ZombieKitten said:

What sort of nude modeling? IMO there's nothing distasteful about disrobing for a life drawing class - but then that kind probably doesn't pay so well.

Now skeevy IMO would be posing in some sorta masturbation pose using toys and/or doing bondage photos for purposes of selling the images for porn.

There is absolutely nothing "skeevy" about posing for an anatomy drawing class. I've done it and the people in the class keep it about the art only. Giggling, and rude comments are always frowned upon and will get any student thrown outta class pronto.

I have never seen any art student get outta line with any model during my time at college.

Its a good way to earn a quick buck and it really helps the students to draw as many different bodies as possible.

paintedlady said:

ZombieKitten said:

What sort of nude modeling? IMO there's nothing distasteful about disrobing for a life drawing class - but then that kind probably doesn't pay so well.

Now skeevy IMO would be posing in some sorta masturbation pose using toys and/or doing bondage photos for purposes of selling the images for porn.

There is absolutely nothing "skeevy" about posing for an anatomy drawing class. I've done it and the people in the class keep it about the art only. Giggling, and rude comments are always frowned upon and will get any student thrown outta class pronto.

I have never seen any art student get outta line with any model during my time at college.

Its a good way to earn a quick buck and it really helps the students to draw as many different bodies as possible.

i'd give you a dollar to see you skeeving yourself

RicoN said:

paintedlady said:

Now skeevy IMO would be posing in some sorta masturbation pose using toys and/or doing bondage photos for purposes of selling the images for porn.

There is absolutely nothing "skeevy" about posing for an anatomy drawing class. I've done it and the people in the class keep it about the art only. Giggling, and rude comments are always frowned upon and will get any student thrown outta class pronto.

I have never seen any art student get outta line with any model during my time at college.

Its a good way to earn a quick buck and it really helps the students to draw as many different bodies as possible.

i'd give you a dollar to see you skeeving yourself

That's sounds like a painful on the knees and all.

paintedlady said:

ZombieKitten said:

What sort of nude modeling? IMO there's nothing distasteful about disrobing for a life drawing class - but then that kind probably doesn't pay so well.

Now skeevy IMO would be posing in some sorta masturbation pose using toys and/or doing bondage photos for purposes of selling the images for porn.

There is absolutely nothing "skeevy" about posing for an anatomy drawing class. I've done it and the people in the class keep it about the art only. Giggling, and rude comments are always frowned upon and will get any student thrown outta class pronto.

I have never seen any art student get outta line with any model during my time at college.

Its a good way to earn a quick buck and it really helps the students to draw as many different bodies as possible.

oh yeah, toys and stuff- hell to the naw! ! No I'm talking about Playboy type poses/ Not that I in ANY shape or form would ever consider my in that league- It's just that there is a certain website (not giving it away!) that my friend models for and you take the pics yourself (no being around strangers) send them in, and if they purchase them, you get around 500 dollars a set. She has been doing it a while and has racked up some decent side money. The reason I asked this question on here is that I sent them some pics/ was "approved" and now all I have to do is take a set of photos and send in. (Tasteful photos!) and so now that they sort of accepted me or whatever I'm thinking, you know, that devil on my shoulder, $500 easy money, then try again for another $500 then another. I'm not in any way trying to be provacative or anything, it's just that dilema of needing fast money that won't require 24 hours a day of my time to make it. And I totally agree Paintedlady, an art class is no problem.

So this isn't about art for the sake of art.

My opinion about what grown folks do means nothing.

lauralevesque said:

paintedlady said:

Now skeevy IMO would be posing in some sorta masturbation pose using toys and/or doing bondage photos for purposes of selling the images for porn.

There is absolutely nothing "skeevy" about posing for an anatomy drawing class. I've done it and the people in the class keep it about the art only. Giggling, and rude comments are always frowned upon and will get any student thrown outta class pronto.

I have never seen any art student get outta line with any model during my time at college.

Its a good way to earn a quick buck and it really helps the students to draw as many different bodies as possible.

oh yeah, toys and stuff- hell to the naw! ! No I'm talking about Playboy type poses/ Not that I in ANY shape or form would ever consider my in that league- It's just that there is a certain website (not giving it away!) that my friend models for and you take the pics yourself (no being around strangers) send them in, and if they purchase them, you get around 500 dollars a set. She has been doing it a while and has racked up some decent side money. The reason I asked this question on here is that I sent them some pics/ was "approved" and now all I have to do is take a set of photos and send in. (Tasteful photos!) and so now that they sort of accepted me or whatever I'm thinking, you know, that devil on my shoulder, $500 easy money, then try again for another $500 then another. I'm not in any way trying to be provacative or anything, it's just that dilema of needing fast money that won't require 24 hours a day of my time to make it. And I totally agree Paintedlady, an art class is no problem.

I would sooner do an art class model job than have nude photos of myself sent to a website. :hhm2:

Since the artists draw their intrepation of you and not an actual photo-copy image.

But hey, if you are comfortable with nude photos of you in circulation then I would go for it. If you got it, flaunt it!

Especially if you can publish the photos under another name.

paintedlady said:

lauralevesque said:

oh yeah, toys and stuff- hell to the naw! ! No I'm talking about Playboy type poses/ Not that I in ANY shape or form would ever consider my in that league- It's just that there is a certain website (not giving it away!) that my friend models for and you take the pics yourself (no being around strangers) send them in, and if they purchase them, you get around 500 dollars a set. She has been doing it a while and has racked up some decent side money. The reason I asked this question on here is that I sent them some pics/ was "approved" and now all I have to do is take a set of photos and send in. (Tasteful photos!) and so now that they sort of accepted me or whatever I'm thinking, you know, that devil on my shoulder, $500 easy money, then try again for another $500 then another. I'm not in any way trying to be provacative or anything, it's just that dilema of needing fast money that won't require 24 hours a day of my time to make it. And I totally agree Paintedlady, an art class is no problem.

I would sooner do an art class model job than have nude photos of myself sent to a website. :hhm2:

Since the artists draw their intrepation of you and not an actual photo-copy image.

But hey, if you are comfortable with nude photos of you in circulation then I would go for it. If you got it, flaunt it!

Especially if you can publish the photos under another name.

I'm glad for all the feedback, the more we discuss it the skeevier it sounds- Don't think I'm gonna do it-

Walgreens here I come

lauralevesque said:

paintedlady said:

I would sooner do an art class model job than have nude photos of myself sent to a website. :hhm2:

Since the artists draw their intrepation of you and not an actual photo-copy image.

But hey, if you are comfortable with nude photos of you in circulation then I would go for it. If you got it, flaunt it!

Especially if you can publish the photos under another name.

I'm glad for all the feedback, the more we discuss it the skeevier it sounds- Don't think I'm gonna do it-

Walgreens here I come

Oh dang, I thought I was being encouraging.

But you would do any sexy pics in an artful way (without you face showing fully ... or under a differenty name) don't want the fam/old classmates googling you and seeing all those lovely assets.

I would be proud of Robert Maplethorpe type photos of his "skin" pics if I still had the body for it.

Well... except the whole pee streaming in the mouth sorta thing.

Send me a pic of yourself and i'll tell ya.

I'll play devils advocate. If it's not beyond the realms of what you think is 'indecent', and you know personally from a friend that it's not a scam, then I'd go for it. You don't have to regret it all your life, you can chalk it up to an adventure born out of neccessity and you may even find it quite liberating. Is the website they're for "skeevy"? I'd be thinking about what people might use those photos for

and if you thinks it's tasteless, don't do it, if you're okay with it, do it. You can pay your vet bills, and maybe even have some fun doing it.

If you took a job where it was likely you would have to kill another human being you would be called a hero; any job requiring nudity and people say it is "skeevy"

Do whatever you are personally comfortable with, from nudity to porn all you should have to worry about is the size of your paycheck

paintedlady said:

RicoN said:

i'd give you a dollar to see you skeeving yourself

That's sounds like a painful on the knees and all.

oh yes!

imago said:

Try starting a donation site, then asking for donations.

People do some very generous things for strangers if they get a compelling story.

lauralevesque said:

paintedlady said:

Now skeevy IMO would be posing in some sorta masturbation pose using toys and/or doing bondage photos for purposes of selling the images for porn.

There is absolutely nothing "skeevy" about posing for an anatomy drawing class. I've done it and the people in the class keep it about the art only. Giggling, and rude comments are always frowned upon and will get any student thrown outta class pronto.

I have never seen any art student get outta line with any model during my time at college.

Its a good way to earn a quick buck and it really helps the students to draw as many different bodies as possible.

oh yeah, toys and stuff- hell to the naw! ! No I'm talking about Playboy type poses/ Not that I in ANY shape or form would ever consider my in that league- It's just that there is a certain website (not giving it away!) that my friend models for and you take the pics yourself (no being around strangers) send them in, and if they purchase them, you get around 500 dollars a set. She has been doing it a while and has racked up some decent side money. The reason I asked this question on here is that I sent them some pics/ was "approved" and now all I have to do is take a set of photos and send in. (Tasteful photos!) and so now that they sort of accepted me or whatever I'm thinking, you know, that devil on my shoulder, $500 easy money, then try again for another $500 then another. I'm not in any way trying to be provacative or anything, it's just that dilema of needing fast money that won't require 24 hours a day of my time to make it. And I totally agree Paintedlady, an art class is no problem.

Like Suicide Girls?

ZombieKitten said:

lauralevesque said:

oh yeah, toys and stuff- hell to the naw! ! No I'm talking about Playboy type poses/ Not that I in ANY shape or form would ever consider my in that league- It's just that there is a certain website (not giving it away!) that my friend models for and you take the pics yourself (no being around strangers) send them in, and if they purchase them, you get around 500 dollars a set. She has been doing it a while and has racked up some decent side money. The reason I asked this question on here is that I sent them some pics/ was "approved" and now all I have to do is take a set of photos and send in. (Tasteful photos!) and so now that they sort of accepted me or whatever I'm thinking, you know, that devil on my shoulder, $500 easy money, then try again for another $500 then another. I'm not in any way trying to be provacative or anything, it's just that dilema of needing fast money that won't require 24 hours a day of my time to make it. And I totally agree Paintedlady, an art class is no problem.

Like Suicide Girls?

Ha! I actually hit reply, typed that, and then hit the My Org link instead of "Post response".

Cerebus said:

ZombieKitten said:

Like Suicide Girls?

Ha! I actually hit reply, typed that, and then hit the My Org link instead of "Post response".

Do the models for that supply their own photo sets (ie their own photography?)

It's a members only site too, so people have to pay to see complete sets.

ZombieKitten said:

Cerebus said:

Ha! I actually hit reply, typed that, and then hit the My Org link instead of "Post response".

Do the models for that supply their own photo sets (ie their own photography?)

It's a members only site too, so people have to pay to see complete sets.

I was a member at SG for many years (not as Cerebus - different name). The entire time I was there I paid $48 a year. That's the discounted price for paying a year in advance. You can sign up for less time, but it costs more. So yes, it's a pay site. I haven't been there for a couple years, though.

There's always been some confusion about how exactly SG works, and a lot of girls end up leaving because the owners are real pains in the ass.

Basically, you can submit self-shot photos or those shot by your own photographer as part of your model application. But once you get accepted, they make a big deal out of you using their approved SG photographers for future sets. it's not required, but those that don't use them have their submissions chosen as "Set of the Day" (which is how they get paid) far less. That involves you getting to the photographer (if they aren't local) and sometimes paying the photographer for sets that may never be approved for front page use (they'll always be under each girls name, though). That alone could cost more than is made for an approved set. Photographers then get paid again for any approved sets.

Their FAQ does say the current rate for a "Set of the Day" is $500.00

The Suicide Girls models I've seen are gorgeous. But yeah I heard the owners treat them like shit.

Cerebus said:

ZombieKitten said:

Do the models for that supply their own photo sets (ie their own photography?)

It's a members only site too, so people have to pay to see complete sets.

I was a member at SG for many years (not as Cerebus - different name). The entire time I was there I paid $48 a year. That's the discounted price for paying a year in advance. You can sign up for less time, but it costs more. So yes, it's a pay site. I haven't been there for a couple years, though.

There's always been some confusion about how exactly SG works, and a lot of girls end up leaving because the owners are real pains in the ass.

Basically, you can submit self-shot photos or those shot by your own photographer as part of your model application. But once you get accepted, they make a big deal out of you using their approved SG photographers for future sets. it's not required, but those that don't use them have their submissions chosen as "Set of the Day" (which is how they get paid) far less. That involves you getting to the photographer (if they aren't local) and sometimes paying the photographer for sets that may never be approved for front page use (they'll always be under each girls name, though). That alone could cost more than is made for an approved set. Photographers then get paid again for any approved sets.

Their FAQ does say the current rate for a "Set of the Day" is $500.00

it's not really easy money at all then

paintsprayer said:

If you took a job where it was likely you would have to kill another human being you would be called a hero; any job requiring nudity and people say it is "skeevy"

Do whatever you are personally comfortable with, from nudity to porn all you should have to worry about is the size of your paycheck

Skeevy or not is not the issue.

The issue is that her nude pictures will be all over the internet and cannot be deleted. Ever.

And at this point she (neither we) can oversee the consequences of that in the future.

It's fast money now. If that really is true. However, the price she has to pay for it in the future, may be very costly.

Why taking that risk? She can never 'undo' any publication of her nude pictures in the future, because she got paid for it. And she can't know if a couple of bucks now, really are worth any future damage in her life.

dJJ said:

paintsprayer said:

If you took a job where it was likely you would have to kill another human being you would be called a hero; any job requiring nudity and people say it is "skeevy"

Do whatever you are personally comfortable with, from nudity to porn all you should have to worry about is the size of your paycheck

Skeevy or not is not the issue.

The issue is that her nude pictures will be all over the internet and cannot be deleted. Ever.

And at this point she (neither we) can oversee the consequences of that in the future.

It's fast money now. If that really is true. However, the price she has to pay for it in the future, may be very costly.

Why taking that risk? She can never 'undo' any publication of her nude pictures in the future, because she got paid for it. And she can't know if a couple of bucks now, really are worth any future damage in her life.

That's what I am saying, if she is comfortable now why not in the future. Why is this advice about irriversible actions and shame not being said to soldiers. Will her picture ever be used to cause death, most nude pictures only cause orgasms

this has to be one of the most erotic threads I've ever read...

some "advice" (since I'm no expert)

-make sure the photographer/agency (whatever) has a good/tasteful reputation

-make sure it's about nude modelling (not masturbatory pics or softcore pics)

-make sure you won't embarrass/piss off somebody with this (boss, family, etc)

other than that I say: GO FOR IT, GIRL

paintsprayer said:

dJJ said:

Skeevy or not is not the issue.

The issue is that her nude pictures will be all over the internet and cannot be deleted. Ever.

And at this point she (neither we) can oversee the consequences of that in the future.

It's fast money now. If that really is true. However, the price she has to pay for it in the future, may be very costly.

Why taking that risk? She can never 'undo' any publication of her nude pictures in the future, because she got paid for it. And she can't know if a couple of bucks now, really are worth any future damage in her life.

That's what I am saying, if she is comfortable now why not in the future. Why is this advice about irriversible actions and shame not being said to soldiers. Will her picture ever be used to cause death, most nude pictures only cause orgasms

How come you think that I would not say that to a soldier?

It's her future. And if in ten years she applies for a job, and the boss has been jurking off over her picture, that will influence his opinion. Or the boss is a woman who recognizes her picture from the porn collection of her ex. Or her picture will be copied and used for not so tasteful businesses, and she can't do anything about that, because she doesn't own the rights of that picture. There are many scenario's thinkable that can happen, that she would not think about now.

And, of course, I understand that you guys are all positive about her posing nude. And it's up to her to decide for herself what's wise.

I'm just waiting for her to photowhore the pics.

Adisa said:

imago said:

Try starting a donation site, then asking for donations.

People do some very generous things for strangers if they get a compelling story.

Great idea.

The truth is that I think people will do more for animals then they will for people.

Maybe their donations could be set up so that they go straight to the vet. I think you would get more money that way. Hell, you may even get so much that you could help pay another pet owners bill!

Deadflow3r said:

Adisa said:

Great idea.

The truth is that I think people will do more for animals then they will for people.

Maybe their donations could be set up so that they go straight to the vet. I think you would get more money that way. Hell, you may even get so much that you could help pay another pet owners bill!

I've always thought that if I were to win the lottery I would set up a fund at different animal hospitals for vet bills that people cannot afford to pay.

The hospital was nice though, and set up a payment plan for me, so I think I've nixed the nude modeling idea, and now am looking for a second job.

I first met XxAxX in Art Class, when she nude modeled for us. She was quite shy, but overcame it when the instructor flashed the $$. She was the most popular model, as she has 6 toes on her left foot, and a tattoo of Fred, the Cockatiel from "Baretta tattooed on her derriere. She was, and continues to be a challenge.

Go for it!

Maybe you could create personal commissioned shots for us orgers and have us sign non-disclosure contracts. Then if the shots get out to the general public you know you're in for a much bigger payday.

I hope your dog is okay, BTW!

NDRU said:

Maybe you could create personal commissioned shots for us orgers and have us sign non-disclosure contracts. Then if the shots get out to the general public you know you're in for a much bigger payday.

I hope your dog is okay, BTW!

Thank you so much! She's good!

its ok if u post here afterwards...