So says my TV. NBC is reporting that CBS has announced this. Didn't see it on CBS's site yet, though.

Confirmed:

CBS has named Stephen Colbert as new host of the "Late Show," effective when David Letterman retires.

Here is the press release:

The CBS Television Network today announced that Stephen Colbert, the host, writer and executive producer of the Emmy and Peabody Award-winning "The Colbert Report," will succeed David Letterman as the host of "The Late Show," effective when Mr. Letterman retires from the broadcast.

The five-year agreement between CBS and Colbert was announced by Leslie Moonves, President and CEO, CBS Corporation, and Nina Tassler, Chairman of CBS Entertainment.

Letterman, the legendary, critically acclaimed host of the CBS late night series for 21 years, announced his retirement on his April 3 broadcast. Colbert's premiere date as host of "The Late Show" will be announced after Mr. Lettermen determines a timetable for his final broadcasts in 2015.

Specific creative elements, as well as the producers and the location for the Colbert-hosted "Late Show" will be determined and announced at a later date.

http://tv.msn.com/tv/arti...ansentrel1

Not sure what I think of this, but I do know that I'm very glad it wasn't Howard Stern or Chelsea Handler

I know it would have been very unlikely, but Ellen DeGeneres would have KILLED all others in ratings.

I don't know that I like Colbert that much. Interesting character actor, loved him in Strangers With Candy. But he's a bit of a caricature. I'll be impressed if he lasts past 3 years.

Honestly, I don't watch many talk shows like I used to. I'm down to watching (when I make an effort) Ellen, Daily Show, and Late Late with Craig Ferguson. Aside from the live performances, Leno and Letterman were pretty lame. Kimmel is funny, Arsenio has a better variety of guests, and Conan is great depending on the guest. They benefit from being "outside" the big 2 slots though.

I love The Colber Report so this saddens me. Doubt if I watch him doing a regular hosting gig. Maybe CC will grab back Oliver and give him the time slot.

Stephen Colbert is going to kick ass as the new host of the Late Show. C'mon. He's nuts!

Dauphin said:

i think colbert is funny but ... i think they made this decision too fast ... I mean they could have milked this for months ...

Craig Ferguson just got a 5 million dollar bonus for being passed over.

BobGeorge909 said:

Dauphin said:

I know it would have been very unlikely, but Ellen DeGeneres would have KILLED all others in ratings.

I don't know that I like Colbert that much. Interesting character actor, loved him in Strangers With Candy. But he's a bit of a caricature. I'll be impressed if he lasts past 3 years.

Honestly, I don't watch many talk shows like I used to. I'm down to watching (when I make an effort) Ellen, Daily Show, and Late Late with Craig Ferguson. Aside from the live performances, Leno and Letterman were pretty lame. Kimmel is funny, Arsenio has a better variety of guests, and Conan is great depending on the guest. They benefit from being "outside" the big 2 slots though.

That's what they said about his comedy central show WAAAAY back in 2005. Its been nominated for numerous emmeys over numerous years and won several, some as late as last year. Its not fading. The character many said couldn't last is fully established and is apparently getting room to grow. Maybe republicans r more entertaining than they r effective leaders. Cuz this 'republican' is taking over a fairly democratic persons timeslot.

True. However, the Colbert Report intros the popular Daily Show at a early evening timeslot. Much of his audience is due to that. Also, his show is rich with satire. If anything, a niche spin-off show like that is perfect for a cable channel.

This is a completely different format, and he would have to split those numbers against Fallon and Kimmel. In the age groups that most networks target, it's going to be a brawl between the three. And who is going to attract the 50 and over market?

So while it definitely can work, I don't see what he offers that Fallon, Kimmel provide, let alone Arsenio or Conan. And the Emmy nominations and wins... meh. A lot of that is friends scratching friends backs. I'd rather give credit that his viewership has been steady and strong. But will those numbers follow him to 11:30? And will the numbers Letterman had stick around?

Time will tell. And like I said, I'd be impressed, not shocked.

The most physically unattractive man in showbusiness, yay.

Dauphin said:

BobGeorge909 said:

Dauphin said: That's what they said about his comedy central show WAAAAY back in 2005. Its been nominated for numerous emmeys over numerous years and won several, some as late as last year. Its not fading. The character many said couldn't last is fully established and is apparently getting room to grow. Maybe republicans r more entertaining than they r effective leaders. Cuz this 'republican' is taking over a fairly democratic persons timeslot.

True. However, the Colbert Report intros the popular Daily Show at a early evening timeslot. Much of his audience is due to that. Also, his show is rich with satire. If anything, a niche spin-off show like that is perfect for a cable channel.

This is a completely different format, and he would have to split those numbers against Fallon and Kimmel. In the age groups that most networks target, it's going to be a brawl between the three. And who is going to attract the 50 and over market?

So while it definitely can work, I don't see what he offers that Fallon, Kimmel provide, let alone Arsenio or Conan. And the Emmy nominations and wins... meh. A lot of that is friends scratching friends backs. I'd rather give credit that his viewership has been steady and strong. But will those numbers follow him to 11:30? And will the numbers Letterman had stick around?

Time will tell. And like I said, I'd be impressed, not shocked.

Colbert is a republican? I thought that was part of his schtick. I don't believe I ever heard him disclose if he has any party affiliation.

Anyhoo, Colbert already has an 11:30 following since that's when his show airs. The show seen in early evening is rebroacast from the night before.

I would have chosen Ellen but Stephen will be fine.

babynoz said:

BobGeorge909 said:

babynoz said:

Colbert is a republican? I thought that was part of his schtick. I don't believe I ever heard him disclose if he has any party affiliation.

Anyhoo, Colbert already has an 11:30 following since that's when his show airs. The show seen in early evening is rebroacast from the night before.

I would have chosen Ellen but Stephen will be fine.

Well I as referring to the character...who is obviously republican....hell a power² republican. I only suspect he is actually a democrat because of the posture of his satire and his guests...but i dont KNOW. And thanks for clearing that timeslot thing up. I live in a central time zone for 4 years after of thirty in pacific... And I shouldn't...but I get fuckin confused with that time bullshit....especially with DVR, hulu, and Netflix...which need me to not know any times. [Edited 4/10/14 16:20pm] And if the format maintains any semblance to the current one...it brings a not so neutral stance on politics to a non-cable lineup that makes attempts to stay neutral to a small degree, With the subject of politics to the fore. [Edited 4/10/14 16:24pm]

I was wondering if they would let him do the character during his monologue or if they'll just have him do a regular stand up routine?

Maybe they'll mix it up. He's going to have different writers so I'm curious how that will work out. Who is going to replace him on Comedy Central?

His Late Show contract is for five years. The only hazard I see is that he may discover that he doesn't like doing this type of show.

babynoz said:

^Hes NOT doing his schtick. He's gonna be himself. That's why it sucks for me.

lazycrockett said:

Wow, you people are critical! Look at his White House correspondents dinner stuff.

terrible choice

BobGeorge909 said:

lazycrockett said:

^Hes NOT doing his schtick. He's gonna be himself. That's why it sucks for me.

It seems ur right. I didn't expect that. I guess that opens it up a bit but sheds summin I thouroughly enjoy. I feel ya. If someone can pull off a good show while being narrowly defined by a schtick...he might be more effective overall if he has more tools. I'm sad though... Sniff sniff...bye bye u crazy² republican.

He was funny as all get-out on "The Daily Show" and he was just being himself most of the time.

RodeoSchro said:

Unimpressed ~ Though ... I don't and wont be investing my time watching

Besides his shtick, when he interviews people I am always blown away at how sharp the man is. The dude is quick! No matter who he interviews he makes it interesting.

kinda looks like him