independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > General Discussion > The Rams are moving to Los Angeles; the Chargers probably are too
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 2 of 2 <12
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Reply #30 posted 01/17/16 2:23pm

morningsong

The LA Times says if the Chargers give a flat out no on moving to LA then the Raiders get the deal offered to the Chargers by the Rams. I think the Chargers if they don't leave immediately are going to take their year option, I doubt they'd give a definite no at this point. But who knows they may have preferred the deal they made with the Raiders and Carson, it seemed to be more in line with their best financial interest. In this instance the Rams own the new stadium.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #31 posted 01/17/16 5:10pm

RodeoSchro

2freaky4church1 said:

They spend other people's money. The right should be outraged.



It's always amused me that NFL owners are almost all right-wingers, and almost every right-winger is a fan of good old 'Murican football and the NFL.

And the NFL is the most Socialistic enterprise in the United States of America. It is almost pure socialism, in fact.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #32 posted 01/17/16 5:12pm

RodeoSchro

I have to say - we were without the NFL in Houston for almost a decade. And to be honest, almost no one missed it. It was nice to get a franchise again, but the quality of life in Houston was certainly not affected at all when we didn't have a team.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #33 posted 01/17/16 9:20pm

morningsong

kpowers said:

I hope no other team moves to LA. Well at least the Rams will travel less for division games now. Now there is talk about the NFL having a team in London, then if that is the case St. Louis should be awarded the other team that comes into the league.


I read that the Chargers and Raiders get a $100mil each incentive to stay in their prespctive cities. There's a $1.1bil stadium on the table for the Chargers to get them to stay, but Oakland isn't promising anything to the Raiders. Who knows.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #34 posted 01/19/16 9:52am

morningsong

The mayor is Still Waiting.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #35 posted 01/20/16 10:39am

morningsong

‪#‎BREAKING‬ The Chargers have applied for trademarks for the terms "Los Angeles Chargers" and "LA Chargers."


zipped

The application to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office was filed Thursday, two days after National Football League owners gave the Chargers a one-year window to enter into an agreement with the Rams to share a future stadium in Inglewood.

The application, first reported by the Los Angeles Times, was filed by the Chargers Football Company and lists NFL lawyer Anastasia Danias as the attorney of record.

The trademark would cover a wide range of products, including helmets, visual recordings, video game software, jewelry, posters, trading cards and toys, among many other items.

The Internet addresses losangeleschargers.com and lachargers.com are already taken by an organization called Blowout Inc.

The website claims to be a "fan site for fans by fans" that's not affiliated with the team. However, the only content is an embedded video posted Dec. 6 of the Chargers' and Oakland Raiders' plan to build a stadium in Carson, which owners ultimately rejected.

Representatives of the Chargers and Rams met Monday, but the two sides agreed not to discuss their negotiations publicly. It was unclear when or if they will meet again.

Meanwhile, officials with the city and county of San Diego have reiterated their offer to build a playing facility in Mission Valley to replace Qualcomm Stadium, paid for with a mix of public and private money, or consider another locations the Chargers might prefer.

Chargers Chairman Dean Spanos said after a meeting of owners last week that he would take time to consider his options.

Triple zipped

[Edited 1/20/16 10:44am]

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #36 posted 01/21/16 10:37am

morningsong

The mayor of Los Angeles won't be advocating for the addition of a second NFL team.

Instead, Eric Garcetti says he would like to see the Chargers stay in San Diego.

"We'd welcome any team to come here, but I love the idea of a great rivalry to the south," Garcetti said Wednesday. "We wish them luck."


"We talked about bringing the Super Bowl here every four or five years," Garcetti said. "We're looking at the Final Four. Also, this wasn't part of our Olympic bid. Now we can add this to the bid. It's huge. It says to the world that you can do a sustainable Olympics and be cost sensitive."

Los Angeles has replaced Boston as the United States' Olympic city candidate. Los Angeles is competing with Hamburg, Germany; Rome, Italy; Budapest, Hungary and Paris, France. The International Olympic Committee will choose a site by vote in Lima, Peru, in September 2017.



Sounds like LA got what it needed and they don't need no more. So again I'm not sure how much "love" the Chargers think they're going to get at their current status over staying put with the fanbase they have. The only reason I can see them leaving is purely the money, "bunk" a fandom.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #37 posted 01/21/16 1:00pm

morningsong

It would be weird having the Raiders here. But it's possible.

No more "San Diego, Super Chargers. San Diego. Chargers, Go" songs. Weird. 55 years is a long time. If they leave it's way more going on than the fans know, they're pissed about something. Ok, we know the stadium's most of it but there has to be more. But hey, they know it took what 20 years to get a new Main Library built, they know how slow we move here. This moving out of a small town mentality is hard stuff. Ok, it's the spending money part that's the issue but hey, it's still hard.


I don't know this, but I seriously doubt we'd go long with no football team, and I read the Raiders might be interested if the Chargers go, seems like they just want out of Oakland. I know for certain there is a fanbase for them here, not sure how large but it can grow.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #38 posted 01/27/16 7:09am

morningsong

No official word but it looks like the Chargers have begun removing San Diego off their merchandise
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #39 posted 01/29/16 3:05pm

morningsong

So it's official, they're staying another year.


http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2016/01/29/chargers-will-play-in-san-diego-in-2016-may-move-to-l-a-in-2017/

Next question.
So will the Raiders end up in Vegas?

[Edited 1/29/16 15:06pm]

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #40 posted 01/29/16 3:19pm

phunkdaddy

avatar

RodeoSchro said:

I have to say - we were without the NFL in Houston for almost a decade. And to be honest, almost no one missed it. It was nice to get a franchise again, but the quality of life in Houston was certainly not affected at all when we didn't have a team.



I didn't get it. It seemed like the city had a love affair with the Oilers.
I loved the Steelers-Oilers rivalry. It was one of the best in football.
It seemed like once the owner asked for a new stadium and didn't get his wishes
from the city the football fans turned on him and quit attending. I enjoyed watchimng Earl Campbell, Billy "White Shoes" Johnson, and Earnest Givins over the
years. The Oilers situation reminded m of the initial Charlotte Hornets incarnation when owner Geoge Shinn wanted a new arena and the city said no so
he announced he was taking the team to New Orleans and he was villainized in
the city.
[Edited 1/29/16 15:26pm]
Don't laugh at my funk
This funk is a serious joint
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #41 posted 01/29/16 3:20pm

morningsong

Supposedly....



Statement from Dean Spanos

Friday, January 29, 2016 2:44 PM PST

Dear Chargers Fans,
Today I decided our team will stay in San Diego for the 2016 season and I hope for the long term in a new stadium.
I have met with Mayor Faulconer and Supervisor Roberts and I look forward to working closely with them and the business community to resolve our stadium dilemma. We have an option and an agreement with the Los Angeles Rams to go to Inglewood in the next year, but my focus is on San Diego.
This has been our home for 55 years, and I want to keep the team here and provide the world-class stadium experience you deserve.
Everyone on both sides of the table in San Diego must now determine the best next steps and how to deploy the additional resources provided by the NFL.
I am committed to looking at this with a fresh perspective and new sense of possibility.
With deep appreciation for your years of support,
Dean A. Spanos
Chairman

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #42 posted 01/29/16 3:27pm

phunkdaddy

avatar

morningsong said:

Supposedly....









Statement from Dean Spanos





Friday, January 29, 2016 2:44 PM PST








Dear Chargers Fans,


Today I decided our team will stay in San Diego for the 2016 season and I hope for the long term in a new stadium.


I have met with Mayor Faulconer and Supervisor Roberts and I look forward to working closely with them and the business community to resolve our stadium dilemma. We have an option and an agreement with the Los Angeles Rams to go to Inglewood in the next year, but my focus is on San Diego.


This has been our home for 55 years, and I want to keep the team here and provide the world-class stadium experience you deserve.


Everyone on both sides of the table in San Diego must now determine the best next steps and how to deploy the additional resources provided by the NFL.


I am committed to looking at this with a fresh perspective and new sense of possibility.


With deep appreciation for your years of support,




Dean A. Spanos

Chairman







I hope so. I've heard San Diego is a great city.
Don't laugh at my funk
This funk is a serious joint
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #43 posted 01/29/16 3:49pm

morningsong

phunkdaddy said:

morningsong said:

Supposedly....



Statement from Dean Spanos

Friday, January 29, 2016 2:44 PM PST

Dear Chargers Fans,
Today I decided our team will stay in San Diego for the 2016 season and I hope for the long term in a new stadium.
I have met with Mayor Faulconer and Supervisor Roberts and I look forward to working closely with them and the business community to resolve our stadium dilemma. We have an option and an agreement with the Los Angeles Rams to go to Inglewood in the next year, but my focus is on San Diego.
This has been our home for 55 years, and I want to keep the team here and provide the world-class stadium experience you deserve.
Everyone on both sides of the table in San Diego must now determine the best next steps and how to deploy the additional resources provided by the NFL.
I am committed to looking at this with a fresh perspective and new sense of possibility.
With deep appreciation for your years of support,
Dean A. Spanos
Chairman

I hope so. I've heard San Diego is a great city.

Interesting the words world-class, SD is a really nice city but I liked it better when it was just a little navy town and wasn't trying to take it's place on the world stage, but life must move forward, what will be will be.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #44 posted 02/16/16 8:00pm

BobGeorge909

avatar

So everything is pretty final? It's just gonna be the Rams? I don't see the Raiders coming back for any reason.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #45 posted 02/17/16 7:04am

morningsong

BobGeorge909 said:

So everything is pretty final? It's just gonna be the Rams? I don't see the Raiders coming back for any reason.

The Chargers took their 1 year option. If they don't get what they want then to LA they go. At the same time blocking the Raiders from LA for at least a year.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #46 posted 02/17/16 10:06am

BobGeorge909

avatar

morningsong said:

BobGeorge909 said:

So everything is pretty final? It's just gonna be the Rams? I don't see the Raiders coming back for any reason.

The Chargers took their 1 year option. If they don't get what they want then to LA they go. At the same time blocking the Raiders from LA for at least a year.

Eye C
..
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #47 posted 02/22/16 6:10am

PurpleJedi

avatar

I wonder if St Louis is going to have a jersey-burning day?

lol

By St. Boogar and all the saints at the backside door of Purgatory!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #48 posted 02/24/16 5:08pm

morningsong

Looks like the Chargers are determined to hitch on to the ComiCon money. This is going to be so lovely.

sigh

Haven't even heard about St. Vincent de Pauls, which was my first thought. Father Joe fought so hard for naught.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 2 of 2 <12
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > General Discussion > The Rams are moving to Los Angeles; the Chargers probably are too