Smize = smiling with your eyes.

veez = sneezing out your veejayjay

DesireeNevermind said:

veez = sneezing out your veejayjay

Queef. I don't care how you want to try and brighten that one up. The word already exists.

Cerebus said:

Efan said:

Smize = smiling with your eyes.

Really? Wow. Talk about sucking all the romantacism out of a perfectly well written concept. "I saw you smizing so I came over to introduce myself."

Cerebus said:

DesireeNevermind said:

veez = sneezing out your veejayjay

Queef. I don't care how you want to try and brighten that one up. The word already exists.

Leave the British Matriarch's curtains out of this. Plus she old as fuck and my imagination can't handle it.

DesireeNevermind said:

Cerebus said:

Queef. I don't care how you want to try and brighten that one up. The word already exists.

Leave the British Matriarch's curtains out of this. Plus she old as fuck and my imagination can't handle it.

I'm not even sure I totally understand what you just wrote... but it made laugh anyway.

Cerebus said:

DesireeNevermind said:

veez = sneezing out your veejayjay

Queef. I don't care how you want to try and brighten that one up. The word already exists.

Cerebus said:

Efan said:

Smize = smiling with your eyes.

Really? Wow. Talk about sucking all the romantacism out of a perfectly well written concept. "I saw you smizing so I came over to introduce myself."

Wrong use of the word. Unless you meet her at a photo shoot.

[Edited 9/21/10 13:14pm]

johnart said:

Cerebus said:

Really? Wow. Talk about sucking all the romantacism out of a perfectly well written concept. "I saw you smizing so I came over to introduce myself."

Wrong use of the word.

Dude.... it's not a word! I can't use it incorrectly because it's not real.

I knew it was relating to staring at a camera, btw. But it's STILL not a word, so I can misuse it however I like.

Cerebus said:

johnart said:

Wrong use of the word.

Dude.... it's not a word! I can't use it incorrectly because it's not real.

<---smizing right now.

http://www.wikihow.com/Smize

DesireeNevermind said:

Cerebus said:

Queef. I don't care how you want to try and brighten that one up. The word already exists.

Leave the British Matriarch's curtains out of this. Plus she old as fuck and my imagination can't handle it.

Efan said:

Nothinbutjoy said:

What kills me is that one would get so twisted over this, especially in this situation.

Someone has used incorrect grammar. Good Gawd Maude!! Let me strap on my fury hat and set them STRAIGHT.

Seriously?

I cannot tell you how many times I've posted something quickly here at work then gone back and realized I've used it's when I should have used its.

Considering this is a Prince website, I should probably be worried about being sued over it by the grammar police.

I think you're taking this friendly little grammar tip too seriously.

Agreed and maybe I've just been here a tad too long as this is the umpteenth friendly little grammar tip .orgers have felt needed to be put out there.

.

[Edited 9/21/10 14:23pm]

SCNDLS said:

.

[Edited 9/21/10 14:23pm]

Im a walking grammar pet peeve

I see signs for "DVD's" and "CD's" everywhere. Drives me nuts.

Efan said:

"Would've" is a contraction of "would have"--as in, "I would've been on time if not for the flat tire."

"Would of" is just wrong. Always. It is never, ever correct to say "would of."

This applies to "could've" and "should've" as well.

Please make a note of it.

Oh! And please post your grammatical pet peeves or general grammar comments and questions so this thread doesn't die as horrible a death as all my other threads do.

Thanks.

Marry me?

johnart said:

orger said:

I so you're new kar

it's' hot

I no, rite?

Stop it, Kerryann!!

johnart said:

Cerebus said:

Dude.... it's not a word! I can't use it incorrectly because it's not real.

<---smizing right now.

aww! dont be like that!!!

PositivityNYC said:

Efan said:

"Would've" is a contraction of "would have"--as in, "I would've been on time if not for the flat tire."

"Would of" is just wrong. Always. It is never, ever correct to say "would of."

This applies to "could've" and "should've" as well.

Please make a note of it.

Oh! And please post your grammatical pet peeves or general grammar comments and questions so this thread doesn't die as horrible a death as all my other threads do.

Thanks.

Marry me?

Oh, lord. Positivity's gaydar failed her again.

Genesia said:

PositivityNYC said:

Marry me?

Oh, lord. Positivity's gaydar failed her again.

She's met him. THANK GAWWWWWD.

chocolate1 said:

CONVERSATE IS NOT A WORD!!!!

Okay... I have had this argument over and over again.... The incorrect use of "MYSELF"

Ex: You can speak to John or myself.

You can speak to John or ME.

People think that it sounds more intelligent if they use "myself" where "me" belongs.

My friend and I have a silent campaign against that shit at work. I think it's more prevalent in the military than most lines of work. I think they feel it sounds more authoritative.

hateration is her motivation and in this conversation he has no validation

translation

myfavorite is having man problems again.

Cerebus said:

orger said:

otherwise, I could or could not care less

whichever is correct

Could not. And that one drives me frickin' bonkers! If you could care less, then you DO actually CARE. That is one of the very few examples where I will interupt a conversation to correct someone. I don't even care if it's embarrassing for them. That and the pronunciation of coupon. It's coopon, not quepon.

It annoys me hearing "Q-pon", too.

As for could/could not care less, I agree it should be could not, but always assumed that saying one could care less carried a subtle sarcasm that one really does not give a shit, but if they really put forth the effort they could theoretically give less of a shit.

Genesia said:

THANK YOU!

Also, "it's" is a contraction for "it is." That is the only proper use of it's.

Correct use: It's one o'clock.

The possessive form - "its" - does not have an apostrophe. It is the parallel of "his" and "hers."

Correct use: My pen lost its cap.

Incorrect use: My pen lost it's cap.

I disagree with what you wrote in your first sentence. It is not the only proper use, you can also use "it´s" as a short form of "it has", like in " It´s been seven hours and thirteen days since you took your love away."

Or was it fifteen days? I don´t remember.

FauxReal said:

Cerebus said:

Could not. And that one drives me frickin' bonkers! If you could care less, then you DO actually CARE. That is one of the very few examples where I will interupt a conversation to correct someone. I don't even care if it's embarrassing for them. That and the pronunciation of coupon. It's coopon, not quepon.

It annoys me hearing "Q-pon", too.

As for could/could not care less, I agree it should be could not, but always assumed that saying one could care less carried a subtle sarcasm that one really does not give a shit, but if they really put forth the effort they could theoretically give less of a shit.

Interesting.....but too smart for the people who use it that way

chocolate1 said:

CONVERSATE IS NOT A WORD!!!!

Okay... I have had this argument over and over again.... The incorrect use of "MYSELF"

Ex: You can speak to John or myself.

You can speak to John or ME.

People think that it sounds more intelligent if they use "myself" where "me" belongs.

I came in here to say that!!!!