SCNDLS said:

Between you and DesireeNevermind there is never a dull thread that yall have posted in. Straight hilarity and have the nerve to be making sense on top it. This is almost on some Tiger level.

Genesia said:

And my statement did not in any way say jacking off and and actual sex are equitable. That is all on you...and you definitely ain't my baby!

Sowhat said:

JackieBlue said:

Desiree is the primary fool tho I just be on her coattails.

SCNDLS said:

I get what you're saying, it's just that if a person is the type that chooses to cheat, then I don't believe a marriage is perfect because it's lacking one committed member.

It's highest potential claim is that of "perfect"--ie only on the outside.

NDRU said:

I get that, but I guess you have to KNOW in advance you're getting with a cheater to KNOW there's a potential he's not going to be committed. And even if you knew they're a cheater they could convince you they've reformed and are ready to be committed and do all the right things.

So, how would you know it's not "perfect" until after you find out they're fucking around? Regardless, I don't think most people enter marriage with the intent to cheat but they'll continue to play the perfect spouse while doing their dirt. To the spouse being cheated on, all could seem well until the shit falls apart.

Fuck that, I'm burning sumthin' DOWN!

SCNDLS said:

Then don't get married if you're not committed. Even his ex-wife said that he's a serial cheater. You can look it up, and I'm going to say this again: it is her fault and his. She knew he was a snake when she married him, and tried to pet it. Try cheating with a married man, and see what happen to you.

angel345 said:

You do not know that. I used to watch his show all the time and he's always come across as a nice guy. So why do you keep calling him a snake? Based on what? Keep in mind that his ex-wife is a crazy, drug-using, tax-cheating, ex-con who is in a custody battle with him. So, I'd take whatever she says about him with a shitload of salt. Can you point to some other sources that said he was a snake BEFORE Sandra dated him???

angel345 said:

Jesse prolly ran that game on her tho.


"I'm tired of women lying to me and using me. I just need somebody who isn't crazy, somebody who has my back ya know Sandy? I wish I could find somebody like you. I just want to settle down with the right woman. I'm at a point in my life where I'm done with the bullshit. Can I call you sometime?"


And Sandy all on that like frosting on a cupcake.

SCNDLS said:

true, maybe she had no idea, and she was a good partner and thought all was well. I guess I'm looking at it knowing what we know now, and saying obviously it was not perfect.

But you're right, that doesn't mean it didn't appear to be perfect to her.
[Edited 3/24/10 15:08pm]

DesireeNevermind said:

Exactly! What's with this she KNEW he was this or that. Ummmm, no. She KNEW the guy he presented her with during the time she dated him.
[Edited 3/24/10 15:11pm]

NDRU said:

That's all I'm saying. I just don't see her gushing the way she has been throughout their marriage not just during Oscar season, if there was some deep schism in the marriage. She seems very genuine and I'd expect her to say nothing at all rather than present all the extra fakery for five years over a guy most folks couldn't care less about.

SCNDLS said:

Because his ex-wife is all of these things, don't count her out. It is coming out now that he's cheated with more women while he was married to Sandra. That's backing her claim. His wife is worth $100 million dollars. Something to be nice about, and put on a front, ain't it?

SCNDLS said:

Booyah! There it is.

angel345 said:

He's got his own millions so that dog don't hunt. And how do YOU know Sandra was aware of his past SIX years ago? Were you? Or are you just regurgitating whatever drivel you hear the ex-wife say now? Was she or any of the other hos talking shit then? If not, how would Sandra know he was a snake THEN?

SCNDLS said:

I don't have to just regurgitate her statement. They're coming out like roaches.

angel345 said:

Of course they are cuz there's money to be made NOW. But were ANY of these chicks talking six years ago?

YOU are the one insisting that Sandra KNEW before she married him he was a snake. What are you basing that assertion on? Anything factual, or just cuz he seems like that "type" of guy?
[Edited 3/24/10 15:22pm]

SCNDLS said:

Let me put this another way. You know the saying the leopard never changes its stripes?

Read this link: http://www.huffingtonpost...05167.html

angel345 said:

Naw, let's stick to how YOU have been putting it since the beginning of the thread and what I've been trying to understand.

YOU have said repeatedly that Jesse was a snake and that Sandra knew that in advance. I want to know is this just your personal opinion or is it based on some fact you're privy to? If it's just your opinion, what is that based on? His tattoos and cuz he owns a bike shop?
[Edited 3/24/10 15:51pm]

Being a cheater doesn't automatically make you a horrible person. He apparently treated Sandra well enough for her to think that he had her back and was supportive in a way that she felt was conducive to what she needed.

People are not one dimensional and many people live dual lives--appearing one way around loved ones and behaving in destructive ways when they're alone or with others.

Sandra has said that parents taught her to love everyone and to not judge on appearance but on how a person treats you. Maybe she saw something in Jesse worth loving. I doubt she waited until she was 40 to marry someone who would treat her badly.

SCNDLS said:

Personally, I believe that she knew about his support of the Nazi cause, I mean Nazi messages on t-shirts and bikes, his biker lifestyle, and thought that she could change him. I truly believe that, and if you want to believe that she didn't play a part in the collapse of her marriage, then believe it. I'll leave it at that, and this is my take on it.

angel345 said:

So, basically you made that shit up, thanks.

SCNDLS said:

Who, the Arrington Post? She's not blind to nothing, and she knew he was married. Did I make that up?

[Edited 3/24/10 16:54pm]
[Edited 3/24/10 16:55pm]

Genesia said:

To me, it is the same thing. In both scenarios, both women cannot have sex with their men.

And he did not cheat on her. I am friends with the man and not the woman so I believe him when he says he was faithful. I don't know her and I have no reason to believe my friend would lie to me.

And lastly, no I don't believe humans were meant to be monogamous but that has nothing to do with what we are talking about. We are talking about how this is supposedly Sandra Bullock's fault.

I do not believe every single man cheats. Nor do I believe when a man or a woman cheats, it makes them a horrible person. Shit happens and none of us are perfect. the only difference is our dirt is not aired to the world

SCNDLS said:

And the story keeps changing. This shit is hilarious.

Vendetta1 said:

Pure-d-comedy!

Genesia said:

Yep, you got it

Anyway . . .

I was doing some research about emigrating back to Panama and was reading up on some of the laws there and found something interesting. In Panama, you are not prosecuted for crimes of passion. Meaning that if you walk in on your spouse in the act of fucking some skank you can bust a cap in both they asses and not go to jail. Maybe that's why I have this innate need to fuck a muhhfucka up if he cheats on me.

So, it really ain't my fault, it's a cultural thang.

SCNDLS said:

what are we gonna do wit you....


Latin America (in this case central) those laws only swang one way for men. No different than "honor" killings you hear about in Asian countries. Keeping on researching, when you find a place that's has equal opportunity crimes of passion laws, please let cough me.... us know.