talk about labeling ... this guy is branded for life ... (probably) ...

anyone see this one coming !!??

when i read it yesterday , i thought it was just a blurb ... and nothing to it ... but i see today he was arrested ... ouch ...

I guess the news accounts do say that he may not get charged ... but sheesh ...

which brings up alot of other questions about visiting some questionable sites on the net ... uh oh ... better erase the computer's history memory button again ...

I remember when i first logged on the net ... and i was sooo amazed at what lunatic sites there are out there ... i think one of my favs was "eatshit.com" or something ... but ... have to say ... never partook in any child porno ones ... sheesh ...

sad but true...

He said he was doing some researchs about pedophilia, because he has suffered of it when he was a child, so

jnoel said:

Which just happened to lead him to some sort of child-porn site, where he sat around and masturbated, right.

Believable story, Pete!

What happens if you are looking around for other things and some sick fucker throws you into a pedophilic pop-up loop? You can get a TON of pop-ups if the programmer makes one of those fucking loop things...

jnoel said:

It sounds a little flimsy but we shouldn't hang him without the evidence.

Innocent until proven guilty i guess. the problem for celebrities is that mud sticks.

Wow.. That's weird, because last night I dreamt that I met the man, after The Who had performed outside a mall near my school. I caught him when he was leaving with the others. I had a little chat with him and I said something that made me cry. He picked me up and hugged me tight. He gave me his autograph and then left.

IceNine said:

I think that he had actually "signed up" with one of those sites.

bkw said:

Well, that's totally fucked then... they should toss that kiddie porn-jacker in the clink!

:EVIL:

BattierBeMyDaddy said:

sometimes I go to nazis/ revisionnists/ racists sites (even to mj sites ), does that mean that I'm a "white man supremacy"?
[This message was edited Mon Jan 13 15:48:53 PST 2003 by jnoel]

jnoel said:

No. But going to a child porn site is different.

And then to claim you were "researching" after you went and signed up and all that shit.

If research makes you get signed up and sit around and jerk off while looking at underage girls, then...Heh. I guess he was researching!

Now, stay off those MJ sites, jnoel dear, they're bad for you!

just in - Pete T. signed up at one of the sites ... gave a credit card - and purchased 169 photos of Wacko Jacko with various disabled children ... sad but true...

BattierBeMyDaddy said:

Pete Townsend is gay, so I suspect that he was jacking it to young boys.

In jail, Pete would have the time to make another version of My Generation now...

IceNine said:

Well, whatever he was jacking it to.

Actually I dont think theres anything wrong with paedophilia. Just aslong as they arent actually a threat to any children.

lol...dont get me wrong. Im not one myself. But simply being one and abusing lil kids is pretty damn different.

Then again I dont agree with paying for a site and encouraging the abuse of children so cut the bastads todger off.

[This message was edited Mon Jan 13 15:55:36 PST 2003 by SuperHyperMegaUltraMan]

I didn't know thatPete Townsend was gay, the worst thing that I've ever seen is zoophilia (women fucking with dogs & suckin a horse's dick) it seems that it's (these pic, video) are legal in certain countries?

jnoel said:

Why were you looking up beastiality, jnoel?

jnoel said:

its all legal in japan (lucky bastads). im gonna move over there I think.

What the fuck are you saying? pedophilia = destruction of a child, at least his personnality

SuperHyperMegaUltraMan said:

I don't know that this is true...

Jerry Hall backs up his story!

SuperHyperMegaUltraMan said:

Yes.

BattierBeMyDaddy said:

NO. So shaddap. :p

SuperHyperMegaUltraMan said:

Yes.

SuperHyperMegaUltraMan said:

yes it's anyways a threat to kids these kind of "passive" pedophiles with "clean hands" are the worst imo because they are conscious of what they're doing and they are hypocrite bastards, behind them there is a lucrative business of children exploitation, especially in poor countries, asian, eastern Europe..
[This message was edited Mon Jan 13 16:15:53 PST 2003 by jnoel]

BattierBeMyDaddy said:

(oogling the attractive buttons on the keyboard)

I think I'll choose "N" and "O".

So shaddap!

[This message was edited Mon Jan 13 16:17:54 PST 2003 by SuperHyperMegaUltraMan]

SuperHyperMegaUltraMan said:

In the early 80s a japanese kill a dutch wowan he was in love with (imagine if he hated her ) in Paris (that's globalization!)put her dead body in his fridge and start to eat her...,after his trial he was declared mentally ill he moved back to Japan where he became a star , he wrote many books (cooking ones too, it's true), played in porn movies etc...
[This message was edited Mon Jan 13 16:24:04 PST 2003 by jnoel]

jnoel said:

So...they are a threat because they are hypocrites is that what your saying? Because thats what it seems.
Townsend is a threat because he is persueing his lust for children by purchasing disgusting images from probably some Russian pimp and eventually he may even decide that he wants more than just pictures, so he is a threat.

Paedophiles who have morals and stand by them and can restrain their urges (and they do exist, lets not be naive and think that all paedphiles are have mental dissorders and are unable to control themselves) are not a threat to anyone because they are not breaking the law by being who they are.

You dont break the law by being who you are but what U do.

BattierBeMyDaddy said:

Iwasn't looking up bestiality, me & a friend were looking for some info about a black dwarf french actor who was famous because of a silly tv comedy (his character's name was Giantcoocoo), and we knew that he was actor in porn movies too so, we put "Giantcoocoo" in Google and we fell upon this, I admit those kind of things, for me at least, are disgusting but bit hypnotic at the same time.

SuperHyperMegaUltraMan said:

Y E S