Forget it.

It seems that there is no use even telling anyone about things that are not common knowledge.
[This message was edited Sun Mar 23 17:23:51 PST 2003 by PsychoWhiteMan]

so go to work next King Holiday in protest...

Rhondab said:

I go to work on every single Martin Luterh King day anyway... nothing would change there... I don't work for the post office.

Am I the only one who didn't know that Martin Luther King, Jr. was a plagiarist?

lol...the post office? Interesting. I think the lack of response to the thread is that people probably would like to remember MLK, jr. for the positive things and not for the negative things that may have occurred.

FYI...not everyone who takes off MLK day is a postal worker.

I always trip on people who try to be a dick on purpose

rdhull said:

I don't think that Martin Luther King, Jr. was trying to be a dick at all.

PsychoWhiteMan said:

[Flame deleted.--Matt]
[This message was edited Sun Mar 23 19:40:16 PST 2003 by matt]

rdhull said:

What I posted was a fact that I did not know until today. Maybe you should stop being so defensive and trying to act in a manner that is unbecoming. I do not appreciate your comments.
[This message was edited Sun Mar 23 19:40:37 PST 2003 by matt]

PsychoWhiteMan said:

I do.

RDHULL

PsychoWhiteMan said:

Defensive and unbecoming?--I responded to something that was meant to get the kind of response I gave ..dont be a punk. Post rhetoric or reviled facts but dont be a crybaby when you get responses that dont send you kisses..Do you actually think I care what or what you dont appreciate? Be sure to run to mommy to tell on me again.


.
[This message was edited Sun Mar 23 19:48:57 PST 2003 by rdhull]

rdhull said:

It is perfectly fine if you don't want to accept the fact that Martin Luther King, Jr. was a plagiarist, but you do not have to try to flame people for posting the truth.

PsychoWhiteMan said:

I didn't flame you..I said you were purposefully trying to be a dick. I was only stating the truth..now how is that a flame. You have yet to see me flame you.

hmmm? what's going on here? i never saw this before it was edited.

rdhull said:

I was absolutely not trying to be a dick in any way, shape, form or fashion. I posted something that I heard about today that I had never heard before and I thought that some people might find it interesting.

I did not know that Martin Luther King, Jr. plagiarized both his doctoral dissertation and the "I have a dream" speech, although it seems to be very well documented.

You, on the other hand, decided to act indignant for the statement of a fact and did, indeed, flame me.

rdhull said:

I am quite sure that it would be just stunning if you did and it would probably render me helpless and vulnerable for weeks to come while my fragile ego healed from your powerful onslaught. :LOL:

PsychoWhiteMan said:

No he didn't. His response was provoked by what you said.

2the9s said:

How so, exactly?

I did not post anything that was objectionable, as it was simply a fact and was not posted with malice in any way.

PsychoWhiteMan said:

It would because I already made your fragile ego edit your original post--now either Ima badazz as ever been beheld at the org to be the catalyst to make you change your post or you have a fragile ego--which is it?

rdhull said:

I edited my post because someone asked me to. This someone was not you and I would never edit a post unless I was asked to by someone that I respect.

In short, you had absolutely nothing to do with the edit so don't start thinking that you are all powerful and a bad-ass in any way. :LOL:

PsychoWhiteMan said:

Yeah, IrishEcho used to do that same shit and got banned.

2the9s said:

IrishEcho flamed people and I have not flamed anyone. I merely posted a fact and someone tried to be rude about it, as they were unable to accept the fact.

You seem to have a problem with this. Why is this, 2the9s?

PsychoWhiteMan said:

Because it's a pattern with you Ice. A very tired pattern. You provoke people that you know are going to react a certain way and then say you are being sracastic or funny or phenomenological or whatever.

You've done it with Nep, Rane, soulpower etc etc

You may not flame according to the TOS, but there always seems to be flames when you are around.

THAT's my problem, thanks for asking.

2the9s said:

but they make it so easy

PsychoWhiteMan said:

yeah..."sure" I had nothing to do with it.

AaronFantastic said:

Yeah I know, that's part of the point.

2the9s said:

Oh Psychowhiteman is Icenine? Interesting

2the9s said:

That's on them, then.

2the9s said:

The thing is this...

I did not flame anyone, nor did I attempt to provoke anyone. I ever so simply posted something that I learned about today. It is a simple theory and I would expect that you could figure that out. I have not flamed, I have not provoked and I have not attempted to engage in a flame war.

Look I don't like you, you don't like me... it is not a big deal to me at all, but I have not done anything wrong in any way, so step down off the soap box and go about your business.

:LOL: