independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > General Discussion > ugh... Stephen King is slowly de-evolving into Anne Rice: "The Shining" sequel about vampires and psychics coming soon
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 1 of 2 12>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Author

Tweet     Share

Message
Thread started 01/14/13 5:11pm

cborgman

avatar

ugh... Stephen King is slowly de-evolving into Anne Rice: "The Shining" sequel about vampires and psychics coming soon

Stephen King Writing ‘Shining’ Sequel About Psychics & Vampires

by Kofi Outlaw

At first glance you might think that we’re now running mock stories. Sorry, no such luck.

Instead, long-standing speculation has now given way to fact: Stephen King is writing a sequel novel to The Shining - more to the point, he has some of said sequel already written, he recently read some it, and we have video of his reading.

The sequel will be called Dr. Sleep, and it will follow The Shining‘s young protagonist, Danny, 30 years after the incident at the Overlook Hotel. Danny now uses his psychic powers to literally ease the minds of terminally-ill patients in hospice care. Things get twisted when “psychic vampires” show - and Psychic vs. Vampire battle ensues?

By now, most people are familiar with the aggravation that comes with learning about another unnecessary movie sequel – it’s kind of new to feel that aggravation about a novel, but that sentiment is already out there and swelling. It will be hard to convince a lot of people that The Shining needs a continuation -let alone that words ’The Shining’ and ‘vampires’ even belong in the same sentence. Here at Screen Rant, we’re already nervous about a possible (semi-)sequel to Stanley Kubrick’s classic 1980 film adaptation of The Shining, as we’re sure a lot of other movie fans are as well.

Sure, Pet Sematary II and Lawnmower Man 2: Beyond Cyberspace have their fair share of fans – but typically speaking, movies sequels spun out of Stephen King stories don’t have a good track record. Would the result be different since King himself is crafting this new tale? Maybe the acclaimed author has a sweet twist that will make this another great story in his litany of great stories – but in our opinion, it’ll have to be one hell of a trick.

Judge for yourself after listening King himself read a passage from Dr. Sleep to a George Mason University audience:




The idea of psychics battling vampires has been done (see: Brian Lumley’s expansive Necroscope series) – however, listening to the passage King read, it’s clear that Dr. Sleep has some heavy Americana themes (Medicare, RV people, American roadways), possibly serving as some sort of social allegory in similar fashion to how The Shining examined themes like family dynamic and addiction. If that’s the case, one can only speculate about the possible implications of the title (on the one hand, an obvious reference to Danny’s character, but beyond that…?).


.....


blerg.
[Edited 1/14/13 17:13pm]
Power tends to corrupt; absolute power corrupts absolutely. - Lord Acton
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #1 posted 01/14/13 5:16pm

XxAxX

avatar

vampirs are a bit overdone, and the shining doesn't need a sequel, but i'm already in line waiting to buy this baby. biggrin yay stephen king!

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #2 posted 01/14/13 7:00pm

lazycrockett

avatar

Can not stand this guys work. ill

The Most Important Thing In Life Is Sincerity....Once You Can Fake That, You Can Fake Anything.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #3 posted 01/14/13 7:18pm

Lammastide

avatar

This sounds like utter trash. confused

Ὅσον ζῇς φαίνου
μηδὲν ὅλως σὺ λυποῦ
πρὸς ὀλίγον ἐστὶ τὸ ζῆν
τὸ τέλος ὁ χρόνος ἀπαιτεῖ.”
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #4 posted 01/14/13 8:47pm

morningsong

Okay I would expect Stephen King to do something on vampires he just seems the type that has to stick his thumb in every kind of horror idea. But, uh, tying it to "The Shining" is scary all by itself.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #5 posted 01/14/13 9:03pm

Rococo

I knew Anne Rice was evil. in case in point

her whiny self hating vampires begat Stephenie Meyers shiny self hating vampires.

and now this. DON"T GET ME STARTED ON ThAT BLOODY QUEEN OF THE DAMNED FILM AND SOUNDtrACK. honestly Aaliyah saved that film.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #6 posted 01/14/13 9:04pm

Rococo

lazycrockett said:

Can not stand this guys work. ill

me too.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #7 posted 01/14/13 9:12pm

Cerebus

avatar

As a lifelong reader of King's work I have to say that I think his recent releases have actually been really solid. 'Under The Dome', 'Full Dark, No Stars', his work on the 'American Vampire' comic book (inspiration?), '11/26/63' and 'Wind Through the Keyhole' (SO much better than the last three Dark Tower books) were all great improvements on the work he'd been doing, and just generally good books. That only represents about three years (less, really) of work, and I won't deny that he was a bit of a career valley before that. I still love reading his books though - they feel familiar in a very comfortable way. 'The Sining' sequel? Meh, not really necessary, but I'll reserve judgment on the quality until I've read it.

[Edited 1/14/13 21:29pm]

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #8 posted 01/14/13 9:27pm

lazycrockett

avatar

Rococo said:

I knew Anne Rice was evil. in case in point

her whiny self hating vampires begat Stephenie Meyers shiny self hating vampires.

and now this. DON"T GET ME STARTED ON ThAT BLOODY QUEEN OF THE DAMNED FILM AND SOUNDtrACK. honestly Aaliyah saved that film.

Now in defense of Anne I Love bout everything she did pre Lasher. Honestly I think The Witching Hour is the best book she ever wrote. She should have stopped after that.

The Most Important Thing In Life Is Sincerity....Once You Can Fake That, You Can Fake Anything.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #9 posted 01/14/13 10:43pm

Rococo

lazycrockett said:

Rococo said:

I knew Anne Rice was evil. in case in point

her whiny self hating vampires begat Stephenie Meyers shiny self hating vampires.

and now this. DON"T GET ME STARTED ON ThAT BLOODY QUEEN OF THE DAMNED FILM AND SOUNDtrACK. honestly Aaliyah saved that film.

Now in defense of Anne I Love bout everything she did pre Lasher. Honestly I think The Witching Hour is the best book she ever wrote. She should have stopped after that.

At least switch genre.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #10 posted 01/15/13 3:18am

chocolate1

avatar

Rococo said:

lazycrockett said:

Can not stand this guys work. ill

me too.

I love him... I have read just about everything he's written.

Anne Rice, on the the other hand: shake

King has done vampires before. 'Salem's Lot, anyone?

He has also done some form of psychic...

If you've followed the books that have tied into the Dark Tower series (not just the 7 books), you'd see that the vampires/psychic idea is not new to him.

I have not liked everything- a couple still have the bookmarks in them.

I am not going to judge something that isn't even out yet based on an article.

I will read it, and then make an informed decision.

reading


"Love Hurts.
Your lies, they cut me.
Now your words don't mean a thing.
I don't give a damn if you ever loved me..."

-Cher, "Woman's World"
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #11 posted 01/15/13 3:20am

chocolate1

avatar

Cerebus said:

As a lifelong reader of King's work I have to say that I think his recent releases have actually been really solid. 'Under The Dome', 'Full Dark, No Stars', his work on the 'American Vampire' comic book (inspiration?), '11/26/63' and 'Wind Through the Keyhole' (SO much better than the last three Dark Tower books) were all great improvements on the work he'd been doing, and just generally good books. That only represents about three years (less, really) of work, and I won't deny that he was a bit of a career valley before that. I still love reading his books though - they feel familiar in a very comfortable way. 'The Sining' sequel? Meh, not really necessary, but I'll reserve judgment on the quality until I've read it.

[Edited 1/14/13 21:29pm]

nod

I agree with your whole post.

As for the bold part, it could be very interesting...


"Love Hurts.
Your lies, they cut me.
Now your words don't mean a thing.
I don't give a damn if you ever loved me..."

-Cher, "Woman's World"
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #12 posted 01/15/13 3:48am

missfee

avatar

XxAxX said:

vampirs are a bit overdone, and the shining doesn't need a sequel, but i'm already in line waiting to buy this baby. biggrin yay stephen king!

yeahthat

I will forever love and miss you...my sweet Prince.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #13 posted 01/15/13 4:03am

imago

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #14 posted 01/15/13 6:54am

cborgman

avatar

lazycrockett said:

a

Rococo said:

I knew Anne Rice was evil. in case in point

her whiny self hating vampires begat Stephenie Meyers shiny self hating vampires.

and now this. DON"T GET ME STARTED ON ThAT BLOODY QUEEN OF THE DAMNED FILM AND SOUNDtrACK. honestly Aaliyah saved that film.

Now in defense of Anne I Love bout everything she did pre Lasher. Honestly I think The Witching Hour is the best book she ever wrote. She should have stopped after that.

i love the witching hour. i will even grant her the vampire series through armand, even though that includes some clunkers like body thief.

but god, she really let her quality control go with lasher and it stayed low till i dropped out

Power tends to corrupt; absolute power corrupts absolutely. - Lord Acton
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #15 posted 01/15/13 6:54am

Empress

XxAxX said:

vampirs are a bit overdone, and the shining doesn't need a sequel, but i'm already in line waiting to buy this baby. biggrin yay stephen king!

Totally agree. I love Stephen King. Sure, some of his books have not been great, but I love the way he writes and every few years he comes out with something awesome. I really loved 11/22/1963. My favourites are:

It

The Stand

Misery

Duma Key

All the Gunslinger series

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #16 posted 01/15/13 9:13am

SynthiaRose

Anne Rice's writing is lyrical, layered and dripping with psychological exploration.

Vampires might NOW be cliche, overdone and trite, but Rice revolutionized the portrayal of the vampire, making them more inteligent, cultured, emotional, romantic, sexual and morally conflicted about their plight. Vampires had never been this multidimensional, even with Ross, Polidori and Stoker and who wrote sophisticated creatures . She deserves respect for elevating the genre for contemporary audiences.

Of course she also powerfully continued the classic metaphor of the vampire as an expression of humanity's fear of death and desire to be immortal -- and she did that well. Unlike Twilight creator STephanie Meyer who is an intellectually dimunitive derivative leech with superficial works, Rice had tons of subtext, complexity and originality.

I really don't know why she had to be slighted in this post title. Maybe King is devolving into Stephanie Meyer (only for people who judge before seeing the sequel' it'll probably be done with finesse) but writing like Rice wouldn't be an insult.

[Edited 1/15/13 9:16am]

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #17 posted 01/15/13 9:24am

SynthiaRose

Rococo said:

I knew Anne Rice was evil. in case in point

her whiny self hating vampires begat Stephenie Meyers shiny self hating vampires.

and now this. DON"T GET ME STARTED ON ThAT BLOODY QUEEN OF THE DAMNED FILM AND SOUNDtrACK. honestly Aaliyah saved that film.

Annie Rice hates that film as well so why blame her for it? confused She didn't write the screenplay and the book was far better. In fact, I barely recognized the film as an interpretation of the book; the writers and filmmakers combined multiple books and added stuff that wasnt even in the book.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #18 posted 01/15/13 9:44am

Rococo

SynthiaRose said:

Rococo said:

I knew Anne Rice was evil. in case in point

her whiny self hating vampires begat Stephenie Meyers shiny self hating vampires.

and now this. DON"T GET ME STARTED ON ThAT BLOODY QUEEN OF THE DAMNED FILM AND SOUNDtrACK. honestly Aaliyah saved that film.

Annie Rice hates that film as well so why blame her for it? confused She didn't write the screenplay and the book was far better. In fact, I barely recognized the film as an interpretation of the book; the writers and filmmakers combined multiple books and added stuff that wasnt even in the book.

Ah, i did not know that.

[Edited 1/15/13 9:45am]

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #19 posted 01/15/13 12:06pm

morningsong

SynthiaRose said:

Anne Rice's writing is lyrical, layered and dripping with psychological exploration.

Vampires might NOW be cliche, overdone and trite, but Rice revolutionized the portrayal of the vampire, making them more inteligent, cultured, emotional, romantic, sexual and morally conflicted about their plight. Vampires had never been this multidimensional, even with Ross, Polidori and Stoker and who wrote sophisticated creatures . She deserves respect for elevating the genre for contemporary audiences.

Of course she also powerfully continued the classic metaphor of the vampire as an expression of humanity's fear of death and desire to be immortal -- and she did that well. Unlike Twilight creator STephanie Meyer who is an intellectually dimunitive derivative leech with superficial works, Rice had tons of subtext, complexity and originality.

I really don't know why she had to be slighted in this post title. Maybe King is devolving into Stephanie Meyer (only for people who judge before seeing the sequel' it'll probably be done with finesse) but writing like Rice wouldn't be an insult.

[Edited 1/15/13 9:16am]

I have to agree with you there, that's what drew me into the books in the first place.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #20 posted 01/15/13 12:10pm

cborgman

avatar

SynthiaRose said:

Anne Rice's writing is lyrical, layered and dripping with psychological exploration.

Vampires might NOW be cliche, overdone and trite, but Rice revolutionized the portrayal of the vampire, making them more inteligent, cultured, emotional, romantic, sexual and morally conflicted about their plight. Vampires had never been this multidimensional, even with Ross, Polidori and Stoker and who wrote sophisticated creatures . She deserves respect for elevating the genre for contemporary audiences.

Of course she also powerfully continued the classic metaphor of the vampire as an expression of humanity's fear of death and desire to be immortal -- and she did that well. Unlike Twilight creator STephanie Meyer who is an intellectually dimunitive derivative leech with superficial works, Rice had tons of subtext, complexity and originality.

I really don't know why she had to be slighted in this post title. Maybe King is devolving into Stephanie Meyer (only for people who judge before seeing the sequel' it'll probably be done with finesse) but writing like Rice wouldn't be an insult.

[Edited 1/15/13 9:16am]

my opinion smile

i like some of her stuff. the first several vampire novels had some real winners, and i loved the witching hour.

but she lost me when tiny characters in her vampire cycle started getting their own books and then the weird flintstones meet the jetsons oddity that was the vamp/mayfair cross-over. and i really was done when she wrote the jesus books.

Power tends to corrupt; absolute power corrupts absolutely. - Lord Acton
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #21 posted 01/15/13 12:12pm

purplethunder3
121

avatar

SynthiaRose said:

Anne Rice's writing is lyrical, layered and dripping with psychological exploration.

Vampires might NOW be cliche, overdone and trite, but Rice revolutionized the portrayal of the vampire, making them more inteligent, cultured, emotional, romantic, sexual and morally conflicted about their plight. Vampires had never been this multidimensional, even with Ross, Polidori and Stoker and who wrote sophisticated creatures . She deserves respect for elevating the genre for contemporary audiences.

Of course she also powerfully continued the classic metaphor of the vampire as an expression of humanity's fear of death and desire to be immortal -- and she did that well. Unlike Twilight creator STephanie Meyer who is an intellectually dimunitive derivative leech with superficial works, Rice had tons of subtext, complexity and originality.

I really don't know why she had to be slighted in this post title. Maybe King is devolving into Stephanie Meyer (only for people who judge before seeing the sequel' it'll probably be done with finesse) but writing like Rice wouldn't be an insult.

[Edited 1/15/13 9:16am]

Exactly! yeahthat

"Music gives a soul to the universe, wings to the mind, flight to the imagination and life to everything." --Plato

https://youtu.be/CVwv9LZMah0
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #22 posted 01/15/13 12:29pm

lazycrockett

avatar

Well with Anne, as was stated earlier her style changed so much after the witching hour that as a fan she lost me. She went from rich context to Harlequin style of writing. It was very off putting. I think I stopped after Body Thief and all I remember from that is the Talamaca guy becoming a vamp in the end.

The Most Important Thing In Life Is Sincerity....Once You Can Fake That, You Can Fake Anything.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #23 posted 01/15/13 12:29pm

PurpleJedi

avatar

I have never read a Stephen King or an Anne Rice novel.

hmmm

Should I add those to my "2013 reading list"???

What would you guys recommend?

question

By St. Boogar and all the saints at the backside door of Purgatory!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #24 posted 01/15/13 12:32pm

lazycrockett

avatar

^Interview with a vampire

The Vampire Lestat

The Queen of the Damned

The Witching Hour.

Also if youre into any of the shades of grey crap out there, check out her anne rampling erotic serious bout sleeping beauty.

N dont bother with anything after Lasher.

The Most Important Thing In Life Is Sincerity....Once You Can Fake That, You Can Fake Anything.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #25 posted 01/15/13 12:36pm

cborgman

avatar

PurpleJedi said:

I have never read a Stephen King or an Anne Rice novel.

hmmm

Should I add those to my "2013 reading list"???

What would you guys recommend?

question

there are classics by each.

stephen: my faves would be the stand (uncut edition is much better), the shining, misery, salems lot, carrie and it (even though it is a little messy)

anne: interview with the vampire, the vampire lestat, queen of the damned, the vampire armand, the witching hour, and maybe cry to heaven

Power tends to corrupt; absolute power corrupts absolutely. - Lord Acton
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #26 posted 01/15/13 12:39pm

purplethunder3
121

avatar

lazycrockett said:

Well with Anne, as was stated earlier her style changed so much after the witching hour that as a fan she lost me. She went from rich context to Harlequin style of writing. It was very off putting. I think I stopped after Body Thief and all I remember from that is the Talamaca guy becoming a vamp in the end.

I didn't care for the mixing of the witches and vampires story line...

"Music gives a soul to the universe, wings to the mind, flight to the imagination and life to everything." --Plato

https://youtu.be/CVwv9LZMah0
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #27 posted 01/15/13 12:43pm

Empress

lazycrockett said:

Rococo said:

I knew Anne Rice was evil. in case in point

her whiny self hating vampires begat Stephenie Meyers shiny self hating vampires.

and now this. DON"T GET ME STARTED ON ThAT BLOODY QUEEN OF THE DAMNED FILM AND SOUNDtrACK. honestly Aaliyah saved that film.

Now in defense of Anne I Love bout everything she did pre Lasher. Honestly I think The Witching Hour is the best book she ever wrote. She should have stopped after that.

I too gave up on Anne Rice after the Witching Hour. I loved that book, but what came after was shit. I can't remember the name of the next book, but I hated it and haven't read anything from her since. The Witching Hour was excellent though.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #28 posted 01/15/13 12:45pm

cborgman

avatar

purplethunder3121 said:

lazycrockett said:

Well with Anne, as was stated earlier her style changed so much after the witching hour that as a fan she lost me. She went from rich context to Harlequin style of writing. It was very off putting. I think I stopped after Body Thief and all I remember from that is the Talamaca guy becoming a vamp in the end.

I didn't care for the mixing of the witches and vampires story line...

me either. it was when she started to lose me

and that's what i meant with the thread's title. if mixing your series starts to occur, it's time to maybe go back to the drawing board.

Power tends to corrupt; absolute power corrupts absolutely. - Lord Acton
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #29 posted 01/15/13 12:51pm

cborgman

avatar

[img:$uid]http://academic.depauw.edu/aevans_web/HONR101-02/WebPages/Fall%202007/Tyler/The%20Jetsons-%20Website/Jetsons%20Meet%20Flintstones.jpg[/img:$uid]

[Edited 1/15/13 12:58pm]

Power tends to corrupt; absolute power corrupts absolutely. - Lord Acton
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 1 of 2 12>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > General Discussion > ugh... Stephen King is slowly de-evolving into Anne Rice: "The Shining" sequel about vampires and psychics coming soon