EXPOSED: Angelina Jolie part of a clever corporate scheme to protect billions in BRCA gene patents, influence Supreme Court decision (opinion)

Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/040365_Angelina_Jolie_gene_patents_Supreme_Court_decision.html#ixzz2U3LHoTUG

NaturalNews) Angelina Jolie's announcement of undergoing a double mastectomy (surgically removing both breasts) even though she had no breast cancer is not the innocent, spontaneous, "heroic choice" that has been portrayed in the mainstream media. Natural News has learned it all coincides with a well-timed for-profit corporate P.R. campaign that has been planned for months and just happens to coincide with the upcoming U.S. Supreme Court decision on the viability of the BRCA1 patent.

This is the investigation the mainstream media refuses to touch. Here, I explain the corporate financial ties, investors, mergers, human gene patents, lawsuits, medical fear mongering and the trillions of dollars that are at stake here. If you pull back the curtain on this one, you find far more than an innocent looking woman exercising a "choice." This is about protecting trillions in profits through the deployment of carefully-crafted public relations campaigns designed to manipulate the public opinion of women.

The signs were all there from the beginning of the scheme: Angelina Jolie's highly polished and obviously corporate-written op-ed piece at the New York Times, the carefully-crafted talking points invoking "choice" as a politically-charged keyword, and the obvious coaching of even her husband Brad Pitt who carefully describes the entire experience using words like "stronger" and "pride" and "family."

But the smoking gun is the fact that Angelina Jolie's seemingly spontaneous announcement magically appeared on the cover of People Magazine this week -- a magazine that is usually finalized for publication three weeks before it appears on newsstands. That cover, not surprisingly, uses the same language found in the NYT op-ed piece: "HER BRAVE CHOICE" and "This was the right thing to do." The flowery, pro-choice language is not a coincidence.

People magazine isn't finalized three weeks before it appears on newsstands. It is finalized and sent to the printer just a couple days before it goes on the newsstand.

I don´t know man...her mom DID die of cancer, and if this news is not based on very solid facts, then it is downright nasty and in bad taste to write the stuff they wrote. I am not necessarily saying that what she did was good or necessary but it´s her choice, and to accuse her of being involved in some grand scheme when there is no such scheme is really nasty.

What proof do they have?

KoolEaze said:

I don´t know man...her mom DID die of cancer, and if this news is not based on very solid facts, then it is downright nasty and in bad taste to write the stuff they wrote. I am not necessarily saying that what she did was good or necessary but it´s her choice, and to accuse her of being involved in some grand scheme when there is no such scheme is really nasty.

What proof do they have?

I hope more about this may see the light of day.

[Edited 5/23/13 6:21am]

KoolEaze said:

I don´t know man...her mom DID die of cancer, and if this news is not based on very solid facts, then it is downright nasty and in bad taste to write the stuff they wrote. I am not necessarily saying that what she did was good or necessary but it´s her choice, and to accuse her of being involved in some grand scheme when there is no such scheme is really nasty.

What proof do they have?

Her mom died of ovarian cancer... What I found odd was she choose not to take her ovaries...

little do we know that her breasts never existed in the first place, and have been only holograms all along

and like any good conspiracist junky I also don't have proof, so that should make my story also very plausible. to some

WTF.

Dancelot said:

little do we know that her breasts never existed in the first place, and have been only holograms all along

and like any good conspiracist junky I also don't have proof, so that should make my story also very plausible. to some