Interesting:

What I don´t quite get in all these UFO discussions is how one side vehemently denies such sightings or downplays them because they think that there is no serious evidence, and on the other hand you have these other people who are also part of the same institution ( Army) and who openly talk about it without getting into trouble. I mean, it is a bit paradoxical, isn´t it?

Do you personally believe in the existence of extraterrestrial life forms, and if so, do you think that there will be some major revelations in the near future? If so, when and why?

Humans ignore things that are right in front of their eyes. I have no doubt about the existence of UFO's but the powers that be will NEVER admit 2 such things.

The illusion that they have created, "God" (the human version) and Humans being the most intelligent beings and the like would be completed destroyed with any such admission. So we are left 2 speculate.....the evidence is there 4 those who are paying attention.

I believe in extraterrestrial life forms, I also believe in parallel universes....

But all this UFO's Shit is actually that.... Of course there is something else out there, but nothing will come to surface till after my life time..

Graycap23 said:

Humans ignore things that are right in front of their eyes. I have no doubt about the existence of UFO's but the powers that be will NEVER admit 2 such things.

The illusion that they have created, "God" (the human version) and Humans being the most intelligent beings and the like would be completed destroyed with any such admission. So we are left 2 speculate.....the evidence is there 4 those who are paying attention.

So....what is right in front of our eyes? What kind of evidence are you talking about?

I am not a disbeliever in life elsewhere in the universe, but the idea of them spying on us from their spaceships is pretty much a man made fallacy IMO.

Not saying it's impossible, but highly improbable.

If, by some slim chance, it is true....the result will not be good for our kind.

JerseyKRS said:

I am not a disbeliever in life elsewhere in the universe, but the idea of them spying on us from their spaceships is pretty much a man made fallacy IMO.

Not saying it's impossible, but highly improbable.

If, by some slim chance, it is true....the result will not be good for our kind.

I'm not worried. Tom Cruise and an annoying, screaming Dakota Fanning will save us. If Will Smith isn't already trained up on how to fly their aircraft, that is.

KoolEaze said:

Graycap23 said:

Humans ignore things that are right in front of their eyes. I have no doubt about the existence of UFO's but the powers that be will NEVER admit 2 such things.

The illusion that they have created, "God" (the human version) and Humans being the most intelligent beings and the like would be completed destroyed with any such admission. So we are left 2 speculate.....the evidence is there 4 those who are paying attention.

So....what is right in front of our eyes? What kind of evidence are you talking about?

Just one example:

http://www.netscientia.co...rians.html

I find it hard to believe

that any advanced life form out there

would use their technology to study weapons

that by their standards are likely antiquated

I mean, if I were an alien

I'd check out J.Lo in the shower or something meaningful like that

also, I'm not sure if there are "parallel" universes so to speak.

I am more interested in finding out why there is so much matter in our universe, but very little antimatter. Events such as the big bang should produce equal parts of matter and antimatter, with the outcome being complete destruction of both. Yet our universe consists almost entirely of matter.

Where is all the equal amount of antimatter????????????

JerseyKRS said:

Where is all the equal amount of antimatter????????????

is antimatter a scientific term

if it is, i have no input

but if it's a jersey-ism

for nonessential bullshit

then there are tons of things out there

that just don't matter

but if it is strictly scientific

then there is a remote possiblilty

that all the antimatter

is in J.Los ass

which would explain the aliens interest

Graycap23 said:

KoolEaze said:

So....what is right in front of our eyes? What kind of evidence are you talking about?

Just one example:

http://www.netscientia.co...rians.html

I'm saying though...that example, and most that are related are nothing more than concepts at their core.

I tend to believe, again this is my opinion, the greatest minds on our planet focus so much on physics, mathematics, biology, chemistry, astronomy, etc. because they are fact based.

orger said:

JerseyKRS said:

Where is all the equal amount of antimatter????????????

is antimatter a scientific term

if it is, i have no input

but if it's a jersey-ism

for nonessential bullshit

then there are tons of things out there

that just don't matter

but if it is strictly scientific

then there is a remote possiblilty

that all the antimatter

is in J.Los ass

which would explain the aliens interest

this is an anti-matter brick

JerseyKRS said:

Where is all the equal amount of antimatter????????????

It's in the evil realm called "the Yankee Kingdom".

JerseyKRS said:

orger said:

is antimatter a scientific term

if it is, i have no input

but if it's a jersey-ism

for nonessential bullshit

then there are tons of things out there

that just don't matter

but if it is strictly scientific

then there is a remote possiblilty

that all the antimatter

is in J.Los ass

which would explain the aliens interest

this is an anti-matter brick

and that's supposed to destroy the universe?

it didn't even kill the lil' yellow emoticon guy

antimatter is for pussies

JerseyKRS said:

Graycap23 said:

Just one example:

http://www.netscientia.co...rians.html

I'm saying though...that example, and most that are related are nothing more than concepts at their core.

I tend to believe, again this is my opinion, the greatest minds on our planet focus so much on physics, mathematics, biology, chemistry, astronomy, etc. because they are fact based.

Is theis picture on a pyramid 10,000 years old a concept?

http://www.netscientia.com/egypt.html

JerseyKRS said:

Graycap23 said:

Just one example:

http://www.netscientia.co...rians.html

I'm saying though...that example, and most that are related are nothing more than concepts at their core.

I tend to believe, again this is my opinion, the greatest minds on our planet focus so much on physics, mathematics, biology, chemistry, astronomy, etc. because they are fact based.

Is Element 115 a concept?

Graycap23 said:

JerseyKRS said:

I'm saying though...that example, and most that are related are nothing more than concepts at their core.

I tend to believe, again this is my opinion, the greatest minds on our planet focus so much on physics, mathematics, biology, chemistry, astronomy, etc. because they are fact based.

Is theis picture on a pyramid 10,000 years old a concept?

http://www.netscientia.com/egypt.html

or coincedental? or reaching?

JerseyKRS said:

Graycap23 said:

Is theis picture on a pyramid 10,000 years old a concept?

http://www.netscientia.com/egypt.html

or coincedental? or reaching?

Like I said.....we ignore what is right in front of our eyes.

Graycap23 said:

JerseyKRS said:

I'm saying though...that example, and most that are related are nothing more than concepts at their core.

I tend to believe, again this is my opinion, the greatest minds on our planet focus so much on physics, mathematics, biology, chemistry, astronomy, etc. because they are fact based.

Is Element 115 a concept?

no, but it is unstable and isn't abundant anywhere. research on all those heavy elements has produced alot of answers, though, right?

Graycap23 said:

JerseyKRS said:

or coincedental? or reaching?

Like I said.....we ignore what is right in front of our eyes.

oh Graycap, you are quite the enigma on this little website of ours.

JerseyKRS said:

Graycap23 said:

Is Element 115 a concept?

no, but it is unstable and isn't abundant anywhere. research on all those heavy elements has produced alot of answers, though, right?

Don't bet on that.......

Graycap23 said:

JerseyKRS said:

no, but it is unstable and isn't abundant anywhere. research on all those heavy elements has produced alot of answers, though, right?

Don't bet on that.......

unless it's proven differently in the future, the fact is it isn't abundant anywhere.

[Edited 9/28/10 8:34am]

JerseyKRS said:

Graycap23 said:

Don't bet on that.......

unless it's proven differently in the future, the fact is it isn't abundant anywhere.

[Edited 9/28/10 8:34am]

Don't u get it? Nothing will be proven or admitted. The basic concepts that keep people in line must be maintained.

We can't get even get simple truths like who killed Kennedy.

Graycap23 said:

JerseyKRS said:

unless it's proven differently in the future, the fact is it isn't abundant anywhere.

[Edited 9/28/10 8:34am]

Don't u get it? Nothing will be proven or admitted. The basic concepts that keep people in line must be maintained.

We can't get even get simple truths like who killed Kennedy.

again, even in disagreement, I agree!

JerseyKRS said:

Graycap23 said:

Don't u get it? Nothing will be proven or admitted. The basic concepts that keep people in line must be maintained.

We can't get even get simple truths like who killed Kennedy.

again, even in disagreement, I agree!

JerseyKRS said:

Graycap23 said:

Don't u get it? Nothing will be proven or admitted. The basic concepts that keep people in line must be maintained.

We can't get even get simple truths like who killed Kennedy.

again, even in disagreement, I agree!

What is your take on the Roswell crash of 1947.

One day it is reported as a UFO crash....the next a weather ballon.

Graycap23 said:

JerseyKRS said:

again, even in disagreement, I agree!

What is your take on the Roswell crash of 1947.

One day it is reported as a UFO crash....the next a weather ballon.

Well, a UFO means unidentified flying object...and that´s what it was, hence the UFO news report. After they found out it was a weather balloon ( therefore, identified and no longer UFO) they probably changed it. I think Roswell is just a top secret area because it is a military zone but not necessarily because of aliens and UFOs.

Graycap23 said:

JerseyKRS said:

again, even in disagreement, I agree!

What is your take on the Roswell crash of 1947.

One day it is reported as a UFO crash....the next a weather ballon.

again, just my personal opinion, I don't think it was either.

I do think whatever it was, the cover up is most certainly a fact.

JerseyKRS said:

Graycap23 said:

What is your take on the Roswell crash of 1947.

One day it is reported as a UFO crash....the next a weather ballon.

again, just my personal opinion, I don't think it was either.

I do think whatever it was, the cover up is most certainly a fact.

what a couple of

over informed nerds