SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said:

Those women know who they marry. A $4,000,000.00 ring that doesn't depreciate isn't a bad deal.

SUPRMAN said:

Alcohol thins the blood, so there would have been more bleeding than normal.

bboy87 said:

Black Mamba looking kind of "fruity" in that white get up.

Timmy84 said:

Not 20 just 5.

SCNDLS said:

He's just trying to fuck up the jury pool. "Have you seen or read anything about this case?" After he's finished, what can a potential jurist honestly say?

dseann said:

Well, most people have also heard about LT's issues over the years so I don't think he's helping. They also replayed some of the 60 minutes interview. That fool was off da chain. He's always made my skin crawl. When he was on DWTS I wondered if he ever hit on Edyta.

SCNDLS said:

To me he's like Michael Jordan. I grew up in Queens and when most of the state was behind the Jets since the early 80's I was a Giants fan ... and it was solely because of the way he hunted down the QB's and RB's. It pains me to see him the way he is and am hoping for the best.

dseann said:

LT's lawyer is on Mike Francesca's show right now http://www.wfan.com . Dude said LT doesn't know the pimp and didn't have sex with the girl. They had contact, but it wasn't intercourse. LT is adamant about that.

Also, the girl told everyone she was 19.
[Edited 5/7/10 10:28am]

uPtoWnNY said:

Sadly, it doesn't matter how old the girl told anyone she was. Legally, she's too young to give her consent to having sex. It's rape anyway you look at it.

dseann said:

But there's a big difference between 1st and 3rd degree rape, and LT said they didn't have intercourse. The lawyer also talked about how the authorities pursued the case against LT based mostly on his fame. He said had this been your average John, the police and whomever else would not have found him and arrested him. And both sides say LT did not injure this girl in any way.

So we have to wait until more facts come out.

dseann said:

But that's not enough to keep you off of a jury. It may make one side or the other use a exemption on you but the follow up question will be, "Having seen and/or read about it, can you still be impartial?" Simply knowing what the case is about is not enough to keep you off the jury. If you can be impartial, then you are eligible. For some cases, one side or the other may want jurors who have seen or read something about the case.

missfee said:

but what's the set-up? Shouldn't he have called the cops instead of counseling her or whatever his excuse is, in his hotel room?

SCNDLS said:

Damn that...I'd be the one catching the case! The only thing that muhhfucka would be catching is a bullet!

uPtoWnNY said:

Oh I think the police would have gone after him if he were an average John. (I don't know why he would say that, that's an irrelevant attempt at a defense unless they have never arrested a john who was not caught engaged in a sex act.)

Discovering the age of the girl, you might be dealing with a pedophile. So I think the police would at least want to know if he knew the age of the girl, what he knew about her injuries, etc.

SUPRMAN said:

That's already been established. She gave her age as 19.

uPtoWnNY said:

But again, wouldn't you want to corroborate that with the john?

uPtoWnNY said:

Established by whom?

I didn't hear nothing about it being established she told anyone she was 19. Even so, it still didn't really help if she was in LT's room regardless if they did anything now. I predict a plea bargain is in the cards unless something explosive against the girl comes out. It's terrible she was sold off to prostitution.

According to TMZ her pimp instructed her to tell LT that she was 19. Here is the link.

http://www.tmz.com/2010/0...stigation/

shorttrini said:

I see...

Even his wife's saying LT was set up:

http://www.tmz.com/2010/0...cumentary/

Even if he was wrong, I think it's safe to say if some crime is happening and someone famous is involved, they'll arrest the famous one first before arresting anyone else.

Timmy84 said:

What do you expect her to say tho: "I know my husband likes underage hookers"

SCNDLS said:

Ask TMZ, I'm just posting the link.

SCNDLS said:

You just want to see a man go down, don't you? There is more to this story, than is being told. Something just does not add up, I just can't put my finger on it.

Which goes back to the question I was asking a few replies back: what was he doing at a rat-infested apartment waiting for sex with a not-yet-determined-aged prostitute?

Timmy84 said:

That's one of my questions. Another is, what was she texting to her uncle? What exactly did she tell him was happening? Also, was this uncle, really her uncle and if so, since she is a "runaway", why doesn't he do something to bring her ass back home? If this is my niece, the LAST thing I would want is for her to be turning tricks.

shorttrini said:

Good question. I was wondering about that too when I read it. Doesn't like she has much of a family so the "uncle" probably wasn't even her blood relative. Who would do that to a child like that and brainwash them into prostitution?

shorttrini said:

You need to relax. I don't care one way or another and honestly I could give a fuck about LT. He and all these other athletes do their dirty shit then wonder why they're always in trouble. So I have ZERO pity for any of 'em. You don't wanna risk fucking an underage hooker, don't patronize hookers and take ya ass home to your wife. Easy fucking peasy.

My concern is for this abused girl and hoping that EVERYONE who took advantage of her pays the price. It's comical to me that you are hellbent on how much shit don't add up but nary a mention of what if it's true and this girl was victimized by him which is quite possible. But feel free to continue riding LT's nuts.