But the vitiligo!!!!

Fauxie said:

But the vitiligo!!!!

Ottensen said:

Fauxie said:

But the vitiligo!!!!

co-all of that

Just for y'all because it's Friday, LaToya has home videos just for her fans to help you get your weekend party started

Ottensen said:

Just for y'all because it's Friday, LaToya has home videos just for her fans to help you get your weekend party started

imago said:

Ottensen said:

Just for y'all because it's Friday, LaToya has home videos just for her fans to help you get your weekend party started

What the fuck was that?

For real... What. The. Fuck. Was. That?

Seriously, thefuckwasat???

Imago, what the fuck, man!

I mean fuuuuuuuuuuuuck whawasit?

I'm sorry but I really don't understand what actually the fuck that indeed was. It made me sad.

imago said:

Ottensen said:

Just for y'all because it's Friday, LaToya has home videos just for her fans to help you get your weekend party started

No, but stop posting about anything else for a minute. What the fuck is this?

Don't mess with my feelings. I really want to know what the fuck it is because I feel like I'm not going to sleep tonight. So what the fuck is it, please?

What the hell. There are more of them, too. Somebody explain what the fuck they are. Mods? Somebody make it alright again.

Fauxie said:

What the hell. There are more of them, too. Somebody explain what the fuck they are. Mods? Somebody make it alright again.

all here: http://prince.org/msg/5/384018

That crazy youtube lady broke my computer box.

imago said:

Fauxie said:

What the hell. There are more of them, too. Somebody explain what the fuck they are. Mods? Somebody make it alright again.

all here: http://prince.org/msg/5/384018

She has a CD with 30 tracks on it.

But what's up with this post of yours in that thread?

Dude, it didn't mean nothing. It was an improbable typo of 'totally'!

It ota makes sense. Get it? You should ota get it by now. Crazy kids.

.

[Edited 3/15/13 13:13pm]

JustErin said:

ThruTheEyesOfWonder said:

Believe me, no proof is ever enough for some people.

Oh, I didn't know that any proof was given. There was?

That's not what I meant.

What I meant was that even if DNA tests were performed and all three kids were proven to be biologically his, there would still be nay sayers out there saying they aren't.

Sorry for any misunderstanding.

Serious said:

ThruTheEyesOfWonder said:

Believe me, no proof is ever enough for some people.

So you honestly think this boy is MJ's biological son????????

Well Serious, I do. I see Michael in all three kids, and most particularly in the youngest. I think there's great possibility that he fathered all three.

I haven't seen any concrete evidence to say they aren't. Just Imago's and others neverending blabbering argument that they aren't. But hey, who am I to argue with the "experts" of all things MJ.

ThruTheEyesOfWonder said:

Fauxie said:

But the vitiligo!!!!

Fauxie said:

imago said:

all here: http://prince.org/msg/5/384018

She has a CD with 30 tracks on it.

I just bought "In My Truck" on iTunes.

Cinny said:

Fauxie said:

She has a CD with 30 tracks on it.

I just bought "In My Truck" on iTunes.

Why would you do something like that? That's like a dog taking a shit on your shoe and you giving it a cookie.

Fauxie said:

Cinny said:

I just bought "In My Truck" on iTunes.

Why would you do something like that? That's like a dog taking a shit on your shoe and you giving it a cookie.

The preview wasn't enough.

Cinny said:

Fauxie said:

Why would you do something like that? That's like a dog taking a shit on your shoe and you giving it a cookie.

The preview wasn't enough.

You sick puppy.

Cloudbuster said:

Dunno why it's so important to people if MJ's children are biologically his or not.

Are there not more important things in the world to focus on?

Anyhoo, looks like Prince Jackson has vitiligo.

When it comes to that topic of discussion, I try not to touch that one

Beautifulstarr123 said:

Often, I wonder what happened to Paris and Prince's mother, Debbie Rowe. Anyone knows? As for Blanket's mother, I recall Michael saying that he had a relationship with his mother, but didn't say who she was. It's the Bashir documentary.

Micheal also stated that he's only had two cosmetic procedures, both on his nose, and only so that he could 'sing better'.

So, I don't think what MJ says is really going to get anyone closer to the truth.

As for Debbie, she was likely a surragate to the children and not their 'mother mother', but whoever provided the eggs will probably not ever be known. None of two older kids resemble her.

She also signed over all parental rights to Michael "as a gift", which had to have been part of the original agreement when he bought those children. It's hard to believe any woman would just give up custody of her actual children to a man suspected of having molested a child just a decade before. She refuses to discuss even meeting MJ or any details regarding their time together outside of the 'fame' and touring, etc. And, now that MJ is dead, she appears largely not involved in the children's upbringing AT ALL, even though she's supposedly their mother.

There are stories (in tabloids) that she has taken some stances on the battles between the guardians of the children, but nothing coming directly from her---all heresay.

My take is that she was only a surragate. A very private woman who now enjoys a comfortable life (she owns 10 dogs and 32 horses. 32! wanting nothing to do with the children or the fame of the MJ world. It appears to be strictly business.

Blanket is different though--he was bought from a different mom and father pair.

imago said:

Beautifulstarr123 said:

Often, I wonder what happened to Paris and Prince's mother, Debbie Rowe. Anyone knows? As for Blanket's mother, I recall Michael saying that he had a relationship with his mother, but didn't say who she was. It's the Bashir documentary.

Micheal also stated that he's only had two cosmetic procedures, both on his nose, and only so that he could 'sing better'.

So, I don't think what MJ says is really going to get anyone closer to the truth.

As for Debbie, she was likely a surragate to the children and not their 'mother mother', but whoever provided the eggs will probably not ever be known. None of two older kids resemble her.

She also signed over all parental rights to Michael "as a gift", which had to have been part of the original agreement when he bought those children. It's hard to believe any woman would just give up custody of her actual children to a man suspected of having molested a child just a decade before. She refuses to discuss even meeting MJ or any details regarding their time together outside of the 'fame' and touring, etc. And, now that MJ is dead, she appears largely not involved in the children's upbringing AT ALL, even though she's supposedly their mother.

There are stories (in tabloids) that she has taken some stances on the battles between the guardians of the children, but nothing coming directly from her---all heresay.

My take is that she was only a surragate. A very private woman who now enjoys a comfortable life (she owns 10 dogs and 32 horses. 32! wanting nothing to do with the children or the fame of the MJ world. It appears to be strictly business.

Blanket is different though--he was bought from a different mom and father pair.

The last I've read of her, maybe several years back, she was trying to get custody of the children, and it's true she volunteered to bring forth Paris and Prince into this world, from her lips

As for Blanket, well if you say so

^^^I think Michael should have left his face alone, period. He was always incredibly handsome.

Beautifulstarr123 said:

imago said:

Micheal also stated that he's only had two cosmetic procedures, both on his nose, and only so that he could 'sing better'.

So, I don't think what MJ says is really going to get anyone closer to the truth.

As for Debbie, she was likely a surragate to the children and not their 'mother mother', but whoever provided the eggs will probably not ever be known. None of two older kids resemble her.

She also signed over all parental rights to Michael "as a gift", which had to have been part of the original agreement when he bought those children. It's hard to believe any woman would just give up custody of her actual children to a man suspected of having molested a child just a decade before. She refuses to discuss even meeting MJ or any details regarding their time together outside of the 'fame' and touring, etc. And, now that MJ is dead, she appears largely not involved in the children's upbringing AT ALL, even though she's supposedly their mother.

There are stories (in tabloids) that she has taken some stances on the battles between the guardians of the children, but nothing coming directly from her---all heresay.

My take is that she was only a surragate. A very private woman who now enjoys a comfortable life (she owns 10 dogs and 32 horses. 32! wanting nothing to do with the children or the fame of the MJ world. It appears to be strictly business.

Blanket is different though--he was bought from a different mom and father pair.

The last I've read of her, maybe several years back, she was trying to get custody of the children, and it's true she volunteered to bring forth Paris and Prince into this world, from her lips

As for Blanket, well if you say so

There are no credible sources that attempting custody is actually what she is doing. She appears largely uninvolved her her 'gifts' to Michael.

A simple DNA test or look at the contract she must have signed with MJ would likely invalidate any claim she had to the kids. She's a surragate.

imago said:

Beautifulstarr123 said:

The last I've read of her, maybe several years back, she was trying to get custody of the children, and it's true she volunteered to bring forth Paris and Prince into this world, from her lips

As for Blanket, well if you say so

There are no credible sources that attempting custody is actually what she is doing. She appears largely uninvolved her her 'gifts' to Michael.

A simple DNA test or look at the contract she must have signed with MJ would likely invalidate any claim she had to the kids. She's a surragate.

Yep, a simple DNA test would do the trick. Whether or not they've decided to do it is not really not our concern, though it's always being discussed. They're family, and that's what counts. I was just wondering what has become of her, that's all.

Thanks for the update on Debbie Rowe