meow85 said: missfee said: I agree. What's the difference between marriage and living together in a committed relationship without the paperwork? Practically and emotionally speaking, I mean. As far as I can see the only difference is a legal one. that's one of the arguments of opposers to gay marriage. it would seem that if one can make a legal committment as well as an emotional one then you are truly bound and devoted to one another. it's weird that people can engage in business contracts which are more likely to leave one party dissatisfied and financially ruined yet contracts involving the heart are just to much to handle. I guess b/c they have kids, it seems weird that they wouldn't make the committment for them. If you've got no babies then by all means just shack up and walk away whenever you feel like it with no repercussions. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Ottensen said: missfee said: And let's not forget Tim Robbins and Susan Sarandon. I totally forgot about them! And they've even made it to senior citizen status together hasn't he worked more than her in the last decade? he dumped her for a younger model right? if she was married she could have gotten compensation and paid for a rejuvenation to hook fresh bait...assuming she gives a damn. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
lafleurdove said: Entertainment and Showbiz
http://www.entertainmenta...0030739850 March 7 2010. Johnny Depp and Angelina Jolie making out a reason to worry for Vanessa Paradis! We really can’t blame a lady when she sees her beau in the arms of a hot female and who has a track record of dating several committed men, isn’t it? So is the case with Vanessa Paradis, Johnny Depp’s longtime girlfriend and a French supermodel who has gone nervous to see Depp and Angelina Jolie making out in their forthcoming film “The Tourist”! New York Post and Daily Mail report that Johnny Depp’s French girlfriend Vanessa Paradis has forbidden her man to do the love making scenes and in fact told him to stop shooting for the film altogether! Vanessa, who has two kids with Johnny Depp, has been with the “Pirates of the Caribbean” star since 12years. Vanessa has reasons enough to be concerned about. First of all the sex scenes are way too steamy for the supermodel to handle. The scenes are too long and intense. The scene rolls in as Angelina is shot naked under shower. Depp holds her wet body and stars kissing frantically, while Jolie kisses him back wrapping her legs around his back. And hence the scene continues with getting hotter and finally resulting to a passionate lovemaking. The other and the most important reason for Paradis to be tensed about is Jolie’s past records of stealing married or engaged men! Needless to say Brad Pitt was married to Jennifer Aniston when Mr. & Mrs. Smith was shot and had similar raunchy scenes that lead to the romantic involvement of Pitt and Jolie later. Looking back, Jolie snatched many other men like Sir Mick Jagger, Antonio Banderas, Jolie’s mother’s boyfriend and Billy Bob Thornton who all were either dating someone or were married. Now it’s upto Depp to decide whether or not he would leave “The Tourist” supporting Vanessa or would continue with Jolie in the film. And suppose he leaves, we would be eager to know who would replace Depp as the Interpol agent whom the sexy tourist Jolie seduces! famous quote: [b]If you love something, set it free; if it comes back it's yours, if it doesn't, it never was.[/b] by Richard Bach Oh fer fuck's sake, are we really taking some rag seriously to be the mouthpiece for Vanessa Paradis and where she stands with her man without even so much as a quote from her own lips? Gimme a break. Vanessa has long held her own reputation here in Europe as a femme fatale, and from every time I've seen an interview with her, she's a pretty strong, accomplished and confident character that hardly strikes one as some weeping willow. It's hilarious that people are reading so much into her state of mind when in all liklihood they've never even heard the woman speak, and particularly about her life and relationship (which she actually does with great ease) Her old man seems to dig her just as much as she digs him. They're cute. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
DesireeNevermind said: Ottensen said: I totally forgot about them! And they've even made it to senior citizen status together hasn't he worked more than her in the last decade? he dumped her for a younger model right? if she was married she could have gotten compensation and paid for a rejuvenation to hook fresh bait...assuming she gives a damn. I was like, if you two don't go sit your old asses down in a corner somewhere and play some bridge together...'the hell are you doing splitting up at 90 years old? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Ottensen said: DesireeNevermind said: hasn't he worked more than her in the last decade? he dumped her for a younger model right? if she was married she could have gotten compensation and paid for a rejuvenation to hook fresh bait...assuming she gives a damn. I was like, if you two don't go sit your old asses down in a corner somewhere and play some bridge together...'the hell are you doing splitting up at 90 years old? co-sign in a BIG WAY!!! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Vendetta1 said: Harlepolis said: WTF? Am I the only ones who sees ALL levels of wrong in this statement? I don't believe the story but if it's true, and Johnny's girlfriend doesn't trust him, they don't need to be together. No man gets stolen that doesn't want to get stole. You are absolutely right Vendetta1. This is just more Hollywood bullshit to stir up controversy and interest in the movie. It's also a smear campaign against Jolie. People are just plain jealous of her and can't stand the fact that Brad left little ole Jen for Ang. Get over it folks . | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Ottensen said: lafleurdove said: Entertainment and Showbiz
http://www.entertainmenta...0030739850 March 7 2010. Johnny Depp and Angelina Jolie making out a reason to worry for Vanessa Paradis! We really can’t blame a lady when she sees her beau in the arms of a hot female and who has a track record of dating several committed men, isn’t it? So is the case with Vanessa Paradis, Johnny Depp’s longtime girlfriend and a French supermodel who has gone nervous to see Depp and Angelina Jolie making out in their forthcoming film “The Tourist”! New York Post and Daily Mail report that Johnny Depp’s French girlfriend Vanessa Paradis has forbidden her man to do the love making scenes and in fact told him to stop shooting for the film altogether! Vanessa, who has two kids with Johnny Depp, has been with the “Pirates of the Caribbean” star since 12years. Vanessa has reasons enough to be concerned about. First of all the sex scenes are way too steamy for the supermodel to handle. The scenes are too long and intense. The scene rolls in as Angelina is shot naked under shower. Depp holds her wet body and stars kissing frantically, while Jolie kisses him back wrapping her legs around his back. And hence the scene continues with getting hotter and finally resulting to a passionate lovemaking. The other and the most important reason for Paradis to be tensed about is Jolie’s past records of stealing married or engaged men! Needless to say Brad Pitt was married to Jennifer Aniston when Mr. & Mrs. Smith was shot and had similar raunchy scenes that lead to the romantic involvement of Pitt and Jolie later. Looking back, Jolie snatched many other men like Sir Mick Jagger, Antonio Banderas, Jolie’s mother’s boyfriend and Billy Bob Thornton who all were either dating someone or were married. Now it’s upto Depp to decide whether or not he would leave “The Tourist” supporting Vanessa or would continue with Jolie in the film. And suppose he leaves, we would be eager to know who would replace Depp as the Interpol agent whom the sexy tourist Jolie seduces! famous quote: [b]If you love something, set it free; if it comes back it's yours, if it doesn't, it never was.[/b] by Richard Bach Oh fer fuck's sake, are we really taking some rag seriously to be the mouthpiece for Vanessa Paradis and where she stands with her man without even so much as a quote from her own lips? Gimme a break. Vanessa has long held her own reputation here in Europe as a femme fatale, and from every time I've seen an interview with her, she's a pretty strong, accomplished and confident character that hardly strikes one as some weeping willow. It's hilarious that people are reading so much into her state of mind when in all liklihood they've never even heard the woman speak, and particularly about her life and relationship (which she actually does with great ease) Her old man seems to dig her just as much as she digs him. They're cute. Thanks for posting those interviews. I wanted to post them myself. I was looking for them, but couldn´t find them. Anyways, I really love them both. They just seem to be down-to-earth, not egoistic as it is normal to be nowadays, just really sweet and genuine. I think they are the perfect "hollywood" couple. "When Michael Jackson is just singing and dancing, you just think this is an astonishing talent. And he has had this astounding talent all his life, but we want him to be floored as well. We really don´t like the idea that he could have it all." | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
meow85 said: missfee said: I agree. What's the difference between marriage and living together in a committed relationship without the paperwork? Practically and emotionally speaking, I mean. As far as I can see the only difference is a legal one. if marriage didn't exist, if people's perception of marriage being the next step up in commitment didn't exist, then there wouldn't really BE a difference. Do you know what I mean? It IS all in the perception of it - the ingrained understanding that it is so. People can very happily live 100% committed to each other and nothing could be stronger than that, without being married of course - as long as both of them have that view. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
DesireeNevermind said: meow85 said: What's the difference between marriage and living together in a committed relationship without the paperwork? Practically and emotionally speaking, I mean. As far as I can see the only difference is a legal one. that's one of the arguments of opposers to gay marriage. it would seem that if one can make a legal committment as well as an emotional one then you are truly bound and devoted to one another. it's weird that people can engage in business contracts which are more likely to leave one party dissatisfied and financially ruined yet contracts involving the heart are just to much to handle. I guess b/c they have kids, it seems weird that they wouldn't make the committment for them. If you've got no babies then by all means just shack up and walk away whenever you feel like it with no repercussions. this is the perception of the level of commitment in a defacto relationship, that it is easier to leave it. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
ZombieKitten said: meow85 said: What's the difference between marriage and living together in a committed relationship without the paperwork? Practically and emotionally speaking, I mean. As far as I can see the only difference is a legal one. if marriage didn't exist, if people's perception of marriage being the next step up in commitment didn't exist, then there wouldn't really BE a difference. Do you know what I mean? It IS all in the perception of it - the ingrained understanding that it is so. People can very happily live 100% committed to each other and nothing could be stronger than that, without being married of course - as long as both of them have that view. I couldn't have said it better. I will forever love and miss you...my sweet Prince. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
ZombieKitten said: DesireeNevermind said: that's one of the arguments of opposers to gay marriage. it would seem that if one can make a legal committment as well as an emotional one then you are truly bound and devoted to one another. it's weird that people can engage in business contracts which are more likely to leave one party dissatisfied and financially ruined yet contracts involving the heart are just to much to handle. I guess b/c they have kids, it seems weird that they wouldn't make the committment for them. If you've got no babies then by all means just shack up and walk away whenever you feel like it with no repercussions. this is the perception of the level of commitment in a defacto relationship, that it is easier to leave it. always worked for me unless the dude had a big dick then I was likely to hang around much longer than necessary. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
whistle said: If Johnny's GF is worried about someone trying to steal her man, it should be Tim Burton.
You know it, I know it, the whole world knows it. Johnny and Tim should just be done with it and declare their love publicly. "A Watcher scoffs at gravity!" | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
DesireeNevermind said: meow85 said: What's the difference between marriage and living together in a committed relationship without the paperwork? Practically and emotionally speaking, I mean. As far as I can see the only difference is a legal one. that's one of the arguments of opposers to gay marriage. it would seem that if one can make a legal committment as well as an emotional one then you are truly bound and devoted to one another. it's weird that people can engage in business contracts which are more likely to leave one party dissatisfied and financially ruined yet contracts involving the heart are just to much to handle. I guess b/c they have kids, it seems weird that they wouldn't make the committment for them. If you've got no babies then by all means just shack up and walk away whenever you feel like it with no repercussions. You're right that that is an argument gay marriage opponents make, but the context is different IMO. The question isn't should a couple marry to prove their love, but should they have the right to do so? A legally binding marriage is a right everyone should be entitled to, but it's not something a couple should feel obligated to, either. "A Watcher scoffs at gravity!" | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
ZombieKitten said: DesireeNevermind said: that's one of the arguments of opposers to gay marriage. it would seem that if one can make a legal committment as well as an emotional one then you are truly bound and devoted to one another. it's weird that people can engage in business contracts which are more likely to leave one party dissatisfied and financially ruined yet contracts involving the heart are just to much to handle. I guess b/c they have kids, it seems weird that they wouldn't make the committment for them. If you've got no babies then by all means just shack up and walk away whenever you feel like it with no repercussions. this is the perception of the level of commitment in a defacto relationship, that it is easier to leave it. It's not true though. It may be easier to leave each other in terms of the law -AND if you're without offpsring. But what about kids? That will complicate things just as much. And let's not even get into the emotional fallout. Married or not, you don't just split up with a partner of 20 years without feeling it. "A Watcher scoffs at gravity!" | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
meow85 said: ZombieKitten said: this is the perception of the level of commitment in a defacto relationship, that it is easier to leave it. It's not true though. It may be easier to leave each other in terms of the law -AND if you're without offpsring. But what about kids? That will complicate things just as much. And let's not even get into the emotional fallout. Married or not, you don't just split up with a partner of 20 years without feeling it. I was responging to the part that said: If you've got no babies then by all means just shack up and walk away whenever you feel like it with no repercussions. I'm not even going to go INTO splits with kids involved | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |