Fauxie said:

HatrinaHaterwitz said:

My bad! I thought we were talking about the reality of the situation.

Since we seem to be skirting reality, let me ask you. If it were not Perez, that posted the picture but it was R. Kelly...would you still feel the same way?

I think we're up-skirting reality, actually.

Look, taking pics up any woman's skirt without her consent is nasty. Miley Cyrus is not a child, but if what Perez has done is against the law then it should be dealt with accordingly, but it ain't child porn in my eyes, it's just really nasty behaviour.

BULLSHIT!!! By LAW...in all 50 of the United States of America...Miley Cyrus IS a CHILD until November 23rd!

The only time I have gone over to Perez Hilton, was like when he was boo hooing over being smacked by one of the Black eyed Peas!

I have noooooooooooooooo respect for gossip columnists. Especially ones who draw dicks into girls mouths on pictures.

He hasn't ever created anything.

He's famous for tearing down.

BklynBabe said:

people still care about this idiot?

Not really. But that idiot (Mario/Perez) loves the spotlight too damn much. He's the same idiot that picked a fight with the Black Eyed Peas to get media attention.

DesireeNevermind said:

As much as I despise Perez Hilton.....it's not his fault this tramp in training didn't wear draws under her skirt when she went out that day.

That is true. And Miley's mother/manager did a horrible job in NOT giving her daughter proper home training on the importence of wearing clean underwear.

But that does NOT exclude Perez from his sins by a long shot. He is a adult AND a grown man. And an adult has no damn business having a picture of an underage teen girl with no underwear on his web blog. THAT is a federal crime in the USA and he should've known better.

Harlepolis said:

As much as tired ass Perez Hilton is in the wrong,,,

What the hell was a 17 years old doing outside of the house without any underwear? Where's her parents and how come they don't have a say on how their juvenile daughter behaves?

Then again, this is the SAME triflin' ass family who released a lingerie line for 9 years old girls

Miley's mother/manager is too much of a pimp to her own daughter AND husband to even bother being a responsible mother.

I hate to say it, but Miley's mother is a little too much like Britney's mother in those regards.

JustErin said:

Shut him down and those like him.

That's how I feel at this point.

Timmy84 said:

I don't give a fuck about either of them. Plus Miley about 18 any fucking ways. Whatever Perez deal with it's on him. His blog's stupid anyway.

CORRECTION: Miley's 18th birthday is November 2010. Until then, she is age 17 and still jailbait.

squirrelgrease said:

FauxReal said:

Wow. You've got to be pretty fucking dumb to do something like that. You can't put disclaimers on what would be classified as kiddie porn and think it makes it okay.

Exactly. Fine him. Prosecute him. Jail him. Whatever it takes to set an example that this shit is NOT OK. The photog should suffer the same fate.

Co-sign.

HatrinaHaterwitz said:

Fauxie said:

I think we're up-skirting reality, actually.

Look, taking pics up any woman's skirt without her consent is nasty. Miley Cyrus is not a child, but if what Perez has done is against the law then it should be dealt with accordingly, but it ain't child porn in my eyes, it's just really nasty behaviour.

BULLSHIT!!! By LAW...in all 50 of the United States of America...Miley Cyrus IS a CHILD until November 23rd!

Thank you. Exactly.

"She looked twelve too mee..."

HatrinaHaterwitz said:

Christopher said:

lol r kellys twitter

and what makes her such a slut?

Purposely going outside in a skirt without underwear on and then gaping her legs when getting out of a car, in front of the flash happy paparazzo.

i did that last night and i am a gospel woman honey. i will not hear any more of dis.

mcmeekle said:

..thrashing a papp car with a brolly.

Fauxie said:

HatrinaHaterwitz said:

My bad! I thought we were talking about the reality of the situation.

Since we seem to be skirting reality, let me ask you. If it were not Perez, that posted the picture but it was R. Kelly...would you still feel the same way?

I think we're up-skirting reality, actually.

Look, taking pics up any woman's skirt without her consent is nasty. Miley Cyrus is not a child, but if what Perez has done is against the law then it should be dealt with accordingly, but it ain't child porn in my eyes, it's just really nasty behaviour.

Fauxie, Sweetie...in the United States the the age of an adult by federal law is 18 years of age. Therefore in the eyes of the justice system Miley Cyrus is still a child on American law books. I don't know what's considered an adult by Thai law, but in my country photographing or filming the private parts of someone under age 18 constitutes child pornography period. The fact that Perez distributed these photos, faked or otherwise, on a website (and one that receives anywhere to million hits a day???) is child porn trafficking...period. We're not talking about the age of sexual consent (which varies from state to state) for private sexual matters. We're specifically addressing what is the age of adulthood as written by law to legally photograph or film a person's genetalia...and in my country, that would be 18.

...still, I also agree though that it's just nasty behavior any way you slice it. Perez has made a fortune and a celebrity name for himself by pretty much being a scumbag. It will be interesting to see if when if and when the tides turn against him (and honestly i hope they do)...makes me sick that reward people in our society for being assholes to others for the sake of fame and noteriety.

Ottensen said:

Fauxie said:

I think we're up-skirting reality, actually.

Look, taking pics up any woman's skirt without her consent is nasty. Miley Cyrus is not a child, but if what Perez has done is against the law then it should be dealt with accordingly, but it ain't child porn in my eyes, it's just really nasty behaviour.

Fauxie, Sweetie...in the United States the the age of an adult by federal law is 18 years of age. Therefore in the eyes of the justice system Miley Cyrus is still a child on American law books. I don't know what's considered an adult by Thai law, but in my country photographing or filming the private parts of someone under age 18 constitutes child pornography period. The fact that Perez distributed these photos, faked or otherwise, on a website (and one that receives anywhere to million hits a day???) is child porn trafficking...period. We're not talking about the age of sexual consent (which varies from state to state) for private sexual matters. We're specifically addressing what is the age of adulthood as written by law to legally photograph or film a person's genetalia...and in my country, that would be 18.

...still, I also agree though that it's just nasty behavior any way you slice it. Perez has made a fortune and a celebrity name for himself by pretty much being a scumbag. It will be interesting to see if when if and when the tides turn against him (and honestly i hope they do)...makes me sick that reward people in our society for being assholes to others for the sake of fame and noteriety.

I know, and the law's the law, and he should be punished according to the law. I'm not defending him. It's a handy slip-up actually, and a good opportunity to nail this horrible little man.

I'm not talking about officially in the eyes of the law, I'm just saying I wouldn't personally give it the label 'child porn' and all that implies. It's an upskirt pic of a 17 year old female celebrity, which isn't the thought the phrase 'child porn' would most readily bring to mind, but it's a disgusting thing to do (both to snap the pic and to put it online) however you look at it. Scumbag, is the right word. He's a professional scumbag, and as you said, the law is black and white so he should be in a world of trouble.

HatrinaHaterwitz said:

InsatiableCream said:

guys, it's definitely not child pornography.

Don't think so? Ok. If you live anywhere inside of the United States of America. Look around the internet and find a picture of ANY 17 year old girl, shot from an angle underneath so that you can see she's not wearing underwear and you get clear peek at her snatch. Once you've found the picture, print it, go to your nearest police station, show it to them and tell them you want to post it to Twitter.

If "it's definitely not child pornography", you should be able to post about it and tell us what happened.

If it definitely is child pornography, we won't be hearing from you for quite a while and I sincerely hope you don't hold grudges.

.

[Edited 6/16/10 11:56am]

The Brass Eye 2001 special lampooned just this kind of reaction though. I can't help but think of it when I read this.

This just in: Perez is a phony.

source

He took the picture down, and admitted it was pixalated to look like she wasn't wearing anything, when in fact she was wearing undies. He altered the photo to brush out her undies, and to then put something over the crotch to make it looks salacious. Why would this person do that to a 17 year old? Perez is wreckless, and thinks anyone in the public eye is up for any scrutiny. It's bullshit.

Perez's biggest problem is he lacks humanity and judgement. He's swimming in his celebrity, but soon enough, it'll die off and he'll go back to shoving down scones and frapps at Starbucks, typing on his eBay'd iPod.

He's a goon, and Miley is a hick. End of story.

TonyVanDam said:

Timmy84 said:

I don't give a fuck about either of them. Plus Miley about 18 any fucking ways. Whatever Perez deal with it's on him. His blog's stupid anyway.

CORRECTION: Miley's 18th birthday is November 2010. Until then, she is age 17 and still jailbait.

See? This is why I never followed Miley like that so Perez's ass (and the photog's ass) is in trouble anyways.

ernestsewell said:

This just in: Perez is a phony.

source

He took the picture down, and admitted it was pixalated to look like she wasn't wearing anything, when in fact she was wearing undies. He altered the photo to brush out her undies, and to then put something over the crotch to make it looks salacious. Why would this person do that to a 17 year old? Perez is wreckless, and thinks anyone in the public eye is up for any scrutiny. It's bullshit.

Perez's biggest problem is he lacks humanity and judgement. He's swimming in his celebrity, but soon enough, it'll die off and he'll go back to shoving down scones and frapps at Starbucks, typing on his eBay'd iPod.

He's a goon, and Miley is a hick. End of story.

What a fucking asshole. I'm starting to think this prick isn't even gay, the fuck is he faking a picture of a minor's pussy? The fuck is wrong with you Mario? Jesus Christ...

Muse2NoPharaoh said:

Muse2NoPharaoh said:

The only time I have gone over to Perez Hilton, was like when he was boo hooing over being smacked by one of the Black eyed Peas!

I have noooooooooooooooo respect for gossip columnists. Especially ones who draw dicks into girls mouths on pictures.

He hasn't ever created anything.

He's famous for tearing down.

Exactly. He's just a prick pretending to be a gossip columnist and he can't even do that right. He's a loser.

Muse2NoPharaoh said:

The only time I have gone over to Perez Hilton, was like when he was boo hooing over being smacked by one of the Black eyed Peas!

I have noooooooooooooooo respect for gossip columnists. Especially ones who draw dicks into girls mouths on pictures.

He hasn't ever created anything.

He's famous for tearing down.

Gossip of the old days isn't anything like it is these days. Page Six, Liz Smith, Rona Barrett, and all that back in the day posted about what WAS happening, and it was a peek into the world of celebs, without being overly intrusive. It wasn't conjecture. Sure, the romance fodder popped up, but we never heard about sex tapes, or any of the nonsense we hear about these days.

There were many "blind" items, meaning it was a report without naming names (almost like a quiz left to the read to figure out). Perez would post pictures of a girl's clit if he could.......and damn near has anyway.

I wonder if people took what Mario did (does) out of context, and posted it to the world how much he'd like it. I'm not a fan of the Black Eyed Peas, but thank God they showed Perez not everyone is going to take that sort of nonsense from him.

HatrinaHaterwitz said:

mcmeekle said:

I agree with IC, I say it's not child porn. The whole thing is quite unsavoury but I think folks are getting a bit carried away.

It's Paedogeddon!

My bad! I thought we were talking about the reality of the situation.

Since we seem to be skirting reality, let me ask you. If it were not Perez, that posted the picture but it was R. Kelly...would you still feel the same way?

If Gary Glitter posted a photo of Miley's minge, I still wouldn't call it "child porn". It makes no difference who posts it and where. The image remains the same.

I'm not disputing the facts or the laws or defending anyone's behaviour here, but classing this as "child porn" is excessive, bordering on hysterical. It's what happens when child porn/abuse rears it's head. It's tabloid headline material.

Obscene/intimate images of a minor. That's a better description.

Have you been following Ms Cyrus' career of late? She's not Hannah Montana anymore. Faux lesbian kisses, semi-nude photoshoots, pole dancing, to name but a few of her recent (and not so recent) escapades.

But, Hilton's an odious wee cunt and I hope he gets it. I'd love to see someone photshop some jizz or something on his mug-shot.

Mario has always been a cunt.

mcmeekle said:

HatrinaHaterwitz said:

My bad! I thought we were talking about the reality of the situation.

Since we seem to be skirting reality, let me ask you. If it were not Perez, that posted the picture but it was R. Kelly...would you still feel the same way?

If Gary Glitter posted a photo of Miley's minge, I still wouldn't call it "child porn". It makes no difference who posts it and where. The image remains the same.

I'm not disputing the facts or the laws or defending anyone's behaviour here, but classing this as "child porn" is excessive, bordering on hysterical. It's what happens when child porn/abuse rears it's head. It's tabloid headline material.

Obscene/intimate images of a minor. That's a better description.

Have you been following Ms Cyrus' career of late? She's not Hannah Montana anymore. Faux lesbian kisses, semi-nude photoshoots, pole dancing, to name but a few of her recent (and not so recent) escapades.

But, Hilton's an odious wee cunt and I hope he gets it. I'd love to see someone photshop some jizz or something on his mug-shot.

her behavior in no way gives grown men the excuse to take photos of her vagina and distribute them on the internet...

what's the next step.....rape? and it was her fault for dressing that way and acting like that.

Thank God I'm not famous because I swear if anyone tried to take a pic of my goodies without permission they will be shitting camera bits for the rest of their natural days.

BklynBabe said:

mcmeekle said:

If Gary Glitter posted a photo of Miley's minge, I still wouldn't call it "child porn". It makes no difference who posts it and where. The image remains the same.

I'm not disputing the facts or the laws or defending anyone's behaviour here, but classing this as "child porn" is excessive, bordering on hysterical. It's what happens when child porn/abuse rears it's head. It's tabloid headline material.

Obscene/intimate images of a minor. That's a better description.

Have you been following Ms Cyrus' career of late? She's not Hannah Montana anymore. Faux lesbian kisses, semi-nude photoshoots, pole dancing, to name but a few of her recent (and not so recent) escapades.

But, Hilton's an odious wee cunt and I hope he gets it. I'd love to see someone photshop some jizz or something on his mug-shot.

her behavior in no way gives grown men the excuse to take photos of her vagina and distribute them on the internet...

what's the next step.....rape? and it was her fault for dressing that way and acting like that.

Thank God I'm not famous because I swear if anyone tried to take a pic of my goodies without permission they will be shitting camera bits for the rest of their natural days.

Fair point/s (except maybe the next step = rape bit). I've probably not been clear.

I mentioned those exploits to illustrate her sexualisation over recent years. Not as an excuse to photograph her fanny*.

(* UK definition)

ernestsewell said:

This just in: Perez is a phony.

source

He took the picture down, and admitted it was pixalated to look like she wasn't wearing anything, when in fact she was wearing undies. He altered the photo to brush out her undies, and to then put something over the crotch to make it looks salacious. Why would this person do that to a 17 year old? Perez is wreckless, and thinks anyone in the public eye is up for any scrutiny. It's bullshit.

Perez's biggest problem is he lacks humanity and judgement. He's swimming in his celebrity, but soon enough, it'll die off and he'll go back to shoving down scones and frapps at Starbucks, typing on his eBay'd iPod.

He's a goon, and Miley is a hick. End of story.

Unfuckingbelievable.

squirrelgrease said:

ernestsewell said:

This just in: Perez is a phony.

source

He took the picture down, and admitted it was pixalated to look like she wasn't wearing anything, when in fact she was wearing undies. He altered the photo to brush out her undies, and to then put something over the crotch to make it looks salacious. Why would this person do that to a 17 year old? Perez is wreckless, and thinks anyone in the public eye is up for any scrutiny. It's bullshit.

Perez's biggest problem is he lacks humanity and judgement. He's swimming in his celebrity, but soon enough, it'll die off and he'll go back to shoving down scones and frapps at Starbucks, typing on his eBay'd iPod.

He's a goon, and Miley is a hick. End of story.

Unfuckingbelievable.

CORRECTION: More like 100% pure bullshit.

Perez has told THE worst perfect lie ever. I truly believe that picture the photographer took of Miley without underwear (which I've NEVER seen and DO NOT want to) was for real the first time when Perez posted on his blog. And now that it has dawn on him that he AND the photographer are likely to face potential federal charges for child pornography (READ: Miley is still underage), Perez want to go public with this bullshit story about the photos being overhyped with a censor that was never necessary.

Now I know for sure that asshole need to have the book thrown at him by a federal judge. Anything less than 5 years in a federal prison would be unacceptable.

TonyVanDam said:

CORRECTION: More like 100% pure bullshit.

While my statements certainly weren't a defense of Mario, I'll say this. A gent who works and writes for PopEater has seen the pictures, saw the underwear, and knew what Perez did, and totally disputed that there was ever a photo of her with her Montana hanging out.

I don't doubt that Mario would want to back peddle when things like "child porn" and "brought up on charges" comes into the conversation, but the guy at PopEater has no investment in either PerezHilton or Miley Cyrus, and has no reason to lie about the underwear actually being on, or off.

ernestsewell said:

...totally disputed that there was ever a photo of her with her Montana hanging out.

Ernest!