I saw a bris on TV, I cried and cried. That poor baby, I could never EVER let anyone do something like that to my weeks old BABY.

AWFUL AWFUL AWFUL

Acrylic said:

I will not suck uncircumsized dick.

I do it all the time

I like a sense of mystery.

ever caught yourself in the zipper, lads? that's near enough to genital mutilation for me.

MidniteMagnet said:

aka circumcision

How come so few people are outraged that boys are sexually mutilated? I can see it being necessary for certain medical problems (phimosis) but even then that can be remedied with a dorsal slit. The fact that it is done for religous reason is even more disgusting since religions aren't based in reality. If you've ever been to a Bris, you'll see how happy everyone is while the baby is getting part of his dick cut off without anesthesia. It's disgusting! It's even more disgusting that some mohels use their mouth to draw blood from the foreskin, instead of the usual suction device. Mutilating a baby's penis and then sucking on it is perverted in my opinion. I think it's in Iran where they dress up in these tacky satin outfits and cut off foreskins. It's bizarre AND evil and should be illegal.

Everyone freaks out when women in Africa have their clits cut off, but where is the outrage for the men in this world?

Also, the head of the penis and the foreskin are ONE structure until the age of 9 or 10 or so. Before you can cut off the foreskin, you have to tear it from the glans so it separates, like peeling an orange.

Lastly, some people don't care that baby boys are sexually mutilated because they think foreskins are gross or ugly or they want the baby to look like the father. Why would you want your son's penis to look like his father's penis? Do they hang out and compare penises? I mean, cmon now!

I just want to make it clear that I love Jews except for the fact that they sexually mutilate their boys while hanging out and eating snacks and shit. You can't criticze an aspect of a group without being accused of hating that group.

that paragraph shows ignorance.

Serious said:

Dave1992 said:

I'm quite sure that's not true. It's only in the first couple of months were you have to take care it doesn't grow together, by pulling the foreskin back in warm water.

I, for instance, was wanking like crazy when I was seven years old.

As for the rest, I quite agree, but it's impossible to make religious traditions illegal, especially in muslim countries.

Was ? Aren't you still?

No, I haven't masturbated for more than half a year, probably. Don't need it, don't want it, don't think I'd like it anymore. Just not my style.

I think female circumcision is INSANE! Like WTF!!

Can't say I agree or disagree with male circumcision, but it is kinda cruel when I think about them doin that 2 a little baby If I had a baby boy, I probably wouldn't let em do that 2 him.

Now as 4 grown weiners.......I have NO preference!

Imma equal opportunity WEINER LOVER!! ..............as long as they are clean

I don't like dirty weiners.

Recently I was reading a blog by this dude who had his penis removed (yeah, the whole thing) for fetish reasons.

THAT's genital mutilation IMO.

I've got a cut dick. It's really pretty. I've never ever thought of it as being mutilated.

johnart said:

Recently I was reading a blog by this dude who had his penis removed (yeah, the whole thing) for fetish reasons.

THAT's genital mutilation IMO.

I've got a cut dick. It's really pretty. I've never ever thought of it as being mutilated.

W........T.......F????

SHOCKADELICA1 said:

johnart said:

Recently I was reading a blog by this dude who had his penis removed (yeah, the whole thing) for fetish reasons.

THAT's genital mutilation IMO.

I've got a cut dick. It's really pretty. I've never ever thought of it as being mutilated.

W........T.......F????

Oh yes! Exactly!

If I can dig up the blog again I'll post a link. I was too.

Acrylic said:

Genesia said:

Really? As long as a guy has good hygiene (which you should know before you ever get "down there"), it's not a big deal.

It's actually kind of fun to play with. [img:$uid]http://i57.photobucket.com/albums/g216/rebecca8273/emoticon/eusa_shifty.gif[/img:$uid]

It's actually not a hygiene thing with me. I won't mess with any guy under any circumstance, unless his hygiene is up to par.

It just feels really weird in my mouth. I don't dig it.

really? i've messed around with cut and uncut guys and never noticed a difference with oral, if they're hard enough. uncut guys are infinitely better to though, in my experience, it feels MUCH better.

evenstar3 said:

Acrylic said:

It's actually not a hygiene thing with me. I won't mess with any guy under any circumstance, unless his hygiene is up to par.

It just feels really weird in my mouth. I don't dig it.

really? i've messed around with cut and uncut guys and never noticed a difference with oral, if they're hard enough. uncut guys are infinitely better to though, in my experience, it feels MUCH better.

yes, way more play

SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said:

I don't agree that it's sexual mutilation. I don't think it's necessary but circumsized men aren't unable to have fulfilling sex lives because the skin is missing. It's not the same as female genital mutilation.

What I was gonna say...

Uncut dick is ugly and gross.

hands up who has actually tried an uncut dick not just googled for photos of them

ZombieKitten said:

hands up who has actually tried an uncut dick not just googled for photos of them

johnart said:

ZombieKitten said:

hands up who has actually tried an uncut dick not just googled for photos of them

only 8 times???

Most people in Europe don't even seem to know that the majority of the adult male population in the US are circumsized. I guess it became more commonly acknowledged recently when more porn started to be available on the internet or when people started talking about it on forums. It was hardly ever even mentioned on the US TV programs that we got over here in the past decades. In many European countries the procedure is not only viewn as unnecessary, but you'd have difficulties finding anyone doing it with any type of a professional certificate.

Having said that, I can understand some of the "eew" comments here. Though for many adults the foreskin doesn't really extend that far up during erection or even when the penis is flaccid. Mine covers only a few millimeteres of the glans on the top. I've had trouble understanding how circumsized men really masturbate though - even the little bit of skin there seems to have a big role in it. I've understood the tradition might have began at least partly in an effort to make masturbation less enjoyable.

novabrkr said:

Most people in Europe don't even seem to know that the majority of the adult male population in the US are circumsized. I guess it became more commonly acknowledged recently when more porn started to be available on the internet or when people started talking about it on forums. It was hardly ever even mentioned on the US TV programs that we got over here in the past decades. In many European countries the procedure is not only viewn as unnecessary, but you'd have difficulties finding anyone doing it with any type of a professional certificate.

Having said that, I can understand some of the "eew" comments here. Though for many adults the foreskin doesn't really extend that far up during erection or even when the penis is flaccid. Mine covers only a few millimeteres of the glans on the top. I've had trouble understanding how circumsized men really masturbate though - even the little bit of skin there seems to have a big role in it. I've understood the tradition might have began at least partly in an effort to make masturbation less enjoyable.

up until a few years ago I'd say Australia was like the USA

Boys of at least the last 10 years seem to have been left uncut. I remember there was a pamphlet at the hospital that I declined, but aside from that nobody asked if I wanted to pursue it. 30 years earlier and they did it without asking, you had to "opt-out" and were asked if it was OK with you that your son would look different to his daddy.

Climate and genetics play a part in it.

I can understand why a Northern European that has migrated to a warmer country would benefit from the operation, but it would be fairly stupid to do it at places where there are cold winters. The skin is there for a good reason. Since I don't personally have that much of skin down there, I can certainly feel the difference when the temperature drops below -20C. It also seems to be the case that the amount and thickness of foreskin vary between people from different geographical locations.

Acrylic said:

I will not suck uncircumsized dick.

A couple of quotes for you to think about

"The complex innervation of the foreskin and frenulum has been well-documented, and the genitally intact male has thousands of fine touch receptors and other highly erogenous nerve endings—many of which are lost to circumcision, with an inevitable reduction in sexual sensation experienced by circumcised males."

"For the woman, the rhythmic bunching and un-bunching of the foreskin during intercourse creates sexual excitement by alternately applying, and then releasing, pressure against the highly erotic G-spot (that triggers orgasmic pleasure) in the roof of the vagina."

[Edited 7/18/10 1:16am]

Hudson said:

Uncut dick is ugly and gross.

Circumcision is mandatory, and especially for males, it prevents from a lot of diseases …

People should read more about it and it's importance.

I'm glad that mine was circumsized at a very young age....

[Edited 7/17/10 3:34am]

i have not actually seen one, or been with a guy that is not circumcised

And that's a lot of skin!!!

IMO there's not much of a diference for a woman . I have been with both and in one case even with the same man before and after it was done and both vaginal sex and giving head were not that different.

One big phimosis here. The operation was one of the best things that ever happened in my life (I was 6 years old at that time). I know if my penis could talk, he would say "hey, thank you for that operation, it was certainly painful, but it changed my life for the better!"

A mutilated penis is much more comfortable, I'm glad I have a mutilated penis...

novabrkr said:

Climate and genetics play a part in it.

I can understand why a Northern European that has migrated to a warmer country would benefit from the operation, but it would be fairly stupid to do it at places where there are cold winters. The skin is there for a good reason. Since I don't personally have that much of skin down there, I can certainly feel the difference when the temperature drops below -20C. It also seems to be the case that the amount and thickness of foreskin vary between people from different geographical locations.

cold glans??

Still, your point seems valid, but then again, source? any scientific fact to back up your theory?

ZombieKitten said:

hands up who has actually tried an uncut dick not just googled for photos of them

It's not the sex that bothers me; I can't tell the difference when it's in a condom and we're gettin' it in.

It's just the oral. The way the extra skin moves in my mouth makes me wanna .