There's no such thing as too much Taylor Swift!

RodeoSchro said:

RodeoSchro said:

There's no such thing as too much Taylor Swift!

*

In my books there is. Anything after 2 minutes of one of her performances. A little bit of Taylor Swift goes a LONG way.

*

There's something about that woman that I find kinda spooky.

Tempest said:

BobGeorge909 said:

RodeoSchro said:

There's no such thing as too much Taylor Swift!

U sound like my old neighbor. He said he used to masturbate to Taylor swift songs....he stole a stand up life size-ish display of her out of a Walgreen's.

Are you trying to offend me?!? 'Cause after reading the thread about getting offended, I'm not sure if you can or can't.

Tempest said:

RodeoSchro said:

There's no such thing as too much Taylor Swift!

*

In my books there is. Anything after 2 minutes of one of her performances. A little bit of Taylor Swift goes a LONG way.

*

There's something about that woman that I find kinda spooky.

It's that she's so NORMAL, isn't it? She's not a cigarette-smoking, porn-star-imitating, drug-overdosing sleazebag like most of the other female pop stars her age!

RodeoSchro said:

RodeoSchro said:

Tempest said:

*

In my books there is. Anything after 2 minutes of one of her performances. A little bit of Taylor Swift goes a LONG way.

*

There's something about that woman that I find kinda spooky.

It's that she's so NORMAL, isn't it? She's not a cigarette-smoking, porn-star-imitating, drug-overdosing sleazebag like most of the other female pop stars her age!

*

I appreciate that she's not all those things (at least what we see). However, my gut tells me that there's more to the (her) story behind the scenes. I would not be surprised if somewhere down the line some news breaks about her that will shock everyone. IMO, I don't find her to be "normal". . . whatever "normal" is.

*

It's just a creepy feeling I have about her that I can't explain. I've never cared for her. She's always come across as very fake to me. Of course, that could just be me too. I'm just sharing the vibe I get from her.

*
And yes, she needs to eat!

*

[Edited 10/9/13 14:49pm]

Tempest said:

Actually, keeping kosher won't make or keep you skinny.

*

I actually found out from an ecommerce site that I sell on that they have been contacted by Swift's legal team (more than once) to let the ecommerce site know that they don't want people even typing her name in their blog posts (or on forums). Honest to God.

*

Now, I understand that celebrities want their images protected (trademark, etc.) to try and keep people from making money off their physical image, their music etc. Totally understand that. However, not being able to type her name in a blog post or on a forum gets seriously into the WEIRD ZONE and paranoia. I can't even imagine a legal team contacting the head of a company to tell them to make sure that people aren't typing her name in their blog posts and on forums. That's seriously, seriously, over the top. Of course, the ecommerce site doesn't have to do any such thing as blog posts and forums are protected by the 1st amendment. They know that too. That doesn't stop them from threatening though.

*

If you want to be a celebrity, than having people talk about you (good and bad) on Twitter, FB, blog posts and forums just goes with the territory. If Taylor wants to be such a super control freak and not have anyone talking about her, than she shouldn't be a celebrity. It's really that simple.

*

I frequent the forums at the ecommerce site as well just to keep up to date on things that I need to know for business and I can promise you that Taylor Swift is mentioned VERY RARELY. And I mean, VERY RARELY (like almost never). So, for her legal team to send them a few notices about it, is really over the top STRANGE! And, if they're doing it to them, obviously, they're contacting a lot more sites as well. You know that they aren't doing it for fun either. They are at Swift''s beck and call and doing what she wants them to do. It's ridiculous and a waste of time.

*

[Edited 10/9/13 15:39pm]

BobGeorge909 said:

RodeoSchro said:

Are you trying to offend me?!? 'Cause after reading the thread about getting offended, I'm not sure if you can or can't.

I was alluding as to how I was offended...that fool wouldn't quit it with that shit. His little Taylor swift fantasies would get quite elaborate. He said one time he put a cut out of her face on a paper bag and put it over his girlfriends head...and said girlfriend was standing right there giggling...prolly cuz he was spinning a yard...but anyways...I was like cool your jets bro...i get u and you girl like offbeat stuff...but bro, I don'wannaknow

No kidding, that's too much information.

I was just joking about the offended part. Did you read uhope's thread on being offended? It's confusing!

RodeoSchro said:

if someone captured me and said my torture was a choice between listening to a taylor swift album, and getting my balls smashed with a hammer... i'd have to think for a bit

Tempest said:

BobGeorge909 said:

Tempest said:

Actually, keeping kosher won't make or keep you skinny.

*

I actually found out from an ecommerce site that I sell on that they have been contacted by Swift's legal team (more than once) to let the ecommerce site know that they don't want people even typing her name in their blog posts (or on forums). Honest to God.

*

Now, I understand that celebrities want their images protected (trademark, etc.) to try and keep people from making money off their physical image, their music etc. Totally understand that. However, not being able to type her name in a blog post or on a forum gets seriously into the WEIRD ZONE and paranoia. I can't even imagine a legal team contacting the head of a company to tell them to make sure that people aren't typing her name in their blog posts and on forums. That's seriously, seriously, over the top. Of course, the ecommerce site doesn't have to do any such thing as blog posts and forums are protected by the 1st amendment. They know that too. That doesn't stop them from threatening though.

*

If you want to be a celebrity, than having people talk about you (good and bad) on Twitter, FB, blog posts and forums just goes with the territory. If Taylor wants to be such a super control freak and not have anyone talking about her, than she shouldn't be a celebrity. It's really that simple.

*

I frequent the forums at the ecommerce site as well just to keep up to date on things that I need to know for business and I can promise you that Taylor Swift is mentioned VERY RARELY. And I mean, VERY RARELY (like almost never). So, for her legal team to send them a few notices about it, is really over the top STRANGE! And, if they're doing it to them, obviously, they're contacting a lot more sites as well. You know that they aren't doing it for fun either. They are at Swift''s beck and call and doing what she wants them to do. It's ridiculous and a waste of time.

*

[Edited 10/9/13 15:39pm]

Serious...if are gonna make money off of the general public and unsolicited advertising....u best tolerate what they got to say.

*

Agreed.

MoBetterBliss said:

Tempest said:

RodeoSchro said:

It's that she's so NORMAL, isn't it? She's not a cigarette-smoking, porn-star-imitating, drug-overdosing sleazebag like most of the other female pop stars her age!

*

I appreciate that she's not all those things (at least what we see). However, my gut tells me that there's more to the (her) story behind the scenes. I would not be surprised if somewhere down the line some news breaks about her that will shock everyone. IMO, I don't find her to be "normal". . . whatever "normal" is.

*

It's just a creepy feeling I have about her that I can't explain. I've never cared for her. She's always come across as very fake to me. Of course, that could just be me too. I'm just sharing the vibe I get from her.

*
And yes, she needs to eat!

*

[Edited 10/9/13 14:49pm]

Yeah, I know what you mean. She totally comes off as creepy to me as well and seeing her behaviour at award shows and the like she also comes off totally immature. Plus she's gone through more men in Hollywood/music business - at a very young age. And some of these men are close to 15 years older than she is.

Dress provocatively and you're a whore, be an actual serial celebrity bed hopper with a so called innocent white girl look and you're America's Sweatheart!

BobGeorge909 said:

RodeoSchro said:

No kidding, that's too much information.

I was just joking about the offended part. Did you read uhope's thread on being offended? It's confusing!

I know u were joking...I used it to carry on about the TMI stuff.

No sweat!

Taylor Swift, though, is exactly what an artist should be. Never a controversy, never something that she'd be ashamed of 10 years later. She is definitely the exception to the "Look what happens to young females when they hit it big" rule that we see so often these days.

Check this out - about three years ago, when she was ruling the country-western world, she did something I've never seen done before. There's an event each summer in Nashville where ALL the big stars meet and greet their fans (the CMA Fest). Most of them have a 1- or 2-hour meet-and-greet.

But Taylor Swift said she would meet anyone and everyone that wanted to see her. She would take a photograph, sign an autograph - whatever.

She received fans for 14 1/2 hours. Incredible! She started around 10 AM and finished up close to midnight.

If you don't tear up at the 2:45 mark of this, you just aren't a human:

That is SO much more refreshing than seeing a formerly-talented young star masturbate with a foam finger, isn't it!

Oh, and did you see the story about her showing up at Auburn University unannounced, surprising two of her biggest fans with a concert on campus?

It's hard to believe any parent would support a drug-promoting trollop over someone as upright as Taylor Swift. But, I guess it takes all types!

Check this out if you want your faith in young female artists restored:

Awesome Taylor Swift moments?

Interesting read on Swift being a role model for young girls:

Despite Conventional Wisdom, Taylor Swift Was Never a Good Role Model for Girls

Despite the conventional wisdom, I’ve never ever thought Taylor Swift was a good role model for girls. . . unless you want your daughter to become an alpha female stalker. And wantonly sleeping around with much older men. And that’s aside from her dreadful and dreadfully overrated (and extremely boring) music. I’m not just talking about recent rumors that she spent $5 million on a Kennedy compound house so she would be near the 18-year-old Kennedy she’s “dating” (euphemism). Or the reports that she crashed a Kennedy wedding, which she was asked to leave (but refused).

Over the years, several readers have written to me about what a “wholesome” role model Swift is, contrary to the many pop music skanks I write about. And I’ve had male friends of mine tell me they were relieved when their daughters were fans of her music. One said, “Well, at least my girls don’t idolize the Kardashians.” Thank Heaven for small favors. But I disagreed, as Swift ain’t much better. As I told some of these people, Swift is a psychotic stalker and teaches young girls to whine endlessly about break-ups and publicly embarrass the guys who dumped her after she probably was easily lulled into sleeping with them. None of this is a good example for America’s girls. It’s just low-class . . . and creepy. And, yet, American girls see Swift’s nutjob behavior rewarded with lucrative, glamorous deals, such as her contract with “Cover Girl” cosmetics, etc.

Taylor Swift writes songs to publicly embarrass men that dumped her. Much older men that dumped her. Much older men who talk about sex with the girls they date and with whom Taylor Swift was probably not an exception. Swift once “dated” (euphemism) John Mayer (who at 34 is 12 years older than her–she is now 22). She was a teen then. And when he dumped her, she wrote a song about–and against–him. This is a guy who discussed, in graphic detail, sex he’s had with his celebrity girlfriends (he called Jessica Simpson, “sexual napalm”). Most people assume that Swift probably had sex with him, too, especially since she wrote a whiny song attacking him. And Swift dated movie star Jake Gyllenhaal, now 31. It’s speculated that her latest “breakup song,” “We Are Never Ever Getting Back Together,” is about him.

http://www.debbieschlusse...for-girls/

It's so funny when the only refutation one can find is an "I'm right and the rest of the world is wrong!" blog post.

I find it telling the author doesn't have kids. Awesome, that makes her a parenting expert! Also, she somehow has the magical powers to find out about Taylor Swift's sex life - despite no public indications whatsoever!

You know you have a parenting expert when she mentions that John Mayer makes it a habit of discussing his sexual conquests, yet she fails to mention that Mayer has never said a thing about having sex with Swift. Not even after Swift apparently wrote a non-too-flattering song about him.

But hey! Whose word are you going take? That of someone who has no children?

Or an actual parent? (Of course, I mean an actual parent who doesn't think it's A-OK to joke about having sex with one's own kids. I don't mean a "parent" who thinks that's in any way acceptable.)

Sooooo fucking creepy.

JustErin said:

Sooooo fucking creepy.

I agree, your stalking of me IS creepy. Not as creepy as you suggesting I have sex with my own kids, but creepy nonetheless.

Do me a favor and quit stalking me. Quit alluding to me in your posts. If you don't have the guts to address me personally, just don't address me at all.

Cool? Good.

Wow, how deluded do you have to be to think I'm stalking you by posting about Taylor Swift in a Taylor Swift thread?

Keep saying fucked up lies and making delusional statements and I'll just keep getting tons of private messages from other orgers about how you - RodeoSchro - are terribly creepy and keep alluding to me in many of your posts.

Doesn't bother me, though. You do your thing, Champ.

JustErin said:

Wow, how deluded do you have to be to think I'm stalking you by posting about Taylor Swift in a Taylor Swift thread?

Keep saying fucked up lies and making delusional statements and I'll just keep getting tons of private messages from other orgers about how you - RodeoSchro - are terribly creepy and keep alluding to me in many of your posts.

Doesn't bother me, though. You do your thing, Champ.

Yep, that's what I thought you'd do.

Oh well, I tried.

JustErin said:

Dress provocatively and you're a whore, be an actual serial celebrity bed hopper with a so called innocent white girl look and you're America's Sweatheart!

bingo

RodeoSchro said:

Taylor Swift, though, is exactly what an artist should be.

oh ffs