SexGod said:

Oh her.. Natasha! Oh I am sure she was real, and Definitely female... She even joined our little Love Universe forum and posted on it a few times... I actually thought she was way cool... and alot of fun...

"Natasha" was a real person. It was posted a while ago that she may be sick from an individual who knew her personally (origmnd). She is missed, as is anyone who posted a lot and then--just stopped. If she is ill, I wish her well. If she was a "character", she will come up again as some one else and you will know who she is right away. Just my two cents...

rdhull said:

I'm sorry counselor; that retort holds no weight in RDHULL vs. Mistermaxxx & Natasha. The burden of proof is on the prosecution, i.e., you.

rdhull said:

Discernment, counselor. Discernment. I didn't bring up orgnotes ALONE. I brought them up with a combination of things.

Besides, if you can go by posting style, I can go by posting style (here and elsewhere), how they express what they say, AND orgnotes.

¥
[This message was edited Sat Apr 26 18:02:35 PDT 2003 by Supernova]

Supernova said:

is this case gonna be on court tv?

SuperC said:

Yes SuperC, I saw that pic. It was taken ( it is said ) from the NPGMC site & was nat at xenophobia. Did this make U all fuzzy inside 4 her? anywho, I was very surprised that IF what ppl claimed about her & stalking P 4 10 yrs. & that he was very afraid of her, that HE'D even allow that pic to be posted, let alone let her inside PP. It was assumed he knew all 2 well what she looked like. maybe the pink wig worked well 4 her though? BUT now, it makes more sense to assume P didnt recognize her ( & y'all know his EYES R GOOD 4 RECOGNIZING PPL- glasses or no ), bcuz it wasnt her. didnt exist? I'm not dissing ppl really 4 taking 2 her. i, myself, at times felt sympathetic 4 her, but it was just so fast & all at ONCE it seemed.

grandebelle said:

And? Harley Quinn has been missing too, is she also supposed to be somenoe else here just because she's missing?


Bzzzt. If you thought it was complimentary that's what you read into it.

That signature was authored by Natasha in one of her many infamous posts, I took it as is and used it as my signature. I don't necessarily believe someone on Prince.org saying that they KNOW Prince is a "stud" in bed is complimentary. Funny? To some of us, yes. Complimentary?


I know of Natasha as much as anyone here who read her posts. Others here have said they've met her, I'm not one of those people.


Btw, there were at least a few times I've told Natasha to shut the fuck up too, those posts must have slipped past ya. This is not as black and white as you seem to think. Sure, Natasha was entertaining at times. So are my neices and nephews - who I've also been known to say shut the fuck up to.

grandebelle said:

How did we get HERE? Just to clear things up(that shouldn't have gotten cloudy in the first place). I was never attracted to natasha physically. To tell the truth i was never attracted, PERIOD! She is a fun person that could break up the redundance of the org(imho).

Supernova said:

Funny!!!

Handclapsfingasnapz said:

Nah. This is Judge Judy type of stuff.

Supernova said:

you mean Supernova :LOL:

NettieSmiles said:

There were a few ppl who claimed 2 know her personally. Its hard to know what 2 believe. IF she exists, it is strange indeed 4 her to just "disappear", but I too, hope NOTHING bad happened 2 her, and hope she is well also. I'm SURE if & when she returns, most of us will kmow!

Supernova said:

ooh, even betta...

gotta love Natasha

I'd have to be RRREEEAAALLL bored to miss Nat

Natasha was cool.

this thread has some crazy stuff on it


i miss Natasha but i miss -KLHK- more

SuperC said:

Christopher said:

me, 2...klhk could write a 500+ page novel on george michael...and create an encyclopedia dedicated 2 prince's booty.

she popped up on the booty thread a month ago, but i ain't seen her since...

You all are way to harsh on the poor child. She wasn't so bad just scary. Natasha is young. She did meet Prince by latching on to someone close to him. And sort of fell in love because he said hello to her. Maybe someone snatched her weekend pass. She followed he from her country of origin. So she was telling some truth. She did meet Prince once. Smile. I think her talk was greater then her bite. News flash guys. Natasha got wind that Prince ocassionally visited this site and lost it. Oh by the way. I dislike being called a liar. And I have never lost my mind so I don't have to go looking for it. Live Life and Love Y'all.

Handclapsfingasnapz said:

i sent her a note she wrote back a few weeks ago saying she comes around from time to time but thats about it.

Supernova said:

Well I feel that I made a compelling argument bringing up things that can be considered that were not before..and you just said "well we've orgnoted each other and I saw Maxx post otherwhweres". Huh? No jury would say "oh that changes everything" lol. The burden of proof albeit not physical as I cant, has at the very least given some sort of possibility of Nat being someone else as I've mentioned.

And for those who claim her past history and pic posting with pink hair..nope. She did NOT look like she described herself over and over (not including the pink hair as part of it). Not one iota. She claimed she was a heavyset buxom Hispanic female...remember that.


Still all folks did was have stories of "friends" who knew she was weird etc. Nobody here said they know her personally and have actually been with her face to face through all of thsese tales etc.

The prosecution rests.


Judge doug lewellen edit
[This message was edited Sun Apr 27 8:58:14 PDT 2003 by rdhull]

queen627 said:

lost what, the site or his sanity?

rdhull said:

Bzzzt. For the second time, counselor, that's not all I said.

Saying a couple of people have said the same "A tip of the cap to you" phrase isn't exactly proof either. Shaky evidence, counselor, shaky evidence. Besides, all you're talking about is what you've noticed from their posts here; I'm talking about how some people sometimes let more of their guard down when corresponding privately with others. And NO, it wasn't like we were buddy buddy agreeable all the time. Maxxx and I have had some serious battles in different threads here before he even talked to me privately. Since we don't know these two, my evidence is no less than yours, and yours no less than mine. The difference is I'm not the one saying they're one and the same based on a couple of phrases a couple of screen names have used, and their writing style isn't 100% the same. All we're dealing with is supposition. And supposition isn't enough for convictions, counselor.


Natasha being someone else does not automatically make that someone else Mistermaxxx.


How is everybody supposed to remember it when everybody doesn't actually know she said it?


Wrong again. At least a couple of people here DID say they've met her. But how that fact would disprove or prove anything we're talking about, I don't know.

I'm just the messanger...


¥
[This message was edited Sun Apr 27 10:44:42 PDT 2003 by Supernova]

Supernova said:[quote]

rdhull said:

I know but after all I had shown that was basically the gist of what you said.



I know its not exactly forensics but this is how thhgs get pieced together..ya know..similarities, commonalities etc...



how is lwetting ones guard down have anything to do with them ever using different identitites?



I aagree



Bzzt--thats not all I said either.



No shit..I never said Im willing to stake my life on it. Id be willing to bet other things if we could actually find out the truth somewhow...and I would bet for my hunch etc that Ive been stating




I know that doesnt auto make her/him Maxx..Ive stated other things why I think he or she are one in the same. It also isnt just as dismissive or black and white as you are making my points out to be.




It isnt about anyone remembering it..its just about me remembering it and presenting that fact..just cause yall don't remember it doesnt take away from the fact of the evidence or the bullshit that he/she was running.I wouoldn't expect anyone to remember trivial things. However it shows that she/he was runnin a game which is also more evidence for the presecution regardless of if only one or if two thousand people remember it




What you mean "wrong again"? Pfft. I already stated that there were people who DID say they met her etc..and Im saying where they at now and if so they were all bogus statements. Lets see them..they had one thread where they "spoke of" seing someone , hearing stories etc..there was only ONE in depth statement of the supposed real story of Natasha and that was by someone who has never been found since etc...which means it is nada as per usual or was just another ruse etc



I know it wouldnt..which is why in this post I posted things that "I" feel proves it..at least to myself. Which is why I kept it to myself for this long and only brought it up because of this thread. If one dooesn't believe thats cool..if they do thats cool too. It wasn't like I made a special post saying "Guess what! Guess What?!



Oh come on, it's much more than that

The quote lines in this thing are starting to give me a headache, so I have to break up what I'm responding to.

I said:


RD said:

Well, it's certainly no less foolproof than your evidence, counselor.

I said:


RD said:

But everything you did say was limited to their posts here. That's my point.

I said:


RD said:

Jeez, RD. Don't take the word "convictions" so literally. This is a mock court, dammit! Respect the court!

RD said:

Oh, I'm sure you would. And you'd lose.

RD said:


I said:


RD said:

I can only go by the black and white examples you've given, which is what they've posted here.

RD said:


I said:


RD said:

How is her claiming or being Hispanic running bullshit?Again, I never said she wasn't running a game, I'm just talking about what I fully believe, and that is that she isn't Maxxx.

RD said:


I said:


RD said:

That's not what you said above. But...

RD said:

SensualMelody has already stated in this thread that she met her. And you have to realize, not every Org member posts as frequently as we do. Which probably means that they don't even read this here thing as much as we do. They're not aware of every thread, even we're not aware of every thread that's posted.

I said:


RD said:

Of course it is bruddahman; which is why I said I'm really surprised you actually believe this. Because I think you're grasping with this one, BIG TIME.

Supernova said:

I meant her using sex in the city as her lifestyle was showing that she runs games etc

RD said:


It seems farfetched I know but i really do believe it..I wouldn't have said these things if I didn't honest. Believe me I wish someone would say something or give me solid proof so I wouldn't have to think this stuff

It would ruin the mystique of it all but then again it would be satisfying at the same time to just know the truth


paranoia? edit
[This message was edited Sun Apr 27 11:51:54 PDT 2003 by rdhull]

Rdhull and Supernova. I just want to thank you two for jacking my thread into a courtcase . And when that you are both Guilty. And sentenced to seven years hard labor, take em away.









That's right Guilty edit
[This message was edited Sun Apr 27 12:09:08 PDT 2003 by SuperC]

SuperC said:

Rdhull and Supernova together again in Stir Crazy II

SuperC said:

I sowwy.

I'm done now.