OldFriends4Sale said:
It is cool we have different takes but don't say 'stop wailing and nashing of teeth' if someone criticizes it. ya know. It's like saying 'just be happy and except it'. No lol I mean some of us are more 'invested' in the SW legacy. Star Wars & Prince are my two guilty pleasures. I'm invested.
As a fellow investor who (like you) takes a back seat to no one in my love of the saga, I'm not saying "shut up and accept it." I'm saying don't panic about certain plot holes that may be filled in 4 months.
lol no I'm not panicing. I just don't have much expectation. I enjoy the stories told in the comics, and the novels situated in the Empire. There are some novels with Leia, but I don't know if they are going to go with TFA's -Leia never trained as a Jedi or TLJ's she did train. These two things are example of how they've messed up canon.
What other movies with Pt I II II IV V etc have had one or two fall flat?
The Godfather, Indiana Jones, Star Trek (in its various iterations), Jaws, Rocky . . .
Right
If the way Luke Skywalker and Leia were handled doesn't sit well with me, I'm not going to dig it. If they are playing with the Force in a way that doesn't fit with script, it's not going to sit well with me. If you are presenting a non-force user as if he is a Jedi Knight, it's not going to sit well with me. These things cannot be overlooked in hopes the last movie tells a story. Leave the Millenium Falcon out of it, if Rey has to take captian chair. Leave it with Chewbacca, but give Rey her own ship. Why cannot they just give her her own ship. Droids are common place in ST, and I love the majority of droids, so I don't have a problem with Bb-8. Just don't have him replace and fill R2-D2's shoes. Again, I wish VII VIII were different films that didn't
1. retell the stories we know
2. try to eradicate George Lucas vision
There are several things we each would have done differently. "Lucas' vision" is a bit vague, since (i) he had other collaborators that brought the OT to life, and (ii) an entire mythology (once known as the EU) formed around the saga for nearly a half-century that flourished under his watch.
I think his vision for the next 3 movies was set. Also the movies with the novels/comics canon was pretty clear. For example, the Force was settled in a way that makes what Rey does, inconceivable. And that Finn is welding a lightsaber as if it is a bat or sword is against the vision, he would have cut his own head off, and he would not have been able to fight even a partially trained Force user.
In hindsight, I would have had Dave Filoni head the whole thing.
Having 1 person take the lead would have been best, I agree.
All that said, that doesn't mean the films we got weren't good.
.
I've said before the films would be good if they were a side story without, impacting Luke Leia, the Republic Alliance, the Jedi and the Force, the Millennium Falcon.
Trying to deconstruct a legacy was a bad move.
Novel connections so far, are not happening. They are telling some good Empire stories with Thrawn as center character. But after TFA, I bought a thick smooth covered book called Lost Stars. See I try, I try. Maybe it would help me with a lead up to events of TFA. It was an uncalled for book. It was very long, drawn out story of two youth, M & F, wait for it.... from a dessert planet. The Empire comes to the planet to get people to join it's military. The two who end up being in a relationship join. One ends up joining the rebellion the other stays etc etc. They did all this just to tell the story of how the Star Destroyer ended up on the planet Rey lived on. I get the book away to a champion of TFA.
Disney's decision to basically excommunicate decades of EU material boxed Disney in. That was a mistake. What we call "Lucas' vision" was moved forward by scores of talented writers of comics, novels, etc. (Timothy Hahn comes to mind). Their material has been largely cast aside or repackaged.
At the end of the day, the magic of the Original Trilogy cannot be repeated. That's what all of the investors grapple with.
Yes, they did well to bring Hahn back to write the Thrawn stories. But I agree, they messed up by removing some wonderful stories lines, heritage and characters. The Thrawn trilogies set the stage for a wonderful follow up to ROTJ expanding the SW universe. They took us back to square one and then caused the footing to digress. Where they took the stories says 'what's the point of everything that happened prior. What's the point of Yoda going into seclusion, "you will be, you will be" 'that boy was our only hope' "no there is another.... skywalker" Leia, Ackbar, Nadien, Mon Mothma etc would not have not built a military. They would have been the next and natural leaders of the New Republic, not needing to be a 'Resistance'. That was were the Old Republic went wront. They believed in the Jedi Knights, they would have made sure it was rebuilt. There is no way someone named Snoke would have been able to emass such a power in the universe.