This is why my husband got the big "V"! I havent had to worry about such things for years!

There's a few reasons why they suck, but the main reason 4 me, is that I feel like it's being strangled. I've tried a few brands, and previously settled on Trojan Magnums, but even they R 2 tight. I don't like being constricted.

tinaz said:

Whatever, I certainly prefer condoms than AIDS...

JoeTyler said:

I'd prefer having sex with people who do not have aids in the first place.

thesexofit said:

Oh, boo hoo.

Yeah, sex is slightly less enjoyable with a condom. I'll let you in on a secret: It's not as fun for the ladies either.

But you know what's a whole lot less fun? Disease and unplanned pregnancy.

Only a complete shit-for-brains fucks without protection.
[Edited 4/26/10 12:41pm]

Giovanni777 said:

So you prefer the burning sensation?

JustErin said:

Yeah, because you can totally tell by looking at someone, and everyone is completely honest and upfront about their status.

meow85 said:

Ya, that's it. That's exactly what I said.

Hate to break it to you sister, but it's not just have sex with a condom or get some disease.

Maybe if you're out fucking people left and right, strangers and shit, but not everyone does that.

You know what else would suck?

Having sex with chicks that constantly bitch about your opinion on condoms.

JustErin said:

Thank you. I am all for safe sex, but not everyone who has unprotected sex is disease ridden.

One dude simply says condoms suck. Then out of nowhere people are going at him left and right like he slapped their mom. He doesnt like condoms. Don't agree with his view, then don't fuck him. Simple.

evenstar3 said:

fucking hell.

luv4u said:

SHIIT!!! This one is killing me!!

Condoms do blow. I haven't used one in years. But being in a long term relationship I know where I'm driving. lolol.

agreed

Mushanga said:

fucking you.

Mushanga said:

Don't I wish

evenstar3 said:

You and me both baby.

JustErin said:

ok

Condoms really do suck. Do they suck worse than death & horrible diseases? No, but they suck. They are an effective & practical design for safety, but don't seem to take the mechanics of male sexual pleasure into consideration.

It is the equivalent of wearing a condom on your tongue during a great meal. You can see the food, smell the food, feel the food in your mouth, chew it, get nourishment from it, but it's basically removing the biggest sensual experience from it.
[Edited 4/26/10 13:25pm]

NDRU said:

well, that's only for those who are only (or specially) interested in the old (and somewhat boring) coitus...

you can do 1000 things to a woman without using your penis at all...the same for gay men...

NDRU said:

But hey, at least you don't end up with salmonella. Because every piece of fried chicken has it.

FauxReal said:

Good point!

RenHoek said:

Forgive my newbieness at this, but why wouldn't marriage solve this problem? Birth control is an option for the wife if the husband doesn't want to wear a condom. There are so many birth control options out there, not just in pill form. Some you can have placed in by your GYN/OB that last for around 5 years and can be easily taken out if you want to have children. And in the case of diseases, I know that in certain religions, blood tests are mandatory before marriage, to check if there are any diseases or genetic disorders that might be passed on to children.

Only downside to marriage for the average swinger is, you can only do it with one lady (or man, whichever your preference ). I wonder how many are willing to do that actually.

JustErin said:

Hate to break it to you, but even a "trusted" person is not necessarily so. You're naive if you think only people who sleep around are at risk.

FauxReal said:

If you're eating at KFC, Church's, or Popeyes that's probably true.

SherryJackson said:

getting married/monogamy only solves the STD issue, not the birth control one

Not every woman wants a IUD or to be on the pill because of hormones, so condoms may still come into play

NDRU said:

Not only do some women not want to be on hormones (it DOES raise the question of why hetero females are expected to actually change their body chemistry for the sake of a guy...) but many women can't use hormonal birth control due to other health issues.

meow85 said:

exactly, and since it's a partnership you have to work out a compromise, it's not just assumed the woman will be on the pill for my sake (though I hope she will!)

FauxReal said: