jone70 said:[quote]

SCNDLS said:

First off, are you kidding me??? You haven't seen his 60 minutes interviews or the huge ruckus recently over him "releasing" pics of his kids. Regardless of how often he does it, he has certainly played the media when it suited him to further this image of his. Either play the game or don't. But don't get mad when people are in your biz ater you have 60 minutes an nem chillin at your house. I, for one, know that image is a straight front but that's what being a public person today amounts to, PR. As for people not speculating, how do you think news and entertainment shows get people to tune in so they can sell their add time?
[Edited 12/1/09 7:14am]

SCNDLS said:

This is an interesting argument you're making.

Doesn't pretty much everyone - in the public eye or not - always put their best face forward when talking about private affairs to others?

I mean, come on...he's really no different than pretty much anyone here.

People need to stop putting celebs on these pedestals and putting these ridiculous expectations on them simply because they are in the public eye.

So what if he has an image of being a certain way but really isn’t totally that way? A lot of us project an image onto others that really isn’t really who we are – or all of who we are, that is. Everyone has shady shit they don't want to admit to.

Sure, he's used to endorse products and all that crap...but really in a way, we're all representing a company and/or product ourselves...being more known shouldn't mean that they must be held to some higher responsibility.

Or at least, that's how I see it.

Bottom line is, the public wants to know if he's banging this chick or not...that's what all this nonsense is about.


http://www.nydailynews.co...faces.html

JustErin said:

Let's be clear: I'm not holding him to any higher standard of responsibility. What I'm saying is that if celebs and public figures choose to fuck with the media for their own purposes and financial gain they are making a conscious decision to play the game. So, don't get indignant and want your privacy when something counter to the fake image of doting dad and faithful husband you've cultivated and sold to the world goes public and inquiring minds want to know. It works both ways.
[Edited 12/1/09 9:31am]

SCNDLS said:

Actually, no, I haven't seen the 60 Minutes interview, or anything else because I don't care enough about him or his private life. I don't watch "news and entertainment shows" - I think they're pointless. I prefer to do more worthwhile things with my time. (Like waste it on the Org! )

celebrity + money = loss of privacy



this mathematical formula is about as old as 1+1=3

jone70 said:

I haven't watched any of his interviews either but I've seen them advertised. And for some reason, I'm thinking that he actually sold those pics of his kids recently which is so en vogue now with celebs.

DesireeNevermind said:

What's that? New math?

But it does and I ain't feeling sorry for them.

SCNDLS said:

nah boo that's old math. 1 dick + 1 pussy = family of three.
Or 15 if you are octomom! Now that's the new math! I love that fertile heffa.

DesireeNevermind said:

Vendetta1 said:

I thought he was scheduled play and host in this event. But either way, I kinda wish he would tell folks to get a life and kiss both cheeks of his ass if they don't like it too. But you know he can't do that without getting roasted rotisserie style by the media.


.
[Edited 12/1/09 10:22am]

Ifsixwuz9 said:

If there is nothing to worry about, he wasn't seriously hurt in the accident, and "nothing" out of the ordinary happened, then why back out of an event? Why tell the public you want to save your family "embarrassment"??? People keep saying that the media is hungry for this drama and want an explanation from him, but to me he is honestly feeding into it. If he really wanted the media off his back, he would have lied from the beginning and said "everything is okay, the accident was minor, and nothing has yet to stop me. Thank you, goodnight and God bless"...but he didn't, he gave cryptic messages instead. So as far as I'm concerned, HE'S THE ONE MAKING this a big deal. Otherwise, we would all still be talking about how funny J-Ho looked when she fell at the AMA's.

Ifsixwuz9 said:

he has enough money to tell people to kiss his ass.

Vendetta1 said:

83K per episode!

uPtoWnNY said:

What is up with straight black male celebrities today going for tranny-looking females?!?

First Eddie. Then Johnny, Now Tiger?!?

TonyVanDam said:

...it's the OJ Syndrome - 'gotta have a white woman'....

awwww..doggies! 3 of them

uPtoWnNY said:

Yeah, but a white woman that is kinda tranny-looking?!?

In that pic of her wearing the white tee, I swear she looks like Kim from RHOA!!! It's uncanny...I mean untranny.

TonyVanDam said:

trying to get all their forbidden fantasies in one person.....

I'm not familiar with radaronline, but they are reporting there are more women now claiming to have had a relationship with Tiger Woods during his marriage.

I hope this isn't true.

http://www.radaronline.co...ng-forward

So now one of the questions is: At what point do his sponsors have a right to know?

Gillette, Gatorade, Nike, etc. pay this guy $$$$ to endorse their products. It seems like they have a right to know if their paid endorser is of the character they thought.

DesireeNevermind said:

It's official GD > Music: NP

RodeoSchro said:

Wonder how much those skanks were paid for their 'story'.

uPtoWnNY said:

More than what Tiger gave them I'm sure.

According to WFAN, the cops have officially closed the case.

^ GOOD! Tiger waited them out.

Skank ass cops.

uPtoWnNY said:

If the person was not a celebrity the police would have pursued this or someone has told the police to

Celebrity status

Florida Authorities: No Criminal Charges to Be Filed Against Tiger Woods
December 1, 2009

by Michael Y. Park


Florida authorities are closing the car accident case on Tiger Woods, and will not do more than issue a minor traffic ticket with a possible $164 fine to the golfer.

"The investigation has concluded that Mr. Woods is at fault in the crash," a Florida Highway Patrol spokeswoman said Tuesday afternoon at a press conference, saying that they found that Woods, 33, had not driven in a "careful and prudent manner" when he was hurt in a one-car crash outside his Orlando home.

In addition to the fine, the careless-driving citation could give Woods four points on his driver's license, if he is found guilty. There will be no criminal charges, and the case is closed, the spokeswoman said.

Police said there were no claims of domestic violence in the case and "there was insufficient evidence available to issue a subpoena for additional medical information that may exist."

"Mr. Woods has satisfied the requirements of Florida law by providing" his driver's license, registration, and insurance information, and was not required to submit to interviews or give evidence, she said.

The FHP spokeswoman refused to take questions, and it's fairly certain those surrounding the famed golfer will continue to circulate.


http://www.people.com/peo...84,00.html

luv4u said:

you have a point there sistah. but I do hope the case stays closed. it was all such nonsense. funny to discuss...but straight up nonsense.

uPtoWnNY said:

It ain't nothing but a thang. Besides, boxer Jack Johnson was boning white chicks nearly 100 years ago.