Charlie Sheen's character set to meet 'violent and bloody' death on season première of Two and A Half Men

By Daily Mail Reporter

Last updated at 12:39 PM on 7th August 2011

Charlie Sheen's character on Two And A Half Men will exit the series in a bloody bang.

Earlier this week, pictures were released showing a funeral scene, complete with flower arrangements, church pews and one of the iconic bowling shirts worn by Charlie Harper throughout the show.

Now new details have emerged revealing Charlie will die a violent death when he is mowed down by a subway trained.

During the same episode, Ashton Kutcher will make his début performance as internet billionaire Walter Schmidt, who ends up buying Charlie's Malibu beach house.

Chuck Lorre the show creator reportedly considered several scenarios, including having Charlie drive off a cliff, but he settled on a bloody subway accident.

According to TMZ, sources at last night's taping revealed Charlie's character married Rose - the neighbour/stalker he flew to Paris with last season -- but things went downhill quickly when she found him in the shower with another woman.

Sources told TMZ Rose spoke at the funeral and recounted what happened to Charlie.

She revealed the day after the shower incident she and Charlie were waiting for a Paris subway train when Charlie 'slipped' and the subway trained ripped his body apart.

The scene is said to allude to the fact that Rose pushed him and got away with it.

TMZ has also reported that the episode will feature celebrity guest stars Jenny McCarthy and John Stamos.

The former E.R. star, who was once rumoured to be Sheen's replacement on the show, is reported to be saying a few 'raunchy words' about his friendship with Charlie Harper at the funeral.

Sources also revealed that Jenny McCarthy will also be returning - she played one of Harper's ex girlfriends who broke up with him after becoming tired of having sex with him.

Following the announcement last month that Ashton would be joining the cast full time, Sheen told TMZ: 'Kutcher is a sweetheart and a brilliant comedic performer... Oh wait, so am I!!'

'Enjoy planet Chuck, Ashton,' he added, referring to the show's creator and his nemesis, Chuck Lorre. 'There is no air, laughter, loyalty, or love there.'

However it looks like Sheen could come back from the dead quicker than expected, as it has emerged he is being lined up to star in a new show.

It has been claimed the star has signed a lucrative deal with Lionsgate Television for a new sitcom that will cash in on his notoriety.

A bidding war is now said to be under way among broadcasters to land the rights to the show.

An insider told RadarOnline: ‘Charlie has inked a deal with Lionsgate Television to create and star in a new sitcom.’

‘Charlie's character will be very similar to the one he played on Two And a Half Men, however the show will be a lot racier.

‘Networks and cable are bidding on the show right now, with TBS being the front runner.

‘TBS recently expanded their comedy division with the acquisition of The Conan O'Brien Show after his fall out with NBC.

‘Plus cable makes more sense because it offers more creative freedom.

‘In other words the show can be raunchier and more outrageous, which is perfect for Charlie.’

It will could see the controversial star, who was sacked from his ratings winning starring vehicle Two And a Half Men, raking in even more cash than before.

He will not be getting paid the $2million (£1.25million) per episode he received the smash hit show.

[Edited 8/8/11 2:37am]

Timmy84 said:

Charlie Sheen's character set to meet 'violent and bloody' death on season première of Two and A Half Men

Now new details have emerged revealing Charlie will die a violent death when he is mowed down by a subway trained.

They train subways to kill?

My mom and sister are fans of the show. I am not. But I heard on the radio that killing him off was just a rumor.

They need to kill this show.

I've been hanging out in hospitals of late (very limited TV choices) I finally got to catch "Two and a Half Men". Are you kidding me that show is so, bad bad BAD. Nothing funny about it at all and Charlie and his sidekick(s) are some of the most goofy-ass looking men I've ever seen.

What is the appeal of this show? Sheen got paid bank for this shit? wow.

TD3 said:

They need to kill this show.

I've been hanging out in hospitals of late (very limited TV choices) I finally got to catch "Two and a Half Men". Are you kidding me that show is so, bad bad BAD. Nothing funny about it at all and Charlie and his sidekick(s) are some of the most goofy-ass looking men I've ever seen.

What is the appeal of this show? Sheen got paid bank for this shit? wow.

It's not the "Citizen Cain" of comidies or anything...but the show was funy. I bust a gut every episode and I believe I have good taste. The appeal for me was it semed to be a reflection of charlies actual life....his character wasn't a stretch AT ALL for him to portray. He just showed up and did iim...it was still funny tho.

I don't know why h egot paid bank...but I'm not an agent or producer...so who knows. Everyone I know thinks it's funny too(referring to people in my non-online life).

Not a fan of the show-but it is a disservice to all the fans of the show who watched it all these years to kill off a main character. His character should have just moved to Europe. Do they not see this will effect DVD sales? Look no further than Roseanne killing off Dan Conner mistake. Instead Roseanne should of had Dan off working in Alaska or something. Don't kill the main characters off.

BobGeorge909 said:

TD3 said:

They need to kill this show.

I've been hanging out in hospitals of late (very limited TV choices) I finally got to catch "Two and a Half Men". Are you kidding me that show is so, bad bad BAD. Nothing funny about it at all and Charlie and his sidekick(s) are some of the most goofy-ass looking men I've ever seen.

What is the appeal of this show? Sheen got paid bank for this shit? wow.

It's not the "Citizen Cain" of comidies or anything...but the show was funy. I bust a gut every episode and I believe I have good taste. The appeal for me was it semed to be a reflection of charlies actual life....his character wasn't a stretch AT ALL for him to portray. He just showed up and did iim...it was still funny tho.

I don't know why h egot paid bank...but I'm not an agent or producer...so who knows. Everyone I know thinks it's funny too(referring to people in my non-online life).

I don't know... I was expecting something more?

Was this article translated or something? It is full of typos!

NDRU said:

Was this article translated or something? It is full of typos!

Might've been: it IS the Daily Mail after all. Piers Morgan used to own it or something lol

I think this goes to show just how hateful and vindictive The creator of the show is and how much he hates a man who made his piece of shit show a success.

lazycrockett said:

I think this goes to show just how hateful and vindictive The creator of the show is and how much he hates a man who made his piece of shit show a success.

That's true. Look how the creators of South Park treated Isaac Hayes' character after he decided to back out of them dissing Scientology in their Trapped in the Closet episode.

Timmy84 said:

lazycrockett said:

I think this goes to show just how hateful and vindictive The creator of the show is and how much he hates a man who made his piece of shit show a success.

That's true. Look how the creators of South Park treated Isaac Hayes' character after he decided to back out of them dissing Scientology in their Trapped in the Closet episode.

Yep.

As for two and a half men I like Ashton but this is just Fail.

^Plus it doesnt bold well with fans of the show. To treat a character with such disgrace is a huge turn off to the fan base. He's being really stupid.

NMuzakNSoul said:

Timmy84 said:

That's true. Look how the creators of South Park treated Isaac Hayes' character after he decided to back out of them dissing Scientology in their Trapped in the Closet episode.

Yep.

As for two and a half men I like Ashton but this is just Fail.

Yeah it's definitely over after this season. And I now believe it was stupid to let Charlie go. The show definitely needed him even if I didn't like the show, Charlie at least gave the show some APPEAL.

I love Two and a Half Men. I will definitely miss Charlie, but the real talent is Jon Cryer and the writers. The show should do fine without Sheen. Kutcher is as dumb as a fence post, but he's cute as hell, so he'll do ok too.

lazycrockett said:

^Plus it doesnt bold well with fans of the show. To treat a character with such disgrace is a huge turn off to the fan base. He's being really stupid.

Right. People watched the show because of Charlie. It's possible they'll just go on to watch his new sitcom on TBS whenever that deal pans out.

Timmy84 said:

NMuzakNSoul said:

Yep.

As for two and a half men I like Ashton but this is just Fail.

Yeah it's definitely over after this season. And I now believe it was stupid to let Charlie go. The show definitely needed him even if I didn't like the show, Charlie at least gave the show some APPEAL.

Yep thats how I feel.

Timmy84 said:

lazycrockett said:

I think this goes to show just how hateful and vindictive The creator of the show is and how much he hates a man who made his piece of shit show a success.

That's true. Look how the creators of South Park treated Isaac Hayes' character after he decided to back out of them dissing Scientology in their Trapped in the Closet episode.

shit...that was completely and utterly justified. Isaac spent HOW MANY years participating with Trey and Matt in denigrating every other religion thought of. Including the "Mormon" episode. The Jesus and Satan fight, the palistinian and jewish sea monkeys...chef participated with all of that. But the second they make fun of his religion...he quits.

I give him credit to the notion that he probably would have gotten ex-communicated by the higher up's if he had. It'd be sad if that was the reason, but I'd hope it was that befor just being closed minded was the reason.

I think he was just being closed minded when it came to him and his.

and btw...no one can "Dis" Scientology....it "dis's" itself. It's completely rediculous. The story told is actual and factual. They took NO liberties with the story. They told the actual truth's of the "religion" AS WRITTEN BY L. Ron himself.

fuck that fuck.

BobGeorge909 said:

Timmy84 said:

That's true. Look how the creators of South Park treated Isaac Hayes' character after he decided to back out of them dissing Scientology in their Trapped in the Closet episode.

shit...that was completely and utterly justified. Isaac spent HOW MANY years participating with Trey and Matt in denigrating every other religion thought of. Including the "Mormon" episode. The Jesus and Satan fight, the palistinian and jewish sea monkeys...chef participated with all of that. But the second they make fun of his religion...he quits.

I give him credit to the notion that he probably would have gotten ex-communicated by the higher up's if he had. It'd be sad if that was the reason, but I'd hope it was that befor just being closed minded was the reason.

I think he was just being closed minded when it came to him and his.

and btw...no one can "Dis" Scientology....it "dis's" itself. It's completely rediculous. The story told is actual and factual. They took NO liberties with the story. They told the actual truth's of the "religion" AS WRITTEN BY L. Ron himself.

fuck that fuck.

No I understand. I just wished they had did it a different way instead of making Chef look like he was bonkers.

Timmy84 said:

BobGeorge909 said:

shit...that was completely and utterly justified. Isaac spent HOW MANY years participating with Trey and Matt in denigrating every other religion thought of. Including the "Mormon" episode. The Jesus and Satan fight, the palistinian and jewish sea monkeys...chef participated with all of that. But the second they make fun of his religion...he quits.

I give him credit to the notion that he probably would have gotten ex-communicated by the higher up's if he had. It'd be sad if that was the reason, but I'd hope it was that befor just being closed minded was the reason.

I think he was just being closed minded when it came to him and his.

and btw...no one can "Dis" Scientology....it "dis's" itself. It's completely rediculous. The story told is actual and factual. They took NO liberties with the story. They told the actual truth's of the "religion" AS WRITTEN BY L. Ron himself.

fuck that fuck.

No I understand. I just wished they had did it a different way instead of making Chef look like he was bonkers.

ohhh...i see...they were't creative about it. I can see that.

If U look into the effects of the doctrination process in scientology, U'll see they use well defined tacticts that are associated with brainwashing and cults. If U ask. ex-cultis and ex-scientology, the "symptoms" chef was exibiting in the episode aren't unfounded...though admitedly, hyperbolic.

BobGeorge909 said:

Timmy84 said:

No I understand. I just wished they had did it a different way instead of making Chef look like he was bonkers.

ohhh...i see...they were't creative about it. I can see that.

If U look into the effects of the doctrination process in scientology, U'll see they use well defined tacticts that are associated with brainwashing and cults. If U ask. ex-cultis and ex-scientology, the "symptoms" chef was exibiting in the episode aren't unfounded...though admitedly, hyperbolic.

Like politics and religion in general lol yeah I can see.

I'll say it cuz no one else did...

Sounds like he's still...

WINNING....

wow that's a harsh way to escort a character off the page

XxAxX said:

wow that's a harsh way to escort a character off the page

He's getting another show and networks are even fighting over him, I'm sure he doesn't give a shit about how they wrote him out .

^But this is bout shiting on the fans. Charlies was the most popular character and really the only reasonanyone would watch, John Cryer nor the kid were bringing in the audience. Im not a Sheen fan but to do this to the character to spite the actor only pisses off the fans.

armpit said:

XxAxX said:

wow that's a harsh way to escort a character off the page

He's getting another show and networks are even fighting over him, I'm sure he doesn't give a shit about how they wrote him out .

it's a shame that he won't be coming back in the future to 2.5 men, for cameos.

and, having rose's character push him into an oncoming train is a betrayal of cool charlie harper.

it's a pretty clear fuck you from chuck to charlie, imo. hard to know who to side with, if anyone

still, sheen is not losing here. not losing at all... i bet he'll do well in a more adult-friendly sitcom

[Edited 8/8/11 16:41pm]