OnlyNDaUsa said:

KingBAD said:

you ever notice

that it's basically the same people

they have the most to say on 'other' subjects

so vehemately (no matter how wrong)

are pretty much the same folks that cannot

GET THIS

i really do love walkin through puddles

the irony is the answer is 14...you are mistaken. See each coconut half is 1, each banana is 1, and each apple is 10.

1+10+ (1+1+1)= 14

just like

10+10+10 = 30

10 + (1+1+1+1) + (1+1+1+1) = 18

(1+1+1+1) - (1+1) = 2

1+10+ (1+1+1)= 14

you just do not get the trick is in the number of coconut halves and you number of bananas is the different bunches....

I did a topic on this trick math things a wile back:

like what is 1 X 2 + 3 x 4 + 5 x 0 + 1?

accordin to you...

why should i accept a pic to be

exatly what they say... you say four bananas (me too)

but actually i only see three and a half bananas

so with that in mind i see no reason to just

accept any other changes that may be implied...

i don't live in the box you live in...

even if i am wrong in that

the fact that you so readily responded to the barb

shows you're at least capable of recognizin yo

character flaw.

OnlyNDaUsa said:

KingBAD said:

i think folks look and still miss the thing...

apples= 10

bananas= 4

coconuts= 2

2+10+4= 16 everywhere i ever been...

ok i can not help it but YES i am replying to all 3 of KB's replies:

an apple is 10 (well we assume it is a whole apple)
a bunch of 4 bananas is 4
and 2 coconut halves are 2

In the last sentence we have one coconut half, an apple, and a bunch of 3 bananas- for a totall established value of 14.

it was the coco nuts that bent the deal for me...

upon lookin at the pic, the split is two parts to one...

i really do hate calculatin fractions....

OnlyNDaUsa said: "ok i can not help it but YES i am replying to all 3 of KB's replies"

if i like anything about you, it's that you are consistant....

tell me you'll miss me if i ever should leave the .org

OnlyNDaUsa said:

RodeoSchro said:

Fruit is 15.

14

Yeah, you're right. I caught the coconut half but not the three bananas.

RodeoSchro said:

OnlyNDaUsa said:

14

Yeah, you're right. I caught the coconut half but not the three bananas.

'but to be fair to you and KB the banana is not all that well erassed

OnlyNDaUsa said:

RodeoSchro said:

Yeah, you're right. I caught the coconut half but not the three bananas.

'but to be fair to you and KB the banana is not all that well erassed

thank you....

(fukkk i hate when we come to an agreement)

KingBAD said:

OnlyNDaUsa said:

'but to be fair to you and KB the banana is not all that well erassed

thank you....

(fukkk i hate when we come to an agreement)

I got to give old timers a break sometimes...

Tax dodging company , never work for them

OnlyNDaUsa said:

KingBAD said:

thank you....

(fukkk i hate when we come to an agreement)

I got to give old timers a break sometimes...

Old timers? Didn't KB join last year?

RodeoSchro said:

OnlyNDaUsa said:

I got to give old timers a break sometimes...

Old timers? Didn't KB join last year?

asked the noob

With a standard selection criterium like this, Google will create a very homogeneous group of collegues. That is never a good idea.

For the different roles in a team, there should be different selection criteria.