Author | Message |
Look what happend to Gawker http://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2016/08/18/five-gawkers-most-controversial-stories/88957742/ | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
"Univision Communications, a Spanish-language media company, agreed on Tuesday to buy six of Gawker's blogs in a bankruptcy auction for about $135 million. Gawker.com, the only Gawker blog not included in the sale, will shut down next week after 14 years of operation. " Sorry, it's the Hodgkin's talking. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
let this be a lesson to paparazzholes everywhere Gawker.com to shut down next week
It represents an abrupt end for a site that helped define a snarky tone and style that are now ubiquitous across digital media. The site also served as a springboard for some of the internet's best-known writers and editors. But Gawker.com had its critics, many of whom are likely celebrating Thursday's news. The site's unsparing coverage prompted several lawsuits, including the one brought by the former professional wrestler Hulk Hogan that sent the parent company into bankruptcy. Hogan, whose real name is Terry Bollea, filed an invasion of privacy suit against Gawker Media after the namesake site published a portion of his sex tape in 2012. A Florida jury awarded Hogan $140.1 million in damages earlier this year, which motivated both Gawker Media and Denton to file for bankruptcy this summer. Hogan's lawsuit was financed by Silicon Valley billionaire Peter Thiel, himself a target of Gawker's coverage. Thiel, who has acknowledged that he's bankrolling other lawsuits against Gawker Media, said in a New York Times op-ed earlier this week that he will support Hogan "until his final victory." Gawker is appealing the Hogan verdict, but Denton said in his memo that even if the appellate court rules in its favor, "Peter Thiel has already achieved many of his objectives." | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
XxAxX said: let this be a lesson to paparazzholes everywhere Gawker.com to shut down next week
It represents an abrupt end for a site that helped define a snarky tone and style that are now ubiquitous across digital media. The site also served as a springboard for some of the internet's best-known writers and editors. But Gawker.com had its critics, many of whom are likely celebrating Thursday's news. The site's unsparing coverage prompted several lawsuits, including the one brought by the former professional wrestler Hulk Hogan that sent the parent company into bankruptcy. Hogan, whose real name is Terry Bollea, filed an invasion of privacy suit against Gawker Media after the namesake site published a portion of his sex tape in 2012. A Florida jury awarded Hogan $140.1 million in damages earlier this year, which motivated both Gawker Media and Denton to file for bankruptcy this summer. Hogan's lawsuit was financed by Silicon Valley billionaire Peter Thiel, himself a target of Gawker's coverage. Thiel, who has acknowledged that he's bankrolling other lawsuits against Gawker Media, said in a New York Times op-ed earlier this week that he will support Hogan "until his final victory." Gawker is appealing the Hogan verdict, but Denton said in his memo that even if the appellate court rules in its favor, "Peter Thiel has already achieved many of his objectives." --- I hope the same thing happens to TMZ. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
It's a shame it went on for so long. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
. Yes, let's celebrate that a super-rich guy can shut down a media org if they've written something he doesn't like. © Bart Van Hemelen
This posting is provided AS IS with no warranties, and confers no rights. It is not authorized by Prince or the NPG Music Club. You assume all risk for your use. All rights reserved. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
BartVanHemelen said:
. Yes, let's celebrate that a super-rich guy can shut down a media org if they've written something he doesn't like. --- They outed him it was invasion of his privacy. Oh and the asshole who ran Gawker he is rich as well. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
laurarichardson said: BartVanHemelen said:
. Yes, let's celebrate that a super-rich guy can shut down a media org if they've written something he doesn't like. --- They outed him it was invasion of his privacy. Oh and the asshole who ran Gawker he is rich as well. That doesn't preclude it being a worrying development. And what does any of this have to do with Prince? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
TwiliteKid said: laurarichardson said: --- They outed him it was invasion of his privacy. Oh and the asshole who ran Gawker he is rich as well. That doesn't preclude it being a worrying development. And what does any of this have to do with Prince? -- I put it in the wrong forum but considering the shit the Tabs have tried to do to Prince's image to be along the lines of the type of slime journalism that Gawker practiced. Look at what The Star Trubine is trying to do. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I'm sorry which millionaire are we most worried about? Which amazing reputable media organizations are in danger after this precedent? This is like that time my boss who owned two $2 million homes told me I couldn't quit because they would "go under" without me. I don't make any of that money and I live in a 800 sq ft condo. I couldn't decide which (of their) $2 mil homes I should be most worried about. So I quit. . | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
laurarichardson said: TwiliteKid said: That doesn't preclude it being a worrying development. And what does any of this have to do with Prince? -- I put it in the wrong forum but considering the shit the Tabs have tried to do to Prince's image to be along the lines of the type of slime journalism that Gawker practiced. Look at what The Star Trubine is trying to do. The Star Tribune is not a tabloid. Despite some questionable posts over the years, neither was Gawker. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
FUNKNROLL said: I'm sorry which millionaire are we most worried about? Which amazing reputable media organizations are in danger after this precedent? This is like that time my boss who owned two $2 million homes told me I couldn't quit because they would "go under" without me. I don't make any of that money and I live in a 800 sq ft condo. I couldn't decide which (of their) $2 mil homes I should be most worried about. So I quit. . The whims of a billionaire being enough to shut down a media orginaztion is worrying, regardless of their reputability. It sets a worrying precedent, especially in an age where magazines and newspapers (even the respected ones) are struggling to stay afloat. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
TwiliteKid said: laurarichardson said: -- I put it in the wrong forum but considering the shit the Tabs have tried to do to Prince's image to be along the lines of the type of slime journalism that Gawker practiced. Look at what The Star Trubine is trying to do. The Star Tribune is not a tabloid. Despite some questionable posts over the years, neither was Gawker. -- Don't you think the Star Trubine is acting like a tabloid by seeking to open Prince's divorce file. I guess you did not read the article because Gawker was conducting tabloid journalism. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
TwiliteKid said: FUNKNROLL said: I'm sorry which millionaire are we most worried about? Which amazing reputable media organizations are in danger after this precedent? This is like that time my boss who owned two $2 million homes told me I couldn't quit because they would "go under" without me. I don't make any of that money and I live in a 800 sq ft condo. I couldn't decide which (of their) $2 mil homes I should be most worried about. So I quit. . The whims of a billionaire being enough to shut down a media orginaztion is worrying, regardless of their reputability. It sets a worrying precedent, especially in an age where magazines and newspapers (even the respected ones) are struggling to stay afloat. /// The whims of newspaper having the power to open a sealed document sets a precedent that is troubling. In addition, Gawker had their day in court they lost they only went after Hulk Hogan because they did not think he would be able to afford the litigation. Real nice people 😳 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
. Oh for crying out loud, why was Thiel mad at them? Oh yeah, because they also went after him. Sheesh... © Bart Van Hemelen
This posting is provided AS IS with no warranties, and confers no rights. It is not authorized by Prince or the NPG Music Club. You assume all risk for your use. All rights reserved. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
BartVanHemelen said:
. Oh for crying out loud, why was Thiel mad at them? Oh yeah, because they also went after him. Sheesh... --- They outed him so he got even. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Gawker are horrible. Thanks to Gamergate and Hulk Hogan that waste of internet space will hopefully be gone soon. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I never even heard of gawker until the Hulk hogan thing but from the sound of it, they won't be missed. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Gawker wasn't really a muckraking site. Nor was it the "new Spy Magazine". It was a hit-and-miss blog, essentially, with several talented writers.
Its specialty sites, Jezebel, Deadspin and io9, among others, remain operational. It's only Gawker that has disappeared. Good night, sweet Prince | 7 June 1958 - 21 April 2016
Props will be withheld until the showing and proving has commenced. -- Aaron McGruder | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |