| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Ace said:[quote]
*** I’ve loved and seen it twice. I’ve seen every Woody Allen movie, save for his first, and the last three, at least two or three times. This is the flip side of my love of SNL. One provides hit-and-miss, off-the-cuff spontaneity, while the other the most consistent brilliance at that which hides many of its warts behind month’s of sweat and editing. He is to me unequaled in terms of comedic writing since the invention of the motion picture camera, and also quite brilliant to a lesser extent at drama. And I haven’t read the “Underrated Actors” thread yet, but it would seem to me that Sydney Pollack would be a great candidate. But perhaps he’s even too known for the purposes of this thread?
*** I’m likely closer to one of those people you mentioned, but I totally love the difference, in both opinion and women. I think any female in decent shape (countless millions or billions) photographed in this perfectly unnatural, almost pedestal-like ambience, bathed in exquisite lightning is going to make me weak at the knees. Perhaps this was in part the audience’s dream being depicted, at least it served that purpose unbelievably well in me. And this crazy, out-of-place image, the film’s first, is then jarringly ripped away from the Mona Lisa on your wall. Instantly we’re shaken back to the daily normality of doctor examinations, dressing and going to the bathroom. Perhaps this signifies the 7-year itch they’re in that eventually ignites this film forward (with perhaps some help from pot’s honesty elixir) causing them (us) to reach back to this unreality of our hidden fantasies, culminating in that secret society mansion that leaves nothing to the imagination. Is this really what we want? It’s complicated. No one has all the answers. We love wildness, but we cannot survive here. We love stability, but there has to be more. Perhaps if we were kinder to each other the spark would never leave, or at least kindly realize that we couldn’t offer it anymore. *** [b][Edited 3/4/18 13:59pm] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Dunkirk (2017)
Good night, sweet Prince | 7 June 1958 - 21 April 2016
Props will be withheld until the showing and proving has commenced. -- Aaron McGruder | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
that BJ scene is tops | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I love that scene so fuckin hot. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
A fellow Woody fan! And, yes - I'm going to add Pollack to the "Underrated actors" thread! Good call!
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Ace said:
A fellow Woody fan! And, yes - I'm going to add Pollack to the "Underrated actors" thread! Good call!
That means a lot to me. I had never made that connection. Now I will never not make that connection. Thank you! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
been hittin' the 'neo-noir' playlist on filmstruck....
3.5/5 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
american honey (2016) 3.5/5 i was put off by the running length of this thing for the longest time (unless you're tarkovsky, does your movie really need to be 160 minutes long?), but i finally gave it a watch earlier this week, and found i settled into its rhythm & barely gave the running time a glance all the way through. it's languid & shambolic, but in a way that i found incredibly appealing. the florida project would be a fairly obvious comparison, in the way both tell rambling stories of lives on the fringe. i don't think american honey is nearly as great - it's ultimately just a bit too baggy & a bit less heartwrenching - but it's really good. the ending of this movie seemed much more intense and trippy to me this go-around, and in particular a scene at the midpoint with a bear played much more powerfully to me. i still think some of the things that seemed a bit too slick and digital didn't really work - the flower effects, the look of the shimmer's exterior, and the deer creatures in particular still felt flat & glossy. but i definitely under-rated this last week. i'd now rate it a 4. i still don't think it's the sci-fi masterpiece some have called it, but it's much better than i initially thought. and it's definitely a film that ought to be seen on a big screen if you can catch it there, particularly if you have any kind of love for chilly, remote 70s sci-fi. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Straight Jacket Funk Affair
Album plays and love for vinyl records. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
2012. 3/5. When I saw this in the theaters years ago, I hated it and haven't seen it since until last night. I love it! It is now added to my go to when I wanna have fun movies. I understood it wrong, I thought it was a movie about what would happen if the world was supposed to end back in 2012. I now see its about a man being a hero to his family when the world is crumbling down around them in a Mr. Toads wild ride fashion and winning them back to start a new life in a whole new world. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Valerian and the City of a thousand planets. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
A Wrinkle In Time 3/5 Very visually pleasing, wish there was a lot more adventure, good message for middle-school girls. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
This was my last too - loved it! VOTE....EARLY | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
[Edited 3/15/18 10:19am] looking for you in the woods tonight Switch FC SW-2874-2863-4789 (Rum&Coke) | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
liberation day (2016) 3/5 documentary on slovenian electronic art-terrorists laibach playing the first show by a western 'rock' group in north korea. this documentary held a few fairly enormous surprises for me, the first one being that laibach still exist. i used to listen to them a little bit back in the day, in that era when wax trax records seemed like the coolest thing in the world and all the bands i listened to had throbbing, ugly electronic bass-lines with vocalists trying to sound like demons screaming on top of them. and the other surprise being that laibach played a show in north korea in 2015 in honour of korean independence from japan. and during that show they played songs from 'the sound of music.' did everybody but me know that this happened? did i just sleepwalk through this event?
l'avventura (1960) 4/5 a fairly conventional first hour or so that plays as a relatively straight-ahead thriller that then goes defiantly off course, resolutely refusing to give a conclusion to the mystery. i found myself just a bit detached by the end, and definitely think this could have benefited from a tighter running time. yet it's chock-full of great, bizarre moments that leave me suspecting there's more here that a second viewing might unveil. [Edited 3/15/18 19:19pm] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Seances (2016) each time you visit the site linked to below, an algorithm creates a unique short film that won't be viewed again. if you've seen guy maddin's films, you'll have a rough idea of what to expect. it looks like some of the footage in here is borrowed from maddin's forbidden room - it's been a while since i saw that movie, but i believe i recognized some clips from it in one of the shorts i cycled through. i don't know how one rates or reviews something like this. what do you compare it to? if it's a 4, then what is a 5? or a 3? it's its own unique entity. but at the least i truly believe that guy maddin is a genuine original. perhaps we live in an era where film is starved for unique vision & new images, but at least we have maddin as a voice for the eccentric & bizarre.
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Was just watching a bit of this again (I've seen the film several times - it's one of my favorites) : | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |