Acrylic said:

ZombieKitten said:

hands up who has actually tried an uncut dick not just googled for photos of them

It's not the sex that bothers me; I can't tell the difference when it's in a condom and we're gettin' it in.

It's just the oral. The way the extra skin moves in my mouth makes me wanna .

I don't know what kinda penises some of you suck on, but when i sick a dick it's hard....there is no extra foreskin when it's hard!

Anyway, i never understood why people would do that to children....oh, let's cut of a piece of his ear....you don't do that either! Your foreskin is part of your body, it has a reason that it's there!

seeingvoices12 said:

Circumcision is mandatory, and especially for males, it prevents from a lot of diseases …

People should read more about it and it's importance.

I'm glad that mine was circumsized at a very young age....

[Edited 7/17/10 3:34am]

Explain this please.

Because your statement appears to infer that circumcision is mandatory (as in, a moral obligation), between both sexes, but especially for males.

It also lists diseases which it helps to prevernt, which is being used as a justification for circumcision.

If you're referring to the HIV studies in Africa involving circumcision, I would argue that using a jimmy would probably be more affective, and probably should be mandatory instead.

Circumcision is only mandatory for a small number of people who have phimosis and other complications.

Otherwise, it's an aesthetic decision, or one based on fairy tales.

.

[Edited 7/17/10 7:15am]

ZombieKitten said:

johnart said:

only 8 times???

What year/month are we talking about? What do you think I am? A prude?

[Edited 7/17/10 8:58am]

JoeTyler said:

novabrkr said:

Climate and genetics play a part in it.

I can understand why a Northern European that has migrated to a warmer country would benefit from the operation, but it would be fairly stupid to do it at places where there are cold winters. The skin is there for a good reason. Since I don't personally have that much of skin down there, I can certainly feel the difference when the temperature drops below -20C. It also seems to be the case that the amount and thickness of foreskin vary between people from different geographical locations.

cold glans??

Still, your point seems valid, but then again, source? any scientific fact to back up your theory?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adaptation

I doubt there are too many credible scientific studies on the variation of foreskin thickness and how much it resides back between different ethnic groups. Who'd finance such studies anyway? If you can find one yourself on the internet, please link it to me. In general, I would dare to make the brazen assumption that Nordic men are likelier to have thicker foreskin and are perhaps also so-called "growers" more often than men from warmer geographical areas. As far as science being based on empiricism goes, you can verify this theory by looking at a large group of men's penises. I guess that's fairly hypothetical in the end without any large-scale studies conducted on the issue, but it's still common sense.

I don't know what's so funny about your penis getting exposed to cold weather too much though. I get that each winter and also tend to piss blood due to it every now and then. Sure, I've learnt to wear long underpants more often than what I used to do in the past. I suppose the foreskin performs the same type of function as it's an extra layer of skin in the end, no? I'd still probably need to wear pants in the winter even if I'd have more foreskin and a less exposed glans, but life in the North can pose its own problems like that sometimes. You'll just have to work your way around such things, you know? Unfortunately, the English language has notoriously poor expressions for symptoms caused by being exposed to cold weather and the dictionary suggests me only the expression "frostbite". A "frostbitten penis" would be something different, I guess.

[Edited 7/17/10 12:40pm]

ZombieKitten said:

hands up who has actually tried an uncut dick not just googled for photos of them

When hard there's no difference at all between a circumcised or uncircumcised penis.

robertlove said:

Acrylic said:

It's not the sex that bothers me; I can't tell the difference when it's in a condom and we're gettin' it in.

It's just the oral. The way the extra skin moves in my mouth makes me wanna .

I don't know what kinda penises some of you suck on, but when i sick a dick it's hard....there is no extra foreskin when it's hard!

Anyway, i never understood why people would do that to children....oh, let's cut of a piece of his ear....you don't do that either! Your foreskin is part of your body, it has a reason that it's there!

There was alot of foreskin, and he was hard as a rock.

That was my only in-the-mouth uncircumsized experience -- maybe it was just a weird one?

I mean... alot.

OnlyNDaUsa said:

i have not read ANY replies. But there is just NO real or rational comparison between circumcision and cutting off a female's clitoris. they male is still fully functional.

mostly

Acrylic said:

robertlove said:

I don't know what kinda penises some of you suck on, but when i sick a dick it's hard....there is no extra foreskin when it's hard!

Anyway, i never understood why people would do that to children....oh, let's cut of a piece of his ear....you don't do that either! Your foreskin is part of your body, it has a reason that it's there!

There was alot of foreskin, and he was hard as a rock.

That was my only in-the-mouth uncircumsized experience -- maybe it was just a weird one?

I mean... alot.

doesn't sound right

like someone else said, it's usually fully retracted during erection

ZombieKitten said:

Acrylic said:

There was alot of foreskin, and he was hard as a rock.

That was my only in-the-mouth uncircumsized experience -- maybe it was just a weird one?

I mean... alot.

doesn't sound right

like someone else said, it's usually fully retracted during erection

Being that was my only experience, I assumed that one uncircumsized dick was the same as any other uncircumsized dick.

I obviously got an unusual one. He was an amazing fuck though.

MAYBE I'd be inclined to slob-a-foreskin-knob again if the opportunity makes itself apparent.

Leave it to me to get the odd one out.

Acrylic said:

ZombieKitten said:

doesn't sound right

like someone else said, it's usually fully retracted during erection

Being that was my only experience, I assumed that one uncircumsized dick was the same as any other uncircumsized dick.

I obviously got an unusual one. He was an amazing fuck though.

MAYBE I'd be inclined to slob-a-foreskin-knob again if the opportunity makes itself apparent.

Leave it to me to get the odd one out.

I've only known 3 uncut ones intimately, and they were all similarly retractible - maybe it's just me that's been kind of lucky?

Not porn, just medical:

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/2b/Erection_Development.jpg/720px-Erection_Development.jpg

If you ask me, that guy has a lot of foreskin to begin with. In general, there is a lot of variation on the appearance of the genital region. Applies to both sexes as well.

When it comes to handling, giving head or fucking, i'm pretty confident in saying I couldn't care less.

Spelling edit

[Edited 7/18/10 2:00am]

it's like men getting their toe nails clipped off and for women it's like getting their legs cut off....it's not the same.

ZombieKitten said:

OnlyNDaUsa said:

i have not read ANY replies. But there is just NO real or rational comparison between circumcision and cutting off a female's clitoris. they male is still fully functional.

mostly

Hey ZK i think I heard your name mentioned it the Wendy and Lisa interview thing? the concord question. *which was one of the best questions asked. that and the one about Chord changes in Mountans and do u lie (their answer was great to both).

ZombieMitten asked about:

Chord changes in Mountans and do u lie (their answer was great to both)

Showoff.

"Oh, I'm just discussing music theory with my homegirls".

Seriously speaking, that was an interesting part. Didn't know it was you asking that.

novabrkr said:

Seriously speaking, that was an interesting part. Didn't know it was you asking that.

No. she asked about the flying on the Concord, someone else asked about the Chord changes.

the concord was my favorite Q and A with the Chord one being 2nd.

(i have not watched the 2nd Q and A)

Oh, nevermind then.

Another personal fuck up for me on the internet!

seeingvoices12 said:

Circumcision is mandatory, and especially for males, it prevents from a lot of diseases

That is utter bullshit. Foreskins do not cause disease. Washing properly is a good idea, but even so most knob related diseases have far more to do with where you put it than whether or not it has a foreskin.

Yes, starting with you.

And on a lighter note:

A rich philanthropist was curious about the purpose of the foreskin and commissioned 3 universities to research it. He gave each €50,000 and 2 years.

UCLA took the entire 2 years to complete their report, and spent all the €50,000, concluding that 'it may or may not increase pleasure for the man'.

Cambridge University also took the entire 2 years to complete their report, and also spent all the $50,000, concluding that 'it may or may not increase pleasure for the partner'.

University College Dublin took 20 minutes to complete their report, spent €5 (for crisps and coke) and concluded that 'it stops your hand from slipping'.

ZombieKitten said:

hands up who has actually tried an uncut dick not just googled for photos of them

Hand up here

ZombieKitten said:

Acrylic said:

Being that was my only experience, I assumed that one uncircumsized dick was the same as any other uncircumsized dick.

I obviously got an unusual one. He was an amazing fuck though.

MAYBE I'd be inclined to slob-a-foreskin-knob again if the opportunity makes itself apparent.

Leave it to me to get the odd one out.

I've only known 3 uncut ones intimately, and they were all similarly retractible - maybe it's just me that's been kind of lucky?

Or me being severely unlucky and possibly scarred for life.

These threads. One pops up every year. I've never been with an uncut one.....very curious though.

AsylumUtopia said:

And on a lighter note:

A rich philanthropist was curious about the purpose of the foreskin and commissioned 3 universities to research it. He gave each €50,000 and 2 years.

UCLA took the entire 2 years to complete their report, and spent all the €50,000, concluding that 'it may or may not increase pleasure for the man'.

Cambridge University also took the entire 2 years to complete their report, and also spent all the $50,000, concluding that 'it may or may not increase pleasure for the partner'.

University College Dublin took 20 minutes to complete their report, spent €5 (for crisps and coke) and concluded that 'it stops your hand from slipping'.

ROFL

Acrylic said:

novabrkr said:

ZombieMitten asked about:

Chord changes in Mountans and do u lie (their answer was great to both)

Showoff.

"Oh, I'm just discussing music theory with my homegirls".

I didn't ask anything about chords only concorde

novabrkr said:

Seriously speaking, that was an interesting part. Didn't know it was you asking that.

hahahaha I COULD'VE asked that question, since I live in a recording studio, BUT since I am obsessed with planes, I didn't

OnlyNDaUsa said:

novabrkr said:

Seriously speaking, that was an interesting part. Didn't know it was you asking that.

No. she asked about the flying on the Concord, someone else asked about the Chord changes.

the concord was my favorite Q and A with the Chord one being 2nd.

(i have not watched the 2nd Q and A)

did you see Lisa's eyebrows go up an up and up as she anticipated my question - who knows what was running through her mind she's a geek like me, I KNEW she would also have loved the Concord

Took this picture at a train museum in Strasburg, PA. This thread is just as good as any for it.