cborgman said: TheVoid said: UGH. Onslaught of heterosexuality I quite like seeing tits on the screen My problem with hetero-sexuality isn't really related to this debate though. I just hate seeing all these shows where there's this dorky main male character and then an absolutely gorgeous female lead who's 20 years younger than him, super-brilliant, extremely charming, and completely unaware of his dorkiness or her own hotness. There's no realism in it whatsoever. It's written by delusional heterosexual males and endorsed by the wider public. These are probably the same folks who thought they were being inclusive by adding that one "flamboyant" character to each show (sometimes gay, sometimes gay-but-NOT-gay) who was completely neutered but everyone could laugh at...you know, cause gay is funny. the gay minstrel. homophobes are completely comfortable with them, because they fit the stereotype, are generally nuetered, and only exist to help heterosexuals fall in love and make straight folks laugh. I didn't realize there was such a term Growing up I had to put up with seeing THAT and the neutered Asian exchange student/scientist who was there for folks to laugh at too. It was quite hostile. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
pplrain said: cborgman said: well, tell ya what, pickles... you keep fighting the good fight to replace all gay sexuality with lil' purple cross-dressing midgets in heels, and we'll continue to support you in your noble endeavors. [Edited 1/10/10 20:06pm] Huh? I am not fighting gay sexuality... I am fighting pornography in general, it shouldn't be on during primetime hours. Yes I monitor what my child watches. We have had to turn off the TV several times when we felt it was too much lewdness for her age. We run a very strict household, that is how my husband and myself were raised and that is how I want to raise my child. When it is time and she is ready we prefer to explain to her about the birds and the bees and we don't want an "Adam Lambert" or anyone else doing our job for us. Get it now? I am sure most conservative American families feel the same way as I do. well, as it was pointed out earlier in this thread, his performance was after your 10:30 definition of primetime. and pornography? you MUST be joking. if rubbing someone's face in your no-no parts is wrong, i imagine you must have a long laundry list of all the times it has happened in primetime and earlier between opposite gendered folks on shows like seinfeld and friends and so many more... and having read a few of your homophobic posts in the past, i am well aware of your stance on anything gay, so feel free to save your soft patter explanations for people stupid enough to believe it. Power tends to corrupt; absolute power corrupts absolutely. - Lord Acton | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
watch out everyone... hard core pornography ahead!
Power tends to corrupt; absolute power corrupts absolutely. - Lord Acton | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
cborgman said: pplrain said: Huh? I am not fighting gay sexuality... I am fighting pornography in general, it shouldn't be on during primetime hours. Yes I monitor what my child watches. We have had to turn off the TV several times when we felt it was too much lewdness for her age. We run a very strict household, that is how my husband and myself were raised and that is how I want to raise my child. When it is time and she is ready we prefer to explain to her about the birds and the bees and we don't want an "Adam Lambert" or anyone else doing our job for us. Get it now? I am sure most conservative American families feel the same way as I do. well, as it was pointed out earlier in this thread, his performance was after your 10:30 definition of primetime. and pornography? you MUST be joking. if rubbing someone's face in your no-no parts is wrong, i imagine you must have a long laundry list of all the times it has happened in primetime and earlier between opposite gendered folks on shows like seinfeld and friends and so many more... and having read a few of your homophobic posts in the past, i am well aware of your stance on anything gay, so feel free to save your soft patter explanations for people stupid enough to believe it. Where are the complaints about Janet Jackson grabbing the guy's crotch when she was performing If? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Oh and there is plenty of fake sex on soap operas as well. To the point where they are breathing heavy after the "sex" is over. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Vendetta1 said: cborgman said: well, as it was pointed out earlier in this thread, his performance was after your 10:30 definition of primetime. and pornography? you MUST be joking. if rubbing someone's face in your no-no parts is wrong, i imagine you must have a long laundry list of all the times it has happened in primetime and earlier between opposite gendered folks on shows like seinfeld and friends and so many more... and having read a few of your homophobic posts in the past, i am well aware of your stance on anything gay, so feel free to save your soft patter explanations for people stupid enough to believe it. Where are the complaints about Janet Jackson grabbing the guy's crotch when she was performing If? did you see the seinfeld clip? that porn plays as early as 5:00 at night in syndication. just watching the clip got me so horny i have to go jack off. Power tends to corrupt; absolute power corrupts absolutely. - Lord Acton | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
cborgman said: pplrain said: Huh? I am not fighting gay sexuality... I am fighting pornography in general, it shouldn't be on during primetime hours. Yes I monitor what my child watches. We have had to turn off the TV several times when we felt it was too much lewdness for her age. We run a very strict household, that is how my husband and myself were raised and that is how I want to raise my child. When it is time and she is ready we prefer to explain to her about the birds and the bees and we don't want an "Adam Lambert" or anyone else doing our job for us. Get it now? I am sure most conservative American families feel the same way as I do. well, as it was pointed out earlier in this thread, his performance was after your 10:30 definition of primetime. and pornography? you MUST be joking. if rubbing someone's face in your no-no parts is wrong, i imagine you must have a long laundry list of all the times it has happened in primetime and earlier between opposite gendered folks on shows like seinfeld and friends and so many more... and having read a few of your homophobic posts in the past, i am well aware of your stance on anything gay, so feel free to save your soft patter explanations for people stupid enough to believe it. Primetime is 8:00 - 11:00 PM Homosexuals don't bother me one way or the other, they don't really affect my life personally and I don't care. If you don't know me personally you can't comment on my stance one way or another. I am not for them or against them. [Edited 1/10/10 20:46pm] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
cborgman said: watch out everyone... hard core pornography ahead!
i've seen worse than that.
Like I said before, remove all straight sexuality from prime time and I'll be for removing the gay sexuality as well. Children do not need to be watching anything on prime time anyway unless their parents are ready to or have explained sex to them. I don't think adults should be penalized because people don't want to parent their kids. Who the fuck doesn't know what kind of stuff GaGa does? Who hasn't seen a Shakira video? This is the dumb shit people care about. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
pplrain said: cborgman said: well, as it was pointed out earlier in this thread, his performance was after your 10:30 definition of primetime. and pornography? you MUST be joking. if rubbing someone's face in your no-no parts is wrong, i imagine you must have a long laundry list of all the times it has happened in primetime and earlier between opposite gendered folks on shows like seinfeld and friends and so many more... and having read a few of your homophobic posts in the past, i am well aware of your stance on anything gay, so feel free to save your soft patter explanations for people stupid enough to believe it. Homosexuals don't bother me one way or the other, they don't really affect my life personally and I don't care. If you don't know me personally you can't comment on my stance one way or another. I am not for them or against them. [Edited 1/10/10 20:45pm] i've seen your posts, the classics being that ones that got you temp-banned a few weeks ago. your ludicrous ones in this thread are just icing on the cake. Power tends to corrupt; absolute power corrupts absolutely. - Lord Acton | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
pplrain said: Primetime is 8:00 - 11:00 PM according to your earlier post it is until 10:30. what changed since that post? the fact that it was pointed out to you that lambert's performance was after 10:30? Power tends to corrupt; absolute power corrupts absolutely. - Lord Acton | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Vendetta1 said: cborgman said: watch out everyone... hard core pornography ahead!
i've seen worse than that.
Like I said before, remove all straight sexuality from prime time and I'll be for removing the gay sexuality as well. Children do not need to be watching anything on prime time anyway unless their parents are ready to or have explained sex to them. I don't think adults should be penalized because people don't want to parent their kids. Who the fuck doesn't know what kind of stuff GaGa does? Who hasn't seen a Shakira video? This is the dumb shit people care about. exactly Power tends to corrupt; absolute power corrupts absolutely. - Lord Acton | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
cborgman said: pplrain said: Homosexuals don't bother me one way or the other, they don't really affect my life personally and I don't care. If you don't know me personally you can't comment on my stance one way or another. I am not for them or against them. [Edited 1/10/10 20:45pm] i've seen your posts, the classics being that ones that got you temp-banned a few weeks ago. your ludicrous ones in this thread are just icing on the cake. Haha! You and others seem to have a harder time accepting Prince is a straight man. Accept it, he won't be changing for anyone. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Vendetta1 said: We're not talking about his music, though. We're talking his performances. Going back as far as the Grammy performance in 85, Prince was sexual. The Pussy Control performance on the VH1 show. The performances on Arsenio. The assless pants performance on MTV. Hell, the performance of the medley on the AMAs.
I am sure if I did the research, I would not find any stories or tons of complaints about Prince's performances. it's a double standard and complete bullshit. OK, his performance of Purple Rain in 85 wasn't sexual at all. It was more emotional than anything. The performance at the Grammys that year wasn't THAT sexual, either. He had his shirt off. I think he and the band swiveled their hips, and made a pelvic thrust or two. Nothing too major. The Pussy Control performance was on Cable TV. Not nearly as many people saw that. I would be surprised if a million people saw that performance. Where as 10-15 million saw Adam Lambert's. The Arsenio performance was aired Late at Night. So he could definitely get away with more. Prince never flipped anyone off like Lambert did, either. Personally, I found his performance to be extremely comical. He was trying WAY too hard!!! JERKIN' EVERYTHING IN SIGHT!!!!! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
pplrain said: cborgman said: i've seen your posts, the classics being that ones that got you temp-banned a few weeks ago. your ludicrous ones in this thread are just icing on the cake. Haha! You and others seem to have a harder time accepting Prince is a straight man. Accept it, he won't be changing for anyone. and as i said last time you rattled off this stupidity just before you got temp-banned for it and the diatribe that followed: i'd choose to fuck a woman before i would choose to fuck prince. i have a strict no midget fucking rule. Power tends to corrupt; absolute power corrupts absolutely. - Lord Acton | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
cborgman said: pplrain said: Primetime is 8:00 - 11:00 PM according to your earlier post it is until 10:30. what changed since that post? the fact that it was pointed out to you that lambert's performance was after 10:30? My kid goes to bed at 9:30 PM... I don't care what is on after that. But if she did stay up to watch that program I like others would be more than pissed. [Edited 1/10/10 21:00pm] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
pplrain said: cborgman said: according to your earlier post it is until 10:30. what changed since that post? the fact that it was pointed out to you that lambert's performance was after 10:30? My kid goes to bed at 9:30 PM... I don't care what is on after that. obviously you do, as evidenced in your ridiculous post deeming it pornography and how it shouldn't be on before 10:30, and the amended 11:00 after it was pointed out it was after 10:30, and the moronic one about how only hookers, porn stars, and strippers want this on tv. [Edited 1/10/10 20:58pm] Power tends to corrupt; absolute power corrupts absolutely. - Lord Acton | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Paris9748430 said: Vendetta1 said: We're not talking about his music, though. We're talking his performances. Going back as far as the Grammy performance in 85, Prince was sexual. The Pussy Control performance on the VH1 show. The performances on Arsenio. The assless pants performance on MTV. Hell, the performance of the medley on the AMAs.
I am sure if I did the research, I would not find any stories or tons of complaints about Prince's performances. it's a double standard and complete bullshit. OK, his performance of Purple Rain in 85 wasn't sexual at all. It was more emotional than anything. The performance at the Grammys that year wasn't THAT sexual, either. He had his shirt off. I think he and the band swiveled their hips, and made a pelvic thrust or two. Nothing too major. The Pussy Control performance was on Cable TV. Not nearly as many people saw that. I would be surprised if a million people saw that performance. Where as 10-15 million saw Adam Lambert's. The Arsenio performance was aired Late at Night. So he could definitely get away with more. Prince never flipped anyone off like Lambert did, either. Personally, I found his performance to be extremely comical. He was trying WAY too hard!!! Mayte's crotch was in Prince's face for the 95 performance at the AMAs. The MTV performance of Gett off may have been on cable but it was aired later on network television. Prince's assless pants were bad enough but the stage was filled with half-naked dancers. If there a pass for Prince because he's our artist of choice? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
cborgman said: pplrain said: My kid goes to bed at 9:30 PM... I don't care what is on after that. obviously you do, as evidenced in your ridiculous post deeming it pornography and how it shouldn't be on before 10:30, and the amended 11:00 after it was pointed out it was after 10:30, and the moronic one about how only hookers, porn stars, and strippers want this on tv. [Edited 1/10/10 20:58pm] See my edited.. But if she did stay up to watch that program I like others would be more than pissed. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
cborgman said: pplrain said: Haha! You and others seem to have a harder time accepting Prince is a straight man. Accept it, he won't be changing for anyone. and as i said last time you rattled off this stupidity just before you got temp-banned for it and the diatribe that followed: i'd choose to fuck a woman before i would choose to fuck prince. i have a strict no midget fucking rule. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
pplrain said: cborgman said: obviously you do, as evidenced in your ridiculous post deeming it pornography and how it shouldn't be on before 10:30, and the amended 11:00 after it was pointed out it was after 10:30, and the moronic one about how only hookers, porn stars, and strippers want this on tv. [Edited 1/10/10 20:58pm] See my edited.. But if she did stay up to watch that program I like others would be more than pissed. so, you're pissed even though it conformed to your biased rules and without even having seen it? Power tends to corrupt; absolute power corrupts absolutely. - Lord Acton | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
cborgman said: pplrain said: See my edited.. But if she did stay up to watch that program I like others would be more than pissed. so, you're pissed even though it conformed to your biased rules and without even having seen it? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
pplrain said: cborgman said: and as i said last time you rattled off this stupidity just before you got temp-banned for it and the diatribe that followed: i'd choose to fuck a woman before i would choose to fuck prince. i have a strict no midget fucking rule. your posts really reflect an intelligence and wit rarely found outside of kindergarten, madam. clearly, you should be the one deciding what is right for the rest of society, what with the incredible levels of maturity and common sense you bring to the world. we should all aspire to be you. bravo. [Edited 1/10/10 21:10pm] Power tends to corrupt; absolute power corrupts absolutely. - Lord Acton | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
there's | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
roodboi said: there's i guess i'm just not as cultured and refined as upstanding straight geniuses. Power tends to corrupt; absolute power corrupts absolutely. - Lord Acton | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Vendetta1 said: Paris9748430 said: OK, his performance of Purple Rain in 85 wasn't sexual at all. It was more emotional than anything. The performance at the Grammys that year wasn't THAT sexual, either. He had his shirt off. I think he and the band swiveled their hips, and made a pelvic thrust or two. Nothing too major. The Pussy Control performance was on Cable TV. Not nearly as many people saw that. I would be surprised if a million people saw that performance. Where as 10-15 million saw Adam Lambert's. The Arsenio performance was aired Late at Night. So he could definitely get away with more. Prince never flipped anyone off like Lambert did, either. Personally, I found his performance to be extremely comical. He was trying WAY too hard!!! Mayte's crotch was in Prince's face for the 95 performance at the AMAs. The MTV performance of Gett off may have been on cable but it was aired later on network television. Prince's assless pants were bad enough but the stage was filled with half-naked dancers. If there a pass for Prince because he's our artist of choice? No, being on cable television makes a big difference. Why are you even acting like Prince has never had protesters, or people criticizing him over his performances and lyrics??? Prince's Gett Off performance was a big controversy. It may not be as big a controversy like it is now because the internet wasn't as prevalent then. Stop with this whining over poor, rich little Adam Lambert. He'll live. JERKIN' EVERYTHING IN SIGHT!!!!! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
pplrain said: cborgman said: i've seen your posts, the classics being that ones that got you temp-banned a few weeks ago. your ludicrous ones in this thread are just icing on the cake. Haha! You and others seem to have a harder time accepting Prince is a straight man. Accept it, he won't be changing for anyone. Being with Prince would be like sleeping with a woman and I'm not a lesbian. We're both looking for the same thing....a dick....not each other. Andy is a four letter word. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
cborgman said: roodboi said: there's i guess i'm just not as cultured and refined as upstanding straight geniuses. Thanks for the admission... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
To me Adam's performance was not good and the song was not great. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
cborgman said: pplrain said: My kid goes to bed at 9:30 PM... I don't care what is on after that. obviously you do, as evidenced in your ridiculous post deeming it pornography and how it shouldn't be on before 10:30, and the amended 11:00 after it was pointed out it was after 10:30, and the moronic one about how only hookers, porn stars, and strippers want this on tv. [Edited 1/10/10 20:58pm] My favorite was when she said the performance belongs on a porn channel. If I turned on a porn channel and saw a musical performance instead of some dicks, I'd be highly pissed. Andy is a four letter word. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |