Janet Jackson planning $24 million wedding?

Janet Jackson and her man Wissam Al Mana might be plotting nuptials to put the royal wedding to shame!

There are whispers that Janet could be planning the wedding of the century. According to One News, Janet is planning to jump the broom in the most extravagant style during a $24 million ceremony.

"They have tentatively set a late 2013 wedding date," a source reportedly told The National Enquirer. "They are still working out the details and the exact day."

Such a wedding wouldn't be hard to pull off for Janet's billionaire beau and she's built up a nice bank account for herself as well. Reportedly the couple will fly in 500 of their loved ones for $3 million. And Wissam is said to be giving each guest a $10,000 Rolex watch as a wedding favor as a sign of appreciation.

"Wissam is going to splash big when he marries Janet. It’s going to be the wedding of the century,” the source explained.

http://www.s2smagazine.com/stories/2012/10/janet-jackson-planning-24-million-wedding?utm_source=crowdignite.com&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=crowdignite.com

Who is this guy? Never heard of him.

National Enquirer

well her previous weddings were hush hush and all secret. At this point in her life she can finally have her cinderella wedding. if there is a lick of truth to this that is.

Seriously? Because there's nothing ridiculous about a woman in her 40s, who's been married twice already, doing the fairy princess thing?

Genesia said:

Seriously? Because there's nothing ridiculous about a woman in her 40s, who's been married twice already, doing the fairy princess thing?

Green is not a good color on you. Its their day let them have it.

popgodazipa said:

Genesia said:

Seriously? Because there's nothing ridiculous about a woman in her 40s, who's been married twice already, doing the fairy princess thing?

Green is not a good color on you. Its their day let them have it.

Riiiiiight. Because anyone who has a negative opinion about something is jealous. That's beyond stupid.

Boy, am I behind! I thought she was still dating Jermaine Dupri.

Genesia said:

Seriously? Because there's nothing ridiculous about a woman in her 40s, who's been married twice already, doing the fairy princess thing?

according to who's standards? big weddings are not my cup of tea at all but if she wants to feel like a princess for a day I dont see a problem.

[Edited 12/11/12 10:46am]

wonder505 said:

Genesia said:

Seriously? Because there's nothing ridiculous about a woman in her 40s, who's been married twice already, doing the fairy princess thing?

according to who's standards? big weddings are not my cup of tea at all but if she wants to feel like a princess for a day I dont see a problem.

[Edited 12/11/12 10:46am]

And most of all, she has the money and the means to do so. I don't see what the big deal is.

Maybe the guy's just really into MJ.

I was supposed to marry Janet. What happened to us babe!

novabrkr said:

Maybe the guy's just really into MJ.

I don't get it?

missfee said:

wonder505 said:

according to who's standards? big weddings are not my cup of tea at all but if she wants to feel like a princess for a day I dont see a problem.

And most of all, she has the money and the means to do so. I don't see what the big deal is.

Uhhhh...you guys are the ones who are making a big deal about it. I just indicated that I think it's a little silly for a woman who is in her 40s and embarking on her third marriage (which, given her track record, will probably not be permanent, either) to have a big, splashy wedding. That's my opinion. If you don't like it, ignore it.

I always wondered why some here posted certain threads here and then just reading some of these opinions and the fact that this is even posted here leads me to believe SOME of you posters are just DUMB.

Why is ANYBODY taking something from the National Enquirer and making it a fact?

Its a tabloid magazine that makes made up stories and lies. I dont think its okay to just jump and bash Janet especially when the story has no credibility. You would think at 30, 40 some of you grown ass people would know that. THINK, use your brain that you have been blessed with and stop posting gossip shit.

[Edited 12/11/12 11:49am]

mjscarousal said:

I always wondered why some here posted certain threads here and then just reading some of these opinions and the fact that this is even posted here leads me to believe SOME of you posters are just DUMB.

Why is ANYBODY taking something from the National Enquirer and making it a fact?

Its a tabloid magazine that makes made up stories and lies. I dont think its okay to just jump and bash Janet especially when the story has no credibility. You would think at 30, 40 some of you grown ass people would know that. THINK, use your brain that you have been blessed with and stop posting gossip shit.

[Edited 12/11/12 11:49am]

Genesia said:

missfee said:

And most of all, she has the money and the means to do so. I don't see what the big deal is.

Uhhhh...you guys are the ones who are making a big deal about it. I just indicated that I think it's a little silly for a woman who is in her 40s and embarking on her third marriage (which, given her track record, will probably not be permanent, either) to have a big, splashy wedding. That's my opinion. If you don't like it, ignore it.

So you can give your opinion but others who may disagree has to ignore it?

I clearly understand it was your opinion, I disagreed and gave my opinion, which you may disagree with as well, however, that's just fine with me. Everything is good.

[Edited 12/11/12 11:59am]

missfee said:

Genesia said:

Uhhhh...you guys are the ones who are making a big deal about it. I just indicated that I think it's a little silly for a woman who is in her 40s and embarking on her third marriage (which, given her track record, will probably not be permanent, either) to have a big, splashy wedding. That's my opinion. If you don't like it, ignore it.

So you can give your opinion but others who may disagree has to ignore it?

I clearly understand it was your opinion, I disagreed and gave my opinion, which you may disagree with as well, however, that's just fine with me. Everything is good.

[Edited 12/11/12 11:59am]

Thats the main problem on this forum. But I refuse to go by that protocol here.

LittleBLUECorvette said:

I was supposed to marry Janet. What happened to us babe!

Yeah, I hear ya She was supposed to marry me too but she never met me

There's still hope, this could easily be a farce considering the source.

missfee said:

Genesia said:

Uhhhh...you guys are the ones who are making a big deal about it. I just indicated that I think it's a little silly for a woman who is in her 40s and embarking on her third marriage (which, given her track record, will probably not be permanent, either) to have a big, splashy wedding. That's my opinion. If you don't like it, ignore it.

So you can give your opinion but others who may disagree has to ignore it?

I clearly understand it was your opinion, I disagreed and gave my opinion, which you may disagree with as well, however, that's just fine with me. Everything is good.

You can say whatever you want. But I'm not going to sit still while my comments are misrepresented. It was not I who made a big deal of anything.

Musicslave said:

LittleBLUECorvette said:

I was supposed to marry Janet. What happened to us babe!

Yeah, I hear ya She was supposed to marry me too but she never met me

There's still hope, this could easily be a farce considering the source.

Well, I actually met her before when I was like 9 and told her I wanna marry her! And she said yes!

She might have been saying that to just be a good sport, but damnit she said it!!!

Genesia said:

missfee said:

So you can give your opinion but others who may disagree has to ignore it?

I clearly understand it was your opinion, I disagreed and gave my opinion, which you may disagree with as well, however, that's just fine with me. Everything is good.

You can say whatever you want. But I'm not going to sit still while my comments are misrepresented. It was not I who made a big deal of anything.

Ok.

LittleBLUECorvette said:

Musicslave said:

Yeah, I hear ya She was supposed to marry me too but she never met me

There's still hope, this could easily be a farce considering the source.

Well, I actually met her before when I was like 9 and told her I wanna marry her! And she said yes!

She might have been saying that to just be a good sport, but damnit she said it!!!

DAMN U!!!! (no prince intended)

Yeah, she MIGHT have

Seriously, how did the hell did that happen? If this is an old story that you've had the luxury of sharing a million times here @ the org. Feel free to orgnote me if you don't want to bore the fellow orgers.

[Edited 12/11/12 12:47pm]

kitbradley said:

Boy, am I behind! I thought she was still dating Jermaine Dupri.

Where on earth have u been? She and Jermaine were separated around the time the Rock Wit U tour ended.

missfee said:

Genesia said:

You can say whatever you want. But I'm not going to sit still while my comments are misrepresented. It was not I who made a big deal of anything.

Ok.

Genesia said:

Seriously? Because there's nothing ridiculous about a woman in her 40s, who's been married twice already, doing the fairy princess thing?

I guess when you marry "Mr. Armani," I guess that changes the game. LOL!!

I have read on other sites that he is the one that is wanting to go all out for this wedding. Like you, I think it's a little ridiculous to go all out on your 3rd marriage.

These kind of stories have been circulating the net and media outlets since she started dating the guy.

There is no real confirmation - has there even been a picture of the engagement ring?

i don't think she's even planning to ever marry him

Nice picture!

daPrettyman said:

Genesia said:

Seriously? Because there's nothing ridiculous about a woman in her 40s, who's been married twice already, doing the fairy princess thing?

I guess when you marry "Mr. Armani," I guess that changes the game. LOL!!

I have read on other sites that he is the one that is wanting to go all out for this wedding. Like you, I think it's a little ridiculous to go all out on your 3rd marriage.

but it would be his 1st wedding, maybe him and his family are looking forward to him having a big wedding, it would be selfish for janet to deny her husband just because she has been married before, especially since she never had a actual wedding herself.

Genesia said:

missfee said:

And most of all, she has the money and the means to do so. I don't see what the big deal is.

Uhhhh...you guys are the ones who are making a big deal about it. I just indicated that I think it's a little silly for a woman who is in her 40s and embarking on her third marriage (which, given her track record, will probably not be permanent, either) to have a big, splashy wedding. That's my opinion. If you don't like it, ignore it.

Some of the responses on this thread have helped Cerebus to gain a fuller understanding of why TLC still exists.

lowkey said:

daPrettyman said:

I guess when you marry "Mr. Armani," I guess that changes the game. LOL!!

I have read on other sites that he is the one that is wanting to go all out for this wedding. Like you, I think it's a little ridiculous to go all out on your 3rd marriage.

but it would be his 1st wedding, maybe him and his family are looking forward to him having a big wedding, it would be selfish for janet to deny her husband just because she has been married before, especially since she never had a actual wedding herself.

I was just about to say that Janet has never had a big fairytale wedding, so if she is getting married and to a billionaire and they want to go all out for their wedding, I say good for them and can I please be on the guest list? A $10,000 Rolex a nice ass wedding favor.