Most studies and meta-analyses have not supported that, however. I’ve linked to two such studies and copied/pasted their conclusions below.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.g...d/19640946
On the basis of a systematic review of studies of satisfactory quality, there is no evidence of a difference in nutrient quality between organically and conventionally produced foodstuffs. The small differences in nutrient content detected are biologically plausible and mostly relate to differences in production methods.
http://www.ajcn.org/conte...type=HWCIT
What may explain the results in the table you pasted above is that organic produce is generally smaller (no surprise) so it may in some instances be somewhat more dense in nutrients than conventional crops. There was an organic/conventional strawberry study that seemed to support that conclusion. That may be legitimate – but that gets to the heart of why organic farming may have to remain a boutique industry for industrialized nations due to its lower crop yields and more expensive inputs.
Also, given the premium paid for most organic products, it's likely the case that any improvement in nutrient by pound is offset by the the higher price - that is to say, you may end up paying the same price for an equivalent amount of a given vitamin or mineral. [Edited 7/11/12 4:32am] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
You are correct...my Dr told me a couple months ago to start taking fish oil caps to thin the blood as well. Just started so not sure of the results yet. He also is the one who said to take the over 50 men's vitamins if I wish as they dont include iron. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Sure, I admit I don't know all the facts. However, what you are suggesting is that I could get more (or at least equal) nutrition from eating less, if I eat organic. That sounds pretty good.
I think that's part of why people are willing to pay more. That, plus it often tastes better. I have not had a decent peach in years that did not come from a farmer's market. But those peaches go bad within a day or two. My Legacy
http://prince.org/msg/8/192731 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Well, I think the nutritional density business I mentioned is very speculative. In the main the most recent and most comprehensive studies seem to indicate that there's generally no nutrional increase to be recognized from eating organic. I'm not arguing against organics. I think there are good reasons for people to choose those products. I just don't think it's been established that improved nutrition can be considered one of them based on the info we have available to us.
[Edited 7/11/12 16:35pm] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |