independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > General Discussion > Director Christopher Nolan Talks Superman Project
« Previous topic  Next topic »
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Author

Tweet     Share

Message
Thread started 09/28/10 1:02am

Identity

Director Christopher Nolan Talks Superman Project

Christopher Nolan in the dark

September 2010

The topic at the Batcave on Monday night was the future of that other superhero — you know, the one from Metropolis. “It’s very exciting; we have a fantastic story,” Christopher Nolan said while sipping tea in the sleek editing suite that fills the converted garage next to his Hollywood home. “And we feel we can do it right. We know the milieu, if you will, we know the genre and how to get it done right.”

Nolan was standing next to his wife, producer Emma Thomas, his partner in all of his films — including “Batman Begins and “The Dark Knight,” the grim franchise that pulled in more than $1.3 billion at theaters worldwide — and he was explaining their plan to take on a challenge that has frustrated Hollywood for two decades: getting another Superman film franchise off the ground.

Nolan, speaking about the Superman project for the first time, is pleased with the excitement stirred but, like the magicians in his 2006 film “The Prestige,” sees no value in revealing all of his tricks before the curtain goes up. Still, he wanted to answer some of the early questions about his plans for Superman — as well as his third visit to Gotham City.

There was a spasm of fan excitement when word leaked last month that Nolan, who is now viewed as the Hitchcock of superhero cinema after his two Batman films, would be the “godfather” for a reboot of the Man of Steel, acting as producer and mentor to an as-yet-unnamed-director who will be making a movie based on a story by Nolan and frequent collaborator David S. Goyer.

The Internet flurry included reports that, according to Thomas, might be better described as fan fiction. The dispatches revealing that the film will be called “Man of Steel”? And feature Lex Luthor and Brainiac? Or the one about it being a period piece with something like a low-fi version of the hero?

“I don’t know where this stuff comes from,” Thomas said with a chuckle, although, as with any good poker player, it’s hard to say where the bluff starts and ends.

This much is certain: The couple are completely focused on the movie-of-the-moment, which is “Inception,” which opens July 16 and stars Leonardo DiCaprio as a dream thief of sorts in what may be Hollywood’s first metaphysical heist film.

The movie is the most complicated undertaking of Nolan’s career — it was shot in six countries and tells a tale that flips between reality and three levels of dream-time — and, well, all things considered, he’d rather Superman stay in his Fortress of Solitude and off the front page for a while longer since that project is a matter for 2012 or 2013 at best.

But of course Superman, first superhero of them all, is an American pop culture icon on a par with Mickey Mouse and Elvis. But after the close of the Christopher Reeve era with “Superman IV: The Quest for Peace” in 1987, the property became one of the most frustrating in Hollywood. A dozen different reboots were started through the years with names attached such as Nicolas Cage, Kevin Smith, J.J. Abrams, McG and Brett Ratner, and plans were trotted out to kill Superman, strip him of his powers or pit him in battle against Batman.

Finally, director Bryan Singer, who had earned credibility with comic book fans with his two “X-Men” films for Fox, delivered with “Superman Returns” in 2006 starring Brandon Routh. But the finished product was viewed as oddly lifeless by many critics. The $200-million film finished its theatrical run with a respectable $391 million worldwide but it wasn’t heroic enough to earn a sequel.

Nolan said that he admired Singer’s film, especially the way it connected to director Richard Donner’s version of Superman and the first two movies starring Reeve. Nolan added, though, that this new movie will stand on its own.

“A lot of people have approached Superman in a lot of different ways. I only know the way that has worked for us that’s what I know how to do,” Nolan said, emphasizing the idea that Batman exists in a world where he is the only superhero and a similar approach to the Man of Steel would assure the integrity needed for the film. “Each serves to the internal logic of the story. They have nothing to do with each other.”

Still, it was a frustrating moment in the Batman franchise that led to this new Superman revival. Nolan and Goyer, a key collaborator on both Batman films, were at a story impasse on the third Batman film (which is now picking up steam as well) when, as a distraction, Goyer gave the filmmaker a daydream version of how he would tackle a story about the last son of Krypton.

“He basically told me, ‘I have this thought about how you would approach Superman,’” Nolan recalled. “I immediately got it, loved it and thought: That is a way of approaching the story I’ve never seen before that makes it incredibly exciting. I wanted to get Emma and I involved in shepherding the project right away and getting it to the studio and getting it going in an exciting way.”

Goyer is now writing the screenplay and Nolan is keeping it close to the vest.

It’s interesting where inspirations originate. Nolan put together an especially deep cast for his Batman films — the first one, for instance, featured Morgan Freeman, Liam Neeson, Gary Oldman and Tom Wilkinson in supporting roles. That, he said, was an idea imported from Metropolis.

“I went to the studio with the analogy of ‘I want to cast the way they did in 1978 with ‘Superman,”’ where they had [Marlon] Brando and Glenn Ford and Ned Beatty and all these fantastic actors in even small parts, which was an exotic idea for a superhero movie at the time. It really paid off too. As a kid watching ‘Superman,’ it seemed enormous and I realized later by looking at it that a lot of that was actually the casting, just having these incredibly talented people and these characterizations. And Marlon Brando is the first guy up playing Superman’s dad. It’s incredible.”

Superman, created by Jerry Siegel and Joe Shuster, was an instant success when he arrived on the publishing scene in June 1938 and he more or less created the American comic book and its signature concept, the superhero.

Superman made the leap to radio in 1940 and then to the silver screen in 1948 when Kirk Alyn became the first of many actors to wear the cape. George Reeves was the face of Superman on television for 104 episodes in the 1950s while Reeve and his work in the 1970s and 1980s may be the definitive version of the hero for most fans. But the youngest fans have a view of the hero shaped more by the award-winning animated series in recent years and “Smallville,” the CW series that just got re-upped for a 10th season, making star Tom Welling the Clark Kent with the longest tenure.

Nolan, for the record, also won’t confirm that he is actually directing the third Batman film, but, well, of course he is – however “Inception” isn’t in the can yet and it’s against his code. He can’t be easily tricked, either. Asked if Superman as a franchise has to overcome a deficiency of truly great villains, unlike, say, Spider-Man and Batman, he won’t bite. “That’s a very sly way of asking a question I’m not going to answer.”

Nolan says he has no idea who will direct the Superman film (there has been conjecture that it may be his brother and frequent collaborator, Jonathan Nolan) but his role appears to be comparable to Peter Jackson with District 9,” which was directed by newcomer Neill Blomkamp but benefited greatly from imprimatur of The Lord of the Rings” auteur. Jackson is also stepping into a similar role in Middle-earth as Guillermo del Toro takes over as director for “The Hobbit” films.

Nolan established himself as a bold and cerebral filmmaker in 2000 with “Memento,” has made a specialty of rooting stories of the fantastic in a gritty reality with psychological undertones and an emphasis on using practical effects and stunt work as opposed to the magical paintbrushes of the CG era.

All of that made him an ideal filmmaker for fight-time in the brutal gutters of Gotham but it doesn’t make the filmmaker the first obvious choice for flight-time amid the gleaming citadels of Metropolis. Warner Bros. executives seem confident that he is — and they need him to be the right man with the “Harry Potter” franchise — and perhaps Batman — nearing an expiration date.

Sitting in his edit bay, which is decorated with posters of Ledger as the Joker and has a skylight that rolls shut with mechanical screeching that adds to the Batcave ambiance, Nolan said he knows about storytelling and it’s difficult to dissect his work beyond that.

“We’re approaching it in a not dissimilar way in terms of trying to find an incredible story in a way that audiences can engage with it the way they engage with contemporary action films,” Nolan continued. “I think David’s approach is a very good way of doing just that.”

And that third Batman film? Jonathan Nolan is “now doing the hard work” of writing the script based on the story by his sibling and Goyer. “My brother is writing a script for me and we’ll wait to see how it turns out…. He’s struggling to put it together into the epic story that you want it to be.”

“Batman Begins” was the origin and back story of the hero, while “The Dark Knight” found the hero reeling as his Manichean, good vs. evil worldview was upended by a new villain, the Joker, who was a wild-card agent of chaos going up against order, be it a police department or the mob. The second film ends, literally, with Batman on the run, a fugitive.

So what happens next?

“Without getting into specifics, the key thing that makes the third film a great possibility for us is that we want to finish our story,” he said. “And in viewing it as the finishing of a story rather than infinitely blowing up the balloon and expanding the story.”

Nolan said the key surviving characters from the two first films and the actors who play them will be back. “We have a great ensemble, that’s one of the attractions of doing another film, since we’ve been having a great time for years.”

Perhaps. But the great challenge is to find a villain (or villains) who can not only match up with the Caped Crusader but also with Heath Ledger’s Academy Award-winning portrayal of the scabby, demented Joker. Fans have churned up the rumor mill for months now (Johnny Depp as the Riddler? Angelina Jolie as Catwoman? Philip Seymour Hoffman as the Penguin? Ben Kingsley as Hugo Strange?). But Nolan, no fan of letting cats out of the bag, declined to play along.

His villain choices to date have steered clear of strongly supernatural or super-science characters (no Man-Bat, Mr. Freeze or Poison Ivy, for instance) but he shook his head when asked if that was a trajectory he would continue. He did however concede one tidbit: “It won’t be,” he said, “Mr. Freeze.”

Batman has been throwing punches in the pages of DC Comics since 1939 and as the decades passed, much of the core of the character stayed the same even as Bruce Wayne’s sideburns or the profile of the Batmobile changed. Not so with film.

“I’m very excited about the end of the film, the conclusion, and what we’ve done with the characters,” Nolan said.“My brother has come up with some pretty exciting stuff. Unlike the comics, these things don’t go on forever in film and viewing it as a story with an end is useful. Viewing it as an ending, that sets you very much on the right track about the appropriate conclusion and the essence of what tale we’re telling. And it harkens back to that priority of trying to find the reality in these fantastic stories. That’s what we do.”

http://herocomplex.latime...c-story-1/

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #1 posted 09/28/10 2:02am

kpowers

avatar

batman I was at the Batcave Monday Night and we were not talking about the new Superman movie. We (The JLA) were making plans to stop Darkseid's plan of conquering the Eartn and enslaving the population.

[Edited 9/28/10 2:02am]

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #2 posted 09/28/10 9:11am

Graycap23

Another one? Ohhh lawrd.confused

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #3 posted 09/28/10 9:17am

Efan

avatar

I would love a new Superman movie. There's never been a very good one, so let's hope they can do it right. I'm glad this one is not going to be connected to any of the previous ones.

My big hope is that Lex Luthor is not in it. I'm tired of seeing the same villain over and over again. Superman fighting Darkseid would be kick-ass.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #4 posted 09/28/10 9:31am

Identity

Also, Supes battling longtime foes like the Parasite, Bizarro or Metallo would be da bomb on film.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #5 posted 09/28/10 9:37am

Efan

avatar

Identity said:

Also, Supes battling longtime foes like the Parasite, Bizarro or Metallo would be da bomb on film.

I love Parasite and Metallo (always hated Bizarro, though).

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #6 posted 09/28/10 9:45am

JoeTyler

bored Superman Returns was CRAP. Nolan is a great director & writer but this pisses me off: I want him 100% focused on the third Batman film confused

Superman is a RELIC, a relic from the 40s (the golden age of old school comic) and the 70s (the two first C.Reeve's films, God bless him). Hollywood knows it, so the execs are not interested in Superman anymore...it floors me that they have green-lighted another Superman film! another one?? wth??the mainstream audience is so fond of the Reeve's films that they will probably reject any new S movie, like it happened with Returns...but who knows: if the script is really "that" good, and if the film is shot in 3D, it could be the monster hit that Returns never was...

[Edited 9/28/10 9:46am]

tinkerbell
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #7 posted 09/28/10 10:10am

Identity

Efan said:

Identity said:

Also, Supes battling longtime foes like the Parasite, Bizarro or Metallo would be da bomb on film.

I love Parasite and Metallo (always hated Bizarro, though).

This rendering of the Parasite (by Alex Ross) is spine-chilling and accentuate his status as one of Superman's most lethal enemies. I'd love to see it used as part of a marketing campaign.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #8 posted 09/28/10 12:54pm

kpowers

avatar

Efan said:

I would love a new Superman movie. There's never been a very good one, so let's hope they can do it right. I'm glad this one is not going to be connected to any of the previous ones.

My big hope is that Lex Luthor is not in it. I'm tired of seeing the same villain over and over again. Superman fighting Darkseid would be kick-ass.

batman Yes some of my best battles were of Superman and I going up against Darkseid

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #9 posted 09/28/10 4:36pm

BklynBabe

avatar

Can they focus on Justice League movie please?

Superman is covered pretty well with Smallville at this time.

And DC Universe online....that game looks to be the business! I may have to go all out looking for a full time job, just to get a PS3, just to get that game!!!

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #10 posted 09/29/10 2:00am

andykeen

avatar

The Doomsday Cartoon/Movie is awsome, they should just convert this to the big screen!

[Edited 9/29/10 2:00am]


Keenmeister
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #11 posted 09/29/10 10:26am

ufoclub

avatar

JoeTyler said:

bored Superman Returns was CRAP. Nolan is a great director & writer but this pisses me off: I want him 100% focused on the third Batman film confused

Superman is a RELIC, a relic from the 40s (the golden age of old school comic) and the 70s (the two first C.Reeve's films, God bless him). Hollywood knows it, so the execs are not interested in Superman anymore...it floors me that they have green-lighted another Superman film! another one?? wth??the mainstream audience is so fond of the Reeve's films that they will probably reject any new S movie, like it happened with Returns...but who knows: if the script is really "that" good, and if the film is shot in 3D, it could be the monster hit that Returns never was...

[Edited 9/28/10 9:46am]

Superman was already a relic when they reinvented it for the 70's version. There were some craptacular tv version before that and cartoons. The 70's one was a genius re-vision of it with it's Krypton crystal design technology (how appropriate for the 70's?!!!) and wise cracking chain smoking Lois Lane... and it's genius casting of an unknown lead next to the likes of Gene Hackman and Marlon Brando!

Nolan's last batman movie faltered for me in one respect... Batman himself was flat, silly, and uninteresting... especially next to those dynamic villains. And the film's boat stalemate part seemed contrived and silly. But they sure have the color pallete/photography down for grim and dark.

I wonder if they can do something new and magnificent with Superman. It could be done.

For me, no one has still come close to the cool plot of the original Superman involved Batman drama graphic novel "The Dark Knight" by Frank Miller.

that thing was cool and revolutionary. And the way it presented Superman was great.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #12 posted 09/29/10 11:24am

JoeTyler

ufoclub said:

JoeTyler said:

bored Superman Returns was CRAP. Nolan is a great director & writer but this pisses me off: I want him 100% focused on the third Batman film confused

Superman is a RELIC, a relic from the 40s (the golden age of old school comic) and the 70s (the two first C.Reeve's films, God bless him). Hollywood knows it, so the execs are not interested in Superman anymore...it floors me that they have green-lighted another Superman film! another one?? wth??the mainstream audience is so fond of the Reeve's films that they will probably reject any new S movie, like it happened with Returns...but who knows: if the script is really "that" good, and if the film is shot in 3D, it could be the monster hit that Returns never was...

[Edited 9/28/10 9:46am]

Superman was already a relic when they reinvented it for the 70's version. There were some craptacular tv version before that and cartoons. The 70's one was a genius re-vision of it with it's Krypton crystal design technology (how appropriate for the 70's?!!!) and wise cracking chain smoking Lois Lane... and it's genius casting of an unknown lead next to the likes of Gene Hackman and Marlon Brando!

Nolan's last batman movie faltered for me in one respect... Batman himself was flat, silly, and uninteresting... especially next to those dynamic villains. And the film's boat stalemate part seemed contrived and silly. But they sure have the color pallete/photography down for grim and dark.

I wonder if they can do something new and magnificent with Superman. It could be done.

For me, no one has still come close to the cool plot of the original Superman involved Batman drama graphic novel "The Dark Knight" by Frank Miller.

that thing was cool and revolutionary. And the way it presented Superman was great.

Oh yes, that was a great story, but it belongs to the comic world: a movie featuring a personal fight between Batman & Superman would be ridiculous, the mainstream mases would reject it as "nerdy" stuff...

tinkerbell
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #13 posted 09/29/10 2:18pm

ufoclub

avatar

JoeTyler said:

ufoclub said:

Superman was already a relic when they reinvented it for the 70's version. There were some craptacular tv version before that and cartoons. The 70's one was a genius re-vision of it with it's Krypton crystal design technology (how appropriate for the 70's?!!!) and wise cracking chain smoking Lois Lane... and it's genius casting of an unknown lead next to the likes of Gene Hackman and Marlon Brando!

Nolan's last batman movie faltered for me in one respect... Batman himself was flat, silly, and uninteresting... especially next to those dynamic villains. And the film's boat stalemate part seemed contrived and silly. But they sure have the color pallete/photography down for grim and dark.

I wonder if they can do something new and magnificent with Superman. It could be done.

For me, no one has still come close to the cool plot of the original Superman involved Batman drama graphic novel "The Dark Knight" by Frank Miller.

that thing was cool and revolutionary. And the way it presented Superman was great.

Oh yes, that was a great story, but it belongs to the comic world: a movie featuring a personal fight between Batman & Superman would be ridiculous, the mainstream mases would reject it as "nerdy" stuff...

I think that if they did it in the way that is indicated in the comic, it's almost abstracted and iconic it would work. It's when people who don't understand how to latch onto the vibe of the source material get stuff that it gets all ridiculous.

Remember the mainstream masses just accepted Batman and Inception, all because they were done with the right vibe, imagine if they had been done by less "highbrow" aspiring directors. And they are both ultra nerdy. That also includes Lord of the Rings which nobody but nerds would talk about... and then they made movies that had a certain style and intensity. Most people really thought those movies were going to fail to be meainstream before the first one came out, because of the past history, the association with nerds and a D&D crowd.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #14 posted 09/30/10 5:56am

DrRockdapuss

avatar

the coolest villains I've seen in Action Comics in ages have been The Elite. I really wish somebody had the gumption to shoot that battle on the big screen. In 3-d even, since Superman Returns bitched out on it.

The Elite was like a self-styled Justice League/band of pirates. They stole a ship and cruised the cosmos beatin the fuckin shit outta whoever they thought deserved it. Their leader grew up an orphan in sweatshops. When his sister lost her hands in a machine, he made the whole factory sew their mouths shut and cut their hands off with scissors and steel punchers.

They came to show Superman how effective he could be if he stopped sendin fuckers to Blackgate and sent em to the pearly gates instead.

[img:$uid]http://www.universohq.com/quadrinhos/images/manchester_black.jpg[/img:$uid]

It was awesome. And they kinda whooped his ass too.

[img:$uid]http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/TruthJustice1.jpg[/img:$uid]

[Edited 9/30/10 6:05am]

[Edited 9/30/10 8:02am]

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #15 posted 09/30/10 11:49am

purplethunder3
121

avatar

andykeen said:

The Doomsday Cartoon/Movie is awsome, they should just convert this to the big screen!

[Edited 9/29/10 2:00am]

I would love to see them tackle the Death/Return of Superman on the big screen! wink

"Music gives a soul to the universe, wings to the mind, flight to the imagination and life to everything." --Plato

https://youtu.be/CVwv9LZMah0
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #16 posted 09/30/10 12:01pm

purplethunder3
121

avatar

kpowers said:

Efan said:

I would love a new Superman movie. There's never been a very good one, so let's hope they can do it right. I'm glad this one is not going to be connected to any of the previous ones.

My big hope is that Lex Luthor is not in it. I'm tired of seeing the same villain over and over again. Superman fighting Darkseid would be kick-ass.

batman Yes some of my best battles were of Superman and I going up against Darkseid

batman When was the last time you butted heads with old Supes? BTW your batcave could stand some redecorating--a few decades out of style... lol Also, have you thought about some modern mood lighting to counter the depressive darkness of your cave? Might help with that dark depression and OCD you suffer from... wink

lol

"Music gives a soul to the universe, wings to the mind, flight to the imagination and life to everything." --Plato

https://youtu.be/CVwv9LZMah0
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #17 posted 09/30/10 1:00pm

kpowers

avatar

purplethunder3121 said:

kpowers said:

batman Yes some of my best battles were of Superman and I going up against Darkseid

batman When was the last time you butted heads with old Supes? BTW your batcave could stand some redecorating--a few decades out of style... lol Also, have you thought about some modern mood lighting to counter the depressive darkness of your cave? Might help with that dark depression and OCD you suffer from... wink

lol

batman I'll answer all of your questions

Question 1. Last week, It was his turn to take out the garbage at the Hall of Justice and left it for me.

Question 2. You have never been in the Batcave, it's very updated (I got windows 9).

Question 3. No, keeping the lighting the way it is.....Wonder Woman likes it that way.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #18 posted 09/30/10 1:16pm

L4OATheOrigina
l

avatar

soemthing without lex would be cool just don't make a remake of superman III and IV

man, he has such an amazing body of music that it's sad to see him constrict it down to the basics. he's too talented for the lineup he's doing. estelle 81
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #19 posted 09/30/10 7:56pm

bluefish

avatar

Superman is my favorite superhero. Batman has always been in second place in my mind...but not even a very close second.

I am not an avid reader of comic books, so when people who are, take issue with a film adaptation's degree of faithfulness to the comics, their arguments are lost on me; some I feel are nitpicky almost to the point of absurdity. Fanboys (not just of comics) can be crazy sometimes: I consider myself a Star Wars nut, yet I've never had a coronary over the fact that in the first film one of the rebel pilots' helmet insignias is blue, rather than the correct red.

I totally understand why Nolan felt the need to inject a bit of gritty realism into the Batman franchise, and I actually enjoyed Begins. But, IMO both films -- especially The Dark Knight -- are a bit too "real" for their own good. I'm not saying they should have gone as far as Joel Schumacher's nightmare neon acid trips. but there does need to be a balance of the real and the fantastic, which is what puts the "super" in "superhero." I would have liked The Dark Knight a lot more if the script hadn't been made as a Batman film: i.e., the protagonist is a normal homicide detective and the antagonist is a normal (relatively speaking) anarchistic sociopath. Putting fantastic characters in a realistic setting can only work within certain contexts, like comedy and horror. When that scenario tries to take itself too seriously (as with TDK), it just comes off as lame and pointless. JMNSHO.

What I mean to say by all of this is, I hope Nolan doesn't try to ground Superman too deep in reality. I do NOT want to hear/see things like:

* Clark/Superman is not an alien and does not have super powers. He is a body-builder with exceptional strength and agility, but not beyond normal human capacity. :lame:

* He "flies" via a jetpack. His suit and cape are made of bulletproof Kevlar. rolleyes

* His "vision" skills (x-ray, heat) are made possible by wearing a set of high-tech infrared goggles. disbelief

* The Fortress of Solitude is the former outpost of an arctic explorer, which Clark discovered and converted into a military-style bunker. doh!

If Nolan tries to do crap like this, I will be pissed!!!

[Edited 9/30/10 20:07pm]

‎https://www.youtube.com/@PurpleKnightsPodcast
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #20 posted 09/30/10 10:40pm

ThreadBare

Chris Nolan said:

We know the milieu, if you will...”

Right there -- when he started talking like Tarantino -- is where I lost interest.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #21 posted 09/30/10 10:49pm

bluefish

avatar

ThreadBare said:

Chris Nolan said:

We know the milieu, if you will...”

Right there -- when he started talking like Tarantino -- is where I lost interest.

lol

‎https://www.youtube.com/@PurpleKnightsPodcast
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #22 posted 10/05/10 11:14am

Identity

Movie Power Rankings: Zack Snyder and 'Superman' soar to no. 1

Zack Snyder to Direct Latest 'Superman' Film, Due in 2012

October 2010

Zack Snyder, director of graphic novel adaptations of Watchmen and 300, will take over the Superman franchise, Warner Bros. announced Monday.

The film, written by David Goyer and Dark Knight director Christopher Nolan, is scheduled for a holiday 2012 release, the studio says.

Snyder says he was surprised to land the movie, to be produced by Nolan and partner Emma Thomas.

"I had always been a huge fan of the character, but this is out of the blue," says Snyder, who has a long-standing relationship with Warner Bros., which will release his Sucker Punch March 25.

The Superman franchise has been a tricky property for Warner Bros., which has tried before to resuscitate the Man of Steel. The last time the studio went to a comics fan, Bryan Singer's Superman Returns earned $201 million in 2206, about $70 million less than it cost to make.

The first big-screen incarnation, 1978's Superman, starred Christopher Reeve as the superhero. The franchise has averaged $104 million a film and made $518 million domestically, according to Box Office Mojo.

Snyder, a professed comic book nerd, knows he's treading on hallowed ground here.

"He's the king daddy, no two ways about it," Snyder says.

The director believes that Clark Kent has been due for a makeover for years, though he's not tipping his hand over the film's star or approach. His bleak interpretation of the 2009 graphic novel Watchmen took in $108 million, well short of its $130 million production budget.

Over the years, Snyder says, other superheroes, "mainly male, have gotten to evolve over the years. Batman. The X-Men. But I think the first (Superman) movies were so well done, he kind of got stuck. I think our challenge is to bring him to a modern audience that's still respectful of the character."

Snyder says Nolan and Thomas came to him with a script "that's really cool. I can't give away anything about it, but I liked it right away."

Whether genre fans will could determine the fate of Krypton's son.

"We're well aware," Snyder says, "that we've opened a big can of worms."

http://www.usatoday.com/l...n_ST_N.htm

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #23 posted 10/05/10 11:32am

uPtoWnNY

ufoclub said:

JoeTyler said:

bored Superman Returns was CRAP. Nolan is a great director & writer but this pisses me off: I want him 100% focused on the third Batman film confused

Superman is a RELIC, a relic from the 40s (the golden age of old school comic) and the 70s (the two first C.Reeve's films, God bless him). Hollywood knows it, so the execs are not interested in Superman anymore...it floors me that they have green-lighted another Superman film! another one?? wth??the mainstream audience is so fond of the Reeve's films that they will probably reject any new S movie, like it happened with Returns...but who knows: if the script is really "that" good, and if the film is shot in 3D, it could be the monster hit that Returns never was...

[Edited 9/28/10 9:46am]

Superman was already a relic when they reinvented it for the 70's version. There were some craptacular tv version before that and cartoons. The 70's one was a genius re-vision of it with it's Krypton crystal design technology (how appropriate for the 70's?!!!) and wise cracking chain smoking Lois Lane... and it's genius casting of an unknown lead next to the likes of Gene Hackman and Marlon Brando!

Nolan's last batman movie faltered for me in one respect... Batman himself was flat, silly, and uninteresting... especially next to those dynamic villains. And the film's boat stalemate part seemed contrived and silly. But they sure have the color pallete/photography down for grim and dark.

I wonder if they can do something new and magnificent with Superman. It could be done.

For me, no one has still come close to the cool plot of the original Superman involved Batman drama graphic novel "The Dark Knight" by Frank Miller.

that thing was cool and revolutionary. And the way it presented Superman was great.

I thought John Byrne's six-issue 'Man of Steel' limited series captured Superman perfectly.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #24 posted 10/05/10 2:28pm

ufoclub

avatar

uPtoWnNY said:



ufoclub said:




JoeTyler said:


bored Superman Returns was CRAP. Nolan is a great director & writer but this pisses me off: I want him 100% focused on the third Batman film confused



Superman is a RELIC, a relic from the 40s (the golden age of old school comic) and the 70s (the two first C.Reeve's films, God bless him). Hollywood knows it, so the execs are not interested in Superman anymore...it floors me that they have green-lighted another Superman film! another one?? wth??the mainstream audience is so fond of the Reeve's films that they will probably reject any new S movie, like it happened with Returns...but who knows: if the script is really "that" good, and if the film is shot in 3D, it could be the monster hit that Returns never was...


[Edited 9/28/10 9:46am]




Superman was already a relic when they reinvented it for the 70's version. There were some craptacular tv version before that and cartoons. The 70's one was a genius re-vision of it with it's Krypton crystal design technology (how appropriate for the 70's?!!!) and wise cracking chain smoking Lois Lane... and it's genius casting of an unknown lead next to the likes of Gene Hackman and Marlon Brando!



Nolan's last batman movie faltered for me in one respect... Batman himself was flat, silly, and uninteresting... especially next to those dynamic villains. And the film's boat stalemate part seemed contrived and silly. But they sure have the color pallete/photography down for grim and dark.



I wonder if they can do something new and magnificent with Superman. It could be done.



For me, no one has still come close to the cool plot of the original Superman involved Batman drama graphic novel "The Dark Knight" by Frank Miller.



that thing was cool and revolutionary. And the way it presented Superman was great.




I thought John Byrne's six-issue 'Man of Steel' limited series captured Superman perfectly.



I'll have to check it out.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #25 posted 10/05/10 2:49pm

uPtoWnNY

ufoclub said:

uPtoWnNY said:

I thought John Byrne's six-issue 'Man of Steel' limited series captured Superman perfectly.

I'll have to check it out.

It's great stuff, and the best Superman origin story, IMO.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Man_of_Steel_(comic_book)

The planet Krypton was a cold and emotionally sterile planet, an idea Byrne borrowed from the 1978 film Superman. Kal-El was not an infant sent from Krypton to Earth; rather, his fetus was placed in a "birthing matrix" equipped with a rocket engine and Jor-El's experimental warp drive, with Kal-El gestating during the trip to Earth; once the rocket landed, Kal-El was fully "born" on Earth. This also made him "born" an American, a plot point that would be used in Armageddon 2001, a DC Comics storyline which explored possible futures, one of which featured Superman becoming President of the United States.

Clark's abilities developed gradually in the yellow sun environment, starting with resistance to injury, then strength, x-ray vision, etc., with his ability to fly being the last to emerge. It took until his late teen years for all of his powers to develop; thus, Clark only adopted the Superman identity in adulthood, and never was Superboy. The Kents secretly adopted Clark and passed him off as their biological son. Prior to finding Clark, Martha Kent had a history of failed pregnancies. Friends and relatives assumed that they kept Martha’s “pregnancy” a secret in fear of losing another child. A blizzard that closed off Smallville also helped in the Kents’ alibi. In some pre-Crisis depictions, the Kents surrendered baby Kal-El to an orphanage before having a change of heart and legally adopting him as their own. The Man of Steel,Birthright, and Smallville all involve the same circumstances and cover-up of Clark's adoption. Clark mentions that at that time he had been making Metropolis his base of operations for about three years.

While the pre-Crisis Superman's costume was invulnerable (as a result of being made from the blankets in the rocket that brought him to Earth), the post-CrisisSuperman's costume was made of ordinary material. But while the cape often became ripped and torn (or even completely destroyed on occasion) for dramatic effect, the rest of the costume was usually left untouched. It was later explained that the post-Crisis Superman's body generated an invisible "aura" that surrounded him and contributed to his invulnerability. Objects held close to him, such as his costume, were protected from harm; his cape, meanwhile, could easily sustain damage in battle. The Superman S-shield is an original design by Clark and Jonathan. Byrne made some adjustments to Superman's costume. While keeping every classic element, he significantly increased the size of the S-shield so that it almost entirely covered the chest. The cape is also made larger and longer, its flowing in the air made to look more dramatic.

[Edited 10/5/10 14:54pm]

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > General Discussion > Director Christopher Nolan Talks Superman Project