Well, I work in fashion and part of my job is to keep up with the stuff comming out at runways in paris, milan, NY etc. and these outfits are what fashion is onto now. It's very 70's and ecclectic and , being the fashion ho i am, i really like them. It will take a few years to trickle down to everybody but this is the direction our clothes are going in folks.

Mach said:

johnart said:

Just to be the difficult one tho (no not I, not evah!)...

Match does not = good fashion/style.

Yeah i know BUT ...

that shit would look LESS like shit maybe if it DID match

No, it would look like matching shit.

kikiB said:

Well, I work in fashion and part of my job is to keep up with the stuff comming out at runways in paris, milan, NY etc. and these outfits are what fashion is onto now. It's very 70's and ecclectic and , being the fashion ho i am, i really like them. It will take a few years to trickle down to everybody but this is the direction our clothes are going in folks.

I work in fashion, too - and that stuff is a hot mess.

If "this is the direction our clothes are going in," the fashion industry is going to be in deep financial doo-doo for a looooooong time. Because dressing a few fad whores in New York and LA won't help them make the rent.

"[T]rickle down to everybody..." You mean...like pee?

Genesia said:

kikiB said:

Well, I work in fashion and part of my job is to keep up with the stuff comming out at runways in paris, milan, NY etc. and these outfits are what fashion is onto now. It's very 70's and ecclectic and , being the fashion ho i am, i really like them. It will take a few years to trickle down to everybody but this is the direction our clothes are going in folks.

I work in fashion, too - and that stuff is a hot mess.

If "this is the direction our clothes are going in," the fashion industry is going to be in deep financial doo-doo for a looooooong time. Because dressing a few fad whores in New York and LA won't help them make the rent.

"[T]rickle down to everybody..." You mean...like pee?

You're an idiot.

johnart said:

Genesia said:

I work in fashion, too - and that stuff is a hot mess.

If "this is the direction our clothes are going in," the fashion industry is going to be in deep financial doo-doo for a looooooong time. Because dressing a few fad whores in New York and LA won't help them make the rent.

"[T]rickle down to everybody..." You mean...like pee?

You're an idiot.

Guilty.

Should we know these people?

Efan said:

Should we know these people?

That, of course, is the other thing. Like I'm going to let some 20-something I've never heard of influence the way I dress.

I thought all that mess was junk. Most of them look like they rolled out of bed or something. What with the high-water chartreuse pants and that spiderweb blouse, ilk!

Shyra said:

I thought all that mess was junk. Most of them look like they rolled out of bed or something. What with the high-water chartreuse pants and that spiderweb blouse, ilk!

I know! We can call it the "I can't be a slob, my clothes are designer" look.

Genesia said:

kikiB said:

Well, I work in fashion and part of my job is to keep up with the stuff comming out at runways in paris, milan, NY etc. and these outfits are what fashion is onto now. It's very 70's and ecclectic and , being the fashion ho i am, i really like them. It will take a few years to trickle down to everybody but this is the direction our clothes are going in folks.

I work in fashion, too - and that stuff is a hot mess.

If "this is the direction our clothes are going in," the fashion industry is going to be in deep financial doo-doo for a looooooong time. Because dressing a few fad whores in New York and LA won't help them make the rent.

"[T]rickle down to everybody..." You mean...like pee?

Yep, just like pee

Anyway, it's high fashion and that's what vogue is about right? It's not the People magazine best dressed list. They aren't clothes that most of us can pull off, but I think it's interesting. They're not telling people to wear those outfits, but they can be inspiring as far as putting interesting textures, colours, patterns and silhouettes together.

Matchy matchy dressing is hecka boring.

kikiB said:

Well, I work in fashion and part of my job is to keep up with the stuff comming out at runways in paris, milan, NY etc. and these outfits are what fashion is onto now. It's very 70's and ecclectic and , being the fashion ho i am, i really like them. It will take a few years to trickle down to everybody but this is the direction our clothes are going in folks.

IMO, the thing about fashion of this kind is that you can choose to participate, to completely ignore it or to incorporate whatever you like about it into your own wardrobe. But really, very few people will ever wear EXACTLY what is show in any of those pictures (maybe in NY and LA). It's not like jeans, some capris (is that right, capris? or a capri? ), or a skirt that most people would havein their closet. Especially these days when, thankfully, trends don't envelope 4/5ths of world, leaving the remaining 20% looking like nerds. Very few things about the modern world make me COMPLETELY happy, but the fact that it's acceptable to find your OWN style and rock it freely is definitely one of them.

kikiB said:

Genesia said:

I work in fashion, too - and that stuff is a hot mess.

If "this is the direction our clothes are going in," the fashion industry is going to be in deep financial doo-doo for a looooooong time. Because dressing a few fad whores in New York and LA won't help them make the rent.

"[T]rickle down to everybody..." You mean...like pee?

Yep, just like pee

Anyway, it's high fashion and that's what vogue is about right? It's not the People magazine best dressed list. They aren't clothes that most of us can pull off, but I think it's interesting. They're not telling people to wear those outfits, but they can be inspiring as far as putting interesting textures, colours, patterns and silhouettes together.

Matchy matchy dressing is hecka boring.

Uh, yeah. There's a lot of territory between hecka boring (I don't see anyone making a case for matchy matchy) and hecka fugly.

Cerebus said:

kikiB said:

Well, I work in fashion and part of my job is to keep up with the stuff comming out at runways in paris, milan, NY etc. and these outfits are what fashion is onto now. It's very 70's and ecclectic and , being the fashion ho i am, i really like them. It will take a few years to trickle down to everybody but this is the direction our clothes are going in folks.

IMO, the thing about fashion of this kind is that you can choose to participate, to completely ignore it or to incorporate whatever you like about it into your own wardrobe. But really, very few people will ever wear EXACTLY what is show in any of those pictures (maybe in NY and LA). It's not like jeans, some capris (is that right, capris? or a capri? ), or a skirt that most people would havein their closet. Especially these days when, thankfully, trends don't envelope 4/5ths of world, leaving the remaining 20% looking like nerds. Very few things about the modern world make me COMPLETELY happy, but the fact that it's acceptable to find your OWN style and rock it freely is definitely one of them.

I absolutely agree. I think having your own style, whether its jeans and t-shirt or what these ladies are wearing, is cool. I don't like dressing like everybody else, that's why i like some of these ecclectic looks. It would be very boring indeed if the whole world did get enveloped by trends. Hey, to each their own right?

Genesia said:

kikiB said:

Yep, just like pee

Anyway, it's high fashion and that's what vogue is about right? It's not the People magazine best dressed list. They aren't clothes that most of us can pull off, but I think it's interesting. They're not telling people to wear those outfits, but they can be inspiring as far as putting interesting textures, colours, patterns and silhouettes together.

Matchy matchy dressing is hecka boring.

Uh, yeah. There's a lot of territory between hecka boring (I don't see anyone making a case for matchy matchy) and hecka fugly.

Fugly is in the eye of the beholder. Style is an objective thing, right?

kikiB said:

Genesia said:

Uh, yeah. There's a lot of territory between hecka boring (I don't see anyone making a case for matchy matchy) and hecka fugly.

Fugly is in the eye of the beholder. Style is an objective thing, right?

No, it isn't. Style (in terms of fashion) is subjective - not objective.

Genesia said:

kikiB said:

Fugly is in the eye of the beholder. Style is an objective thing, right?

No, it isn't. Style (in terms of fashion) is subjective - not objective.

Oops, sorry for the mistake. It is subjective, as in being in the beholder's mind. That is what i meant.

JustErin said:

Yikes to all of them.

It kills me how such a publication with an out-of-touch view still have a business.

I like her fashion much better.

PicklesMcMillan said:

Rayan said:

8. Genevieve Jones // Valentino, Philip Treacy for Valentino

7. Coco Rocha // BCBG jumpsuit, Rag & Bone blouse, JoeFresh shoes

is this womans name really coco rocha!!!!!!

shit sounds like cocka- roach

Haha, yes, Coco is a top model from Canada.