Lol....there is more than one actual current Nasa employess admitting in this video that the technology for going to the Moon doesn't exist.
actually, the technology and logistics for FAKING a moon landing do and did not exist in 1969
that would have been 1000 times more complicated (i.e. impossible) than actually going there
Indeed. As it says on rationalwiki:
If we assume a conspiracy exists, we need to know what it involves. Given the number of people that would need to be paid off (or killed) to stay silent, the effort required to pull the wool over the USSR's eyes (and the eyes of other countries who were watching), the ground-based fakery – rockets, launches, control rooms – fakery such as moon rocks and the photography and video taken from the moon... wouldn't it seem more logical and far simpler to just go to the moon?
"Anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that "my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge"" ~ Isaac Asimov
actually, the technology and logistics for FAKING a moon landing do and did not exist in 1969
that would have been 1000 times more complicated (i.e. impossible) than actually going there
Indeed. As it says on rationalwiki:
If we assume a conspiracy exists, we need to know what it involves. Given the number of people that would need to be paid off (or killed) to stay silent, the effort required to pull the wool over the USSR's eyes (and the eyes of other countries who were watching), the ground-based fakery – rockets, launches, control rooms – fakery such as moon rocks and the photography and video taken from the moon... wouldn't it seem more logical and far simpler to just go to the moon?
Correct. Someone (and who, exactly?) would have had to have kept 20,000 people silent - and that's just at the Johnson Space Center in Houston. There were another 20,000+ people working at NASA facilities in Florida and elsewhere.
To believe that anyone could get that many people to keep a secret is childish. People that don't believe we went to the moon are not in touch with reality. They have a mental problem.
Lol....there is more than one actual current Nasa employess admitting in this video that the technology for going to the Moon doesn't exist.
actually, the technology and logistics for FAKING a moon landing do and did not exist in 1969
that would have been 1000 times more complicated (i.e. impossible) than actually going there
Indeed. As it says on rationalwiki:
If we assume a conspiracy exists, we need to know what it involves. Given the number of people that would need to be paid off (or killed) to stay silent, the effort required to pull the wool over the USSR's eyes (and the eyes of other countries who were watching), the ground-based fakery – rockets, launches, control rooms – fakery such as moon rocks and the photography and video taken from the moon... wouldn't it seem more logical and far simpler to just go to the moon?
As usual, "rationalwiki" is more like "sarcasticwiki". I'm not saying that I believe these claims about not going to the Moon are true. I think they make as much sense as the claims about the earth being flat (remember funkcreep?). I'm just saying that I don't have much faith in "rationalwiki".
[Edited 11/8/17 13:03pm] [Edited 11/8/17 13:06pm]
And here's the clear evidence in a Video, comming straight out of YouTube University, or what I call it, bitchville, where you can learn things for free and still won't gain knowledge at all.
Lol....there is more than one actual current Nasa employess admitting in this video that the technology for going to the Moon doesn't exist.
actually, the technology and logistics for FAKING a moon landing do and did not exist in 1969
that would have been 1000 times more complicated (i.e. impossible) than actually going there
Indeed. As it says on rationalwiki:
If we assume a conspiracy exists, we need to know what it involves. Given the number of people that would need to be paid off (or killed) to stay silent, the effort required to pull the wool over the USSR's eyes (and the eyes of other countries who were watching), the ground-based fakery – rockets, launches, control rooms – fakery such as moon rocks and the photography and video taken from the moon... wouldn't it seem more logical and far simpler to just go to the moon?
As usual, "rationalwiki" is more like "sarcasticwiki". I'm not saying that I believe these claims about not going to the Moon are true. I think they make as much sense as the claims about the earth being flat (remember funkcreep?). I'm just saying that I don't have much faith in "rationalwiki". [Edited 11/8/17 13:03pm] [Edited 11/8/17 13:06pm]
It’s well referenced, logical and usually reliable. I enjoy the “sarcasticwiki” aspect you mention, as idiots of that magnitude should be laughed at.
"Anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that "my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge"" ~ Isaac Asimov
Boy, airheads like that, I see them on a daily basis on FB. Makes you think if these nutshots ever been on an airplane, or on a fucking boat. You ACTUALLY see that the earth ain't flat. You can see the curve and shit.
They are dumb as dog shit, but amusing nonetheless
Perhaps the biggest giveaway is the fact that man in the video quite clearly isn't Kubrick. While there is a superficial resemblance, a comparison between a video of Kubrick from 1997 and the man in the hoax film, made by the website Snopes, makes it obvious that they are two different people.
The Snopes article also points out that some unedited video from the interview, released on YouTube, actually shows Murray addressing the actor as “Tom”, and instructing him on how to perform certain scenes (skip to 14 minutes in).
A date shown on a title card at the beginning of the film also raises some red flags; while the interview is said to have taken place in May 1999, Kubrick in fact died in the March of that year.
And the late director’s widow has stated, through a spokesperson, that the film is definitely a hoax.
"The interview is a lie, Stanley Kubrick has never been interviewed by T Patrick Murray the whole story is made up, fraudulent and untrue,” she told the website Gawker.
New topic
Printable
Report post to moderator
