Here's video from the premiere http://sexandthecitymovie.com/premiere/
I dunno but something about Kim Cattrall when she interviews comes across bad IMO | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I just wanna see Aiden | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
heybaby said: I just wanna see Aiden
He's looking good again. John Corbitt sho do pack on the pounds when he ain't working but he knows how to tighten that shit back up. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Here are some video clips. Damn SJP look like a botoxed mare in these stills
http://www.rottentomatoes...he_city_2/ | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
We KNEW this was coming . . .
Sex and the City 2 "Sex and the City 2" hits theaters on Thursday and the fans are expected to come in droves. Movitickets.com is reporting that many of the opening night screenings sold out weeks ago and some SATC mavens are even shelling out $70 for tickets. Critics, however, are urging moviegoers to lower their expectations. Roger Ebert of the Chicago Sun-Times gives the movie one star out of four and describes the four main characters as "flyweight bubbleheads living in a world which rarely requires three sentences in a row." In Mr. Ebert's view, the characters of Carrie, Samantha, Miranda, and Charlotte exist only to consume things. And their threads? Ebert contends that "these women spend much of the movie dressed in tacky, vulgar clothing." Mr. Ebert isn't the only critic who noticed the ugly clothes. Michael Phillips of the Chicago Tribune writes that the four women are "insanely costumed" (not a good thing) and resemble "full-on drag queens." Other reviewers are similarly unimpressed, not just with the clothes, but with the movie as a whole. Claudia Puig of USA Today calls the femme-fest "tasteless" and "an insult to the memory of the cleverly written show and its celebration of friendship." Even more damning -- Ms. Puig calls the sequel, which takes place largely in the Middle East, an "affront to Muslims." The New York Post's Kyle Smith leaves little doubt regarding his thoughts with this headline: "Sucks in the city." Rex Reed over at the New York Observer penned a truly poisonous critique, calling the 2-hour-and-25-minute flick a "deadly, brainless exercise in pointless tedium." In Mr. Reed's esteemed opinion, it's "so bad you can't even watch the trailer." A.O. Scott from The New York Times remarks that "you may be shocked at just how much older you feel when the whole thing is over." Amid all the haters (and there are many), there exist a few brave souls who dare to defend the movie. Stephen Farber of the Hollywood Reporter gives the movie credit for scoring "some choice, politically incorrect laughs." And Brian Lowrey of Variety writes that "there are good sequences sprinkled in, where the movie sparks to life." Alas, for Carrie and company, such praise is rare. Far more common are reviews like Lisa Schwarzbaum's from Entertainment Weekly. She laments a script jammed with "pun after groaner pun." Ms. Schwarzbaum's grade: A decidedly unsexy C-. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Roger Ebert of the Chicago Sun-Times gives the movie one star out of four and describes the four main characters as "flyweight bubbleheads living in a world which rarely requires three sentences in a row."
In Mr. Ebert's view, the characters of Carrie, Samantha, Miranda, and Charlotte exist only to consume things. And their threads? Ebert contends that "these women spend much of the movie dressed in tacky, vulgar clothing." And this the same nucca that wrote the script for Beyond The Valley of the Dolls. He can kiss my ass! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
The New York Post's Kyle Smith leaves little doubt regarding his thoughts with this headline: "Sucks in the city." Rex Reed over at the New York Observer penned a truly poisonous critique, calling the 2-hour-and-25-minute flick a "deadly, brainless exercise in pointless tedium." In Mr. Reed's esteemed opinion, it's "so bad you can't even watch the trailer." A.O. Scott from The New York Times remarks that "you may be shocked at just how much older you feel when the whole thing is over."
2 gays dudes mad cuz they didn't get a cameo in the flick. Suck it up. You don't see Andy Cohen cryin'. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I wanted to see the film, but the usual Islamphobia/racism factor killed all the enthusiasm I had.
Fuck it, its not worth getting my blood boiled over, I'll gladly settle with the show instead. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
No interest on any level. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
No, but I'll probably go see it just to look at John Corbett and imagine us having sex.
I thought the show was ok - I'd watch it if I caught it on, but I wanted to kill myself about 40 minutes into the first movie. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Bad reviews won't kill my buzz, I'll be there with my 2 dear friends on Saturday night!! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
DesireeNevermind said: Roger Ebert of the Chicago Sun-Times gives the movie one star out of four and describes the four main characters as "flyweight bubbleheads living in a world which rarely requires three sentences in a row."
In Mr. Ebert's view, the characters of Carrie, Samantha, Miranda, and Charlotte exist only to consume things. And their threads? Ebert contends that "these women spend much of the movie dressed in tacky, vulgar clothing." And this the same nucca that wrote the script for Beyond The Valley of the Dolls. He can kiss my ass! You leave Valley Of The Dolls alone. Classic Like I said, cable. Ot.... don't say it. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
TD3 said: DesireeNevermind said: And this the same nucca that wrote the script for Beyond The Valley of the Dolls. He can kiss my ass! You leave Valley Of The Dolls alone. Classic Like I said, cable. Ot.... don't say it. "I am....Superwoman!!!" | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
uPtoWnNY said: TD3 said: You leave Valley Of The Dolls alone. Classic Like I said, cable. Ot.... don't say it. "I am....Superwoman!!!" that movie is the craziest piece of 70s batshit ever made. Drugs are a terrible thang. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I was very excited until I saw Rotten Tomatoe's rating of it, which didn't make to even 20%, it got a 15%. Now my excitement is completely deflated. "Prince of Persia" it is, it got a rotten rating too but it's 3Xs better than SATC2's, that's bad, too bad for my money. I understand they spent massive amounts on the fashions maybe that's messing with the critics mind and they are rebelling against such excess. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
uPtoWnNY said: TD3 said: You leave Valley Of The Dolls alone. Classic Like I said, cable. Ot.... don't say it. "I am....Superwoman!!!" Why are YOU here.... it's a "chick flick". | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
TD3 said: DesireeNevermind said: And this the same nucca that wrote the script for Beyond The Valley of the Dolls. He can kiss my ass! You leave Valley Of The Dolls alone. Classic Like I said, cable. Ot.... don't say it. No, no NO!! Not Valley of the Dolls ...she's talking about BEYOND Valley of the Dolls...two totally different movies...the latter is beyond horrendous | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Ottensen said: TD3 said: You leave Valley Of The Dolls alone. Classic Like I said, cable. Ot.... don't say it. No, no NO!! Not Valley of the Dolls ...she's talking about BEYOND Valley of the Dolls...two totally different movies...the latter is beyond horrendous I know I was too lazy to go back an type Beyond. Typing on a Blackberry is a bitch. Yes, "Beyond the Valley of the Dolls" is a cult classic still, for me anyways. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SCNDLS said: Rex Reed over at the New York Observer penned a truly poisonous critique, calling the 2-hour-and-25-minute flick a "deadly, brainless exercise in pointless tedium."
Why the hell is the movie that long???? [Edited 5/28/10 5:04am] I will forever love and miss you...my sweet Prince. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
DesireeNevermind said: Roger Ebert of the Chicago Sun-Times gives the movie one star out of four and describes the four main characters as "flyweight bubbleheads living in a world which rarely requires three sentences in a row."
In Mr. Ebert's view, the characters of Carrie, Samantha, Miranda, and Charlotte exist only to consume things. And their threads? Ebert contends that "these women spend much of the movie dressed in tacky, vulgar clothing." And this the same nucca that wrote the script for Beyond The Valley of the Dolls. He can kiss my ass! Touche, heffa! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
DesireeNevermind said: The New York Post's Kyle Smith leaves little doubt regarding his thoughts with this headline: "Sucks in the city." Rex Reed over at the New York Observer penned a truly poisonous critique, calling the 2-hour-and-25-minute flick a "deadly, brainless exercise in pointless tedium." In Mr. Reed's esteemed opinion, it's "so bad you can't even watch the trailer." A.O. Scott from The New York Times remarks that "you may be shocked at just how much older you feel when the whole thing is over."
2 gays dudes mad cuz they didn't get a cameo in the flick. Suck it up. You don't see Andy Cohen cryin'. Andy ain't cryin' cuz he's practically SJP and Matthew's BFF. Did you see her on Watch What Happens eating fried chicken, knockin back cocktails, and dishing on the Housewives of NYC???? I soooo didn't expect that, but it was funny as hell. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
missfee said: SCNDLS said: Rex Reed over at the New York Observer penned a truly poisonous critique, calling the 2-hour-and-25-minute flick a "deadly, brainless exercise in pointless tedium."
Why the hell is the movie that long???? [Edited 5/28/10 5:04am] The first one is way long too. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SCNDLS said: Vendetta1 said: There's one in the Chicago area. I love that place.
I'm already addicted. They opened one 2 miles from my house 2 weeks ago and I'm already a regular. that is cool, we have something similar, but i love how the seats r a pair | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
missmad said: SCNDLS said: I'm already addicted. They opened one 2 miles from my house 2 weeks ago and I'm already a regular. that is cool, we have something similar, but i love how the seats r a pair And I'ma be laid out, head back, and snorin' in that bitch fuckin' around with this 2 1/2 hour booshit! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SCNDLS said: missfee said: Why the hell is the movie that long???? [Edited 5/28/10 5:04am] The first one is way long too. Yes that's true, even though I did enjoy the first one, they could have cut out the long drawn out Christmas holiday details as well as Miranda pondering whether or not she should take Steve back (when we knew she would at the end anyway) and with Samantha pondering on whether or not to fulfill her sexual appetite or stay loyal to Smith (which we figured she was going to drop him sooner or later...there's no way a woman who loves dick that much was going to stay loyal to just one dick for long). I will forever love and miss you...my sweet Prince. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Critics are RIPPING this shit to shreads, y'all | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Take this SATC quiz http://movies.yahoo.com/p.../fp#photo0 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SCNDLS said: missmad said: that is cool, we have something similar, but i love how the seats r a pair And I'ma be laid out, head back, and snorin' in that bitch fuckin' around with this 2 1/2 hour booshit! go right ahead. but did u see titanic- that was billed a 2 hours and 74 minutes | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Any of ya'll seent it yet? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SCNDLS said: Any of ya'll seent it yet?
Girl I'm busy til early next week; I'mma have to sneak out on an extended late lunch and catch a matinee maybe on Tuesday | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |