ernestsewell said:

This just in: Perez is a phony.

source

He took the picture down, and admitted it was pixalated to look like she wasn't wearing anything, when in fact she was wearing undies. He altered the photo to brush out her undies, and to then put something over the crotch to make it looks salacious. Why would this person do that to a 17 year old? Perez is wreckless, and thinks anyone in the public eye is up for any scrutiny. It's bullshit.

Perez's biggest problem is he lacks humanity and judgement. He's swimming in his celebrity, but soon enough, it'll die off and he'll go back to shoving down scones and frapps at Starbucks, typing on his eBay'd iPod.

He's a goon, and Miley is a hick. End of story.

And now I hate him!

If he wanted to see cunt so damned bad he should have just looked in the mirror. I hope Miley sues his ass and gets more paper than she's already got.

Exclusive: Perez Hilton Quotes From Tonight's 'Joy Behar' Interview

PRINT

Email More

Controversial blogger Perez Hilton is hitting HLN's 'The Joy Behar Show' tonight to talk about this week's Miley Cyrus photo incident for the first time--and PopEater's got exclusive quotes from the interview.

Earlier this week, Hilton, whose real name is Mario Lavandeira, posted a link on his Twitter account pointing to a photo of Miley Cyrus. The photo featured Cyrus climbing out of a car apparently wearing no underwear. And while underwear-less photos of celebrities is a common occurrence on the Hilton's site, Miss Cyrus is only 17 years old, making her a minor--and his actions could have some serious legal implications.

Joy Behar scored the first sit down with the Hilton and the blogger was eager to tell his side of the story. Excerpts from the interview on HLN's 'The Joy Behar Show' after the jump.

On why he posted the photo:
"I didn't pick it for her to look like she wasn't wearing underwear. The point of me choosing that one photo is because it was showing Miley getting out of the car in an unladylike fashion. And I just thought that was funny and in keeping with her shocking behavior of late, because she was very well aware that she was in a public place at a -- at a video shoot and that there were paparazzi present."

On if he altered the photo before posting:
"I did not pixelate anything. I did not PhotoShop anything. There's been a lot of inaccuracies being perpetuated about what happened in the media. And I just chose a photo that showed her getting out of the car. You didn't see anything down there."

On why he removed photo:
"I did not take the photo down. I didn't even post the photo o my Web site. I wanted to clear that up, as well. I merely linked to a photo that I found on the Internet on my Twitter... Then that Web site that I posted a link to, they're the ones that took it down. I would have posted the image on my site had I been able to. But it was taken by one photo agency that I don't have a deal with. So I've learned my mistake in the past about using photos that I don't have licenses to."


On possibly being charged with child pornography:
"I think it's insulting to children to accuse that of child pornography. If you want to look at the definition of child pornography, it is not an image like the one I posted. It is explicit behavior designed to arouse, engage in sexual activity. You don't see anything from Miley's private parts. You just see here from an unflattering vantage view getting out of her car. the point is that it's not child pornography. And if I was aware that it was or that she was not wearing underwear, I would not have posted it. But I -- I knew the opposite, Joy. I saw other photos from that video shoot and I was very well aware of the fact that Miley was wearing underwear."

On whether he regrets posting the photo:
"I don't regret what I did and I would do the same thing again... It's not actually doing anything worse than Miley herself has been doing recently, from grinding up on her 40 something year old director to pole dancing to all the over sexualized things that she has been doing and turning herself into this creature."

CHIC0 said:

Exclusive: Perez Hilton Quotes From Tonight's 'Joy Behar' Interview

8 Comments

By PopEater Staff Posted Jun 17th 2010 07:16PM

PRINT

Email More

Controversial blogger Perez Hilton is hitting HLN's 'The Joy Behar Show' tonight to talk about this week's Miley Cyrus photo incident for the first time--and PopEater's got exclusive quotes from the interview.

Earlier this week, Hilton, whose real name is Mario Lavandeira, posted a link on his Twitter account pointing to a photo of Miley Cyrus. The photo featured Cyrus climbing out of a car apparently wearing no underwear. And while underwear-less photos of celebrities is a common occurrence on the Hilton's site, Miss Cyrus is only 17 years old, making her a minor--and his actions could have some serious legal implications.

Joy Behar scored the first sit down with the Hilton and the blogger was eager to tell his side of the story. Excerpts from the interview on HLN's 'The Joy Behar Show' after the jump.

On why he posted the photo:
"I didn't pick it for her to look like she wasn't wearing underwear. The point of me choosing that one photo is because it was showing Miley getting out of the car in an unladylike fashion. And I just thought that was funny and in keeping with her shocking behavior of late, because she was very well aware that she was in a public place at a -- at a video shoot and that there were paparazzi present."

On if he altered the photo before posting:
"I did not pixelate anything. I did not PhotoShop anything. There's been a lot of inaccuracies being perpetuated about what happened in the media. And I just chose a photo that showed her getting out of the car. You didn't see anything down there."

On why he removed photo:
"I did not take the photo down. I didn't even post the photo o my Web site. I wanted to clear that up, as well. I merely linked to a photo that I found on the Internet on my Twitter... Then that Web site that I posted a link to, they're the ones that took it down. I would have posted the image on my site had I been able to. But it was taken by one photo agency that I don't have a deal with. So I've learned my mistake in the past about using photos that I don't have licenses to."


On possibly being charged with child pornography:
"I think it's insulting to children to accuse that of child pornography. If you want to look at the definition of child pornography, it is not an image like the one I posted. It is explicit behavior designed to arouse, engage in sexual activity. You don't see anything from Miley's private parts. You just see here from an unflattering vantage view getting out of her car. the point is that it's not child pornography. And if I was aware that it was or that she was not wearing underwear, I would not have posted it. But I -- I knew the opposite, Joy. I saw other photos from that video shoot and I was very well aware of the fact that Miley was wearing underwear."

On whether he regrets posting the photo:
"I don't regret what I did and I would do the same thing again... It's not actually doing anything worse than Miley herself has been doing recently, from grinding up on her 40 something year old director to pole dancing to all the over sexualized things that she has been doing and turning herself into this creature."

What a disgusting human being.

Vendetta1 said:

CHIC0 said:

Exclusive: Perez Hilton Quotes From Tonight's 'Joy Behar' Interview

8 Comments

By PopEater Staff Posted Jun 17th 2010 07:16PM

PRINT

Email More

Controversial blogger Perez Hilton is hitting HLN's 'The Joy Behar Show' tonight to talk about this week's Miley Cyrus photo incident for the first time--and PopEater's got exclusive quotes from the interview.

Earlier this week, Hilton, whose real name is Mario Lavandeira, posted a link on his Twitter account pointing to a photo of Miley Cyrus. The photo featured Cyrus climbing out of a car apparently wearing no underwear. And while underwear-less photos of celebrities is a common occurrence on the Hilton's site, Miss Cyrus is only 17 years old, making her a minor--and his actions could have some serious legal implications.

Joy Behar scored the first sit down with the Hilton and the blogger was eager to tell his side of the story. Excerpts from the interview on HLN's 'The Joy Behar Show' after the jump.

On why he posted the photo:
"I didn't pick it for her to look like she wasn't wearing underwear. The point of me choosing that one photo is because it was showing Miley getting out of the car in an unladylike fashion. And I just thought that was funny and in keeping with her shocking behavior of late, because she was very well aware that she was in a public place at a -- at a video shoot and that there were paparazzi present."

On if he altered the photo before posting:
"I did not pixelate anything. I did not PhotoShop anything. There's been a lot of inaccuracies being perpetuated about what happened in the media. And I just chose a photo that showed her getting out of the car. You didn't see anything down there."

On why he removed photo:
"I did not take the photo down. I didn't even post the photo o my Web site. I wanted to clear that up, as well. I merely linked to a photo that I found on the Internet on my Twitter... Then that Web site that I posted a link to, they're the ones that took it down. I would have posted the image on my site had I been able to. But it was taken by one photo agency that I don't have a deal with. So I've learned my mistake in the past about using photos that I don't have licenses to."


On possibly being charged with child pornography:
"I think it's insulting to children to accuse that of child pornography. If you want to look at the definition of child pornography, it is not an image like the one I posted. It is explicit behavior designed to arouse, engage in sexual activity. You don't see anything from Miley's private parts. You just see here from an unflattering vantage view getting out of her car. the point is that it's not child pornography. And if I was aware that it was or that she was not wearing underwear, I would not have posted it. But I -- I knew the opposite, Joy. I saw other photos from that video shoot and I was very well aware of the fact that Miley was wearing underwear."

On whether he regrets posting the photo:
"I don't regret what I did and I would do the same thing again... It's not actually doing anything worse than Miley herself has been doing recently, from grinding up on her 40 something year old director to pole dancing to all the over sexualized things that she has been doing and turning herself into this creature."

What a disgusting human being.

Totally...and people eat this shit up.

Actually, some of the posts I see on the org are not that far off from the kinds of things this parasite says.

ernestsewell said:

TonyVanDam said:

CORRECTION: More like 100% pure bullshit.

While my statements certainly weren't a defense of Mario, I'll say this. A gent who works and writes for PopEater has seen the pictures, saw the underwear, and knew what Perez did, and totally disputed that there was ever a photo of her with her Montana hanging out.

I don't doubt that Mario would want to back peddle when things like "child porn" and "brought up on charges" comes into the conversation, but the guy at PopEater has no investment in either PerezHilton or Miley Cyrus, and has no reason to lie about the underwear actually being on, or off.

Well if I'm wrong, then I stand corrected. But be as it may, some kinds of punishment need to be granted to Perez because the last time I checked, people can get sue for slandering charges. If or when The Cyruses ever becomes interested in suing, this mess can still end ugly.

Just saying.

CHIC0 said:

Exclusive: Perez Hilton Quotes From Tonight's 'Joy Behar' Interview

8 Comments

By PopEater Staff Posted Jun 17th 2010 07:16PM

PRINT

Email More

Controversial blogger Perez Hilton is hitting HLN's 'The Joy Behar Show' tonight to talk about this week's Miley Cyrus photo incident for the first time--and PopEater's got exclusive quotes from the interview.

Earlier this week, Hilton, whose real name is Mario Lavandeira, posted a link on his Twitter account pointing to a photo of Miley Cyrus. The photo featured Cyrus climbing out of a car apparently wearing no underwear. And while underwear-less photos of celebrities is a common occurrence on the Hilton's site, Miss Cyrus is only 17 years old, making her a minor--and his actions could have some serious legal implications.

Joy Behar scored the first sit down with the Hilton and the blogger was eager to tell his side of the story. Excerpts from the interview on HLN's 'The Joy Behar Show' after the jump.

On why he posted the photo:
"I didn't pick it for her to look like she wasn't wearing underwear. The point of me choosing that one photo is because it was showing Miley getting out of the car in an unladylike fashion. And I just thought that was funny and in keeping with her shocking behavior of late, because she was very well aware that she was in a public place at a -- at a video shoot and that there were paparazzi present."

On if he altered the photo before posting:
"I did not pixelate anything. I did not PhotoShop anything. There's been a lot of inaccuracies being perpetuated about what happened in the media. And I just chose a photo that showed her getting out of the car. You didn't see anything down there."

On why he removed photo:
"I did not take the photo down. I didn't even post the photo o my Web site. I wanted to clear that up, as well. I merely linked to a photo that I found on the Internet on my Twitter... Then that Web site that I posted a link to, they're the ones that took it down. I would have posted the image on my site had I been able to. But it was taken by one photo agency that I don't have a deal with. So I've learned my mistake in the past about using photos that I don't have licenses to."

See THIS?^ That's more bullshit. Now he is trying to pass the blame on someone else. This dude is nothing more but a selfish lying asshole. And if The Cyruses have any piece of diginity left in them, they should sue. Honestly!

TonyVanDam said:

Well if I'm wrong, then I stand corrected. But be as it may, some kinds of punishment need to be granted to Perez because the last time I checked, people can get sue for slandering charges. If or when The Cyruses ever becomes interested in suing, this mess can still end ugly.

Just saying.

I hear ya, man.

DesireeNevermind said:

As much as I despise Perez Hilton.....it's not his fault this tramp in training didn't wear draws under her skirt when she went out that day.

But the douchebag didn't have to put it on his site

Plus, anything involved with Perez Hilton is automatically his fault

Christopher said:

HatrinaHaterwitz said:

Purposely going outside in a skirt without underwear on and then gaping her legs when getting out of a car, in front of the flash happy paparazzo.

i did that last night and i am a gospel woman honey. i will not hear any more of dis.

bboy87 said:

DesireeNevermind said:

As much as I despise Perez Hilton.....it's not his fault this tramp in training didn't wear draws under her skirt when she went out that day.

But the douchebag didn't have to put it on his site

Plus, anything involved with Perez Hilton is automatically his fault

Of course it is! Perez has built a career of being nothing more than a tabloid media troublemaker. Now that his latest antic is proven to be a total backlash, we now have the case of "the chickens coming home to roost". So f*** him!

Perez Hilton is everything that's wrong with our society. The guy is famous for talking a nasty mess about other famous people. He's slime. The lowest of the low. I've been speaking out against this guy for as long as I've know he existed. I'm like a down with Perez Hilton evangelist. Seriously, the guy is evil. I hope he does have charges brought against him. Should have been charges brought against him previously just for putting an entire fleets worth of dumptrucks of dumb into the public consciousness. The biggest walking fail ever.

So I just watched the Joy Behar show with Perez on it and he actually says on national television that he sent the photo to Joy. Distribution of child pornography (yet to be determined in this case) is a felony. What a jackass.

Cerebus said:

Perez Hilton is everything that's wrong with our society. The guy is famous for talking a nasty mess about other famous people. He's slime. The lowest of the low. I've been speaking out against this guy for as long as I've know he existed. I'm like a down with Perez Hilton evangelist. Seriously, the guy is evil. I hope he does have charges brought against him. Should have been charges brought against him previously just for putting an entire fleets worth of dumptrucks of dumb into the public consciousness. The biggest walking fail ever.

That Black Eyed Peas punch wasn't enough

Cinnie said:

Cerebus said:

Perez Hilton is everything that's wrong with our society. The guy is famous for talking a nasty mess about other famous people. He's slime. The lowest of the low. I've been speaking out against this guy for as long as I've know he existed. I'm like a down with Perez Hilton evangelist. Seriously, the guy is evil. I hope he does have charges brought against him. Should have been charges brought against him previously just for putting an entire fleets worth of dumptrucks of dumb into the public consciousness. The biggest walking fail ever.

That Black Eyed Peas punch wasn't enough

Nope!!!

As my Momma (May she be resting in everlasting peace! ) used to tell me..."A hard head...makes a soft ass!"

He needs a full blown, straight up out the streets...BEAT DOWN!! Powered by the people...to make him see the error of his ways!!

.

[Edited 6/18/10 1:47am]

you are all feeding into attention whoredom.

by actually reacting to this vile person and this vile person's "job"

you are all feeding into it.

people should just ignore this crap and let the authorities stick to it.

this kind of stuff distracts us from actual important things that are going around the world.

[Edited 6/17/10 22:46pm]

baroque said:

you are all feeding into attention whoredom.

by actually reacting to this vile person and this vile person's "job"

you are all feeding into it.

people should just ignore this crap and let the authorities stick to it.

this kind of stuff distracts us from actual important things that are going around the world.

[Edited 6/17/10 22:46pm]

Totally disagree. People need to be as vocal as possible about the kind of hate this man spreads in the name of entertainment. We need to let as many people know - family, friends and complete freakin' strangers - that this kind of behavior will not be tolerated because "it's funny", "he's not really hurting anybody" or "it will just be said someplace else". All things I've been told in response to expressing how vile I find him. I believe, in fact, that he wins if people don't stand up and express just how distasteful they find his schtick. Because one of the things he has at his disposale is the ability to bully people down through the popularity of his public persona. The people who follow him actually believe the stuff he says is right and true. It's just all kinds of wrong. And I will be as loud about it as I can.

ernestsewell said:

This just in: Perez is a phony.

source

He took the picture down, and admitted it was pixalated to look like she wasn't wearing anything, when in fact she was wearing undies. He altered the photo to brush out her undies, and to then put something over the crotch to make it looks salacious. Why would this person do that to a 17 year old? Perez is wreckless, and thinks anyone in the public eye is up for any scrutiny. It's bullshit.

Perez's biggest problem is he lacks humanity and judgement. He's swimming in his celebrity, but soon enough, it'll die off and he'll go back to shoving down scones and frapps at Starbucks, typing on his eBay'd iPod.

He's a goon, and Miley is a hick. End of story.

Uh, if this is true, he is the creepiest motherfucker ever. Throw him in jail, if he thinks deliberately trying to sexualise a perfectly innocent photo of a child is OK behaviour by any standards, where does he draw the line?

Who am I kidding, this leech has no boundaries whatsoever and he's only going to get worse the longer he's allowed. If not jail, his site should be shut down. What's the point of it anyway?

I feel sorry for Miley, she's encountering so many sleazy men in this business and seems to have non existent parents.

EDIT: OK, so he at the very least didn't photoshop anything but still, he knew exactly what he was implying by posting the tweet the way he did. And to turn around and blame her?! FUCK YOU PEREZ.

[Edited 6/18/10 1:02am]

mcmeekle said:

BklynBabe said:

her behavior in no way gives grown men the excuse to take photos of her vagina and distribute them on the internet...

what's the next step.....rape? and it was her fault for dressing that way and acting like that.

Thank God I'm not famous because I swear if anyone tried to take a pic of my goodies without permission they will be shitting camera bits for the rest of their natural days.

Fair point/s (except maybe the next step = rape bit). I've probably not been clear.

I mentioned those exploits to illustrate her sexualisation over recent years. Not as an excuse to photograph her fanny*.

(* UK definition)

Completely off topic, but until now I always thought the Brit definition of fanny was the bottom. I didn't know that you guys have been talking about the front bits all this time

Ottensen said:

mcmeekle said:

Fair point/s (except maybe the next step = rape bit). I've probably not been clear.

I mentioned those exploits to illustrate her sexualisation over recent years. Not as an excuse to photograph her fanny*.

(* UK definition)

Completely off topic, but until now I always thought the Brit definition of fanny was the bottom. I didn't know that you guys have been talking about the front bits all this time

Fanny in the UK refers to the vagina. Which always adds some school-boy-level humour when Americans say things like "I'll spank your fanny young man!" or "I was playing [American] football and I slipped and hurt my fanny!"

mcmeekle said:

Ottensen said:

Completely off topic, but until now I always thought the Brit definition of fanny was the bottom. I didn't know that you guys have been talking about the front bits all this time

Fanny in the UK refers to the vagina. Which always adds some school-boy-level humour when Americans say things like "I'll spank your fanny young man!" or "I was playing [American] football and I slipped and hurt my fanny!"

Just to be clear say "Front bottom" or "back bottom"

squirrelgrease said:

So I just watched the Joy Behar show with Perez on it and he actually says on national television that he sent the photo to Joy. Distribution of child pornography (yet to be determined in this case) is a felony. What a jackass.

He's a fuck-tart.

He should have his mouth sewn up.

And his hands cut off.

And if he had a set of balls, they should be removed as well.

He's just a bitter cunt, sitting on his female eunuch whilst typing vitriol.

I didn't even know who this guy was until the threads about him on the org.

I so cannot be bothered with what celebs are doing.

There must be a market for him if he is still around.

MrsMdiver said:

I didn't even know who this guy was until the threads about him on the org.

I so cannot be bothered with what celebs are doing.

There must be a market for him if he is still around.

He's not a celeb. He's a leech.

purplesweat said:

MrsMdiver said:

I didn't even know who this guy was until the threads about him on the org.

I so cannot be bothered with what celebs are doing.

There must be a market for him if he is still around.

He's not a celeb. He's a leech.

He leeches on to celebs.

MrsMdiver said:

purplesweat said:

He's not a celeb. He's a leech.

He leeches on to celebs.

purplesweat said:

MrsMdiver said:

He leeches on to celebs.

Poor bastard needs to get a life of his own but I guess he is making money from what he is doing.