Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #22 posted 01/09/25 2:09am
MickyDolenz |
nayroo2002 said:
No comment? Really???
I think the average person who is interested in this kind of thing don't post on these kinds of sites. They make trailer reaction videos on Youtube.
You can take a black guy to Nashville from right out of the cotton fields with bib overalls, and they will call him R&B. You can take a white guy in a pin-stripe suit who’s never seen a cotton field, and they will call him country. ~ O. B. McClinton |
| Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #23 posted 01/09/25 3:44pm
nayroo2002
|
MickyDolenz said:
nayroo2002 said:
No comment? Really???
I think the average person who is interested in this kind of thing don't post on these kinds of sites. They make trailer reaction videos on Youtube.
Yeah, i know.
It was a test of dead-ness "Whatever skin we're in
we all need 2 b friends" |
| Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #24 posted 01/09/25 8:33pm
ShellyMcG |
The org may not be as populated as it was when Prince was alive or before there were other options out there but to be honest, it's the smaller community here that appealed to me in the first place. There's probably only about 15-20 regular active users on here (give or take, I haven't counted) but I'd rather spend my limited free time chatting to 15-20 cool people than hundreds of arseholes. The org is what we make it. No point in lamenting the past when we can be discussing stuff in the here and now. Books, movies, music, games, TV shows etc. New Prince releases, if we ever get more of those Basically, the org isn't dead. It's alive (and it lives in Minneapolis). Or somewhere a bit warmer, preferably |
| Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #25 posted 01/09/25 9:12pm
S2DG
|
ShellyMcG said:
The org may not be as populated as it was when Prince was alive or before there were other options out there but to be honest, it's the smaller community here that appealed to me in the first place. There's probably only about 15-20 regular active users on here (give or take, I haven't counted) but I'd rather spend my limited free time chatting to 15-20 cool people than hundreds of arseholes. The org is what we make it. No point in lamenting the past when we can be discussing stuff in the here and now. Books, movies, music, games, TV shows etc. New Prince releases, if we ever get more of those Basically, the org isn't dead. It's alive (and it lives in Minneapolis). Or somewhere a bit warmer, preferably
I love this perspective in 2025. It's a fact that a lot of music and art I've discovered (over decades) has been from the Org and the knowledge of the people who come here. Why stop now?
Shelly you're wise beyond your years
|
| Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #26 posted 01/10/25 10:13am
kpowers
|
ShellyMcG said:
The org may not be as populated as it was when Prince was alive or before there were other options out there but to be honest, it's the smaller community here that appealed to me in the first place. There's probably only about 15-20 regular active users on here (give or take, I haven't counted) but I'd rather spend my limited free time chatting to 15-20 cool people than hundreds of arseholes. The org is what we make it. No point in lamenting the past when we can be discussing stuff in the here and now. Books, movies, music, games, TV shows etc. New Prince releases, if we ever get more of those Basically, the org isn't dead. It's alive (and it lives in Minneapolis). Or somewhere a bit warmer, preferably
Well said |
| Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Forums >
General Discussion > I didn't realize how dead this place was untill the new trailer for 'Superman' just came out and there is no thread
copyright © 1998-2025 prince.org. all rights reserved.