JustErin said:

I'll go with cinnie's explanation. I could describe it to prove i'm not lying, lol.

FauxReal said:

JustErin said:

How did it load if I deleted it?

I'll go with cinnie's explanation. I could describe it to prove i'm not lying, lol.

Everyone shows cleavage, so I decided to show under boob.

JustErin said:

Good call. The avatar has ample cleavage, anyway

Cinnie said:

ButterscotchPimp said:

wait a minute. what's the HOURLY rate again?

Aren't you a slim one? Remember that Salon article said on average you only last 108 seconds.

Slim? as in weight wise? and what Salon article that said what?

if i'm reading the implication right, Salon says that thin guys can only last 108 seconds and what fat guys can go all night? are you kidding me? shouldn't that be like the other way around? considering we have sex MUCH more?

JustErin said:

FauxReal said:

JustErin said: I'll go with cinnie's explanation. I could describe it to prove i'm not lying, lol.

Everyone shows cleavage, so I decided to show under boob.

and magnificent under boob it was.

ButterscotchPimp said:

Cinnie said:

Aren't you a slim one? Remember that Salon article said on average you only last 108 seconds.

Slim? as in weight wise? and what Salon article that said what?

if i'm reading the implication right, Salon says that thin guys can only last 108 seconds and what fat guys can go all night? are you kidding me? shouldn't that be like the other way around? considering we have sex MUCH more?

noooooo, fat guys can go 112 seconds!

ZombieKitten said:

ButterscotchPimp said:

Slim? as in weight wise? and what Salon article that said what?

if i'm reading the implication right, Salon says that thin guys can only last 108 seconds and what fat guys can go all night? are you kidding me? shouldn't that be like the other way around? considering we have sex MUCH more?

noooooo, fat guys can go 112 seconds!

that's just retarded.

that makes no sense at all.

and also doesn't apply to me, at all.

ButterscotchPimp said:

JustErin said:

Everyone shows cleavage, so I decided to show under boob.

and magnificent under boob it was.

I thought that making the pic smaller would make it a bit less offensive...that's why it was so small.

ButterscotchPimp said:

ZombieKitten said:

noooooo, fat guys can go 112 seconds!

that's just retarded.

that makes no sense at all.

and also doesn't apply to me, at all.

here is the article

http://open.salon.com/blo..._after_all

sorry I was wrong, the fat guys can go 7.3 minutes!!!!!

JustErin said:

ButterscotchPimp said:

and magnificent under boob it was.

I thought that making the pic smaller would make it a bit less offensive...that's why it was so small.

It's a thread based on "massive mams" not "considerately resized and less offensive mams".

ZombieKitten said:

ButterscotchPimp said:

that's just retarded.

that makes no sense at all.

and also doesn't apply to me, at all.

here is the article

http://open.salon.com/blo..._after_all

sorry I was wrong, the fat guys can go 7.3 minutes!!!!!

I've never been with any man that only lasted a couple of minutes.

FauxReal said:

JustErin said:

I thought that making the pic smaller would make it a bit less offensive...that's why it was so small.

It's a thread based on "massive mams" not "considerately resized and less offensive mams".

I suppose.

JustErin said:

ButterscotchPimp said:

and magnificent under boob it was.

I thought that making the pic smaller would make it a bit less offensive...that's why it was so small.

I was so hoping to make that a Desktop...

RenHoek said:

JustErin said:

I thought that making the pic smaller would make it a bit less offensive...that's why it was so small.

I was so hoping to make that a Desktop...

You can tile it.

ZombieKitten said:

ButterscotchPimp said:

that's just retarded.

that makes no sense at all.

and also doesn't apply to me, at all.

here is the article

http://open.salon.com/blo..._after_all

sorry I was wrong, the fat guys can go 7.3 minutes!!!!!

FIRST of all, a TURKISH SEX SURVEY? as in scientists from TURKEY.

pardon me, if i don't take a lot of stock in any kind of "scientific research" from Turkey.

JustErin said:

ZombieKitten said:

here is the article

http://open.salon.com/blo..._after_all

sorry I was wrong, the fat guys can go 7.3 minutes!!!!!

I've never been with any man that only lasted a couple of minutes.

that's a shame.

and i'm again pointing out that New York isn't a far away as you think.

ButterscotchPimp said:

JustErin said:

I've never been with any man that only lasted a couple of minutes.

that's a shame.

and i'm again pointing out that New York isn't a far away as you think.

no it's not

Erin's only been with ABOVE average guys

ButterscotchPimp said:

JustErin said:

I've never been with any man that only lasted a couple of minutes.

that's a shame.

and i'm again pointing out that New York isn't a far away as you think.

It's a shame? No, it's not. They go a long time....sometimes too long.

ZombieKitten said:

ButterscotchPimp said:

that's a shame.

and i'm again pointing out that New York isn't a far away as you think.

no it's not

Erin's only been with ABOVE average guys

In terms of time, certainly not in penis size.

In that case, average is what I've been with most, a few have been way above and one was really really little.

JustErin said:

ButterscotchPimp said:

that's a shame.

and i'm again pointing out that New York isn't a far away as you think.

It's a shame? No, it's not. They go a long time....sometimes too long.

good lord.

so ZK, a couple of minutes is above average and Erin a couple of minutes is sometimes too long? really?

ButterscotchPimp said:

JustErin said:

It's a shame? No, it's not. They go a long time....sometimes too long.

good lord.

so ZK, a couple of minutes is above average and Erin a couple of minutes is sometimes too long? really?

No, that's not what I said.

I've only been with long timers, not a couple of minutes. 30+ more is average and sometimes I've been with way too long.

But really when you think about it. When you add up all the minutes of actual intercourse, it's usually not that long. Most of the time is doing other fun stuff.

ButterscotchPimp said:

JustErin said:

It's a shame? No, it's not. They go a long time....sometimes too long.

good lord.

so ZK, a couple of minutes is above average and Erin a couple of minutes is sometimes too long? really?

yes, according to this turkish research, a couple of minutes IS above average, but the guys Erin has been with have all lasted much longer than that. At least that is how I understand it!

Speaking from my own experience

I'm not one to bother timing, but sometimes it goes so long I lose interest, and once I start thinking about other stuff while he's pounding away, I might as well switch on the telly

JustErin said:

ButterscotchPimp said:

good lord.

so ZK, a couple of minutes is above average and Erin a couple of minutes is sometimes too long? really?

No, that's not what I said.

I've only been with long timers, not a couple of minutes. 30+ more is average and sometimes I've been with way too long.

But really when you think about it. When you add up all the minutes of actual intercourse, it's usually not that long. Most of the time is doing other fun stuff.

so is your 30+ minutes including all the other stuff?

because if anyone was banging away at me that long, I'd have made my excuses and left the room already

ZombieKitten said:

JustErin said:

No, that's not what I said.

I've only been with long timers, not a couple of minutes. 30+ more is average and sometimes I've been with way too long.

But really when you think about it. When you add up all the minutes of actual intercourse, it's usually not that long. Most of the time is doing other fun stuff.

so is your 30+ minutes including all the other stuff?

because if anyone was banging away at me that long, I'd have made my excuses and left the room already

No, it's not. It's a guess at how much actual intercourse takes place over an encounter. It's not 30 minutes straight.

JustErin said:

ZombieKitten said:

so is your 30+ minutes including all the other stuff?

because if anyone was banging away at me that long, I'd have made my excuses and left the room already

No, it's not. It's a guess at how much actual intercourse takes place over an encounter. It's not 30 minutes straight.

ohhhhhhhhh

JustErin said:

ButterscotchPimp said:

good lord.

so ZK, a couple of minutes is above average and Erin a couple of minutes is sometimes too long? really?

No, that's not what I said.

I've only been with long timers, not a couple of minutes. 30+ more is average and sometimes I've been with way too long.

But really when you think about it. When you add up all the minutes of actual intercourse, it's usually not that long. Most of the time is doing other fun stuff.

ah. that makes much more sense. i suppose you have a point when you deduct all of the oral/foreplay, but even then if you're really into it you kind of have to hit the cycle (position wise), if you know what i mean. blame it on listening to Prince in my formative years. i mix in the "other stuff" in between positions. (wonders if he's over-sharing)

ZombieKitten said:

ButterscotchPimp said:

good lord.

so ZK, a couple of minutes is above average and Erin a couple of minutes is sometimes too long? really?

yes, according to this turkish research, a couple of minutes IS above average, but the guys Erin has been with have all lasted much longer than that. At least that is how I understand it!

Speaking from my own experience

I'm not one to bother timing, but sometimes it goes so long I lose interest, and once I start thinking about other stuff while he's pounding away, I might as well switch on the telly

good lord!

that sounds so bad!!!!!!

you lose interest?

you've never gotten so into it that you've completely lost track of time?

ButterscotchPimp said:

ZombieKitten said:

yes, according to this turkish research, a couple of minutes IS above average, but the guys Erin has been with have all lasted much longer than that. At least that is how I understand it!

Speaking from my own experience

I'm not one to bother timing, but sometimes it goes so long I lose interest, and once I start thinking about other stuff while he's pounding away, I might as well switch on the telly

good lord!

that sounds so bad!!!!!!

you lose interest?

you've never gotten so into it that you've completely lost track of time?

of course! it's like playing tetris. You look up at the clock and wonder where the last hour or 2 went.

Other times, it hasn't like that at ALL

ZombieKitten said:

ButterscotchPimp said:

good lord!

that sounds so bad!!!!!!

you lose interest?

you've never gotten so into it that you've completely lost track of time?

of course! it's like playing tetris. You look up at the clock and wonder where the last hour or 2 went.

Other times, it hasn't like that at ALL

LOL like Tetris.

well, when it's bad it's bad.

i've got a couple of horror stories for sure.

but when it's good it's oh sooooooooo good.