independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > General Discussion > Pan & scan or Widescreen?
« Previous topic  Next topic »
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Author

Tweet     Share

Message
Thread started 04/11/03 1:43am

BorisFishpaw

avatar

Pan & scan or Widescreen?

Well, go on, state your preference.

I promise I won't say anything...
well, apart from that pan & scan is
the work of evil devil monkeys from
Saturn and everyone should only buy
glorious unedited, as the director
intended, Widescreen. (and whining
that you only have a 3 inch screen
to watch it on is no excuse.)
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #1 posted 04/11/03 1:54am

suomynona

Widescreen only... unless the director prefers full-frame (or if the film was originally shot in full frame.)

I can't imagine watching my dvds on anything but a widescreen tv...

Here are some examples on why widescreen is better than pan & scan...

Remember:
Widescreen ==
Pan & Scan ==
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #2 posted 04/11/03 3:00am

CalhounSq

avatar

Pan & Scan sucks rancid, bleached assholes!!! :X Widescreen only, please!
heart prince I never met you, but I LOVE you & I will forever!! Thank you for being YOU - my little Princey, the best to EVER do it prince heart
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #3 posted 04/11/03 3:03am

suomynona

CalhounSq said:

Pan & Scan sucks rancid, bleached assholes!!! :X Widescreen only, please!
squirming in chair after imagination gets hold of that sentence... yikes!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #4 posted 04/11/03 3:10am

Natsume

avatar

CalhounSq said:

Pan & Scan sucks rancid, bleached assholes!!! :X Widescreen only, please!

They bleach assholes in LA.

nod
I mean, like, where is the sun?
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #5 posted 04/11/03 3:11am

Christopher

avatar

Natsume said:

CalhounSq said:

Pan & Scan sucks rancid, bleached assholes!!! :X Widescreen only, please!

They bleach assholes in LA.

nod



and how do you know little miss smart guy?!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #6 posted 04/11/03 3:15am

CalhounSq

avatar

suomynona said:

CalhounSq said:

Pan & Scan sucks rancid, bleached assholes!!! :X Widescreen only, please!
squirming in chair after imagination gets hold of that sentence... yikes!


lol Blame it on LA biggrin
heart prince I never met you, but I LOVE you & I will forever!! Thank you for being YOU - my little Princey, the best to EVER do it prince heart
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #7 posted 04/11/03 3:59am

IceNine

avatar

Dig this topic:

http://www.prince.org/msg...pid=299327

I have examples of the aspect ratios and all kinds of neat stuff in there.

biggrin

Screw it... I copied the messages below!

smile
...
[This message was edited Fri Apr 11 4:01:35 PDT 2003 by IceNine]
SUPERJOINT RITUAL - http://www.superjointritual.com
A Lethal Dose of American Hatred
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #8 posted 04/11/03 4:00am

IceNine

avatar

IceNine said:

Am I the only one here who absolutely HATES movies that are not presented in letterbox format preserving the original cinematic aspect ratio?

I cannot stand it when movie companies butcher movies and destroy the cinematography by cropping the damned thing or doing pan and scan. They should NEVER destroy a movie by cutting anything from it...

Have you ever noticed how much picture is missing when you see a "standard" picture versus a cinematic aspect letterbox picture? There is so much picture missing on some of them that it destroys the feel of the scene.

For those of you who love movies and buy DVDs, please support the director's vision and do not buy butchered copies... I will ONLY buy LETTERBOXED editions if they are available and often times I will not even buy a movie if it is not released in letterbox format.

Anamorphic Letterbox movies that are enhanced for 16:9 televisions are my favorite, as I have a 65" 16:9 HDTV.

All the DVD signals are sent through a Faroudja de-interlacer, line-doubler as well.

Who is with me on this?

EDIT: Aspect ratios below

Here are examples of aspect ratios:

Standard 4:3 TV:



1.33:1



1.85:1



2.35:1

Widescreen 16:9 TV:



1.33:1



1.85:1



2.35:1
...
[This message was edited Wed Oct 16 19:41:16 PDT 2002 by IceNine]
SUPERJOINT RITUAL - http://www.superjointritual.com
A Lethal Dose of American Hatred
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #9 posted 04/11/03 4:00am

IceNine

avatar

IceNine said:

These animated GIFs show the lost information on Standard/Pan and Scan DVDs versus Letterbox:


SUPERJOINT RITUAL - http://www.superjointritual.com
A Lethal Dose of American Hatred
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #10 posted 04/11/03 4:03am

klaatu

avatar

Widescreen of course I can't stand seeing the work of a director destroyed by this Pan and Scan process...

This can ruin a shot and its meaning.. it's like cutting the head of Mona Lisa just because it didn't fit the format...
"Goodness will guide us when love is inside of us... The Force will be with you, always"
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #11 posted 04/11/03 4:06am

klaatu

avatar

you forgot the 1.66 format there have been some 2.50 in the past...

Also most of the 1.85 formats are reformatted a little to fit the 1.66 format of the 16/9 TV sets. (I'm glad Lucas didn't do it for Tucker actually)...
"Goodness will guide us when love is inside of us... The Force will be with you, always"
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #12 posted 04/11/03 4:06am

suomynona

which begs the question i've always wondered... what aspect ratio were all of prince's major film releases filmed in?
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #13 posted 04/11/03 5:06am

klaatu

avatar

suomynona said:

which begs the question i've always wondered... what aspect ratio were all of prince's major film releases filmed in?



I think it is 1.85 but I ain't sure... I wouldn't be surprised it's 1.33 in fact...
"Goodness will guide us when love is inside of us... The Force will be with you, always"
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #14 posted 04/11/03 6:55am

BorisFishpaw

avatar

IceNine said:

IceNine said:

These animated GIFs show the lost information on Standard/Pan and Scan DVDs versus Letterbox:




Conclusive proof!
pan and scan sucks donkey ass...it's official!

only child haters love pan & scan
you don't hate children now do you?
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #15 posted 04/11/03 7:13am

IceNine

avatar

BorisFishpaw said:

IceNine said:

IceNine said:

These animated GIFs show the lost information on Standard/Pan and Scan DVDs versus Letterbox:




Conclusive proof!
pan and scan sucks donkey ass...it's official!

only child haters love pan & scan
you don't hate children now do you?


Correct!

If you buy Pan and Scan discs, you hate children!!!
SUPERJOINT RITUAL - http://www.superjointritual.com
A Lethal Dose of American Hatred
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #16 posted 04/11/03 10:48am

CalhounSq

avatar

IceNine said:

BorisFishpaw said:

IceNine said:

IceNine said:

These animated GIFs show the lost information on Standard/Pan and Scan DVDs versus Letterbox:




Conclusive proof!
pan and scan sucks donkey ass...it's official!

only child haters love pan & scan
you don't hate children now do you?


Correct!

If you buy Pan and Scan discs, you hate children!!!


lol Excellent examples Ice smile I just wish the world would WAKE UP & make nothing but letterbox!!! pray
heart prince I never met you, but I LOVE you & I will forever!! Thank you for being YOU - my little Princey, the best to EVER do it prince heart
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #17 posted 04/11/03 11:27am

ufoclub

avatar

the only problem with wide screen ntsc is the lack of resolution, you're actors' faces are divided into a few lines! But... hidef will take care of that.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #18 posted 04/11/03 11:28am

Marrk

avatar

..and yet i still get the odd person (Mainly female - it has to be said) moaning about widescreen "it makes people look fat", "i don't like the black bars on the top and bottom of the picture" etc. rolleyes

One girl i know said she won't get a widescreen TV for those reasons.I told her in 10 years she probably won't have a choice.

Good riddance to 4:3!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #19 posted 04/11/03 11:55am

TheMico

In simple terms, movies are projected using larger frames of film than you see; the projector masks the top and bottom of the frame, creating the widescreen effect. This is why some movies are shown in theaters with people's heads or the subtitles cut off - there's extra movie at the top and the bottom.

Keep in mind that when you see a film in a theater, the exact framing is left to the whims of the projectionist. They can be adjusted.

For example:

(thanks Ice)

The actual film is as large as the entire box (both colors). When you reduce this to pan-and-scan, you're gettting about half the projected image, or about 25% of the actual film.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #20 posted 04/11/03 11:58am

klaatu

avatar

ufoclub said:

the only problem with wide screen ntsc is the lack of resolution, you're actors' faces are divided into a few lines! But... hidef will take care of that.



How come you have horizontal lines? I don't when a movie is widescreen and when I watch in my home theater room there is no line you can believe that it crystal clear...
"Goodness will guide us when love is inside of us... The Force will be with you, always"
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #21 posted 04/11/03 12:00pm

klaatu

avatar

TheMico said:

In simple terms, movies are projected using larger frames of film than you see; the projector masks the top and bottom of the frame, creating the widescreen effect. This is why some movies are shown in theaters with people's heads or the subtitles cut off - there's extra movie at the top and the bottom.

Keep in mind that when you see a film in a theater, the exact framing is left to the whims of the projectionist. They can be adjusted.

For example:

(thanks Ice)

The actual film is as large as the entire box (both colors). When you reduce this to pan-and-scan, you're gettting about half the projected image, or about 25% of the actual film.


Exactly... And well letterbox doesn't make the character fat (unless you use a wrong zooming option) and I know that a lot of people think the film ain't complete if there are bars... Sad but true they need their screen to be filled... sad
"Goodness will guide us when love is inside of us... The Force will be with you, always"
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #22 posted 04/11/03 12:04pm

TheMico

klaatu said:

TheMico said:

In simple terms, movies are projected using larger frames of film than you see; the projector masks the top and bottom of the frame, creating the widescreen effect. This is why some movies are shown in theaters with people's heads or the subtitles cut off - there's extra movie at the top and the bottom.

Keep in mind that when you see a film in a theater, the exact framing is left to the whims of the projectionist. They can be adjusted.

For example:

(thanks Ice)

The actual film is as large as the entire box (both colors). When you reduce this to pan-and-scan, you're gettting about half the projected image, or about 25% of the actual film.


Exactly... And well letterbox doesn't make the character fat (unless you use a wrong zooming option) and I know that a lot of people think the film ain't complete if there are bars... Sad but true they need their screen to be filled... sad

Right. The only time the picture is distorted is on some widescreen TV's that stretch the picture to fit, or if the movie is projected in flat vs. scope, or vice versa. This happens at AMC a lot; they really don't try very hard.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #23 posted 04/11/03 12:24pm

ufoclub

avatar

You might have a line doubler system or progressive scan player to make it seem clear in your home theatre, but...

ntsc is the resolution of tv that was desided on back when tv first came out. it sucks. (the average best that you get form ntsc material is 720 by 480 pixels) no matter how good yur tv is,if its not hi-definition resoultion (1920 x 1080 pixels), it sucks compared to the true resoultion of a photographic image.

I have shot stuff in hi-def, and have done countless projects in regular ntsc, and there is a world of difference. Just walk up to your tv and look at the lines that make up the image. On true hidef or projected film, the resoution is much much greater resulting in a smooth image.

klaatu said:

ufoclub said:

the only problem with wide screen ntsc is the lack of resolution, you're actors' faces are divided into a few lines! But... hidef will take care of that.



How come you have horizontal lines? I don't when a movie is widescreen and when I watch in my home theater room there is no line you can believe that it crystal clear...
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #24 posted 04/11/03 12:33pm

luv4thepurple1

avatar

Widescreen!
He calls me "Holi" cuz he says everyday w/ me is like a Holiday...
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #25 posted 04/11/03 1:35pm

klaatu

avatar

ufoclub said:

You might have a line doubler system or progressive scan player to make it seem clear in your home theatre, but...

ntsc is the resolution of tv that was desided on back when tv first came out. it sucks. (the average best that you get form ntsc material is 720 by 480 pixels) no matter how good yur tv is,if its not hi-definition resoultion (1920 x 1080 pixels), it sucks compared to the true resoultion of a photographic image.

I have shot stuff in hi-def, and have done countless projects in regular ntsc, and there is a world of difference. Just walk up to your tv and look at the lines that make up the image. On true hidef or projected film, the resoution is much much greater resulting in a smooth image.

klaatu said:

ufoclub said:

the only problem with wide screen ntsc is the lack of resolution, you're actors' faces are divided into a few lines! But... hidef will take care of that.



How come you have horizontal lines? I don't when a movie is widescreen and when I watch in my home theater room there is no line you can believe that it crystal clear...



I admit i have a double liner system!!! But even without you should try with a laser disc: zoom it and you'll see the difference between a widescreen DVD and a letterbox LD... (though LD got a better sound due minor compression... I got PhantomMenca on LD and DVD and even if both versions are amazing you hear the difference...)... And yeah there is a diff between Hi-def and NTSC...
[This message was edited Fri Apr 11 13:37:22 PDT 2003 by klaatu]
"Goodness will guide us when love is inside of us... The Force will be with you, always"
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #26 posted 04/11/03 2:24pm

TheMico

ufoclub, how do you think the European PAL format stacks up to NTSC?
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #27 posted 04/11/03 3:58pm

ufoclub

avatar

PAL is superior to NTSC, not only does it run at a frame rate closer to film, but it has a slightly higher resolution, but all of this is moot...

here comes hidef, it will knock all out just like color tv's knocked out b&W tv's.

TheMico said:

ufoclub, how do you think the European PAL format stacks up to NTSC?
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #28 posted 04/11/03 4:02pm

ufoclub

avatar

are you saying that the sound is better on laserdisc? I guess this could be true unless, its dts sound, then it would be the same.

but I thought that dvd's had superior sound... better than cd as far as frequency sampling...

maybe I don't know nuthin!

I have a laserdisc too... got these laser discs: hits, sign o' the times, 3 chains of gold, purple rain... beatles anthology

klaatu said:

ufoclub said:

You might have a line doubler system or progressive scan player to make it seem clear in your home theatre, but...

ntsc is the resolution of tv that was desided on back when tv first came out. it sucks. (the average best that you get form ntsc material is 720 by 480 pixels) no matter how good yur tv is,if its not hi-definition resoultion (1920 x 1080 pixels), it sucks compared to the true resoultion of a photographic image.

I have shot stuff in hi-def, and have done countless projects in regular ntsc, and there is a world of difference. Just walk up to your tv and look at the lines that make up the image. On true hidef or projected film, the resoution is much much greater resulting in a smooth image.

klaatu said:

ufoclub said:

the only problem with wide screen ntsc is the lack of resolution, you're actors' faces are divided into a few lines! But... hidef will take care of that.



How come you have horizontal lines? I don't when a movie is widescreen and when I watch in my home theater room there is no line you can believe that it crystal clear...



I admit i have a double liner system!!! But even without you should try with a laser disc: zoom it and you'll see the difference between a widescreen DVD and a letterbox LD... (though LD got a better sound due minor compression... I got PhantomMenca on LD and DVD and even if both versions are amazing you hear the difference...)... And yeah there is a diff between Hi-def and NTSC...
[This message was edited Fri Apr 11 13:37:22 PDT 2003 by klaatu]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > General Discussion > Pan & scan or Widescreen?