that poop was the size of 2 Malteezers!!!!

u r all crazy!!!!

but i luv uzzzzzzzzzzzzz

ThisOne said:

that poop was the size of 2 Malteezers!!!!

u r all crazy!!!!

but i luv uzzzzzzzzzzzzz

Damn....now I'm hungry

[Edited 4/20/12 3:33am]

Tittypants said:

ThisOne said:

that poop was the size of 2 Malteezers!!!!

u r all crazy!!!!

but i luv uzzzzzzzzzzzzz

Damn....now I'm hungry

[Edited 4/20/12 3:33am]

i hope the ppl that see them sitting there on the grass dont think they r real!!!!!!!!!!!!!

ThisOne said:

Tittypants said:

Damn....now I'm hungry

[Edited 4/20/12 3:33am]

i hope the ppl that see them sitting there on the grass dont think they r real!!!!!!!!!!!!!

If I was a little kid & saw poop that looked like that.....it probably would have been in mouth

almost was as a matter of fact

[Edited 4/20/12 3:45am]

Tittypants said:

ThisOne said:

i hope the ppl that see them sitting there on the grass dont think they r real!!!!!!!!!!!!!

If I was a little kid & saw poop that looked like that.....it probably would have been in mouth

almost was as a matter of fact

[Edited 4/20/12 3:45am]

omg i need to go pick it up!!!!

well maybe tomorrow!!!

ThisOne said:

Tittypants said:

If I was a little kid & saw poop that looked like that.....it probably would have been in mouth

almost was as a matter of fact

[Edited 4/20/12 3:45am]

omg i need to go pick it up!!!!

well maybe tomorrow!!!

I think picking up dog shit is a must when you live in an apartment community... Theres probably 10 or more dogs in just my building alone, and in the winter people get lazy cuz its so friggin cold so they stand in the door way and let the dogs onto the area of grass by the front of the buldings.. lemme tell you it doesnt take long for it to become DISGUSTING as hell when people dont pick it up... I myself have 2 dogs, I always take my bag out and pick it up cuz i dont wanna live in a trailer park! Now, if you are walking your dog out somewhere, it is only polite to pick it up if it shits on someone elses lawn.. I think thats rude to leave it... Otherwise, dog shitting is fair game...

Dave1992 said:

Shorty said:

I do have a dog, a German Shepherd but we live in the country surrounded by woods so he goes in the woods.

That's completely cool with me. It's just the urban area where people should be the priority, in my opinion...

we are in agreement!

jone70 said:

Dave1992 said:

This is something I am very picky about! I usually try to persuade everyone to vote anytime they can. I find it important, because it's an ode and a sign of respect to what we have achieved culturally and we should be thankful for the right to vote every single day. Plus, it's the only time we the people can achieve what we want to achieve. I make sure to take part in as many votes as I can.

Take a stand!

If I feel uninformed, I won't vote. I'd rather abstain than vote for someone that I don't know about. For example, I wouldn't want to vote for someone simply because they belong to a certain political party (Democrat, for instance) and then find out they want to cut funding for the arts or something like that.

But you don't have to vote for a certain party. You'd also make a stance by attending the vote and voting for nobody in particular - it would mean that you are either not satisfied with the parties offered or that you don't feel informed enough to vote for a certain party. There's a huge difference between not voting for anybody particular and not attending the vote at all!

Cerebus said:

Dave1992 said:

If I had seen that I would have called you out immediately, and would have said something like "you will pick this shit up this instant, or I will personally piss on you and your fucking dog". And if you still didn't pick it up, I would have pissed on you and your dog.

And I would have beat your punk ass and walked away laughing. Idiot.

I think you are the idiot here, actually.

There are so many things that would be oh-so-natural (like people shitting on the floor, for instance), and still they are taboo in a civilised world (for obvious reasons). When your dog shits on the floor, you should pick it up, because, in an urban area, that floor doesn't belong to dogs in the first place, but to humans (including children). So, if you let your dog shit on where my little brother would like to play (in a city), I will piss on you and your dog. And if you are too stupid to understand this and decide that it would be wise to "punch me in the throat", the fight is on.

And letting your dog shit on someone elses lawn is the exact same thing as someone shitting on your lawn. It's gross, it smells, it's dirt and above all that it's illegal.

If someone is too lazy to take care of a dog in the way it won't restrict other people's lives, they shouldn't own dogs. The world doesn't evolve around fucking dogs, and especially not in urban areas, built to be convenient to people.

If you want your dog to shit around freely, move to the woods. There you can bathe in each other's waste and nobody will interrupt you.

Deadcake said:

Cerebus said:

I hope many dogs shit on the lawn, sidewalk, walkway, par, etc. of every person who bitches about how wrong it is for a dog to leave it's waste on the ground, naturally, like every other animal on the planet. It's a completely asinine concept that human beings should follow around behind their dogs with little plastic bags.

isn't it!!!

but how about that difference between what is cool in europe and what is cool in the states

such a culture divide

Dave he's such a rebel but such a too I bet he doesn't cross the road until the little man is green

(Oh, but then again I know a certain New Yorker who won't walk on the grass if there is a path available )

You call it square, I call it sanitary, civilised and urban.

Dave1992 said:

jone70 said:

If I feel uninformed, I won't vote. I'd rather abstain than vote for someone that I don't know about. For example, I wouldn't want to vote for someone simply because they belong to a certain political party (Democrat, for instance) and then find out they want to cut funding for the arts or something like that.

But you don't have to vote for a certain party. You'd also make a stance by attending the vote and voting for nobody in particular - it would mean that you are either not satisfied with the parties offered or that you don't feel informed enough to vote for a certain party. There's a huge difference between not voting for anybody particular and not attending the vote at all!

Yes, I realize I don't have to vote for specific parties; but if I haven't done any research into any of the candidate what would I possibly base my vote on - their name? At least if you choose by party you can sort of assume the candidate has certain views on the main issues.

I'm not really following your line of thinking as to attending and voting for nobody. How could I vote for nobody in particular? I'd have to vote for someone, or write in someone. Who would I write in (since I haven't done enough research to know who to put)? That's a waste of my time and taxpayer time. I don't know how it is where you live, but in NYC, there is always a line to vote so why would I waste everyone's time to vote for nobody?

Cerebus said:

I hope many dogs shit on the lawn, sidewalk, walkway, par, etc. of every person who bitches about how wrong it is for a dog to leave it's waste on the ground, naturally, like every other animal on the planet. It's a completely asinine concept that human beings should follow around behind their dogs with little plastic bags.

Such disgusting laziness, arrogance, complacency and stupidity. There's nothing wrong about a dog shitting somewhere (because every living being does), but there is something wrong about not reaction to our imperfections in a civilised way that encourages hygiene and cleanness. It's not the dogs fault, but the dog owner's fault.

jone70 said:

Dave1992 said:

But you don't have to vote for a certain party. You'd also make a stance by attending the vote and voting for nobody in particular - it would mean that you are either not satisfied with the parties offered or that you don't feel informed enough to vote for a certain party. There's a huge difference between not voting for anybody particular and not attending the vote at all!

Yes, I realize I don't have to vote for specific parties; but if I haven't done any research into any of the candidate what would I possibly base my vote on - their name? At least if you choose by party you can sort of assume the candidate has certain views on the main issues.

I'm not really following your line of thinking as to attending and voting for nobody. How could I vote for nobody in particular? I'd have to vote for someone, or write in someone. Who would I write in (since I haven't done enough research to know who to put)? That's a waste of my time and taxpayer time. I don't know how it is where you live, but in NYC, there is always a line to vote so why would I waste everyone's time to vote for nobody?

Over here, a very large number of people votes the "white" party, which means basically not writing any name into the box and not voting for any party. Those votes are officially treated as "white" votes and are distinguished from "non-voters".

Voting "white" is a very important alternative, because you do make a proper stance, and that's why it should be worth everybody's time. By voting no person at all but attending the vote, you basically say "I thank for my right to vote and I would like to make good use for it, but this idiot country only offers idiots to vote for". Whereas by not attending the vote at all, you say something like "I don't care who wins, I'm fine with everything, - I wouldn't even care if there were a voting".

Dave1992 said:

jone70 said:

Yes, I realize I don't have to vote for specific parties; but if I haven't done any research into any of the candidate what would I possibly base my vote on - their name? At least if you choose by party you can sort of assume the candidate has certain views on the main issues.

I'm not really following your line of thinking as to attending and voting for nobody. How could I vote for nobody in particular? I'd have to vote for someone, or write in someone. Who would I write in (since I haven't done enough research to know who to put)? That's a waste of my time and taxpayer time. I don't know how it is where you live, but in NYC, there is always a line to vote so why would I waste everyone's time to vote for nobody?

Over here, a very large number of people votes the "white" party, which means basically not writing any name into the box and not voting for any party. Those votes are officially treated as "white" votes and are distinguished from "non-voters".

Voting "white" is a very important alternative, because you do make a proper stance, and that's why it should be worth everybody's time. By voting no person at all but attending the vote, you basically say "I thank for my right to vote and I would like to make good use for it, but this idiot country only offers idiots to vote for". Whereas by not attending the vote at all, you say something like "I don't care who wins, I'm fine with everything, - I wouldn't even care if there were a voting".

Ahh, thanks for the explaination. I'm not sure that we have that equivalent in the US. I think that if you vote, you have to either choose one of the candidates on the ballot, or write in a name. I don't think you can just vote for "no one" - I like that idea, though, because people don't vote for all sorts of reasons. You're right, specifically voting but not choosing anyone one does send a different message than just not voting at all.

jone70 said:

Dave1992 said:

Over here, a very large number of people votes the "white" party, which means basically not writing any name into the box and not voting for any party. Those votes are officially treated as "white" votes and are distinguished from "non-voters".

Voting "white" is a very important alternative, because you do make a proper stance, and that's why it should be worth everybody's time. By voting no person at all but attending the vote, you basically say "I thank for my right to vote and I would like to make good use for it, but this idiot country only offers idiots to vote for". Whereas by not attending the vote at all, you say something like "I don't care who wins, I'm fine with everything, - I wouldn't even care if there were a voting".

Ahh, thanks for the explaination. I'm not sure that we have that equivalent in the US. I think that if you vote, you have to either choose one of the candidates on the ballot, or write in a name. I don't think you can just vote for "no one" - I like that idea, though, because people don't vote for all sorts of reasons. You're right, specifically voting but not choosing anyone one does send a different message than just not voting at all.

Really? What happens when you simply don't vote for a party and don't write in a name? Over here, you put your ballot into an envelope and throw it into a box. Nobody can check what you have written on the ballot or whether you have even written anything...

Or do you mean that such ballots are simply ignored and not mentioned in the results at all?

Dave1992 said:

jone70 said:

Ahh, thanks for the explaination. I'm not sure that we have that equivalent in the US. I think that if you vote, you have to either choose one of the candidates on the ballot, or write in a name. I don't think you can just vote for "no one" - I like that idea, though, because people don't vote for all sorts of reasons. You're right, specifically voting but not choosing anyone one does send a different message than just not voting at all.

Really? What happens when you simply don't vote for a party and don't write in a name? Over here, you put your ballot into an envelope and throw it into a box. Nobody can check what you have written on the ballot or whether you have even written anything...

Or do you mean that such ballots are simply ignored and not mentioned in the results at all?

How quaint! Up until recently New York was still using the old lever voting machines. It's a huge machine with all these switches. You "flip" the switch a certain direction to choose who you want and then when you're finished you pull the red lever to the right, then back to lock in your vote. I can't remember if it let you pull the lever if you hadn't chosen someone for each section, and I can't remember if you could flip a switch to choose a "blank."

They were supposed to upgrade to some sort of electronic system, I think, where you fill out "bubbles" on a paper (like in a standardized test) and then scan it into a machine. I think I had to do that once and I didn't like it because it didn't seem as private; the Board of Elections person was standing right next to the scanner to make sure everything scanned correctly.

A lever voting machine:

[img:$uid]http://alloveralbany.com/images/lever_voting_machine.jpg[/img:$uid]

.

[Edited 4/20/12 12:17pm]

hmm....I live in a very small town and we have paper ballots. when you come out of the booth there is a person standing at the box who puts it in the box for you. The ballot is folded so they can't see what you voted as they put it in. I suppose you could just leave the whole thing blank but I'm not sure how that would be counted....perhaps not counted at all.

interesting.

Shorty said:

hmm....I live in a very small town and we have paper ballots. when you come out of the booth there is a person standing at the box who puts it in the box for you. The ballot is folded so they can't see what you voted as they put it in. I suppose you could just leave the whole thing blank but I'm not sure how that would be counted....perhaps not counted at all.

interesting.

Me too, and I am in a larger city... I haven't seen one of those lever pulling voting booths in YEARS.

We have booths were you mark your votes by checking off the boxes on paper ballots and drop them in a slot by the booth.

tinaz said:

I think picking up dog shit is a must when you live in an apartment community... Theres probably 10 or more dogs in just my building alone, and in the winter people get lazy cuz its so friggin cold so they stand in the door way and let the dogs onto the area of grass by the front of the buldings.. lemme tell you it doesnt take long for it to become DISGUSTING as hell when people dont pick it up... I myself have 2 dogs, I always take my bag out and pick it up cuz i dont wanna live in a trailer park! Now, if you are walking your dog out somewhere, it is only polite to pick it up if it shits on someone elses lawn.. I think thats rude to leave it... Otherwise, dog shitting is fair game...

I am with you and Dave on that one... my comminuty stinks of dog shit in the summer because there is dog poop every 15 feet on the sidewalks. It really smells and it is just gross, but its worse on the beach. You better not let your dog shit on the beach near me, I will go OFF!!

Nothing's worse than chillin' on a blanket and a dog opens up its asshole 2 feet from you... or worse your trying to let your kids swim in water and a piece of dogshit floats by.

Yeah, I love dogies and their owners but keep the poopies at a minimun please

oh... and I eat little Debbie snack cakes, that's gotta be bad.

Dave1992 said:

Cerebus said:

I hope many dogs shit on the lawn, sidewalk, walkway, par, etc. of every person who bitches about how wrong it is for a dog to leave it's waste on the ground, naturally, like every other animal on the planet. It's a completely asinine concept that human beings should follow around behind their dogs with little plastic bags.

It's not the dog who is wrong, because as you say, for them it's natural. But most of us don't live in nature. It's kind of asinine to think we should live in a city and behave as if we live in nature.

Deadcake said:

Dave1992 said:

You call it square, I call it sanitary, civilised and urban.

I'm not calling your belief square I happen to agree with you and I pick up my dogs poop because this ISN'T nature any more. Your earnestness and stance is endearingly square But it DOES feel stupid with poop in a bag

Dog shit is a serious issue here in Vienna, because many owners are so ignorant of other people and especially children wanting to play on playgrounds and in run around in the grass. They don't understand that cleaning a child's clothes of dog shit is much harder and longer work than simply picking up your dog's shit. If people want to live in a city, this kind of complacency is unacceptable, in my opinion. Dog shit is just one facet of this complacency problem in urban areas...

Dave1992 said:

Deadcake said:

Dave1992 said: I'm not calling your belief square I happen to agree with you and I pick up my dogs poop because this ISN'T nature any more. Your earnestness and stance is endearingly square But it DOES feel stupid with poop in a bag

Dog shit is a serious issue here in Vienna, because many owners are so ignorant of other people and especially children wanting to play on playgrounds and in run around in the grass. They don't understand that cleaning a child's clothes of dog shit is much harder and longer work than simply picking up your dog's shit. If people want to live in a city, this kind of complacency is unacceptable, in my opinion. Dog shit is just one facet of this complacency problem in urban areas...

No it is not . Vienna has loads of issues, but dogshit is not on that list.

Serious said:

Dave1992 said:

Dog shit is a serious issue here in Vienna, because many owners are so ignorant of other people and especially children wanting to play on playgrounds and in run around in the grass. They don't understand that cleaning a child's clothes of dog shit is much harder and longer work than simply picking up your dog's shit. If people want to live in a city, this kind of complacency is unacceptable, in my opinion. Dog shit is just one facet of this complacency problem in urban areas...

No it is not . Vienna has loads of issues, but dogshit is not on that list.

Even whenever it was voted "best city of the world", the only "downside" was always dog shit, according to the jury.

How could you say this isn't the truth? Have you been to a lot of other European cities? You can roll around in Hyde Park, you can lay in the grass in front of the Prado museum, you can chill besides the Brandenburgertor, but God beware you'd want to lay down in the grass in front of the Nationalbank in Vienna. (Paris is quite dirty too, that way)

Use lots of electricity.

Dave1992 said:

Cerebus said:

And I would have beat your punk ass and walked away laughing. Idiot.

I think you are the idiot here, actually.

There are so many things that would be oh-so-natural (like people shitting on the floor, for instance), and still they are taboo in a civilised world (for obvious reasons). When your dog shits on the floor, you should pick it up, because, in an urban area, that floor doesn't belong to dogs in the first place, but to humans (including children). So, if you let your dog shit on where my little brother would like to play (in a city), I will piss on you and your dog. And if you are too stupid to understand this and decide that it would be wise to "punch me in the throat", the fight is on.

And letting your dog shit on someone elses lawn is the exact same thing as someone shitting on your lawn. It's gross, it smells, it's dirt and above all that it's illegal.

If someone is too lazy to take care of a dog in the way it won't restrict other people's lives, they shouldn't own dogs. The world doesn't evolve around fucking dogs, and especially not in urban areas, built to be convenient to people.

If you want your dog to shit around freely, move to the woods. There you can bathe in each other's waste and nobody will interrupt you.

Dude. You threatended to piss on another human being for not picking up dog shit. I would beat your ass if you pulled out your dick and tried to piss on me for ANY REASON! Have some common sense, already. Nothing else you have to say about it matters beyond that point.

Cerebus said:

Dave1992 said:

I think you are the idiot here, actually.

There are so many things that would be oh-so-natural (like people shitting on the floor, for instance), and still they are taboo in a civilised world (for obvious reasons). When your dog shits on the floor, you should pick it up, because, in an urban area, that floor doesn't belong to dogs in the first place, but to humans (including children). So, if you let your dog shit on where my little brother would like to play (in a city), I will piss on you and your dog. And if you are too stupid to understand this and decide that it would be wise to "punch me in the throat", the fight is on.

And letting your dog shit on someone elses lawn is the exact same thing as someone shitting on your lawn. It's gross, it smells, it's dirt and above all that it's illegal.

If someone is too lazy to take care of a dog in the way it won't restrict other people's lives, they shouldn't own dogs. The world doesn't evolve around fucking dogs, and especially not in urban areas, built to be convenient to people.

If you want your dog to shit around freely, move to the woods. There you can bathe in each other's waste and nobody will interrupt you.

Dude. You threatended to piss on another human being for not picking up dog shit. I would beat your ass if you pulled out your dick and tried to piss on me for ANY REASON! Have some common sense, already. Nothing else you have to say about it matters beyond that point.

I know it's wrong, but only because it's just as wrong as letting your dog shit on somebody else's lawn. You might just as well let the dog shit in their neck (or piss on them, you see?).