Funkcreep said:

Another reason why I support the death penalty. And not the way it's currently administered. It needs to be painful and swift! The family of the victim should be allowed to participate if they wish.

[Edited 7/7/11 6:51am]

Death penalty is too expensive.

SUPRMAN said:

Funkcreep said:

Another reason why I support the death penalty. And not the way it's currently administered. It needs to be painful and swift! The family of the victim should be allowed to participate if they wish.

[Edited 7/7/11 6:51am]

Death penalty is too expensive.

My point exactly. We need the death penalty but NOT the way it's currently administered. The way the death penalty is set up today is a joke! The most common cause of death for people on death row today is old age. They need to be swiftly put to death. For instance, the monster who committed this crime should have been killed the same night he confessed to the crime. The judge asks the family if anybody wants to participate, then the family can have at him for 2-3 minutes of executing him. The judge would then approve the family's method of execution. The cost to the state would be almost nothing!

Funkcreep said:

SUPRMAN said:

Death penalty is too expensive.

My point exactly. We need the death penalty but NOT the way it's currently administered. The way the death penalty is set up today is a joke! The most common cause of death for people on death row today is old age. They need to be swiftly put to death. For instance, the monster who committed this crime should have been killed the same night he confessed to the crime. The judge asks the family if anybody wants to participate, then the family can have at him for 2-3 minutes of executing him. The judge would then approve the family's method of execution. The cost to the state would be almost nothing!

So just lynch mobs huh?

Take him OUT......2day.

Funkcreep said:

SUPRMAN said:

Death penalty is too expensive.

My point exactly. We need the death penalty but NOT the way it's currently administered. The way the death penalty is set up today is a joke! The most common cause of death for people on death row today is old age. They need to be swiftly put to death. For instance, the monster who committed this crime should have been killed the same night he confessed to the crime. The judge asks the family if anybody wants to participate, then the family can have at him for 2-3 minutes of executing him. The judge would then approve the family's method of execution. The cost to the state would be almost nothing!

Sounds good to me. I never understood the argument that housing, feeding, paying for medical expenses, education and legal representation for these mofos all throughout their long ass lives is more cost effective to the state than knocking their asses off within 6 months to a year. Hell, when you have a confession and evidence to support the crime was committed then kill these bastards and call it a day. All this money we spend keeping them alive, that money could be used for far better things.

HotGritz said:

Funkcreep said:

My point exactly. We need the death penalty but NOT the way it's currently administered. The way the death penalty is set up today is a joke! The most common cause of death for people on death row today is old age. They need to be swiftly put to death. For instance, the monster who committed this crime should have been killed the same night he confessed to the crime. The judge asks the family if anybody wants to participate, then the family can have at him for 2-3 minutes of executing him. The judge would then approve the family's method of execution. The cost to the state would be almost nothing!

Sounds good to me. I never understood the argument that housing, feeding, paying for medical expenses, education and legal representation for these mofos all throughout their long ass lives is more cost effective to the state than knocking their asses off within 6 months to a year. Hell, when you have a confession and evidence to support the crime was committed then kill these bastards and call it a day. All this money we spend keeping them alive, that money could be used for far better things.

You would think this country has had enough of lynching and vigilante 'justice.'

SUPRMAN said:

HotGritz said:

Sounds good to me. I never understood the argument that housing, feeding, paying for medical expenses, education and legal representation for these mofos all throughout their long ass lives is more cost effective to the state than knocking their asses off within 6 months to a year. Hell, when you have a confession and evidence to support the crime was committed then kill these bastards and call it a day. All this money we spend keeping them alive, that money could be used for far better things.

You would think this country has had enough of lynching and vigilante 'justice.'

You would think this country has had enough of child rape, abuse, neglect and murder.

HotGritz said:

You would think this country has had enough of child rape, abuse, neglect and murder.

There is too much money to be made off of these things, by selling ads on the 6 and 11 o'clock news.

Imaginative said:

HotGritz said:

You would think this country has had enough of child rape, abuse, neglect and murder.

There is too much money to be made off of these things, by selling ads on the 6 and 11 o'clock news.

You touch on something that I think is a bigger issue than most people are willing to acknowledge. Crime = profit on so many levels. If all crime stopped tomorrow, a lot of people would be out of a job and source of income.

HotGritz said:

SUPRMAN said:

You would think this country has had enough of lynching and vigilante 'justice.'

You would think this country has had enough of child rape, abuse, neglect and murder.

Those are generally singular acts attributed to individual behavior.

If you could suggest how we stop individuals from committing such crimes, I'd love to hear it.

Imaginative said:

HotGritz said:

You would think this country has had enough of child rape, abuse, neglect and murder.

There is too much money to be made off of these things, by selling ads on the 6 and 11 o'clock news.

?

Do news stations stage such acts to have something to report?

HotGritz said:

Imaginative said:

There is too much money to be made off of these things, by selling ads on the 6 and 11 o'clock news.

You touch on something that I think is a bigger issue than most people are willing to acknowledge. Crime = profit on so many levels. If all crime stopped tomorrow, a lot of people would be out of a job and source of income.

So what's the preference, no crime and higher unemployment, or higher crime and the same unemployment?

SUPRMAN said:

Imaginative said:

SUPRMAN said:

?

Do news stations stage such acts to have something to report?

No, but by reporting them, they are treating them as entertainment.

No, they are treating it as news.

How are they treating it as entertainment? They are informing. If you are entertained in the process and watch more, I'm sure they're happy.

Should they not report that a rapist is in the neighborhood? Should they ignore local problems and issues?

If you see what is called news as entertainment, how do you stay informed?

How could someone feel like they're better than a child molester while they're talking about their fantasies to torture and murder people?

[Edited 7/7/11 20:16pm]

The1592 said:

How could someone feel like they're better than a child molester while they're talking about their fantasies to torture and murder people?

[Edited 7/7/11 20:16pm]

Glad someone else said it. SMH....

Meanwhile, the 6 month old kid still has HIV.

HotGritz said:

Spinlight said:

I doubt he is a "pervert" - rape isn't a sex crime. And this very clearly was not about sex, but giving the child an uncurable disease he may die from. Perversion =/= rape.

Oh please! We are talking a 6 month old baby. Anybody who rapes a 6 month old infant IS A PERVERT! That is not up for debate IMO. There are many forms of perversion and raping an infant no matter the reason is a perverted and evil act. I hope his dick falls off and his blood boils and his brain swells to the point that his skull cracks and he drains from his nose, mouth and ears...and then....all of his supporters/followers/friends/sympathizers can suffer the same fate.

I can't really believe you just maded a veiled threat/attack at me, suggesting I am a sympathizer or supporter of this guy, and that my brain should swell until my skull cracks. You are a fucked up individual. I can't even be bothered to judge you, your words are as sick as the act itself.

[Edited 7/7/11 20:28pm]

i just threw up in my mouth

he looks so gross and molesty with those dry ass lips and hanging right eye

just thinking about that transaction is so...sick x one millon.

SUPRMAN said:

Imaginative said:

SUPRMAN said: No, but by reporting them, they are treating them as entertainment.

No, they are treating it as news.

How are they treating it as entertainment? They are informing. If you are entertained in the process and watch more, I'm sure they're happy.

Should they not report that a rapist is in the neighborhood? Should they ignore local problems and issues?

If you see what is called news as entertainment, how do you stay informed?

There are two kinds of news. News you can act on, do something about, etc. The rest is topical entertainment disguised as news. Next time you watch, count how many stories you can actually act on, if

If you want to be "informed," stay away from the 6 and 11 o'clock news.

formallypickles said:

i just threw up in my mouth

he looks so gross and molesty with those dry ass lips and hanging right eye

just thinking about that transaction is so...sick x one millon.

You kind of make it sound like you'd be okay with it if he looked like Brad Pitt?

[Edited 7/7/11 23:50pm]

SUPRMAN said:

HotGritz said:

You would think this country has had enough of child rape, abuse, neglect and murder.

Those are generally singular acts attributed to individual behavior.

If you could suggest how we stop individuals from committing such crimes, I'd love to hear it.

FEAR.

Hate to say it, but crime in totalitarian/oppressed societies pales in comparison.

PurpleJedi said:

SUPRMAN said:

Those are generally singular acts attributed to individual behavior.

If you could suggest how we stop individuals from committing such crimes, I'd love to hear it.

FEAR.

Hate to say it, but crime in totalitarian/oppressed societies pales in comparison.

Got stats for that?

I don't think it pales. I think it's covered up by corruption, which is in itself criminal.

What about the baby????

Forget the sick bastard who raped him.... what about the baby?

How bad were the injuries to the baby's colon, does it say? Does the baby still have a functioning colon?

One small positive note, if this little baby heals OK and can still maintains normal use of his organs (despite his HIV status), then hopefully this baby will be too young to remember anything done to him sexually.

I couldn't click on the article to read.... I am too disturbed.

paintedlady said:

What about the baby????

Forget the sick bastard who raped him.... what about the baby?

How bad were the injuries to the baby's colon, does it say? Does the baby still have a functioning colon?

One small positive note, if this little baby heals OK and can still maintains normal use of his organs (despite his HIV status), then hopefully this baby will be too young to remember anything done to him sexually.

I couldn't click on the article to read.... I am too disturbed.

The article itself offers practically no more information than does the shocking headline.

SUPRMAN said:

PurpleJedi said:

FEAR.

Hate to say it, but crime in totalitarian/oppressed societies pales in comparison.

Got stats for that?

I don't think it pales. I think it's covered up by corruption, which is in itself criminal.

No...not stats...just the common knowledge that you're less likely to be mugged in Tehran or Singapore than London or NYC.

When you're threatened with beheading or public caning you think twice about mugging that woman on the street.

PurpleJedi said:

SUPRMAN said:

Got stats for that?

I don't think it pales. I think it's covered up by corruption, which is in itself criminal.

No...not stats...just the common knowledge that you're less likely to be mugged in Tehran or Singapore than London or NYC.

When you're threatened with beheading or public caning you think twice about mugging that woman on the street.

SUPRMAN said:

HotGritz said:

You would think this country has had enough of child rape, abuse, neglect and murder.

Those are generally singular acts attributed to individual behavior.

If you could suggest how we stop individuals from committing such crimes, I'd love to hear it.

And lynching and vigilante justice are not? You think an individual is incapable of committing those acts and such acts are ONLY committed by groups of people?

Spinlight said:

HotGritz said:

Oh please! We are talking a 6 month old baby. Anybody who rapes a 6 month old infant IS A PERVERT! That is not up for debate IMO. There are many forms of perversion and raping an infant no matter the reason is a perverted and evil act. I hope his dick falls off and his blood boils and his brain swells to the point that his skull cracks and he drains from his nose, mouth and ears...and then....all of his supporters/followers/friends/sympathizers can suffer the same fate.

I can't really believe you just maded a veiled threat/attack at me, suggesting I am a sympathizer or supporter of this guy, and that my brain should swell until my skull cracks. You are a fucked up individual. I can't even be bothered to judge you, your words are as sick as the act itself.

[Edited 7/7/11 20:28pm]

I think you put yourself in that category hon. You put yourself in that category in big fuckin' way.

@ veiled threat/attack.

Apparently you found a shoe that fits.

HotGritz said:

SUPRMAN said:

Those are generally singular acts attributed to individual behavior.

If you could suggest how we stop individuals from committing such crimes, I'd love to hear it.

And lynching and vigilante justice are not? You think an individual is incapable of committing those acts and such acts are ONLY committed by groups of people?

Lynching by an individual? Suspect. You'd have to choose your victim carefully. But in this sick world that could include a child.

Vigilante justice certainly is capable of being an individual.

SUPRMAN said:

HotGritz said:

And lynching and vigilante justice are not? You think an individual is incapable of committing those acts and such acts are ONLY committed by groups of people?

Lynching by an individual? Suspect. You'd have to choose your victim carefully. But in this sick world that could include a child.

Vigilante justice certainly is capable of being an individual.

Finally we agree on something.